How Far Has Web 2.0 Enabled Personalisation? A Tale of Two Projects Neil Currant, University of Bradford and Leeds Metropolitan & Christopher Murray, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Knowledge & Innovation in Education: A 3D Virtual Experience on Second Life Noor Faridah KM Conference Sept 2010.
Advertisements

Supporting further and higher education Priority themes from pre- meeting questionnaires.
EPARs (electronic Personal and Academic Records).
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
E-Portfolios Along The Lifelong Learning Cycle: Differences Between Use, Pedagogy and Context Christopher Murray, University of Leeds Neil Currant, University.
Session title Christopher Murray and Neil Currant, Differences in e-portfolio success!, Starting from scratch versus ready-made materials University of.
Contents The Role of the Personal Tutor in Supporting the Transition from FE into HE. Jacki Cartlidge & Sue Riddell Learning and Teaching Enhancement Unit.
Context 2 Moving from HE to Work. Context 2 Stage 5 of Student Lifecycle Model Work-based learning Progress File for Under- and Post-graduate Nurses 2.
Norah Fahim Jennifer Eidum Zinchuk University of Washington, Seattle, WA 2014 TESOL Convention, Portland OR Digital Composing: Utilizing Students’ Web.
Rose Papworth Charlie Papworth Hull College Higher Education Learning Portfolio for Placements HELPP.
Whiteboard Content Sharing Audio Video Text Chat Polls & Recording Meet Now Skype Integration MS Lync 2013 Features, Tools & Tips for facilitators… Limitations.
ESCalate seminar, Swansea Metropolitan University 3 June 2008 Digital tools for blended learning
Joint Information Systems Committee | | Slide 1 Find your way around e-assessment Jo Smedley Joint Information Systems CommitteeSupporting education and.
The Enhancing Learner Progression (ELP) Project Universities of Bradford, Leeds & Leeds MetropolitanBradfordLeeds Metropolitan Part of JISC funded Distributed.
PERFORMANCE FOR ALL The Project & the System. A HE project co-ordinated by University of Bristol, open to HE internationally. Developing the requirements.
Getting Started in Blackboard. You will need… A web browser, preferably Internet Explorer, version 4.0 or higher An account and the knowledge of.
Educational Media Research Centre (EMRC). ECE Department. EdTech2004: The Fifth Annual Irish Educational Technology Users' Conference Institute of Technology.
New Faculty Orientation Blackboard Academic Suite 7.1 University of the Pacific June 28, 2015.
1 TransQUAL Online: Improving Student Transitions to Life After School Version 3.0 Employment and Disability Institute Cornell University ILR School Extension.
Pre-registration training website The pre-registration e-portfolio will continue to be completed in an online capacity for the pre-registration.
Pebblepad: for successful student personal professional development Radiotherapy and Oncology Jo Doughty.
OnlineInset.net Ltd is a non-profit training company limited by guarantee that develops training courses to teach people who support children.
Presentation. Learning Management System manages, tracks and reports on interaction between the learner and the content & the learner and the instructor.
Learners' Experiences of using e- Portfolios (eP) in Raising Aspirations for Higher Education and Supporting their Transition into HE. By Neil Currant,
SOLSTICE Conference th & 5 th June 2015 Designing and facilitating cross-country collaborative learning in a professional education context Sarah.
Dharmadeo Luchoomun1 Joe McLuckie1, and Maarten van Wesel2 Prepared By: Aiswarya Gopal Ramya Ravi.
ICON Professional Learning Module: BLOGGING How do I create & use a Global2 blog?  ICON Integrated Catholic Online Network.
From Application to Graduation and Beyond Christopher Murray University of Leeds, UK EDEN 2006.
Introduction to our On-Line Self Service Center at
ILearnNYC Platform Session Objectives Provide an understanding of overall platform components, how they fit together and associated timelines Explain.
Supporting Student Employability Online Damian McGivern Ron Laird June 2007.
A comparison of two methods of synchronous (real time) interaction in distance learning Jane Montague University of Derby
Damien Raftery Lecturer & eLearning Development Officer Teaching & Learning Centre Institute of Technology Carlow Using Google Docs to support Project-based.
Virtual Campus Student Orientation Welcome to Virtual Campus Spring 2015.
From an e-portfolio to a PLS: Integrating an e-portfolio into PgC in Learning & Teaching in HE. Sarah Chesney Centre for the Development Of Learning &
James Williams e: eTutor Project SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS for 2 Pilot studies of the.
Joint Information Systems Committee 14/10/2015 | | Slide 1 Effective Assessment in a Digital Age Sarah Knight e-Learning Programme, JISC Ros Smith, GPI.
Rose Papworth Charlie Papworth Hull College Higher Education Learning Portfolio for Placements HELPP.
Module 2 Wikispaces: A Training Module Patsy Kraj Spring 2011 University of West Georgia.
SQA Unit DW7J 11 Social Software E-communication Methods Russell Taylor Lecturer in Computing & Business Studies.
A Problem Based Learning Journey Through the BA Learning Technology Research pathway.
Company LOGO Technology Institute: Session 8 Tools for the Visual Learner, Part 1.
Fundamental principles in training experienced face to face (f2f) lecturers to moderate online courses Marga Navarrete Imperial College London
Assessment and Learning in Practice Settings (ALPS) © Mobile Learning and Assessment- The Student Experience Julie Laxton- ALPS.
Online registration Presented by: Ymer LEKSI. Learning objectives By the end of this session you will be able to: Login to the web post messages to forums.
Improving Student Engagement and Achievement Through Blended Learning Peter Anello & Steve Courchesne Nipissing-Parry Sound Catholic DSB.
Educational Networks What are they and why are they important?
Personalised Learning NOCN Level 2. Induction Welcome and introductions Completion of enrolment forms Qualification Initial assessment Personalised learning.
Evidencing professional development on a teacher education programme Iain Kitchener and Rita Headington.
External Messaging Services. Page 2 External Messaging: Extends the power of Presence and Instant Messaging outside corporate Network Provided only to.
Fig. 1 ranchochristian.org. Click Below Hello From your instructional IT.
Lauren Crow Ed Tech: Tech Tool Presentation 3/6/2014.
Starting out with Project Q For use with students.
DR JAYNE ELLIS, DR CELINE LAKRA DR CLIFFORD LISK, DR PENELOPE SMITH PEER MENTORSHIP IN MEDICINE: AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHARE OUR GOOD PRACTICE.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
Winning with wikis and blogs: Models for effective delivery of student online activities E-Learning Development Team University of York Simon Davis and.
ELP2 Project & Web 2.0 Leeds Met. 24 April Introduction ‘Web 2.0’ – what’s out there and what’s it for? Mark Power, CETIS  eLearning Programme.
Learning Technology Development. edgehill.ac.uk/ls David Callaghan September 2013 “How I engaged my students” One tutor’s experience that produced outstanding.
Today’s Agenda 1. Sign in please 2. Brief Check in 3.Presentation of Learning Management Systems (LMS) - 4.Comparison of 2 LMSs 5.Sign in to
School of Teaching & Learning Development Advanced Lecturer in Education: Julie-Ann Stobo BA (Hons)
Study Island Teacher Training
Study Programmes: Modelling & Operation Project
Knowledge & Innovation in Education: A 3D Virtual Experience on Second Life Noor Faridah KM Conference Sept 2010.
Applying for 6th Forms, Colleges and Apprenticeships in Kent.
The InWEnt Blended-learning approach; GC21 as an e-learning and Blended-learning platform 22/02/2019 An introduction course on InWEnt Blended-learning.
Session 3: Messages What themes and issues are emerging?
Elluminate your World! A quick guide to the explanation on how to use the many features of Elluminate (in Blackboard) to communicate with a classmate or.
Canvas introduction for students
Presentation transcript:

How Far Has Web 2.0 Enabled Personalisation? A Tale of Two Projects Neil Currant, University of Bradford and Leeds Metropolitan & Christopher Murray, University of Leeds

Aims  Considered the impact of personalised learning and ownership through a comparison of institutional and non- institutional tools  Explored issues of implementation  Experienced how web 2.0 can be used to personalised learning

What Is Personalisation?  Learner Control?  Different Materials?  Location and Time?  To Collaborate or Not?  Learner Choice?

Institutional Tools  In ELP project 3 groups used institutional tools  Creation of e-portfolios to assist transition, for assessment and for professional development  Implemented in colleges, schools, university and the workplace

Features  Private reflective area  Share work and reflection with FP or other students  Message board facility  Single sign-in

Ownership Cohort UsedFeelings of Ownership FE Students (Feedback from PO) 39%44%-Me 52%- University Undergraduate Nurses (Feedback from tutor) 86%50%-Me PRHO’s88%14%-Me 71%-Deanery

Comments on Ownership  Design-“Because when you log in the logo is Leeds University”  Feedback-“You do what you want on it but the university still has input”  Work-”It’s personal to me and most useful to me”  Assessment impacted on ownership!

Discussion  How do you encourage ownership/personalisation?

Non –Institutional tools Lesson learnt

Background  BME students from Leeds who were previously involved in Junior Windsor Fellowship Programme BME students Junior Windsor Fellowship Programme  Independent learning Progression ModuleProgression Module  Assessed E-portfolio used to provide evidence of learningE-portfolio  Once monthly face to face sessionsface to face sessions

Tools – outside direct institutional control & ‘personalisable’  PebblePAD e-portfolio Evidence of learning assessed  Google group Peer communication Tutor communication  Messenger (MSN / Yahoo) 1to1 learner / tutor communication

Getting started  Setting up accounts E-portfolio Google group Adding friends to Messenger  Issues Student addresses (all tools need an account to set-up) Self registration v. Tutor registration Multiple usernames needed

Keeping Going 1  Google group did not ‘take off’ username / password issue Some students came from same school  Number of messages posted after training session : 2  Content of messages: password / login issues

Keeping Going 2  Messenger ‘private space?’ Age issue  Users who I was able to add : 11 (out of 20)  Users who added me : 7  Conversations held: 2  Content of conversations: 1) a general hello, 2) encouragement to carry on the module after student had missed some face to face sessions.

Keeping Going 3  Independent learning Not used to setting own deadlines and working in this way.

Experience of certain tools

Contribute content online

Communication tools used

Lessons learnt  Students prefer mobile for communication and real time (e.g MSN) over delayed ( )  Mainly consumers of content rather than creators  Independent learning needs to be developed and encouraged more  Not as familiar with internet tools as expected  Issues of being outside the institution

Discussion  Is using non-institutional tools: Sustainable? Too risky? More flexible? More personlised?  Can we „piggy-back“ on learners personal tools?  Do we need to create formal personal learning tools?