Gent, September 2007 Liliana Voicu Improving the quality of trainers’ work through self-reflection on values and roles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREPARATORY ACTIVITIES Training Unit 6.1 Preparatory activities before the placement.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Employer Mentoring at Edinburgh Napier University Claire Bee Towards a Confident Future.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
How Key is Commitment? – An Outline Proposal Charlotte J Young, Bournemouth University, UK 2 nd July 2009.
Leadership.
Intercultural knowledge and language awareness
How to teach heterogeneous groups
Teachers Self-evaluation of Inclusive Education in Czech Primary Schools Teachers Self-evaluation of Inclusive Education in Czech Primary Schools Research.
Creating a positive classroom atmosphere
Community Mentorship Training. Session Focus: To provide community volunteers with a framework to begin a community mentoring process. Introduction.
Balanced Literacy J McIntyre Belize.
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
PROPOSALS Comm Arts II Mr. Wreford. PROPOSALS ► Writing in order to make an observable difference in the world around you. ► Identify a problem and come.
Discussion examples Andrea Zhok.
The LCVP is funded by the Department of Education and Science under the National Development Plan Preparing students for Work Experience.
Obtaining reliable feedback from students about teaching
Generic Employability Skills Centre for Developing and Evaluating Lifelong Learning (CDELL)
Into Teaching Promoting access for disabled people Tony Stevens How do you make change happen? LINK Conference, Antwerp July 2011.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development PILOT WORKSHOP EVALUATION MARY RICHARDSON MER CONSULTING.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Welcome to the 2008 Day 1 Teacher Mentor Support!.
TRAINING AND COUNTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT
Technology and Motivation
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
/0503 © Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Human Resources Training Presentations Exit Interviews.
Writing comments for reports
New Teacher Preparation: Compass Teacher Evaluation
T 8.0 Central concepts:  The standards for all lessons should not be treated simply as a “to do” list.  Integration of the disciplines can be effective.
Designing effective self marketing tools
Effective Teaching of Health Reporting: Lectures and More Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University Train the Trainer Workshop: Health Reporting for.
Building Effective Interpersonal Relationships
Qualitative Evaluation of Keep Well Lanarkshire Alan Sinclair Keep Well Evaluation Officer NHS Lanarkshire.
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
Spring Learning Statement #1 I am learning that the use of technology is not always engaging for students and does not always support student learning.
Lesson 1: Knowing Yourself Module 3: FINDING A JOB.
Developing Training Programmes for Qualified Teachers to Teach in Prisons CP MT-GRUNDTVIG-G11 Teaching Practice Observation Module 11.
Introducing E-Learning Using Technology in Literacy, Language and Numeracy Teaching 1.1.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Programming the New Syllabuses (incorporating the Australian Curriculum)
1 Claverley COE School Parent/Carer Questionnaire Results Summer Term - June 2014.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
On a Good Teacher. “ Believing in what you teach and teaching what you believe creates a powerful role model for our students. ”
Students seizing responsibility: A revolution of collegiality Amie Speirs, Zoe Welsh, Julia Jung and Jenny Scoles Introduction: In our project Students.
Getting started – support for reflection and engagement Gaelic (learners)
Contribute to Personal Skill Development and Learning BSBCMN304A Prepared by Melanie Lynch Training Consultant.
An essential part of workplace success!
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar.
Relating to others taking different roles in different situations interacting with diverse others in a range of learning contexts knowing when it is appropriate.
Application Individualization and Differentiation in Czech Primary Schools - One of the Characteristic Features of Inclusion Application Individualization.
Final Presentation, European Cooperative House Brussels, 16 Dec.2009 Training +45 “Teachers Facilitating Learning among Elders” WP5 Test and Evaluation.
Marking and Feedback CPD Follow up to marking. Expectations and ground rules Respect the views of others Give everyone space to make a contribution All.
ASCCC Cultural Competency and Advocacy Plan Update Cleavon Smith, Berkeley City College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College.
What do we know (page 1)? Define the word "Taxonomy." (Knowledge) Define the word "Convergent." (Knowledge) Define the word "Divergent." (Knowledge) What.
By Dr. J.AUGUSTUS RICHARD Professor
Selecting Behaviors Calculating Weights
we help to improve social care standards
Martin Wedell School of Education
PISA 2009 – New Approaches to Assessing Reading Literacy
Ethical Dilemmas in Leadership
Teacher slide Objectives: To understand how to formulate strong answers to person and position specific questions. You need: Feedback form x2 per student.
Risk MENTORING Alberta Construction Safety Association.
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
BENEFITS OF WEB DESIGNING. 2 There are many benefits that a web designer gets. Web designing can be one of the best option for getting most of the benefits.
Designing and delivering a learner centred curriculum
PARTICIPATORY TEACHING STRATEGIES By: Alfredo S. Donio Jr.
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Faye Nicholson, P7 Class Teacher, Kingsland Primary School
REACH Accreditation Preparing Your School for a Team Visit
Presentation transcript:

Gent, September 2007 Liliana Voicu Improving the quality of trainers’ work through self-reflection on values and roles

Why values and roles  Work of trainers and teachers - repetitive and structured in the daily routine  Axiological dimension of this work - deeply embedded in behavioural patterns and cultural background -->  more difficult to reveal  its effects in subsequent messages - nevertheless powerful

Values and roles dimension  The teacher is considered to be the learning tutor/consultant. In this quality area for reflection it is presumed that teachers and trainers can improve their training and class quality if they change their self-conception (Values) and their different ways of acting (Roles).  The reflection of Values and Roles yields findings which can be used for answering the key question:  What kind of self-conception and acting supports the teaching and training quality?

 Please state what are the most important reasons that led you choose teaching instead of any other profession. How did you become a teacher/trainer? Since you are practicing this job, have you thought of changing profession? If yes, why? Question - individual

 Which of the following values do you consider to be represented by your institution?  Equal Opportunity  A Just Society  Excellence  Democracy  Participation  Professionalism  Partnerships Question - institution

 What kind of strategy in the list below does represent your teaching values ?  Don't humiliate any student or strive for power for power's sake.  Respect your students for their potential. Treat every student fairly.  Always address their bad actions not their bad selves. Their actions can change.  Get enough sleep. Get -Enough- sleep. Keep in shape physically. Question - individual

 Learn something new every year so your students don't have to listen to the same stuff.  Don't take yourself too seriously.  You can not save everyone in your class... don't be loaded down with that one.  Learn from others, borrow, be teachable, don't expect to know all things. Be humble. The manner in which a teacher/trainer views the students and the task of teaching subtly permeates all of a teacher's plans. Leif Danielson

 What are the three most important values integrated in the curriculum developed in my institution?  What are the three most important values integrated in the main handbook/course support/teaching material used in day-to-day classes? What are the three most important values derived from the behaviour of our students?  Are these values coherent between themselves? Question - institution

How does the tool work first overall evaluation in Romania

 30 CVT trainers from consultancy companies and internal trainers  5 representatives from the field of educational management

 Initial presentation (150 attendees) at training fair  30 recruited at AxA stall  1:1 discussion  Participants used the tool at the fair with informal observation  Participants completed evaluation afterwards

 1:1 use of tool - no guidance or instruction  Follow up interview  Qualitative feedback only

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 66 x30 x6 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Overall people thought the tool was quite attractive but that this was fairly irrelevant provided that the tool works.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 43 x2100 x18 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Basic use is straight forward but navigating between dimensions and tiers can be confusing.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 51 x4100 x5 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Many “old school” Romanian teachers and trainers have a fairly low IT competency level and this could be a huge barrier to adoption in the Romanian context especially in the public education system.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 47 x3100 x7 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: The amount of desired backup information depends greatly on the specific questions tested. Some participants did not require any but felt it might be important. The phrasing of the questions is sometimes ambiguous or irrelevant (to them personally) and this could be a cause for the perceived requirement.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 73 x3100 x18 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Some of the questions are quite closed (Y/N), and do not actively encourage reflection, and others are more knowledge based and feel like a test.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 0 x1679 x4 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Trainers feel that using the tool will be an individual choice and of benefit only to them personally. They would also resent being forced to use it by their organisation. Time constraints was the most common reason given.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 68 x258 x2 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Some liked the sharing of ideas and knowledge gained from IT&C usage. Others would prefer to use a non IT solution and a more personal approach.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 73 x2100 x17 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Participants enjoyed the variety of stimuli and question types, although some were more difficult to use than others. There seemed to be something for everyone (from interactive to text based).

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 0 x13100 x7 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: Participants didn’t understand the purpose of the higher tiers and found the extra level of navigation annoying. They would have preferred to have less options of navigation as long as the text of the question includes the scope.

Statistics EffImp Count: 3131 Mean: Mode: 55 x422 x3 Median: IQR: STDev: Comments: A wide range of results. Many participants found the definitions of the dimensions to be clear and easy to understand. But they were unsure as to the reasoning behind them on first impression.

 Some questions should be rephrased or removed  The participants were positive on the need for the tool  The only common complaint in terms of user- friendliness was the tiers  Variety in presentation of questions is appreciated  Self evaluation & reflection is seen as an individual activity  Repetition of the questions is not seen as a barrier