MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Advertisements

Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Bologna Seminar Learning outcomes based higher education: The Scottish experience Workshop 5: national qualifications frameworks and levels, and internal.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
Quality assurance considerations in work- based learning provision
1 ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT IT MEANS. 2 ORIGINS Dearing report 1997 Dearing report 1997 Proposals: Proposals: framework for qualifications and awards.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Registered charity numbers and SC Research, Development.
UK Quality Code Guide: Further Education & Colleges The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Registered charity numbers and SC
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
The UK Quality Code for Higher Education Jenny Beaumont LTC February 2012.
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
SPA’s Good Practice for Admissions Policies Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Launch of Quality Management System
Implementing a framework for employability Penny Renwick, Pro Vice Chancellor, Manchester Metropolitan University.
What’s driving the need for flexible curricula? How are our learners changing and what are their needs/expectations for flexible curricula? QAA Enhancement.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
The Modernisation of Higher Education Modernisation, Quality Assurance and Transparency Anthony Vickers 27 th June 2012.
Enterprise & Entrepreneurship Education the new curriculum guidelines in Ireland and the UK ISBE 2012, Dublin 6 November Professor David Rae
Quality assurance for e- learning Dr Tim Brown (formerly) Deputy Director, Validation Services, Open University UK.
UK Higher Education Qualifications Dr Stephen Jackson Quality Assurance Agency.
Teaching Quality Indicators Project Ian Solomonides Excellence is as low as we go or When is good, good enough?
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
Jeremy Hall Nicholas Jones Wouter Poortinga An Exploration of Assessment Practices at Cardiff University’s Schools of Engineering, Psychology and the Centre.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
Creating Entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship education for the creative industries David Clews Subject Centre Manager Higher Education Academy Art | Design.
Embedding quality – a quality enhancement driven approach Jill Morgan Assistant Dean, Learning and Teaching, Quality Enhancement, School of Arts and Media.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Quality Assurance in English Higher Education Cross Border Issues and Transferability Bev Thomas Deputy Director for HE Access and Quality Department for.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013.
The UK Quality Code and Higher Education Reviews Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Catherine Kerfoot, Development Officer, QAA.
‘to safeguardthe public interest in sound standards of higher education qualifications and to inform and encourage continuous improvement in the management.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
EU/CoE PROJECT “STRENGTHENING HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS IN SERBIA”
University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business & Society FGM Development Day Wednesday 18 th July 2012 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education A Brief Guide.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Linking the learning to the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare Joan Heffernan Inspector Manager Regulation – Healthcare Health Information.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Exploring chapter B7 of the UK Quality Code and what external examining means to Institutional Review (IRENI) The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
What makes for good standards in Apprenticeships? Jeremy Benson – Executive Director for Vocational Qualifications Bryan Horne - Associate Director, Standards.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
UK National Qualifications Framework Stirling Wood, TVET Specialist
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Quality and Standards An introduction.
The UK Quality Code and Chapter B9
The view from the ‘regulator’
Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Validation Programme Developers
Presentation transcript:

MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education

Overview  The UK Quality Code  Constructive Alignment  Learning Outcomes  Qualifications Frameworks  Content  Learning & Teaching  Assessment  Learning Resources & Support for Learning  Information  Evaluation 2

The UK Quality Code for HE  The Quality Code is the definitive reference point for all UK higher education providers.  It makes clear what higher education providers are required to do, what they can expect of each other, and what students and the general public can expect of them.  The Quality Code covers all four nations of the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) and all providers of UK higher education operating internationally.  It protects the interests of all students, regardless of where they are studying or whether they are full-time, part-time, undergraduate or postgraduate students. 3

UK Quality Code Part B 4 B1: Programme design, development and approval B2: Recruitment, selection and admission to higher education B3: Learning and teaching B4: Enabling student development and achievement B5: Student engagement B6: Assessment of students and the recognition of prior learning B7: External examining B8: Programme monitoring and review B9: Academic appeals and student complaints B10: Managing higher education provision with others B11: Research degrees Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality

5 Triangle of Effective Learning 5 Learning Outcomes AssessmentLearning activities

Constructive Alignment Learning Outcome Learning & Teaching Assessment

Constructive Alignment Learning Outcome Learning & Teaching Assessment

Learning Outcomes  Learning outcomes are central to the Quality Code and Part A advocates an outcomes based approach.  To assist in the design of the learning activities, and for the student to know what is expected of them, it is sound practice to specify the intended learning outcomes of the course of study before establishing the syllabus (content) or learning activities. 8

9

Miller’s Prism of Clinical Competence 10

National Qualifications Frameworks 11

Content  Having established the learning outcomes it is easier to decide on the content, rather than trying to match outcomes to content.  The QAA subject benchmark statements, which underpin Part A of the Quality Code, indicate the expected content in terms of knowledge, skills and attitudes for degree level study.  Many Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Bodies (PSRBs) also provide guidance on expected syllabus content and learning outcomes. 12

13 Nice Could Should Essential

Learning & Teaching 14

Learning & Teaching  Whilst a large number of methods to support learning and teaching have been described over the years not all can be replicated in a MOOC; although with a little thought and organisation most of these can be implemented in some form.  However, before rushing into the “How do I do this?” question it is helpful to think what it is that the student is learning, and therefore what would most likely help their learning. Part B, Chapter B3 of the Quality Code encourages learning designers to think in this way. 15

Learning & Teaching Bourner & Flowers (1998) suggested that there are six purposes of higher education:  to disseminate knowledge  to develop the capability to use ideas and information  to develop the ability to test ideas and evidence  to develop the ability to generate ideas and evidence  to foster personal development  to develop the capacity to plan and manage one’s own learning 16

Assessment  Assessment for Learning  Assessment of Learning  Reflection on feedback received 17

Characteristics  Valid  Reliable, fair & equitable  Purposeful  Timely  Demanding  Efficient and manageable 18

19

Learning Resources & Support for Learning  Resource types  Reliability of delivery platform  Academic & Digital literacy  Access to Learner Support independent of time zone  Assessment 20

Information  Principle 1: Information that providers produce about themselves and the learning opportunities they offer should be clear, timely, current, transparent, and focused on the needs of the intended audiences.  Principle 2: Providers are responsible and accountable for the information they produce about the learning opportunities they offer. At the same time, providers have autonomy regarding the mechanisms and media they choose to communicate this information.  Principle 3: Information should be available and retrievable where intended audiences and information users can reasonably expect to find it. The format and delivery of information should take account of the access requirements of a diverse audience.  Principle 4: Information produced by providers should offer a fair and accurate reflection of the learning opportunities they offer. 21

Information  Public information  Information for prospective students  Information for current students  Information on completion 22

Evaluation  Providers regularly review their provision that enables student development and achievement, to promote continuous improvement in ways that are not overly burdensome.  Procedures include guidance about who will be involved and how feedback from and participation of key stakeholders contribute to the process.  These stakeholders include students, employers, academic and professional services staff and external organisations, including professional, statutory and regulatory bodies where relevant. 23