Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADDRESSING FOREST GOVERNANCE THROUGH REDD+
Advertisements

Trend of international discussions on the UNFCCC
Governance for REDD+ Crystal Davis Governance of Forests Initiative World Resources Institute REDD Civil Society Coordination Seminar CIFOR campus, Bogor.
Refreshed Strategies to Address the Dimensions of Sustainability and Effective Delivery Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International.
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction Climate change initiatives Capacity Challenges.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT The World Bank World Bank Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples Navin Rai Lead Social Development Specialist UNPFII Panel.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Participants Committee, 2 nd Meeting, Gamboa, Panama, March 2009 Ghana: Multi-stakeholder Participation.
REDD PLUS -- What is that?. 1. REDD PLUS – in brief Background: Deforestation has become a problem that the world cannot ignore.  Deforestation results.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Is the.
Katoomba Group Training Initiative Climate Change, Markets and Services Welcome and Introduction Course Introduction and Guidelines Participant Introduction:
KEY ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN REDD+ AND FCPF Joan Carling, AIPP.
Regional highlights of R-PINs Africa Region FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008 By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel Forest Carbon Partnership.
Module developers: Erika Romijn, Wageningen University
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
Regional highlights of R-PINs Asia Region FCPF Steering Committee Meeting Paris, July 9 and 10, 2008 By FCPF Technical Advisory Panel Forest Carbon Partnership.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Presentation by Alfred N. Gichu Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness.
GUYANA PROFILE Land area of 21.5 M hectares Forest area of 18.6 M hectares State Forest of 13.8 M hectares Amerindian lands/private property of 4.8 M hectares.
Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza Results of the e-consultation: What Steps has South America Taken on REDD? Consuelo Espinosa.
COUNTRY Quality and Completeness of the R-PIN Ownership by both the government and relevant stakeholders Consistency between national strategies & REDD.
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
FINANCING REDD – A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE REDD MECHANISM Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor 1.
World Bank - Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: REDD+ Readiness and Country Needs Alexander Lotsch Forest Carbon Partnership Facility The World Bank
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Global Dialogue on Developing a Readiness Preparation Proposal August 13-14, 2009 Structure of the R-PP template Review.
UN-REDD – QUICK OVERVIEW. The UN-REDD Programme. What it is? Since part of you may not have heard about the UN-REDD Programme, I have thought it could.
Developing Incentives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) The Readiness Mechanism Some ideas for your consideration next steps.
Critical issues facing REDD+ CPA Conference. Global Mechanisms: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), July 2010.
20 February 2009 Tanzania Natural Resource Forum Carbon-Forestry Working Group 1 Conceptual and Practical Challenges in the Operationalization of REDD.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) Readiness Procedures July 9, 2008.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
U.S. Office: 1877 Garden Avenue Eugene, Oregon USA.
Outcomes from the Regional Workshop on Forest and Climate Change: Phnom Penh, Cambodia May 2009 REDD Consultation Support to ASEAN Senior Officers.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Overview of the R-Package Kenn Rapp, Facility Management Team Asia-Pacific Indigenous Peoples Dialogue of the FCPF Chiang.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
[Country] Poverty-Environment Initiative Economics Assessment/Valuation of Environment and Natural Resources Country Experience Presented to the PEI Africa.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland June 16-18, 2009 Application of World Bank Safeguard.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Global Assessment Report and need for Regional Assessment Report Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership, September September 2011 Pattaya, Thailand.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Guyana’s REDD Readiness-Plan Technical.
REDD after Copenhagen – The way forward. EARLY LESSONS FROM THE UN-REDD PROGRAMME Mar
Lessons of Participatory Governance from Angola The Municipal Development Program and potential lessons learned for REDD+ in Brazil Amy Merritt UNDP-IPC,
Findings From the National Preparations For Rio + 20 for Select Developing Countries A UNDESA/UNDP partnership International Workshop on Strengthening.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
Towards a comprehensive Monitoring Framework for REDD+ Peter Holmgren FAO 5 December 2010.
Piloting a System of Positive Incentives for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) The Proposed Forest Carbon Partnership Facility.
4.3 Developing a Safeguard Information System as part of a country-led approach to REDD+ safeguards Tom Blomley.
REDD+ negotiations and key milestones from Cancun to Durban Geneva, 9 May 2011 Clea Paz-Rivera, UN-REDD Secretariat.
1.5 USAID Climate Change/REDD+ Policy Overview Evan Notman Climate Change Office Bureau of Economic Growth, Education and Environment, USAID FEBRUARY 2015.
Support to National REDD+ Action: Global Programme Framework (SNA) Work Plan and Budget 2015 Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions Twelfth.
Duncan Marsh The Nature Conservancy Inter-American Development Bank June 7, 2007 Reducing Deforestation in Developing Countries: Critical Issues and Directions.
Bosque Patagónico Bosque Chaqueño YungasYungas REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA Selva Misionera Bosque Patagónico.
UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries FAO-UNDP-UNEP April 2008.
CARIBBEAN WORKSHOP ON E-GOVERNMENT BEST PRACTICES Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, July 26-28, 2005.
External Action: Thematic Programme For Environment and Sustainable Management of Natural Resources including Energy Structure: I- INTRODUCTION II - CONTEXT.
NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT Zonal Level REDD+ Awareness Creation Workshop MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST Tigray Regional State, Mekele September 3 &
A Brief History of REDD + Regional REDD+ Coordination Unit Tigray Regional State,Mekelle Sep 3 & 4/2015 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST NATIONAL REDD+
Achieving Sustainable Development with Low Carbon Action Asia Pacific Carbon Forum Rakshya Thapa Regional Technical Specialist, UNDP Global Environment.
REDD+ Methodology: Issues Coming Out from Country Presentations
Overview of the international climate policy & finance framework and the building of the REDD+ mechanism Josep A. Garí Africa Advisor, UN-REDD Programme.
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Introduction to Malawi REDD+ Process and Outlook
Country needs assessment Madagascar: Progress and next steps
Kenya’s REDD+ Readiness Activities
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
UN REDD FAO-UNDP-UNEP July 2008
SSWG Presentation on: Forestry
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Lessons learned from REDD+ readiness processes
Presentation transcript:

Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international mechanism for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conserving and enhancing stocks and sustainably managing forests (REDD+).  While this RPP does not preclude any future policies or anticipate any outcomes, the Government is committed to the REDD+ readiness process and is participating actively in international REDD+ negotiations.  Even if an international mechanism to provide carbon finance for emissions management activities in forests do not reach the magnitude many are hoping, the Government of Kenya aims to design policies and measures to protect its remaining forest resources from deforestation and degradation and to enhance forest carbon stocks in ways that help improve local livelihoods and biodiversity.

Basic Considerations Cont’d  The Government of Kenya’s priority is the implementation of environmentally and socially sustainable land-use and forest policies, and this plan establishes a set of actions to help access funding and international recognition to support this aim.  While an international REDD+ mechanism is anticipated to emerge from the negotiations for a post-2012 climate regime under the UNFCCC, the details of the mechanism remain unclear on how emission reductions will be rewarded and at what scale. Consequently, the development of the RPP has to build in flexibility and take into account the evolving nature of a REDD+ mechanism. The process will also need to manage expectations carefully regarding matters like REDD+ compensation mechanisms.  We are committed to communicating the lessons learned from the Readiness Process both within Kenya, the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) and the broader international community.

RPP Formulation Process  A National stakeholder Forum in July, 2009-R-PP  Formulation launch and initial information sharing – Nov February 2010  established a multi stakeholder Technical Working Group (TWG);  The TWG was divided into three sub groups  Consultation and Participation subgroup  Methodology subgroup  Policy and Institutional Subgroup  Continued information sharing and initial consultation – February 1- April, 2010  More than 200 people have been consulted so far to inform the formulation process.

Tasks for the Sub-Groups  Policy and Institutional Issues  Development of national REDD Strategy, including identification of drivers of deforestation and degradation;  Institutional dimensions of REDD: national, regional and local-level institutions; legal framework; governance dimensions, benefit-sharing mechanisms, land tenure, etc.  Methodology - Reference Scenario,Monitoring, Reporting,Verification system, Biomass estimation  Consultation and Participation - National dialogue, including participation of civil society and the private sector,elaboration of a national consultation, participation and outreach plan; identification of participatory mechanisms.

Key Components of RPP 1. Organize and Consult  National Readiness management arrangements  Stakeholder consultation and participation 2. Prepare the REDD Strategy  Assessment of land use, Forest policy and Governance  REDD strategy options  REDD implementation framework  Social and Environmental Impacts 3. Develop a Reference Scenario 4. Design a Monitoring System  Emissions and Removals  Other Benefits and Impacts 5. Budget and Schedule 6. Design a Program Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

Issues Addressed by the 6 Components  Organize and consult  How REDD can be incorporated into the national development agenda - 1A  How the process will be managed -1A  How to maximize “buy-in” from all stakeholders -1B  REDD Strategy  Where country stands with regard to land use assessment -2a  What actions / policies / activities are behind the emissions and what is needed to stop them -2b  What institutional, economic, governance arrangements are required to implement REDD strategy -2c  How to maximize REDD benefits and minimize negative impacts for the people & environment- 2d

Issues Addressed by the 6 Components  Reference Scenario  Means of estimation of recent historical emissions from deforestation/degradation and projected future emissions /removals. National, regional or project level -3  Monitoring System  Monitoring of emissions/ removals. Deforestation and or degradation Reporting systems, technological options, community engagement -4A  Monitoring of benefits and impacts e.g. livelihoods, biodiversity, governance factors etc.-4B  Schedule and Budget  Timelines, budget requirements and sources of funding for activities identified in R-PP  Monitoring &Evaluation Framework  What are best indicators for keeping track of progress towards readiness

Overview of the RPP The R-PP provides a detailed assessment of the forest sector and the policy, social and legal framework that currently drive activities in this resource. It presents various components that propose:  four strategy priority areas and actions to design and test REDD+ measures that have emerged from the R-PP formulation process as options for Kenya’s forest carbon emission management strategy; They are grouped by priority areas including:  improving governance in the forest sector;  providing economic incentives;  promoting efficient technologies for forest products extraction and use; iv) promoting investments outside the forest sector; and  carrying out studies and analyzing the value of forests to the national economy.  a management and consultation approach that will underlie all activities in the upcoming R-PP implementation phase, and recommends some legal, economic and financial arrangements for subsequent REDD+ implementation;

Overview of RPP  an approach to design Kenya’s carbon emissions reference scenario and the means for monitoring these emissions;  an approach to assess and subsequently monitor social and environmental impacts from the REDD+ strategies and an overall REDD+ program monitoring mechanism.  Each Component has a related list of next steps and initial activities planned to carry out the work plan leading to REDD+ readiness implementation.

ASANTE SANA