Conservation Authorities Act Headwaters Workshop Eastern Region February 25 th, 2011 Garden Inn, Ottawa International Airport Don Maciver MCIP, RPP Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontario Low Water Response (OLWR)
Advertisements

Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Environmental Assessment in Nova Scotia
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Managing Development in the Coastal Zone, Federal Policy II: Coastal Zone Management Act; Slide 29.1 Session Name: Managing Development in the Coastal.
Joint Work Session Skagit County Planning Commission and Shoreline Advisory Committee May 22, 2012.
Fisheries Sensitive Watersheds (FSWs) Background, Procedures, and the Horsefly River as a candidate A Presentation to the Horsefly River Roundtable (April.
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
Robinson Creek and Tooley Creek Watershed Management Plan Presented By: Jason Cole, M.Sc., P.Geo Rob Frizzell, M.Sc., P.Geo Municipality of Clarington.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
Primary Headwater Habitats (PHWH). The Basics - What is a Primary Headwater Stream? Characteristics: A Watercourse 1 with: A Watercourse 1 with: A defined.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Ramsar Convention on Wetlands ( Convention on Wetlands “The conservation and wise use of.
1 Massachusetts Wetlands Regulations and the MCP Rachel Freed Mass. Department of Environmental Protection Wetlands and Waterways Program Northeast Regional.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL August 26, 2005.
Land Use and Restrictions.  The municipal government is the main source of land use control  Why is the main source of land use control the municipal.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Environmental Management Services
Mississippi Valley Conservation Mississippi Lakes Association June 4, 2011 Matt Craig Manager of Planning and Regulatory Services
Range Practices 1 Objectives and Range Practices under FRPA & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 3 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 3 Government Regulation and the.
Advancing the Science Around Indirect and Seasonal Fish Habitat Laura C.R. Del Giudice, Senior Planning Ecologist, B.Sc., M.F.C.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Changes to Stream Mitigation Procedures and Guidelines Mike Moxey USACE, Mobile District IRT Chair May.
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
Lake Planning …the health of your lake depends on it! French Planning Services Inc
Bras d’Or Lakes Land-Use Planning Standards: Options for Municipal Government Consideration Presented by: The Bras d’Or Stewardship Society.
August 20, 2015 Aquatic Habitat Protection Program Turtle Lake Watershed - AGM Ben Wilson – Aquatic Habitat Protection Specialist.
Interim Headwater Drainage Feature Guideline: Protecting HDFs through Urbanization Laura C.R. Del Giudice, B.Sc., M.F.C., Senior Planning Ecologist.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan Presentation – March 12, 2013 HLVRCD.
Newmont Mining Corporation Mineral Development Advisory Group Meeting Fisheries and Oceans Canada October 26 th to 28 th, 2010 Cambridge Bay, Nunavut.
Watercourse DPA District of North Vancouver Streamside DPA Development Permit Area for the Protection of the Natural Environment: Streamside Areas Public.
Agricultural Headwater Streams and Restoration Opportunities Bradley Wright Bradley Wright City of Ottawa City of Ottawa February 25, 2011.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
Who We Are What I Do Great Lakes Commission. Great Lakes Basin.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Great Lakes Perspective Samuel W. Speck Chair, Water Management Working Group Council of Great Lakes Governors Chair, Great Lakes Commission Director,
Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.
Fisheries Protection Program: An overview November
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 21 Policy History: Rivers as a Legal Battleground Public Policy in the American Federal System – An Overview Prepared by.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Adoption of Stream Corridor Management Regulations for the Lake George Park.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Flow Standard Amendment to New York’s Water Quality Standards Regulations Scott J. Stoner Chief, Standards.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
2035 General Plan Update Joint Study Session on Draft Conservation Element Planning Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission December 1, 2015.
Water Use licencing in Namibia
New Environmental Science-based Regulations on Pleasure Craft
Our Mission We work with landowners, communities, and organizations to protect lakes and rivers through developing effective, transferable, long-term solutions.
The Impact of Provincial Policies Changes on Conservation Authorities
36 CAs across Ontario (mainly in the south)
Environmental Assessment and Licensing (EAL) in Manitoba
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Technical Advisory Committee
Presentation transcript:

Conservation Authorities Act Headwaters Workshop Eastern Region February 25 th, 2011 Garden Inn, Ottawa International Airport Don Maciver MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Rideau Valley Conservation Authority

Important Sourcing Information ______________________ With respect, this presentation has been adapted from a previous presentation prepared by Laurie Nelson MCIP, RPP - Senior Manager, Development Planning and Policy at TRCA; imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Conservation Authorities Act  Legislated in 1946 in response to concerns of soil erosion and flood damage; putting “the boys” from the war (WW II) to work….  Provided means for provincial and municipal governments to join together to form a conservation authority and undertake programs for natural resource management on a watershed basis  Broad responsibilities for watershed management, community based projects and municipal partnerships 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services Conservation Authorities

Conservation Authorities Act The powers of a Conservation Authority are described within Section 21(1), sub sections (a) through (q) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O., In particular, for the purpose of accomplishing its objects, an Authority has power: 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Objects 20. (1) 20. (1) The objects of an authority are to establish and undertake, in the area over which it has jurisdiction (the watershed), a program designed to further the conservation, restoration, development and management of natural resources other than gas, oil, coal and minerals. R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27, s. 20. Same (2)(2) Despite subsection (1) and subject to any other legislation pertaining to these resources, authorities may enter into agreements to allow exploration, storage and extraction by others in order to share in the revenue from use of gas or oil resources owned by them if, (a) the use is compatible with the conservation, restoration, development and management of other natural resources; and (b) extraction occurs on land adjacent to, but not on, conservation authority land. 1998, c. 18, Sched. I, s /19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Programs and Policies Flood Forecasting and Warning Drought Response Watershed Monitoring (terrestrial and aquatic, surface water quality and quantity, sub-surface resources) Source Protection Planning Watershed Plans and Strategies Lake Planning Watershed Information aggregation Watershed Report Cards (existing conditions /data gaps) Planning Advisory Services and Regulatory Policies Septic Inspection / Re-inspection Fisheries Management Plans Stewardship / Environmental Enhancement Programming Clean Water Grants Tree Planting programs Conservation Areas ownership / conservation lands management Outdoor Education 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Connected / linked role CA Role in Planning  Required circulation (Planning Act) unless screening agreed to  Provincially delegated responsibility for Natural Hazards (S. 3.1) (One Window Planning) MOU with CO, MNR and MMAH that CA’s are the lead for natural hazard (flooding, soil and slope stability) issues for site specific applications; Province is policy lead.  Natural Heritage, Aquatic, Groundwater, Stormwater Management, etc. (S. 2.1, 2.2) MOU’s for Planning Act applications with upper tier / lower tier municipalities to provide technical review and advice vis-à- vis PPS and local OP conformity ( wePm’s ) 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Other connected / linked roles (other statutes) Other  Canada Fisheries Act Individual CA Agreements with DFO (Level II, Level III re. habitat – Section 35 only, no enforcement) Bringing what we know to the process  Environmental Assessment Act A s required (local knowledge + regulatory requirements)  OWRA Permits to take Water P rovision of local knowledge to MOE (esp. on site and / or downstream constraints) 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

CA Regulatory Role – CA Act  Section 28 of the CA Act was updated in 1998 (red tape reduction) to ensure more consistency among all conservation authority Regulations as well as complementarity with provincial policies (PPS)  “Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses” Regulation (O. Reg. 97/04 the “Generic” Regulation) approved by the Province in 2004; established Regulation content requirements ….  May 2006, old “Fill, Construction and Alteration to Waterways” regulation rescinded and new individual Section 28(1) “Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses” Regulations approved by the Minister of Natural Resources for application by individual CA’s N. Bay - Mattawa 177/06 Quinte 319/09 Cataraqui 148/06 Mississippi 153/06 Raisin 175/06 Rideau 174/06 South Nation 170/06 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

The Development, Interference and Alterations Regulations 28(1) Subject to approval of the Minister, an authority may make regulations applicable in the area under its jurisdiction: b.prohibiting, regulating or requiring the permission of the authority for straightening, changing, diverting or interfering in any way with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream or watercourse, or for changing or interfering in any way with a wetland; c.prohibiting, regulating or requiring the permission of the authority for development if, in the opinion of the authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches or pollution or the conservation of land (the “tests”) may be affected by the development; 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Regulated Areas Development prohibited 2. (1) Subject to section 3, no person shall undertake development, or permit another person to undertake development in or on the areas within the jurisdiction of the Authority that are…  Hazardous Land (flood, slope, unstable soil(s))  River or steam valley systems (depressional feature)  Watercourses (any meeting def’n. in S. 28(25) of the Act)  Shoreline of the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence River System & inland lakes  Wetlands (as defined in S. 28(25) of the Act)  Other Areas - … where development could interfere with the hydrologic function of a wetland (typically the 120 m. adjacent lands) 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services Where?

Regulated Areas 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services Dominant Hazard  Wetland and “other areas”  Any “water- course”

The Permission- O. Reg. 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services Permission to develop 3. (1) The Authority may grant permission for development in or on the areas described in subsection 2 (1) if, in its opinion, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches, pollution or the conservation of land will not be affected by the development. (2) The permission of the Authority shall be given in writing, with or without conditions. Permission to alter 6. (1) The Authority may grant a person permission to straighten, change, divert or interfere with the existing channel of a river, creek, stream or watercourse or to change or interfere with a wetland. (2) The permission of the Authority shall be given in writing, with or without conditions. Structures / Fill Alter / change or interfere

Important Definition(s) “wetland” means land that, (a) is seasonally or permanently covered by shallow water or has a water table close to or at its surface, (b) directly contributes to the hydrological function of a watershed through connection with a surface watercourse, (c) has hydric soils, the formation of which has been caused by the presence of abundant water, and (d) has vegetation dominated by hydrophytic plants or water tolerant plants, the dominance of which has been favoured by the presence of abundant water, but does not include periodically soaked or wet land that is used for agricultural purposes and no longer exhibits a wetland characteristic referred to in clause (c) or (d). (“terre marécageuse”) 1998, c. 18, Sched. I, s. 12. Headwater wetland features – Mississippi / Rideau watershed Hwy 7 West Ottawa “ evaluated ” 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services MVC RVCA

Important Definition(s) 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services Conservation of Land : the protection, management, or restoration of lands within the watershed ecosystem for the purpose of maintaining or enhancing the natural features and hydrologic and ecological functions within the watershed. (*March 2008) Not as yet formally defined in CA Act or policy; interpreted (by a Committee) as meaning this based on a pattern in decisions over the years by the Ontario Mining and Lands Commissioner who conducts hearings on appeal of CA decisions on behalf of the Minister of Natural Resources * Draft Guidelines to Support Conservation Authority Administration of the “Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alteration to Shorelines and Watercourse Regulation”, MNR/CO, April 18, 2008 (unapproved)

Important Definition(s) “ Watercourse” “An identifiable depression in the ground in which a flow of water regularly or continuously occurs” Section 28 (5), CA Act “ Interfering in Any Way ”  Also not as yet defined in CA Act…  Interpreted as: “ any anthropogenic act or instance which hinders, disrupts, degrades or impedes in any way the natural features or hydrologic and ecologic functions of a wetland or watercourse” (*March 2008) * Draft Guidelines to Support Conservation Authority Administration of the “Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alteration to Shorelines and Watercourse Regulation”, MNR/CO, April 18, 2008 (unapproved) 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial

Natural features and hydrologic / ecologic functions “hinders, disrupts, degrades or impedes …” Features Channel morphology Substrate Vegetation Wetland Functions Hydrology / transport of Water Sources of Water Sediment transport Habitat 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Legislation and Policies 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Implementation Local policies developed and approved by Board of Directors to ensure consistent implementation of Section 28 regulations. 5/19/2015 CA Planning Advisory and Regulatory Services

Implementation Guidelines The next step?! Laura Del Giudice TRCA Over to: