1. Municipal Partners in Lake and River Stewardship Barbara King Executive Director king@watersheds.ca

2. Our Mission
We work with landowners, communities, and organizations to protect lakes and rivers through developing effective, transferable, long-term solutions.

3. Managing our Lakes and Rivers?
The Canadian Framework around freshwater protection is one that is very complex with shared and sometimes duplicated responsibilities.
With all the Federal cuts to legislation around water policy, we are relying on municipalities in Ontario to ensure that they take responsible for creating and enforcing policy and zoning bylaws that protect shorelines under direction of the PPS.
Also private citizens and lake and river groups are stepping up to help take care of our waters.
Southern and eastern Ontario fall far below the provincial target for landscape conservation and protection set out in Ontario’s Biodiversity Strategy,53 as well as the international target to which Canada is committed under the Convention on Biological Diversity.54 That target is to conserve at least 17 percent of the landscape through well-connected networks of conservation lands. While it does not bind municipalities, it should guide policy development so that the immense social, environmental and economic benefits that the natural heritage system provides are fully realized.

4. Lake/River Level Management Issues
So much development happens at the lake level. Increased development = increased nutrient loading, vegetation loss, increased boating etc.
Climate change factors, lower water levels, algae blooms, etc.
Multiple players governing a single water body = Confusion
No clear definition of lake capacity
Rural municipalities are left vulnerable without strong policies in place to protect their lakes. And it is happening……..
There are as many as 2 million lakes in Canada

5. We Can’t Reverse Development Once the Damage is Done - Economics
The quality of a lake has a direct economic impact for Municipalities- It is essential to look at long term impacts of development. Studies show that property values decline where water quality or the natural environment has been degraded. Both residential and commercial businesses are negatively affected- which has substantial impacts to the economic development of the area.

6. What Municipalities Need do to Protect our Lakes and Rivers?
Ensure policies and bylaws are in place/ use site plan control- Target 30 metre native plant buffer requirement with a limit of less than 25% clearing at shore.
(Can require landscape plan with development proposals)
Strictly enforce bylaws on vegetation removal and ensure inspectors, during compliance inspections are required to report any infractions with respect to bylaws
Ensure bylaws state “Tree and shrub cutting” not just tree cutting to protect understory vegetation
Educate Landowners on ‘who is responsible for what’ and how they can protect their lakes through proper shoreline management practices. Ensure that they are provided with environmental requirements contained in by-laws

7. What Municipalities Need to do to Protect our Lakes and Rivers?
Be good example…ensure municipal lands are well vegetated and use them as demonstration sites for education
Know your lakes and rivers and protect Natural heritage features in official plans with a focus on linkeages of natural areas
Septic inspections should be mandatory for entire waterbodies
When more than one municipalities exists on a waterbody, create consistent policies with each other and meet to discuss any potential development applications
Partner with Conservation Groups, Lake Associations and Conservation Authorities to carryout Shoreline Stewardship Actions - Meet regularly, create committees around lake stewardship, bring in funding for restoration, education and more….

8. Systems Based Planning for Natural Heritage Protection
Policy should require the consideration of the role and importance of lands adjacent to natural heritage systems with an analysis of the impacts of development proposals, and establishment of appropriate ecological buffers and setbacks
Use environmental impact assessments by qualified consultants on adjacent lands to protected areas.
Where appropriate, site remediation plans should be required focusing on principles of net environmental gain
Use the Natural Heritage Strategy in local planning
Best Practices Guide from Nature Ontario for Natural Heritage Systems Planning is a resource designed for municipal planners.
In accordance with the PPS, development and site alteration are not permitted on lands adjacent to natural heritage features and areas except where evaluation has demonstrated that no negative impacts on the natural features or functions will occurThe intent is to ensure that adjacent lands act as a buffer to protect natural heritage features and functions from impact. They help to sustain the ecological function and long-term viability of natural heritage systems. The Natural Heritage Reference Manual provides a recommended distance from natural heritage features identified in the PPS to prevent potential negative impacts from a proposed development or site alteration. According to the manual: “If studies determine that development anywhere within the adjacent lands will have a negative impact on natural features and their functions, buffers identified to mitigate these impacts could include the entire adjacent lands.”Municipal policy should set out additional requirements to address site-specific issues Noah Cole Red-tailed hawk in Port Rowan Section 3 Best Practices Guide to Natural Heritage Systems Planning 3.3 Requirements for Environmental Impact Studies and to ensure that buffers and setbacks are designed to prevent any adverse impacts on the natural heritage system. They could provide recommendations on the width and nature of buffers, for example.

9. Thank You! Barbara King Executive Director
Sunset Blvd., Perth ON K7H 2Y4
Office:
watersheds.ca