Mary Matteson Bryan, P.E. 415.305.5445 Bi-Level Office Lighting with Occupancy Sensors E3T Field Assessment Mary Matteson Bryan, P.E. January 14, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4 basic approaches to determining energy efficiency benefits (savings) 1.Stipulated or deemed savings 2.Individual Building Metering – Measurement and.
Advertisements

Start of Presentation ALLUME, LLC High Performance – Energy Efficient Lighting and Controls.
Next Century Power: Energy Efficiency Opportunities in Newer K-12 Schools Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 19, 2013 David.
Energy Efficiency 4/29/2015 Lighting Akrem Awad 1.
Management and Organisation of Electricity Use Energy Efficient Lighting Techniques Belgrade November 2003.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUSINESSES TO DIRECTLY IMPROVE THE BOTTOM LINE THROUGH ENERGY EFFICIENCY 3 rd May 2010 Kees Brinkman Managing Director.
I can see the light! Energy Efficient Lighting. Energy webinar series.
Harwood Union High School Board of Directors Presenters: Gabriela Meade and Lorne Nix Presented: April 25 th, 2007 Vermont Energy Education Program.
Timber Research Centre Michael Anderson– Mohamed Farid Pablo Prallong – Lewis Macleod Ross Turbet & Group A 26/04/20054 th Presentation.
RTF Lighting Standard Protocol Review of Hours of Operations, Controls Savings, and Variation.
BPA Guidelines for Measurement & Verification of Energy Efficiency Measures Presented at Brown Bag Session November 29, 2006.
Lighting Techniques and Technology Practical Applications Britnei Godusky LC, LEED AP BD+C June 4, 2014AOBA / Current Trends in Sustainability.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 LIGHTING CONTROLS ACCEPTANCE TESTING
Deeming Savings for Ductless Heat Pumps in Manufactured Homes Regional Technical Forum January 4 th, 2011.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
Daylighting Prediction Tool Online Presented By: Eng.Reham Mostafa Mohamed Mohie El-Din By: Christoph Reinhart Web Address:
Introducing The Revolutionary ENSA  EN ergy SA ving Automated Wireless Light Switch A World First For The Security Industry By Making Alarm Sensors Dual.
LED Case Lighting With and Without Motion Sensors Michele Friedrich – Sr. Engineer PECI 1/5/2010.
 Budget: $210,000  Energy : 255,700 kWh  Demand reduction: 36 kW  Cost Savings: $34,520 / year  Utility Incentive $61,370  Simple Payback = 4.2.
2009 CAMPUS LIGHTING RETROFIT FORUM Laboratory Lighting Controls Upgrade New Laboratory Building Biological Sciences 3 Beat Title 24 Energy Standard by.
Smart Exterior Lighting Initiative (Bi-level Lighting) Dr. Michael Siminovitch Professor, University of California, Davis Director, California Lighting.
Smart Buildings Microgrid Innovations Energy and Construction Best Practices Summit | June 23, 2011.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Building 111 Mike Holda Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (510) or (209) ,
Provisional Protocol and Research Plan: Non-Residential Lighting Retrofits Nonresidential Lighting Subcommittee November 6, 2014.
Non-Residential Network Computer Power Management UES Measure Update Regional Technical Forum July 16, 2013.
Lisa F. | May 20, 2014 Introduction to Lighting Incentives & Process for Medium/Large Customers.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Using Private Financing to Maximize Energy and Cost Savings Track 5: Project Financing Session 7: Economics.
Resource Conservation Program November 2003 Kelley Gonzales Resource Conservation Manager.
Michigan Homebuilders Training: Integrating Building Codes, ENERGY STAR, and Building America Case Study Documenting an Integrated Workshop Approach -
LED Case Lighting in Vertical and Semi-Vertical Open Refrigerated Cases Eric Mullendore – Energy Analyst PECI 6/29/2010.
Best Practices in Overall Sustainable Design Cal State University, Long Beach - Liberal Arts 2, 3 and 4 Renovation Presented By:Mark Zakhour,, CASp, LEED.
Reviewing the Audit Results. Defining a Quality Base Year is Key to Maximizing Project Value n Base year is the mutually agreed upon pre-retrofit annual.
Main Headquarters: 120 Water Street, Suite 350, North Andover, MA With offices in: NY, ME, TX, CA, OR Standard Protocol for Non-Residential.
April, 2002Energy Audits1 April, 2002 Ryan Stroupe, Pacific Energy Center DeAnza College: ES 76 Energy Reliability and Your Organization Energy Auditing.
Name of Building(s) or Project Speaker(s) Organization(s)
The EWZ building Presentation of the building Presentation of the building The design issue The design issue The building concept The building concept.
Refrigerator Decommissioning: Measure Status Update Regional Technical Forum October 16, 2013.
APS Multifamily Energy Efficiency Program Arizona Housing Alliance Seminar February 25, 2011.
RTF Custom Protocols: Background, Issues and Critical Elements February 8, 2012 Regional Technical Forum Subcommittee on Impact Evaluation and Custom Protocol.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for large projects Agency Energy ManagerLife-Cycle Cost Methodology Jeanette Fiess,
Center for Energy and Environment Cost Effectiveness Determination & Benefits and Resources Russ Landry, PE, LEED® AP Center for Energy and Environment.
Bill Savings Costs and Bill Saving in the Low Income Energy Efficiency Programs for 2002 to 2004 Bill Savings Public Workshop April 15, San Diego.
[DATE] [PLACEHOLDER FOR DISTRIBUTOR LOGO]. Low Wattage T8s: A Win for Customers Cost Savings Product Quality Easy Installation Energy Savings.
Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
Advanced Lighting Control Systems (ALCS) Energy Estimation Tool Pacific Gas & Electric Company Dave Alexander.
Grocery VSD Measure Deemed Savings Reid Hart, PE & Ken Anderson September 28, 2010.
01/15/16Prop 39 Update - Maintenance & Operations - Sustainability Initiatives Unit1 CALIFORNIA CLEAN ENERGY JOBS ACT LAUSD PROPOSITION 39 ENERGY EFFICIENCY.
Kansas City International Airport Michael Glasker, P.E. George Butler Associates, Inc.
VRF Applications in PNW RTF RTUG Meeting October 26, 2011 Kevin Campbell Reid Hart, PE Technical Research Group.
PART L Problem or opportunity? Bill Wright Corporate Energy and Environment Manager, John Lewis plc.
CALCULATING PAYBACK PERIOD. Formula Payback Period = Initial Investment Net annual savings + Income.
Non-Res Code Compliant Lighting: Working Toward a Standard Protocol Christian Douglass, RTF Contract Analyst Non-Residential Lighting Subcommittee October.
1 1 DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY INITIATIVE (DEI) Benefits on Both Sides of the Meter RTF MEETING February 5, 2008.
Lighting Beyond the Bulb LED Lighting and Lighting Management Solutions Todd Smith
Lighting facts.  Lighting can be a big energy consumer in offices and production areas and experience shows that energy savings may be achieved - often.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
Lower Garage Lighting Costs and Improve Illumination – A Case Study Michael Klein, Albany Parking Authority Don Monahan, Walker Parking Consultants The.
Vampire power. contents  Introduction  Devices which use standby power  Tips to reduce vampire power  Smart Power Strip  Conclusion.
ENERGY SAVING AND EFFICIENCY OF AIR CONDITION & LIGHT SYSTEMS AT PUBLIC BUILDINGS Meitav-tec (Contel group)
Energy Savings Performance Contracts & Energy Service Companies
EnMS Management Review
A custom presentation for:
Calculating Payback Period
Case sample of a CT option
Sustainability Left click to advance $200 Billion
Who Benefits? Building Owners
County of Kane Facility Efficiency Improvements.
[PLACEHOLDER FOR DISTRIBUTOR LOGO]
Daylight Redirecting Window Film
Light level sensor Temperature sensor Motion detection ecDeskSensor
Presentation transcript:

Mary Matteson Bryan, P.E Bi-Level Office Lighting with Occupancy Sensors E3T Field Assessment Mary Matteson Bryan, P.E. January 14, 2011

2 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Bi-level Office Lighting with Occupancy Sensors Courtesy CLTC CLTC Study - with the option of bi-level switching, occupants often choose to use a lower light level Up to 50% savings

3 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Field Assessment Goals Validate and add to CLTC findings for NW applications Quantify energy savings Develop economic analysis (customer simple payback) Provide energy savings data to support incentives Document occupant acceptance Develop case study Develop specifications Provide NW test installation

4 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Baseline and Proposed Measures Worked with BPA program staff to define baseline and proposed measures Define baseline per BPA lighting calculator Calculator assumes single-level (100%) manual switching Define proposed measures Rewire to bi-level switching with occupancy sensor For this assessment, also included ballast change to provide uniform illumination at 50%

5 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Host Site: Pierce County High level of interest in energy efficiency, sustainability Individual offices, both perimeter with daylighting and interior Monitoring 30 offices Existing control: manual single level switching (all lights on or off) County-City Building

6 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Experimental Design and Procedure Monitor each of three operational scenarios. Auto On at 50%/Auto Off: Lights are switched on automatically at the low level (50%) upon occupancy, the remaining lights can be switched on manually. Auto On at 100%, Auto Off: Lights are switched on automatically at the high level (100%) upon occupancy, lights can be switched to a lower light level (50%) manually. Manual On/Auto Off: Lights can be switched on and off manually at 50% or 100%. In all cases, lights can be switched off manually, and lights are turned off automatically after the office is unoccupied for a period of time.

7 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Project Results Lighting Operation Significant operation at the low light level setting with bi-level switching as compared to the baseline manual, single level. Maximum operation at low (66% of lit hours) using the auto-on at 50% setting.

8 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Project Results Energy Savings Greatest energy savings achieved with the Auto-on at 50% setting. Note that savings are different for the retrofit and new construction cases because of the different baseline lighting hours of operation.

9 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Project Results Occupant Satisfaction Occupants had very favorable reactions to the bi-level switches and occupancy sensors. Most occupants (64%) preferred the Auto-on at 50% setting.

10 Project Results Economic Performance Economic estimates are sensitive to site-specific variables such as lighting hours of operation, installation labor costs, utility incentives, and energy costs. Economic calculations presented here are based on variables specific to this field assessment. Energy Savings (kWh/yr) Energy Cost Savings ($/yr) Installed Cost ($) Payback (yrs) Small Office, New Construction64$5.62$509 Large Office, New Construction194$17.04$1106 Small Office, Retrofit85$7.47$36048 Large Office, Retrofit254$22.31$87039 Assessment Site Specific Analysis

11 Project Results Economic Performance - Impact of Lighting Hours of Operation and Installation Labor Costs

12 Project Results Economic Performance As a point of reference, economic performance was calculated for a hypothetical situation with more favorable, put reasonable, assumptions for baseline lighting hours and installed cost than those found for this assessment. Energy Savings (kWh/yr) Energy Cost Savings ($/yr) Installed Cost ($) Payback (yrs) Small Office, New Construction354$10.26$222 Large Office, New Construction1062$30.78$241 Small Office, Retrofit131$11.51$26823 Large Office, Retrofit393$34.52$63818 Favorable Assumptions Analysis

13 Conclusions Bi-level switching in individual offices can deliver significant savings as compared to single level switching. Energy savings are maximized when the switches are set to automatically turn on at the low light level setting. Bi-level switching provides high occupant satisfaction with the lighting system, possibly delivering non-energy benefits. The economic performance of bi-level switching is most favorable in a new construction/major remodel situation.

14 Background Concepts – Heat Mgmt Thank You Mary Matteson Bryan, P.E