1. VRF Applications in PNW RTF RTUG Meeting October 26, 2011 Kevin Campbell Reid Hart, PE Technical Research Group

2. Modeled Office Building Basic Qualities Simulation Runs 1.RTU, no economizer 2.RTU, with Economizer and fan control 3.VRF, Heat Pump, no Economizer 4.VRF, Heat Recovery no Economizer 2 Floors2 Floor Area25,000sq ft Ventilation Rate15cfm/person Lighting Density1.2watts/sq ft Equipment Density1.0watts/sq ft

3. 3 System Parameters RTU VRF SystemRTUVRF SEER/EERSEER 13 Cooling COP3.993.96 Heat AFUE (gas)80.6%- Heating COP (HP)-4.06 Supply Fan Eff. (total)36%60% Supply Fan total SP2.001.00 DOAC total SP-2.25 DOAC Fan Eff. (total)-53%

4. Impact of VRF on HVAC Energy Fans have significant savings! (even more if no RTU fan control) Heating savings in northern climates (switch gas to Electric) Cooling savings except PNW where OSA economizer wins Both cooling and heating benefit from variable compressor 4

5. Small Office Comparison Two Models in PNW Duct leakage: ES high; PECI none Separate ventilation fan: PECI 2.5”’; ES ? ES: refrigerant piping loss factor; PECI none 5

6. PNW Office Energy End Use Comparison 6 *PECI small office utilizes economizer and fan controls. Energy Solutions small office includes duct leakage.

7. Differences Are Not Suprising A simple fan VSD measure had a wide range of savings when load variation was considered. Differences indicate need for: Regional standard buildings Range of loads to capture variation Expected value savings or other process to generate population values 7

8. Modeled Medical Clinic Basic Qualities Simulation Runs 1.VAV (dX) Electric Reheat + Economizer + SAT reset 2.VRF Heat Pump 3.VRF Heat Recovery Building Patient rooms with variable occupancy More perimeter zones Diagnostic equipment room 8 Floors1 Floor Area20,000sq ft Ventilation Rate20cfm/person Lighting Density1.2watts/sq ft Equipment Density1.0watts/sq ft

9. Impact of VRF on HVAC Energy Fans have significant savings! Heating always savings since no reheat with VRF Cooling savings due to improved part load efficiencies and high cooling requirements of VAV reheat 9

10. Healthcare/Medium Office (VAV) Compare Two Models in PNW 10

11. PNW Office VRF Energy Use per SF 11 *PECI VAV with electric reheat and SAT reset. Energy Solutions VAV with electric reheat.

12. Other Heat Recovery Options: Domestic Hot Water VRF Water Heater Standard to 115°F Booster to 160°F Applicable for buildings with both: Heat rejection (server; equipment; kitchen; cooling) Hot Water Load (Restaurants, Dorms, Hotel, Medical) Efficiency Improvement VRF water heating percentage savings vs. gas 12 Water Heat Mode% Site Btu’s% MW/NE Cost Heat Pump80%8% Heat Recovery93%69%

13. Exhaust Air Heat Recovery Adapt the old run- around or loop heat pump concept In heat mode, cool exhaust air In cool mode, heat exhaust air Feed general loop or pre conditioning at DOAC Need to verify airside pressure tradeoffs This strategy not in models 13

14. Conclusions Modeling tools and load/system assumptions have significant impact on predicted savings VRF systems can provide significant HVAC savings with lower fan energy and better part load efficiencies Buildings with low heating loads in economizer friendly climates have less significant savings Exhaust and DHW heat recovery applicable Notes: Proper control set-up & commissioning is important, as simulations are based on perfect control operation Simulations are not monitored results 14

15. 15 Questions? Contact: Kevin Campbell PECI kcampbell@peci.org 503-575-4169