PPAC Outreach Effort Andrew Faile Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Patents.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patent System Reform(s) 2007 EDUCAUSE Policy Conference May 16, 2007 E.R. Kazenske Microsoft Corporation.
Advertisements

National Intellectual Property Strategies, Some Examples and Their Significance June, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique WIPO Intellectual Property and New Technologies.
Energy-Intensive Industrial Rates Workgroup Information Session Steve Bakkal Michigan Energy Office Michigan Economic Development Corporation March 24,
Community Patent Robert Clarke – Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
BUSINESS PROCESS IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES Chad Cleveland June 18, 2014 BAAF Meeting.
1 ITRC Mission ITRC is A state-led coalition working together with industry and stakeholders to achieve regulatory acceptance of environmental technologies.
Community Governance Consensus Based Governance RECOMMENDATIONS.
Page 1 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) GAO’s Report on Electronic Disbursement of Federal Benefit Payments (GAO ) Presented by Kay Kuhlman,
1 WIPO/INV/BEI/02/14 SECOND INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON CREATIVITY AND INVENTION - A BETTER FUTURE FOR HUMANITY IN THE 21 ST CENTURY Beijing, May 23 to 25,
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Patent & Trademark Connections: One Library’s Partnership with the USPTO in Providing Intellectual Property Resources & Services to the Public by Amy Jansen.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
Complex Work Unit Pilot Program Lisa J. Hobbs, Ph.D. Project Manager Search and Information Resources Administration Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical.
Simplified Entry and Financial Process CBP Trade Integrated Planning and Coordination Cell Initiative Commercial Operations Advisory Committee Subcommittee.
NESCC Meeting March 28, Topics Accomplishments Since Last Meeting Program Management for NESCC Support to the NESCC Sponsor Committee Review and.
1 Involving Data Users in the Planning Process Who are your data users? Why do you meet with your data users? When do you meet with your data users? What.
CSO engagement in policy process Hille Hinsberg State Chancellery Government Communication Officer
Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board 9/11/2015 WEDA Spring/Summer Conference Tools for the Recovery Workforce Development.
1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,
1 Patent Quality Initiatives Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Valencia Martin-Wallace Deputy Commissioner.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative ANF IT Consolidation Website Publishing / IA Working Group Kickoff.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
Indiana University Professional Opportunities Orientation Program September 25, 2001 Presented by: Brian Oliver Laura Bissett Sarah Leinweber
AHIMA & PHDSC A Transformational Alliance. CONFIDENTIAL AHIMA Background  Professional association founded in 1928 as the Association of Record Librarians.
Community Employment Alliance An advocacy organization, with a statewide membership network of employment service providers and businesses. 1.
Issues in Corporate Governance: Board Structures and Functions Based on a Student Presentation by Joshua Shullaw and Matthew Domeyer.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Office of Small Business Utilization (OSBU) MSC Industry Day Presenter: Kenyon L. Taylor GSA Northwest/Arctic Region.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
Open Data Future for Grants ANN EBBERTS, CEO AGA MIKE PECKHAM, DIRECTOR, DATA ACT PMO, HHS CHRIS ZELEZNIK, ENGAGEMENT LEAD, DATA ACT PMO, HHS.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
Page 1 Reexamining Regulations: Opportunities to Improve Effectiveness and Transparency of Reviews Administrative Conference of the United States March.
Page 1 Postsecondary Education: Many States Collect Graduates’ Employment Information, but Clearer Guidance on Student Privacy Requirements Is Needed Presentation.
2006 Customer Survey A Presentation to the Stakeholder Advisory Committee November 1, 2006.
Policy Influencing strategies & Tactics. What is Public policy? Public policy: It is a guideline to the actions of the governments in addressing societal.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
State EE/RE Policy Best Practices & Next-Generation Innovations: September Meeting Feedback on overall work plan and phasing of policies September 25,
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Compliance Promotion Formalizing an Approach to Support Stakeholder Compliance.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
Stakeholders Terms of Reference - BOD Goals GCOOS Stakeholder Council Once potential users and stakeholders for GCOOS have been identified, a Stakeholder.
Arizona Department of Education in partnership with Arizona State University Using Technical Skill Attainment Data.
C-DERL is an application designed to be a Federal- wide, online repository for data standards, definitions, and context. It was authorized jointly by the.
JPO’s Initiatives for World‘s Best Examination Quality January, 2015 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
Proposed Preliminary Statewide Full Service Partnership Classification System BASED ON STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK THIS REPORT IS THE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES OVERSIGHT.
Annual Report Constitution Public Audit Act Public Finance Management Act Other legislation Minister of Finance Establishment and operations National.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
1 Biotech/Chem/Pharm Customer Partnership Meeting June 15, 2005 USPTO Study on Restriction Reform and Update on TC1600 Restriction Practice Action Plan.
June 13, Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership USPTO Study on Restriction Reform and TC1600 Restriction Practice Action Plan.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 USPTO Financial Report Trademark Public Advisory Committee Meeting February 25, 2010.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section B 1.
ATP Meeting September 18, Overview Key components of the 2016 Plan Public Participation Plan Discussion.
“Welcome to the Table” May 15, 2006 Jay Lucas Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Practical Experiences - Evaluation of Program 1 Geneva January 29, 2016.
Border Master Plan Laredo, Texas July 28, 2010  Laredo District  Coahuila  Nuevo León  Tamaulipas.
Policy Research Center At Alcorn State University (ASU) Eloris D. Speight, Policy Research Center, Socially Disadvantaged Farmers & Ranchers.
IP Community Outreach (Suite of Patent Products) Andrew Faile Director, TC 2600 United States Patent and Trademark Office
Title Training Program Work-plan On Information Management for ACFTU Duration June, 2009 Starting date 13 JUNE, 2009 Language Chinese\English Union.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
IP Community Outreach (Suite of Patent Products)
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
The American Intellectual Property Association
The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
Presentation transcript:

PPAC Outreach Effort Andrew Faile Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Patents

2 Patent Public Advisory Committee The Patent Public Advisory Committee — Established by the American Inventor’s Protection Act of 1999 — Created to advise the Director of the USPTO on patent-related matters — Nine voting members are appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, and serve three-year terms — Includes individuals with substantial background and achievement in finance, management, labor relations, science, technology, and automation

3 Purpose of the Outreach In conjunction with PPAC, the USPTO is soliciting feedback from a wide variety of stakeholders to identify improvements to the current patent system These stakeholders include practitioners, academics, CEOs, legislators, industry groups, patent holders and independent inventors The aim is to identify all manner of change including long, medium and short term solutions — Solutions may need: Statutory changes Rule changes, or Programs that can be implemented under USPTO existing authorities. Through this process, we hope to define changes that will improve the patent system in terms of quality, timeliness, and other areas of interest to patent users

4 Structure of the Outreach USPTO has hired an independent firm to conduct the stakeholder research which is divided into two basic phases The first phase includes: — Qualitative research which involves: Conducting focus groups (both in-person and virtual/web-based) One-on-one interviews with members of the patent community Collecting and collating existing feedback and suggestions (comments on proposed strategic plan, proposed rules, public reports, etc.) The purpose of this phase is to obtain high-level feedback on problem areas that IP users are interested in and also to identify a wide-range of potential solutions for these areas

5 Structure of the Outreach The second phase includes: — Quantitative research including: — Developing an online survey using the findings of the first phase which will narrow the focus and solicit more detail around specific solutions. The results will validate earlier findings and quantify the support for the solutions in the broader IP community PPAC will review results and make recommendations to the USPTO on viable solutions. The recommendations can be used to develop pilot programs at the USPTO to test the ideas

6 Focus Sessions Conducted For the first phase, the following focus sessions have been conducted: — Alexandria VA on 8/7/07 USPTO Managers — Alexandria VA on 9/5/07 USPTO Examiners — Washington DC on 10/17/07 Participant concentration: Patent Practitioners — San Francisco on 10/24/07 Participant concentration: High-Tech industries — New York City on 11/17/07 Participant concentration: Large Corporations

7 Focus Sessions Conducted First phase focus sessions (cont):, — Virtual Focus session on 11/26/07 Participant concentration: Academics and Tech transfer — Chicago on 1/16/08 Participant concentration: Manufacturing industries — Dallas on 1/23/08 Participant concentration: Energy, Aerospace and Communications

8 Focus Sessions Conducted First phase focus sessions (cont):, — Virtual Focus session on 1/24/08 Participant concentration: Financial services industries — Santa Barbara CA on 1/28/08 Participant concentration: Corporate patent counsel — Washington DC on 2/6/08 Participant concentration: Patent advocacy groups — Philadelphia on 2/13/08 Participant concentration: Pharma and Biomed

9 One on One Interviews Phase I, One on One Interviews conducted: — Judiciary — CEOs of large corporations — Independent Inventors — CEOs of small businesses

10 Documents Analyzed Phase I, sample of available documents considered: — A Patent System For The 21st Century National Academy of Sciences report, 2001 — To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy Federal Trade Commission report, 2003 — US Patent and Trademark Office: Transforming to Meet the Challenges of the 21 st Century National Academy of Public Administration report, 2005 — Comments from the public on the USPTO’s draft strategic plan — Comments from the public on various USPTO proposed rule changes — Various reports from the General Accountability Office (GAO) — USPTO customer satisfaction surveys

11 Gathering and Analyzing the Data Each focus session, one-on-one interview, or document is reviewed to identify problem areas and solutions from the participant’s or author’s point of view These problems and solutions are captured and catalogued for further analysis Analysis of the data has revealed a number of areas of interest

12 Gathering and Analyzing the Data The following major categories of interest have been identified so far: — Agency Interaction with the Public — Alternative Forms of Patents — Examination Practices — Fees — Internal USPTO Processes — Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Enhancement (Internal and External) — Post-Issuance Concerns — Prior Art and Searching — Recruitment and Retention — Examination Timing Options

13 Gathering and Analyzing the Data The following are some examples of the most frequently mentioned suggestions: — Pre-examination interviews — Improved USPTO search systems — Revised examiner production system The following are some other representative examples of the more that 1000 ideas catalogued so far: — Hire experts ‘on demand’ to assist examiners with technical questions — Provide legal writing training to examiners — Expand window in which third parties can submit prior art in published applications

14 Next Steps PPAC Analysis of the data continues Specific problems or solutions identified in the major categories above will become the subject of the survey instrument in Phase II Phase II planned for summer and fall of 2008

15 How You Can Help Interested in contributing your ideas? PPAC and the USPTO welcomes your input on changes to the current Patent System I’ll be happy to collect your ideas and bring them back to the Office for consideration USPTO point of contact for the outreach effort: — Andrew Faile — Assistant Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations, Electrical — Phone: –