Domain 2: The Classroom Environment. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Teacher interaction with students Teacher interaction with at least.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

Autism Observation Instrument General Education Classrooms
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Teacher Excellence and Support System
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 2d. Managing Student Behavior 1.
Domain 3: Instruction. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Expectations for learningTeacher’s purpose in a lesson or unit is unclear to.
Teacher Orientation to the Framework for Teaching and Framework for Teaching Proficiency System.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
The DC Framework for Teaching exists to strengthen Christian Schools and equip Christian Educators worldwide as they prepare students academically and.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching KACTE Spring 2014.
Domain 2D Without Support? I Think Not… Teacher’s Perspectives of the Implementation and Use of a Discipline Matrix in Secondary Schools 1.
Observation Assessing Teacher Practice using the Framework for Teaching.
Rubrics YOU can do this!. Rubric Achievement relative to a level of mastery (criteria) is compared  Need to know the criteria ahead of time  Need to.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Environment; Management; Methods; & Curriculum Whittney Smith, Ed.D.
1 Creating Productive Learning Environments ED 1010.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Kauchak and Eggen, Introduction to Teaching: Becoming a Professional, 3rd Ed. © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 11 Creating.
Classroom Management: Creating Productive Learning Environments What is classroom management?
Domain 2: The Classroom Environment
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth Portfolio Your Name Here Date.
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
“Teaching” by Sharleen L. Kato
Library Media Specialist Evaluation
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
Domain 2 – Classroom Environment This domain discusses establishing a respectful learning culture with clear procedures and high expectations.
Frameworks for Teaching Observation Points for the Classroom The components and elements of Domains 2 (environment) and 3 (instruction) can be directly.
New Trends in Teacher Evaluation
Managing and Teaching the Physical Education Lesson Chapter 7.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities. Component 4a: Reflecting on Teaching ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished AccuracyTeacher does not.
Time Management CAMSTEP Fall “[S]tudent achievement is maximized when teachers allocate most classroom time to activities designed to promote student.
01-1-S230-EP Unit S230-EP S230-EP Unit 1 Objectives Describe the values and principles of operational leadership. Identify the qualities.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Professional Expectations Non-Standard and/or Destructive (Unacceptable) Cooperative (Acceptable) Collaborative (Most Desired) Conflict: Uses conflict.
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Alternative Educators Evaluation Hamblen County Department of Education.
Classroom Management Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3230 Math and Science in Education 1.
Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice Chapter 11
“All learning has an emotional base.” Plato
Classroom Management.
Domain 2 Environment.
CCA Teacher Evaluation Rubric
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Class Participation Rubric – Grades given at mid-point and end of each marking period. Advanced ProficientProficient Emerging Proficient Below ProficientNo.
Lori Cameron from the WI RtI Center/ PBIS Network TALK.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Roxanne M. Williams Ed.D. Michelle Hellman. How many years of teaching experience do you have? 1. Pre-service over.
Compass- Teacher Performance Evaluation Rubric
Implementing PBIS in the Classroom Chapter 4 –Classroom Management: Systems & Practices.
Marisa Hansard Katie Heath.  How do transition times affect student learning?  How does structure and organization in the classroom affect students.
CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT. Classroom Management: Actions the teacher takes to create a safe and positive learning environment. 1. How can the environment be.
Enhancing Professional Practice
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
How to maximize the time you have Managing the Religious Education Classroom:
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
Advanced Proficient Proficient Emerging Proficient Below Proficient
Improving Instructional Effectiveness
Chapter 11 Creating Productive Learning Environments
Joseph Buffington Teaching Portfolio
Presentation transcript:

Domain 2: The Classroom Environment

ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Teacher interaction with students Teacher interaction with at least some students is negative, demeaning, sarcastic, or inappropriate to the age or culture of the students. Students exhibit disrespect for the teacher. Teacher-student interactions are generally appropriate but may reflect occasional inconsistencies, favoritism, or disregard for students’ cultures. Students exhibit only minimal respect for the teacher. Teacher-student interactions are friendly and demonstrate general caring and respect. Such interactions are appropriate to the age and cultures of the students. Students exhibit respect for the teacher. Teacher interactions with students reflect genuine respect and caring for individuals as well as groups of students. Students appear to trust the information. Student interactions with other students Student interactions are characterized by conflict, sarcasm, or put-downs. Students do not demonstrate disrespect for one another. Student interactions are generally polite and respectful. Students demonstrate genuine caring for one another and monitor one another’s treatment of peers, correcting classmates respectfully when needed. Component 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport

ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Importance of the Content Teacher or students convey a negative attitude toward the content, suggesting that it is not important or has been mandated by others. Teacher communicates importance of the work but with little conviction and only minimal apparent buy- in by the students. Teacher conveys genuine enthusiasm for the content, and students demonstrate consistent commitment to its value. Students demonstrate through their active participation, curiosity, and taking initiative that they value the importance of the content. Expectations for learning and achievement Instructional outcomes, activities and assignments, and classroom interactions convey low expectations for at least some students. Instructional outcomes, activities and assignments, and classroom interactions convey only modest expectations for student learning and achievement. Instructional outcomes, activities and assignments, and classroom interactions convey high expectations for most students. Instructional outcomes, activities and assignments, and classroom interactions convey high expectations for all students. Students appear to have internalized these expectations. Student pride in workStudents demonstrate little or no pride in their work. They seem to be motivated by the desire to complete a task rather than to do high-quality work. Students minimally accept the responsibility to do good work but invest little of their energy into its quality. Students accept the teacher’s instance on work of high quality and demonstrate pride in that work. Students demonstrate attention to detail and take obvious pride in their work, initiating improvements in it by, for example, revising drafts on their own or helping peers. Component 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning

ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Management of instructional groups Students not working with the teacher are not productively engaged in learning. Students in only some groups are productively engaged in learning while unsupervised by the teacher. Small-group work is well organized, and most students are productively engaged in learning while unsupervised buy the teacher. Small-group work is well organized, and students are productively engaged at all times, with students assuming responsibility for productivity. Management of transitions Transitions are chaotic, with much time lost between activities or lesson segments. Only some transitions are efficient, resulting in some loss of instructional time. Transitions occur smoothly, with little loss of instructional time. Transitions are seamless, with students assuming responsibility in ensuring their efficient operation. Management of materials and supplies Materials and supplies are handled inefficiently, resulting in significant loss of instructional time. Routines for handling materials and supplies function moderately well, but with some loss of instructional time. Routines for handling materials and supplies occur smoothly, with little loss of instructional time. Routines for handling materials and supplies are seamless, with students assuming some responsibility for smooth operation. Performance of noninstructional duties Considerable instructional time is lost in performing noninstructional duties. Systems for performing noninstructional duties are only fairly efficient, resulting in some loss of instructional time. Efficient systems for performing noninstructional duties are in place, resulting in minimal loss of instructional time. Systems for performing noninstructional duties are well established, with students assuming considerable responsibility for efficient operation. Supervision of volunteers and paraprofessionals Volunteers and paraprofessionals have no clearly defined duties and are idle most of the time. Volunteers and paraprofessionals are productively engaged during portions of class time but require frequent supervision. Volunteers and paraprofessionals are productively and independently engaged during the entire class. Volunteers and paraprofessionals make a substantive contribution to the classroom environment. Component 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures

ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished ExpectationsNo standards of conduct appear to have been established, or students are confused as to what the standards are. Standards of conduct appear to have been established, and most students seem to understand them. Standards of conduct are clear to all students. Standards of conduct are clear to all students and appear to have been developed with student participation. Monitoring of student behavior Student behavior is not monitored, and teacher is unaware of what the students are doing. Teacher is generally aware of student behavior but may miss the activities of some students. Teacher is alert to student behavior at all times. Monitoring by teacher is subtle and preventive. Students monitor their own and their peers’ behavior, correcting one another respectfully. Response to student misbehavior Teacher does not respond to misbehavior, or the response is inconsistent, is overly repressive, or does not respect the student’s dignity. Teacher attempts to respond to student misbehavior but with uneven results, or there are no major infractions of the rules. Teacher response to misbehavior is appropriate and successful and respects the student’s dignity, or student behavior is generally appropriate. Teacher response to misbehavior is highly effective and sensitive to students’ individual needs, or student behavior is entirely appropriate. Component 2d: Managing Student Behavior

ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Safety and accessibility The classroom is unsafe, or learning is not accessible to some students. The classroom is safe, and at least essential learning is accessible to most students. The classroom is safe, and learning is equally accessible to all students. The classroom is safe, and students themselves ensure that all learning is equally accessible to all students. Arrangement of furniture and use of physical resources The furniture arrangement hinders the learning activities, or the teacher makes poor use of physical resources. Teacher uses physical resources adequately. The furniture may be adjusted for a lesson, but with limited effectiveness. Teacher uses physical resources skillfully, and the furniture arrangement is a resource for learning activities. Both teacher and students use physical resources easily and skillfully, and students adjust the furniture to advance their learning. Component 2e: Organizing Physical Space