Arizona’s Cultural Heritage Tourism Study. Purpose  The purpose of the study was to generate information about cultural heritage tourists in Arizona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marketing & Operations of the Sport & Event Industries
Advertisements

Volunteer feedback questionnaire analysis September 2009.
Missouri Brand Awareness & Destination Audit Study Fall 2003 Presented to: Missouri Association of Convention & Visitors Bureaus June 8, 2004.
Profile of the visitor and their vacation in JAMAICA The Jamaica Tourist Board through its Corporate Planning & Research Dept. maintains a statistical.
ANTHONY W. DIXON Economic Significance of College Baseball as a Tourism Attraction: A Pilot Study.
DR. ANTHONY W. DIXON DR. MARK HENRY Economic Significance of College Football as a Tourism Attraction.
Chapter 1. Meeting the needs of guests with kindness and goodwill Derived from the Latin word hospes, which means host or guest Hospitality is a “people.
National Findings. Most Comprehensive Study Ever All 50 States + D.C.
Tourism Events & Festivals An Approach to Evaluation Cristine Angus Angus & Associates Riyadh, 17 March 2015.
What We Know of the Youth Market
Background Survey 15 minute online survey Data collected June 26 – July 1, 2009 Respondents 1,071 Moms participated in the survey 356 are members of the.
 The travel and tourism industry is the world’s largest and most diverse industry.  Many nations rely on this dynamic industry as a primary source for.
Copyright © Chmura Economics & Analytics Profile of Visitors to Tompkins County May 4, 2010.
Tourism Statistics in Azerbaijan
The World of Hospitality
Metro Region Visitor Profile Kevin Hanstad August 25, 2010.
Social and Cultural Aspects of Tourism
Social and Cultural Environment and The Tourism Industry.
1 Fredericksburg/Gillespie County VISITOR TRACKING STUDY FINAL REPORT March, 2013.
The 2006 Economic Impact of Visitor Expenditures on Northern New York State April, 2007.
AIF Tool Kit This PowerPoint presentation is provided by the ARDA International Foundation for use in addressing those.
Travel and Tourism In Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Maine Lakes and Mountains Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
HEADLINES FROM THE GREATER MANCHESTER LEISURE VISITOR SURVEY 2014.
Domestic Tourism 分分 in Britain and China By 杨芳 and 伍泳婷 By 杨芳 and 伍泳婷.
Pittsburgh Three Rivers Arts Festival 2014 Visitor Feedback Summary Report Intercept Interviews and Online Survey June 2014 N= 1,002 An Analysis of Visitors’
First Night 2014 Visitor Feedback Summary Report Intercept Interviews and Online Survey January 2014 N=765 An Analysis of Visitors’ Demographics and Feedback.
CGG 3OI. What is Tourism?  Not all journey’s taken within and between countries of the world are considered to be tourism travel.  Tourism allows people.
Hospitality Assured & Tourism Presentation Friday 20 November 2009 Riddell Graham, Director of Strategic Partnerships Hospitality Assured Forum.
MARKETING A TOURIST- FRIENDLY SESQUICENTENNIAL Virginia Tourism Corporation November 9, 2009.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
NAU ALUMNI What Do We Know About Them & What Are They Telling Us?
JerryHenry & A S S O C I A T E S FY 2005 Lake of the Ozarks Convention & Visitors Bureau Conversion Study Performance Analysis & Profile Prepared by Jerry.
Vital Signs: Draft Cultural Indicators for Australia.
CULTURAL HERITAGE TOURISM: A SUSTAINABLE STRATEGY October 27, 2010 – Sustainable Tourism Laboratory Blackstone River Valley Tourism Council, Rhode Island.
The Profile of First-time & Repeat Trips to Maine Maine Overnight Visitor Studies - Special Analytics Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism November.
Cycle Tourism. What is Cycle Tourism? How can it benefit our community?
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Southern Maine Coast Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Aboriginal Family Holiday Program: Promoting Health and Wellbeing Aboriginal people view health holistically. To them it includes social, emotional, physical,
Majorca is the largest of the Balearic Islands with a population of 700,000.
Chapter 1. Hospitality  Meeting the needs of guests with kindness and goodwill.
1 Taking Part in Scotland 2008 Presentation of survey results.
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Downeast & Acadia Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study Kennebec & Moose River Valleys Prepared by the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Travel and Tourism in Maine The 2003 Visitor Study The Maine Highlands Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism June 2004.
Heart of Devon research & National trends. Typical visitor to Exeter & the Heart of Devon – aged 45+ years – majority of visitors are ABC1’s – majority.
 1) accommodation  2) adventure tourism and recreation  3) attractions  4) events and conferences  5) food and beverage  6) tourism services  7)
© 2007 Arkenford Ltd Hastings and 1066 Country Visitor Study Hastings Destination Profile.
National Findings. Most Comprehensive Study Ever All 50 States + D.C.
Pittsburgh International Children’s Festival 2014 Visitor Feedback Summary Report Intercept Interviews and Online Survey June 2014 N=461 An Analysis of.
3.01 Discuss the economic impact of tourism.
California Welcome Center Oceanside FY Economic Impact Study Conducted by Lauren Schlau and Assoc.
© 2007 Arkenford Ltd Hastings and 1066 Country Visitor Study Rye Destination Profile.
National Findings. Most Comprehensive Study Ever All 50 States + D.C.
We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster. Introduction.
Columbia River Gorge Visitor Opportunities Study 2015 Conducted by ECONorthwest for Travel Oregon.
Parves Khan Andrew Gostelow 7 October 2009 Tourist Information provision A national economic impact review Tourism Management Institute National Conference.
Tourist Perceptions of Environmentally Friendly Innovations Kathleen Andereck Department of Recreation & Tourism Management Arizona State University.
© 2007 Arkenford Ltd Hastings and 1066 Country Visitor Study Bexhill on Sea Destination Profile.
The Winter Texan Report Winter 2006 Highlights…. Valley Markets and Tourism Research Center © UTPA 2006 Three studies were conducted…  Study 1 – Questionnaire.
Kelly Rogowski and Janet Crone
ASSESSMENT OF DESTINATION’S TOURISM OFFERING IN THE OFF-SEASON
Ontario Cultural Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Hunting Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Sport Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Theme Park Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Casino Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Fishing Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Skiing Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Snowmobiling Tourism Statistics 2015
Ontario Boating Tourism Statistics 2015
Presentation transcript:

Arizona’s Cultural Heritage Tourism Study

Purpose  The purpose of the study was to generate information about cultural heritage tourists in Arizona.  Get a better idea of visitors who go to cultural and heritage attractions.  One of the most comprehensive studies done. Most are at one site and/or for a short amount of time.

Collecting information  Study lasted a year  Were 17 sites and 3 events throughout the state focused on history and culture  Selected several days a month, both weekdays and weekends; people at the sites gave out questionnaires (onsite and mail back)  Surveyed residents and non-residents AZ: 883 out of 2,035 (43%) Out of state: 1,069 out of 1,980 (54%)

Study Highlights

Profile  Couples without children at home  Average of 56 years old  Traveling together  Working full time or retired  Fairly well educated, moderate to high income  Out of state visitors from Southwest, Pacific Northwest, Midwest, Northeast. Also international— CH attractions have broad appeal to people from diverse regions  Event attendees more diverse that site visitors

Planning  Out of state visitors plan their trips fairly far in advance  Not much interest in buying tickets ahead of time  Residents tend to decide to visit the attraction on fairly short notice (31% the day of the visit; 30% 2-6 days)—but so do others (34% the day of the visit; only 32% before leaving home)

Information  CH tourists tended to use typical information sources (friends and family, prior experience) to plan their trips, but In-state visitors are quite reliant on newspaper articles for information--newspapers need to part of the promotional mix for residents Out of state visitors use web sites, travel clubs more often

Logistics  Out of state visitors stay a median of 7 days  Half stay in a hotel or motel, a quarter in a private home  Quite a large number of residents were on an overnight trip: 30% with a median of 2 nights. Increases their economic importance  Residents travel in their own vehicles  Many out of staters (half) fly in and rent or use a private vehicle

General Activities  Most participated in a number of activities in addition to cultural heritage activities— scenery, friends and family, nature activities, shopping.  Out of state visitors do more acitivities than residents. It is the package of activities that appeal to tourists  Event visitors, though, are less likely to do other things

Cultural Heritage Activities  Primary CH activities included visiting museums, historic sites, eating local or ethnic food, shop for arts/crafts  True CH tourists participate in culturally oriented activities to a greater extent  Interestingly, not all reported participation in a cultural or heritage activity – perception is everything

Motives  Many were highly motivated by CH types of experiences 58% were very or extremely motivated by learning about AZ history and culture and/or experiencing other cultures CH attractions are significant players in the AZ experience Residents were more strongly influenced by these motives; CH attractions inspire in-state travel

Influence  The specific attractions were fairly influential in inspiring the visit to the community, somewhat less influential on the visit in general > CH attractions are a draw for visitors

Experience  Cultural heritage attractions are important to people; those who frequent such attractions do so often 91% out of state visitors and 93% residents had been to at least one other CH attraction in the past 6 months  They have broad appeal Visitors were from many states, provinces and countries

Benefits  Enjoy the visit and appreciation and knowledge of the area’s cultural heritage are the most important benefits  They feel they are able to attain these benefits  Importance and attainment levels of true CH tourists are higher that others  CH attractions are important for quality of life; residents feel connection to heritage and fulfilling lifestyle are important benefits

A = Enhanced family relationships B = Contributed to a fulfilling lifestyle C = Had fun/enjoyed the visit D = Enhanced relationship with my friends E = Increased appreciation of the area’s culture/history/ heritage F = Contributed to my quality of life G = Enhanced visit to Arizona H = Experienced a quality heritage attraction I = Learned more about the area’s culture/history/herit age J = Felt “connected” to Arizona’s cultural heritage K = Appealed to the whole family/group L = Had a significant cultural learning experience

A = Enhanced family relationships B = Contributed to a fulfilling lifestyle C = Had fun/enjoyed the visit D = Enhanced relationship with my friends E = Increased appreciation of the area’s culture/history/ heritage F = Contributed to my quality of life G = Enhanced visit to Arizona H = Experienced a quality heritage attraction I = Learned more about the area’s culture/history/he ritage J = Felt “connected” to Arizona’s cultural heritage K = Appealed to the whole family/group L = Had a significant cultural learning experience

Show me the Money  Overnighters spent over $1.2K (about 1,050 people)  Day trippers spent over $75,000 (about 440 people)  Estimate are 3.2 million CH visitors who spent over $2 billion (includes resident and day-trip travel)

Satisfaction  CH visitors are very satisfied with the experiences in AZ with high levels of satisfaction with their visit to the specific attraction, with the diversity and quality of the CH tourism product  “True CH tourists” are even more satisfied than others

Event vs. Site visitors  Event Less married, lower education More diverse Resident day-trips Newspaper use Alone Attend events/ entertain. Weather, cultures, entert. Experience greater benefits Decide to visit farther in advance; had visited before  Site Stay in hotel, RV Rent cars More activities, general & CH New places, sights, scenery Spent more overall—but because of longer stay (daily spending not different) Benefits of enhanced visit and learn about area higher Slightly more satisfied with trip and attraction

True heritage vs. others  True Newspaper CH activities/events All motive items more important All benefit items more important and achieved Spent more on arts and crafts More satisfied  Others Friends and relies Visit friends and relies Tended to spend less in general

Thanks to the Arizona Office of Tourism and the Arizona Humanities Council