Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Outcome 4: Alignment PowerSchool. Think about Outcome 4. What comes to mind?
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Moving to the Implementation Plan. The Implementation Plan Due July 1, 2010 Mandate for 9-12 Recommended for System K-12 Will be on EdInfo page –predicted.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Overview of District Self Study. Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content:
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
Examining the Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Community School District, /19/2015v. 2.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
Iowa Core Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Examining the Alignment of Instructional Content to the Iowa Core Community School District, /5/10v. 2.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Welcome to I-CAT Training! Iowa Core Outcome 4 …increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum … to the Iowa Core I A.
The Vision Implementation Project
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance (SINA & DINA) Phase I: Audit Keystone AEA January 28, 2008.
Rising Star An Overview Prepared for the District 97 Board of Education By Felicia Starks Turner and Cynthia Baranowski November 27,
1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
1 Iowa Core Curriculum Session 2 January
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
IOWA CORE CURRICULUM LEADERSHIP TRAINING Day Two.
Collaboration Grants Design 101 Salem November 21 st, 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Implementation Planning: Module 10 Iowa Core Curriculum Leadership Development Series Year Two.
District Accreditation Overview DAC and Parent Overview.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
Student Affairs Assessment Council: Articulating our purpose “Position description” for membership Charge update Wednesday, August 21, 2013.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Continuous Quality Improvement Basics Created by Michigan’s Campaign to End Homelessness Statewide Training Workgroup 2010.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Accreditation External Review
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Are we ready for the change?
February 21-22, 2018.
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
Presentation transcript:

Overview of District Self Study

Objectives To understand specific aspects of the District Self Study: A.Purpose and use B.Recommended Practices C.Content: the Iowa Core Curriculum outcomes D.Roll out schedule and future directions E.Process of completion of the self study and related forms

A. Purpose and use Baseline for each of the six stated outcomes Progress monitoring of implementation Prioritization of need for action planning State evaluation of Iowa Core Curriculum roll out and implementation

B. Recommended Practices Diverse stakeholder input –Full District Leadership Team –Processes used that elicit ownership in self study results and implementation plan Facilitators –Review all materials –Adept at facilitation at district or AEA level Data collection/reporting –Scoring Rubric, Consensus Rating form and Feedback –Self study completed as baseline and annually AEA as Partners

C. Content: Iowa Core Curriculum Outcomes Outcome 1 – Leadership: School leaders build and sustain system capacity to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum. Outcome 2 – Community: Community members and other supporting agencies work together to support the implementation of the Iowa Core Curriculum. Outcome 3 –Schools: A continuous improvement process to improve teaching and learning is used at the district and school level. Content-Instruction-Assessment Outcome 4 – Content Alignment: District leaders and other educators monitor and use data to increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum and other relevant educational opportunities to the Iowa Core Curriculum. Outcome 5 – Professional Development: Educators engage in professional development focused on implementing Characteristics of Effective Instruction and demonstrate understanding of Essential Concepts and Skill Sets. Outcome 6 – Instruction and Assessment: Educators implement effective instructional practices to ensure high levels of learning for each and every student.

D. Roll out schedule and future directions Rolled out in phases –Outcome 1, 2 (Leadership, Community): Module 5 –Outcome 3, 5 (Schools, Professional Development): Module 6 –Outcomes 4 and 6: TBA Future Directions –Paper document now – online by 2010 –Working to embed into CSIP

E. Process of completion of the self study and related forms Advanced Organizer Facilitation through the process Outcome 1-Leadership as the practice Complete Outcome 1 now......, –Take this process back to complete with Full District Leadership Team – coordinate with AEA Iowa Core Curriculum Network Liaison

Advance Organizer: Facilitation Of District Self Study 1.Identify: Members of the leadership team who will complete the self study 2.Present: Overview of the self study 3.Review: Individually review the content of the Outcome Guidance and Scoring Rubric 4.Discuss: Questions and answers 5.Rate: Individually rate the Scoring Rubric 6.Vote: Consensus rating/Completion of Consensus Rating form 7.Prioritize: Identify 2-3 priorities for action planning 8.Record: Consensus vote, priorities and informal next steps/activities on Consensus Rating form 9.Evaluate: Complete evaluation of self study process and products 10.Submit: One consensus rating form and one feedback form per district

Step 1- Identify: Self Study Respondents Representative group Persons on your Iowa Core Curriculum district leadership team Persons with knowledge of your district’s structures, policies and procedures Handouts needed: Outcome Guidance, Self Scoring Rubric, Consensus Rating Form, Feedback Form

Step 2 - Present: Scoring Rubric Description of Action Levels of Practice Possible Sources of Documentation Activity Time: 5-10 minutes Represents the desired final result Represents actions to get to final outcomes

Step 3 - Review: Self Study Reading Step 4 – Discuss: Q and A Each member receives copy of Outcome Guidance and Scoring Rubric Two representations of the same information, more/less detail Each member reads documents without making ratings Group question and answer Activity Time: minutes for all of Outcome 1; minutes for all other Outcomes

Step 5 - Rate: Individual Rating Each member rates each action on Scoring Rubric Activity Time: 20 minutes for all of Outcome 1; 10 minutes for all other Outcomes

Step 6 - Vote: Consensus Rating Fist-to-Four process – Round 1 Within each table/team, identify: –Facilitator –Time Keeper –Recorder Starting with Action 1, Fist-to-Four Vote –Identify the number that is most frequent - “Modal Number” –One “Modal Number” voter explain – amendments from other “Modal Number” voters –Round robin, “Non-Modal Number” voters explain Activity Time: 60 minutes for all of Outcome 1; 30 minutes for all other Outcomes

Step 6 - Vote: Consensus Rating Fist-to-Four process – Round 2 All persons vote again on this action. –“Modal Number” on this vote becomes group’s answer for this item on the consensus rating Record this answer on the Consensus Rating form. If consensus not reached, further discussion and further votes till “Modal Number” emerges Continue voting process through actions 2 through 10 Activity Time: 60 minutes for all of Outcome 1; 30 minutes for all other Outcomes

Step 7 - Prioritize: Identify Top Areas For Action Planning Have a conversation among your team Identify top 2 or 3 areas that would be priorities for initial action planning within this outcome Identify initial ideas about possible actions steps for each priority Activity Time: minutes

Step 8 - Record: Record ratings, priorities and initial ideas on Consensus Rating form Activity Time: 10 minutes

Step 9 - Evaluate: Completion of Feedback Form Activity Time: minutes

Step 10 – Submit: Forms to AEA 13 Network Lead Send a copy of your completed Consensus Rating form and Feedback form to: Deb Johnsen Harlan Regional Office Van Route #2 or Fax