The TELOS Model of Integrated Skills of English Zou Weicheng East China Normal University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Advertisements

KRISTINE SOGHIKYAN YEREVAN STATE LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY EPOSTL AS AN ADMINISTRATOR'S GUIDE TO INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE IN UNIVERSITY LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION.
Planning to Support Mixed Ability Teaching
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Enhancing Lessons Using Task-Based Language Teaching
MEXTESOL Mindful Teaching: Transforming Lives and Achieving Goals.
Second Language Acquisition
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
Pedagogical Tasks and Learner Participation in the English Classrooms of Undergraduate Engineers Khamseng Baruah Department of English Language Teaching,
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
School case I The Use of Writing Portfolios to Help Students Write Fables Po Leung Kuk 1983 Board of Directors’ College.
The Basics of Language Acquisition
Cooperative/Collaborative Learning An Instructional technique in which learning activities are specifically designed for small interactive groups Collaborative.
Teaching Language in Context First edition 1986 Third edition 2001
Integrating Content-Based Instruction with Story Teaching 尚惠芳 教授兼系主任暨所長 義守大學應用英語系所 97/12/30.
Bilingual Pairs in the Dual Language Classroom
DED 101 Educational Psychology, Guidance And Counseling
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Montgomery County Public Schools STARTALK 2009 Transferring Beliefs into Practice Best Practices for Teacher Development Iran Amin Judith Klimpl.
In-service Certificate in English Language Teaching
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Student Centered Learning
Exploring Strategies for the Secondary Level in Mathematics Patricia Latham and Cathie McQueeney September 28, 2006.
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
MA course on language teaching and testing February 2015.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
SIOP Overview Shelter Instruction Observation Protocol
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
CAMBRIDGE CERTIFICATE IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO SPEAKERS OF OTHER LANGUAGES CELTA.
Adult Learner Characteristics & Teaching Implications.
Sheltered Instruction for English Language Learners Tonie Garza
PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o : No formal in-house development opportunity o : Peer observation conducted but no input provided.
Teach writing Group Why we need to teach writing? Ten Reasons Why Students Should Write? a. Main reason: Students learn English by writing it. b.
Marica Romano1 Teaching English Language in Mixed Ability Classes The Challenge of Heterogeneous Classes.
Overview of the Pedagogical Guidelines (2006) IST workshop, Agadir, December, 2006.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Lesson Planning SIOP.
Unit 6 Teaching Speaking Do you think speaking is very important in language learning? Warming-up Questions (Wang: 156) Do you think speaking has been.
SIOP The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP)
Teaching English Language Learners in the Content Areas.
Goals/objective statement:  1) Communicating with English-language learners about the problem of the lack of using English language vocabulary.  2) Encouraging.
Teaching Oral Communication with CCE- Oral English Lin Yan.
Teaching Reading Comprehension
Similarities to my current programme of work Teaching of relevant strategies to be used whenever pupils listen and talk with others (e.g. one person speaking.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
INTO CLIL I.S. CARLO DELL’ACQUA – LEGNANO Prof.ssa Gallo Adriana.
The Direct Method 1. Background It became popular since the Grammar Translation Method was not very effective in preparing students to use the target.
Mohammad Alipour Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch.
Technology Standards Ashley Balasa. MTTS Standard I: Information Access, Evaluation, Processing and Application. Standard I: Information Access, Evaluation,
Definition Title: Motivation and Attitude toward Integrated Instruction through Technology in College-level EFL Reading and Writing in Taiwan Integrated.
Classroom Interaction Prepared by :Remah Hassan Submitted to :Dr. Suzan Arafat.
Utilizing Small Groups in Large ESL Classes Dr. Bruce Kreutzer International University, HCMC.
BEST PRACTICES FOR ADULT INSTRUCTION Derrick Messer, Terri Tillman & Tanisha Washington UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX AET 520 July 7, 2014 Dr. Shannon Long.
Presenter: Elizabeth Perry, M Ed. TESL-NS Fall 2014 Conference Dalhousie University.
Objectives of session By the end of today’s session you should be able to: Define and explain pragmatics and prosody Draw links between teaching strategies.
T H E D I R E C T M E T H O D DM. Background DM An outcome of a reaction against the Grammar- Translation Method. It was based on the assumption that.
So, dear colleagues, first of all we need to understand the exceptional value of the teacher in the civilized world. Always there was a relationship:
Analysis of Research and Impact on Practice, Action Planning Monday December 13th.
EFL Learners Setting Foot on American Land for the First Time Presenter: Wan-Ching Chiou 邱婉菁 Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Hsu Date: March 30, 2009.
التوجيه الفني العام للغة الإنجليزية
Second Language Acquisition & English Teaching
Lectured by: Oktriani Telaumbanua, M.Pd.
The Interaction Hypothesis
CLIL: the next teaching challenge!
Unit 3 The National English Curriculum
TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS: TEACHING SPEAKING
Chapter 3: Curriculum © VAN SCHAIK PUBLISHERS Chapter 3: Curriculum.
Teaching Oral Communication
Objectives and Areas of Educational Psychology
Presentation transcript:

The TELOS Model of Integrated Skills of English Zou Weicheng East China Normal University

OUTLINE 1. What is the TELOS Model? 2. What are the rationales for this model? 3. How are the components implemented in the course? 4. What are the evaluations given by the students and teachers?

What is the TELOS model? TELOS MODEL Target language input Engage- ment Learner’s active search Comprehensible Output Selective negative input

What are the rationales for this model? (I) 1. Input hypothesis Conditions for input to work: (1) i and i+1 theory (casting the net) (2) high-order thinking skills 2. Output hypothesis Conditions for output to work: (1) Genuine-needs-driven-output (2) Presence of audience

What are the rationales for this model? (II) 3. Learning begins with existing knowledge. Learner factors effecting language learning speed: (1) Prior knowledge (Linguistic and Non-linguistic knowledge) (2) Abilities: Good learners and Less-abled learners (3) Interest: Interest-driven and lack of interest (4) Flexible instructions (due to teacher’s factors, environmental factors – immediate and peripheral)

What are the rationales for this model? (III) 4.. Humpty-dumpty Effect When the egg is broken there is no way to recover the whole. 5. Negative input theory (1) Corrections are mandatory for inter-language growth. (2) Corrections are selected within the tolerance range of the learners.

How are the components implemented in the course? (I) Target Language Input a. Conversations (audio-visual) b. Teacher’s modeling & teaching & interaction c. Interactions with peers d. Materials in the worksheetsMaterials in the worksheets e. Reading passages f. Proverbs and sayingsProverbs and sayings g. Exercises h. Conversational practice

How are the components implemented in the course? (II) Engagement Techniques of Engagement (1) Asking good questions Can you talk on smoking for five minutes? Can you think of three ways to help people stop smoking? (2) Be observant about opportunities discipline problems vs. class management (3) Sufficient preparation before teaching pre-reading activities, warming-ups, being supportive and responsive to the needs of the students (4) Worksheets (5) Surprises and Awards (6) Taking serious attitudes to the work (7) Never embarrass your students in the public.

How are the components implemented in the course? (III) Learner’s active choices Skills to encourage learners to make choices (1) Making opportunities easily available (2) Using multiple criteria for assessment (3) Allowing for creative use of language (Including non-native like expressions) (4) Allocating tasks based on the level of the learners

How are the components implemented in the course? (IV) Comprehensible Output Skills to manage learner’s output (1) Allowing students to have ample time for preparation before presentation to class (2) Multiple opportunities of output: pair work, peer review, group competition, one-to-one interaction (3) Making the output meaningful (4) Creating audience for the speaker (5) Taking notes when the students are making presentation (6) Encouraging peer reviews

How are the components implemented in the course? (V) Selective negative input Skills of providing negative input (1) Be selective (2) Commenting based on notes/facts/not on memories (3) Be friendly and positive (4) Be flexible (give up when the input is rejected or does not work on the learners.)

What are the evaluations by the students and teachers? Students: no affective barriers even though these students are classified as 3L learners at the beginning (Low motivation, Low achievement, Low confidence) Teachers: Positive research reports published in the professional journals

Further Research Topics 1. Pronunciation 2. Teacher’s in-service training 3. Portfolio development 4. Cultural barriers 5. Teaching support systems 6. Conflict between commercialization and complexity of teaching methodologies

Questions and Answers THANKS Contact Information Phone: