LArTF and MicroBooNE Installation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Valley City State University | Facilities Services
Advertisements

MICE OsC – 22 nd June 2010 Liquid-hydrogen system and absorber M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold S Ishimoto W Lau I Mullacrane P Warburton.
NuMI Radiation and Environmental Protection NBI th International workshop on Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation September 5-9, 2006 Mike Martens.
Oxygen Deficiency Hazards ODH SAF 103 Patty Hunt.
Review of Helium Venting Analyses
Hydrogen Workshop for Fleet Operators. Module 3, “Vehicle Operations and Maintenance Facilities”
Gas Transmission Pipelines
MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.
Hydrogen R&D system HAZOP and failure analysis Yury Ivanyushenkov, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold, Matthew Hills and Tony Jones.
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
Patrick Thornton, SNS/FPE June 9, 2008
March 14, 2002GJG NCSX CRYOGENICS DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STATUS WBS-63.
Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL Safety considerations at RAL July 9, RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting 1.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
NFPA 31 Standard for the installation of Oil- Burning Equipment
LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop – April 2012 FD Assumptions and Cost Estimate 1 Bruce Baller.
1 Twelve Steps to Engineering Safe Oil and Gas Facilities Based on SPE By: Jim Johnstone and Jim Curfew – Contek Solutions LLC Presenter: Mike Leonard.
NUMI NuMI Review of the Infrastructure – W, G & V 20 July 2001 WBS Page 1 1 Infrastructure Review - W.B.S Water Systems Water Systems –Upstream.
MTA Cryogenics: Where We Are The Work of Fermilab AD/Cryo Barry Norris, Christine Darve and a host of wonderfully talented Cryogenic Personnel John Thompson,
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Summary of FSCF Final Design Parameters Meeting at SURF, 10 Aug 2015 Elaine McCluskey, LBNF Project Manager EFIG 19.
4/5/2005FLARE Cryogenics, RLSchmitt1 Argon Refrigeration Supply Purity.
128 May 2013 CENF Near Far Integration For the Safety Folder + Environmental impact Study Simple process: Identify Safety issues >> description >> risk.
Utilities 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby, Gordon Bowden.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
Conceptual Design Review of the NPDGamma Experiment in Beam Line 13 Seppo Penttila NPDGamma project manager September 25, 2007 at SNS.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
Magnetic Mitigation - Contents l Magnetic Mitigation General l West Wall Compressors l Rack Room 2 l Magnetic Shielding Yoke Jason Tarrant – Integration.
Safety Requirements and Regulations 10/3/20121Safety Requirements & Regulations James Sears.
GIF in EHN1- layout, construction and schedule Adrian Fabich, EN-MEF-LE GIF users meeting, 12 th February 2014.
Application – Identifying, Listing Equipment, and Documentation
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Fueling and Vacuum Pumping Systems W. Blanchard WBS 21 and 22 Manager.
2 IMPACT - THE FIRE PERMIT = Hot Work Permit 3 Welcome ! This course is linked to the use of IMPACT, so it is assumed that: You know how to use IMPACT.
Materials Qualification for long drift Liquid Argon TPC Effect of water on electron drift lifetime Plans Material Tests, purging and H20 studies, Purity.
CENF – Civil Engineering Extension B887 Status – 02 October 2014 Done: (1/2) Preliminary civil engineering drawing and Functional specification approved.
1Page # Machine Assembly WBS 700 By: James H. Chrzanowski January 24, 2001.
Conventional Construction Working Group Meeting Tom Lackowski L2 Conventional Facilities Mu2e Working Group.
CM 28 – 6 th October 2010 LH2 Infrastructure M Hills M Courthold T Bradshaw I Mullacrane P Warburton.
LH2 Safety Issues for MICE 1.O2/LH2 separation 2.No Ignition sources near LH2 3.Adequate ventilation 4.Affects: Windows: absorbers and vacuum Primary and.
Hydrogen Pre-Operation Safety Review 4 th October 2011 The Hydrogen Delivery System – An Introduction M Hills.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Johan Bremer, 22th-26th September 2008 Cryogenics Operations 2008, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 1 CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN Safety aspects.
Fermilab 1 SNUMI Civil Issues September 18, 2006Dixon Bogert SNUMI Civil Design & Site Considerations; Issues and FESS work Dixon Bogert SNUMI Meeting,
SCH Controls Readiness Review: Site SCH Controls Readiness Review: Site UNIQUE HAZARDS: Significant fields in adjoining magnet cells Magnetic field.
Linda Bagby - SBN Program Electrical Coordinator ICARUS Electronics Meeting 27 January 2016 SBN Program Operational Readiness Clearance.
Installation of the T600 at Fermilab CSN2, September 22,
Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Cryostats Systems Requirements on FSCF Marzio Nessi LBNF/DUNE DOE/SC CD-3a Director’s Review October 27-29, 2015.
Interface of FP420 to LHC FP420 meeting 28-Sep-2006.
Duy Phan, EN-STI-RBS. Description of the hazards  An Oxygen Deficiency Hazard (ODH) exists when the concentration of O2 ≤ 19.5 % (by volume)  Cold burns.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
Work by contractors And Safety Coordination CONTRACTORS ’ ACTIVITIES What is the role of TSOs when contractors are working in their area? HSE Unit - Olivier.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF Far Site Conventional Facilities (FSCF) Scope and Interface Overview Tracy Lundin as borrowed from Headley & Willhite.
UITF ODH Assessment UITF Safety Review May 10, 2016.
SBN Near Detector Building Conventional Facilities Update Steve Dixon LAr1-ND Collaboration Meeting 16 September 2014.
Flammable Liquids Directorate of Training and Education
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
WBS Experiment Infrastructure: Design Status Discussion Dixon Bogert Prepared for the MicroBooNE Collaboration Meeting 6/17/11.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
Installation of the T600 at Fermilab Fermilab, February 15,
E- source kick-off meeting e- Source RDR- Conventional Facility & Siting Overview Fred Asiri/SLAC.
WBS 1-7 System Assembly & Installation John Voirin August 10-11, 2011.
Installation of the T600 at Fermilab
IT-4189 Supply and installation of a cryogenic distribution system
protoDUNE – single-phase Instrumentation - Gas Analyzers
Proximity Cryogenics P&IDs meeting
SBN Far Detector integration model overview
David Montanari / Johan Bremer Jun 11, 2015 Rev. 1
Presentation transcript:

LArTF and MicroBooNE Installation D. Bogert, C. James

Outfitting Concerns for MicroBooNE Topics - - Cryo safety and access to pit Getting the tank installed and insulated Service crane to the pit Electrical service to detector elements set in place after the vessel is installed Racks and Cabling for detector readout Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Internal LArTF GPP Review Introduction The use of Liquid Argon as the basis of large scale neutrino detectors for future neutrino experimentation is under active investigation. A program of increasing scale liquid Argon detector development is scheduled at Fermilab, possibly leading to the use of a very large scale liquid Argon detector at a future site for long baseline neutrino research. A small detector has been installed, successfully operated, and removed in the MINOS Hall of the Fermilab NuMI beamline. The next upscale of the liquid Argon program at Fermilab is the MicroBooNE experiment, to be followed by studies of other alternative cryostat designs. It is proposed to operate these devices (serially) in a new facility to be constructed in the Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) just upstream of the existing MiniBooNE Facility, which is still active. Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Interfaces to the Experiment - TDR The experimenters participating in the MicroBooNE Experiment have had significant input to the definition of the outfitting requirements. The principle repository of the requirements has been the MicroBooNE Experiment TDR. Chapter 5 of this document contains a list of the specifications that appear in the discussion presented by Chuck Federowicz. These specifications have been discussed and reviewed at numerous Collaboration Meetings of the experiment. Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

OD-Hazard considerations Initial ODH calculations were performed early in 2010, checked and re-done recently While various enclosure options were investigated, certain safety features were assumed in all options, based on prior experience with LAr installations Containment area for spills Ventilation to remove heavier-than-air gas Safe areas to escape to (rated “no OD hazard present”, like the outside environment in some above-grade options, or over-pressured areas in buried options) ODH calculations Verified that all these are needed to minimize the ODH classification The floor area around the MicroBooNE vessel won’t be ODH-0 Heavier-then-air argon sinks; expansion from liquid to gas far exceeds the vessel::building volume ratio The nature of this detector requires pumps outside the vessel, located below the liquid level, and other cryo equipment is located nearby to minimize piping Therefore, personnel access below the cryogen level is necessary Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Safe operation in ODH area For this enclosure configuration - Provide a safe area, reachable from all levels of the enclosure, as close as possible to work areas Escape stair – over-pressured to keep argon from seeping in Transit time estimated to be 45-30 seconds, from anywhere on the pit floor to any door in the stairwells Provide a duct, from pit floor to outside, with fans which can remove argon which has leaked and stratifies near the floor. Fans are triggered by oxygen monitors on the floor Grating above the pit floor is what people walk on – covers an insulated containment volume For the worst case spilling/leak (broken pipe), the ODH analysis provides the oxygen concentration versus time. […can people reach a safe area before being overcome..] Calculations show it takes ~4 minutes to get to a minimum-steady-state level of oxygen at the pit floor, level ~ 12% O2. Falls rapidly, from 21% to below 18%, in the first 60 sec Both longer than it takes to reach the stairwell Backup generator to keep the ventilation systems in stairwells and argon removal, as well as alarms and ODH sensors All of these have failure rates too, all factored in to the final ODH calculations Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

ODH Interlocks; Access An interlock system must be developed that will prevent access if the systems necessary for maintaining ODH-1 conditions in the pit are not functioning. Building access will be into the electronics room where a wall surface is reserved for the interlock system. Air quality must be sampled and acceptable. The over-pressurization of the stairs must be operational. The high flow exhaust fans must be capable of operation. The stair doors must not remain open. The Fermilab Cryo Safety Committee and Fermilab ES&H Section will review the system. Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Geographical Features of LADTF Ground Level Platform Level Pit Level 2 stairwell exits to surface >30-ft below grade Pit level floor you walk on is a grating above a containment volume – 15” deep Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Installing MicroBooNE Below-grade structure Sufficient width for the vessel “stacked” arrangement Cryogenics lowest, then vessel, then readout; a separate room for DAQ is on the surface Vessel lowered through the roof Roof is designed in two removable sections which are easily weather-proofed after remove/replace operation Concrete beams bridge above the removable sections, sized to carry additional shielding, if subsequent data-taking indicates a need Use truck crane – Remove beams and roof sections Install vessel supports and vessel Replace roof sections – weatherproof – replace beams Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Internal LArTF GPP Review Installing Vessel Roof is removable in two sections The seam between the sections is the only part which gets “re-weather-proofed” Rectangular removable sections are large enough to accommodate MicroBooNE vessel Vessel is rotated from the long axis of the roof opening - - this is done to allow the building crane to reach the pit floor, needed for servicing of cryogenics equipment Separate fire control Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Internal LArTF GPP Review Grond-level view Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Cryogenics Installation Pre-assembled units Components on skids Liquid pumps, liquid filters, gas heat exchanger, gas condenser Sections of piping Input lines, vent manifold Connections between these made after the vessel is in place Use 3-D modeling to help determine the break points; the number of welds performed in the enclosure has a direct link to the determination of the cryogenics installation Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Racks and Cabling design Platform arrangement above vessel Need access to the detector feed-throughs, during installation and also during operations Platform is part of civil construction contract Removable in two sections – can be handled by the enclosure’s 5-ton crane Rack placement and cabling plan worked out in advance These go in place after the vessel and the pre-assembled cryogenics sections are in Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Internal LArTF GPP Review The Walkways at El 733’6” Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Internal LArTF GPP Review Platform design by civil A&E and fabricated as part of the civil construction Bi-level platform – lower level located for access to the detector feed-throughs Platform holds racks serving both the detector readout and cryogenics monitors and controls Safety relief valves are accessed from the platform, as are the vacuum pump-out ports Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011

Internal LArTF GPP Review Interfaces to the Experiment – Interface sign-off; Schedule; Engineering The cryogenics and installation WBS Managers have signed “interface documents” with the enclosure design. These documents state that they have read the enclosure description and specs in the TDR and they agree that the specifications and drawings available are consistent with the requirements of their WBS. The schedule developed for construction has been integrated into the MicroBooNE Project schedule. In particular the schedule for the delivery of the cryostat has been coordinated. The MicroBooNE Project Electrical Engineer has participated in the definition of the building electrical drawings. Internal LArTF GPP Review August 2011