Promotion and Tenure Workshop May 2005 PURPOSE CRITERIA Lou Malcomb 5/2005

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promotion & Tenure Notes 1/2011 Resources – –
Advertisements

Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure School of Medicine March 19, 2013.
1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for Administrators
Professor of Teaching Tenure Track Stream at UBC Anna M. Kindler, Vice Provost and AVP Academic May 2013.
Department of Medicine Three Year Review Workshop Job Descriptions November 21, 2012 Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three Year Review Joan Wither Co-Chair, Three.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Tenure and Promotion for Extension Faculty: Tips for the Evaluated and the Evaluators Larry Smith Executive Senior Vice Provost Utah State University Annual.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Personnel Policies Workshop Best Practices for Personnel Committees.
Faculty Affairs presents:. PPCs  Consist of 3 or 5 members  Are selected based on Program Personnel Standards (i.e. one per program or one per faculty.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Scholarship As defined in the Gold Book Primary basis for academic advancement Encompassing generation of new knowledge and/or the dissemination of knowledge.
Faculty Promotion and Tenure NYU SOM. Faculty Tracks Criteria for appointments and promotions Q&A Faculty Appointments NYU SOM.
Promotion & Tenure Workshop The Dossier. What the Committee Looks for: I nnovation I nitiative I mpact.
Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
+ PTR at UCONN: Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment of our Faculty Sally M. Reis Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor.
Making the Case for Teaching Professor Pip Pattison Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Education) 2015 Academic Promotions Applicant Information Session.
Teaching Quality Indicators Project Ian Solomonides Excellence is as low as we go or When is good, good enough?
Promotion Expectations and Preparation Dianne Delva.
OCTOBER 4, 2012 Tenure and Promotion Workshop. Today’s Agenda Execution of Mission, Vision and Goals Criteria for Tenure and Promotion FAQ’s E-Faculty.
Building the Performance Culture. Introduction: Reflections from the Dean  University Context »Transparent and defensible process. »Evidence based »Academic.
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
Meeting of Assistant Professors Discussion of Promotion and Tenure July 26, 2010.
The P&T Process Roles of the Candidate, Supervisor and P&T Committee.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
Key Points for Putting Your Packet Together. Titles for Promotion System  Assistant Extension Professional  Associate Extension Professional  Extension.
The Road to Promotion: Beyond Associate Professor.
SUNY Distinguished Librarians Constantia Constantinou -- (SUNY Maritime) Trudi Jacobson -- (SUNY Albany)
The Road to Promotion: Beyond Associate Professor.
Associate Professor to Professor Associate Professor to Professor Robert T. Burns, PhD. PE Assistant Dean & Professor University of Tennessee UTIA Promotion.
 Traditional View of Excellence Research funding- whatever the topic Number of Doctoral Degree Programs Selectivity Invention/discoveries Size International.
1 Faculty Motivation and Policies Steven R. Hall Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair of the MIT Faculty.
Information Session 13 th February & 18 th February 2015.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
POST-TENURE REVIEW: Report and Recommendations. 2 OVERVIEW Tenure Field Test Findings Recommendations This is a progress report. Implementation, assessment,
Agenda Review of Faculty Tracks Mentoring Committees Third- and Sixth-Year Reviews Tenure Statistics Pre- and Post- “Artman”
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Promotion and Tenure Open Forum for Faculty April 18, 2013 Henri Jansen Faculty Senate Promotion and Tenure Committee Becky Warner Academic Affairs.
MDC Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Coordinating Committee October/November 2010.
EPMS (Employee Performance Management System) Training FOR NON-SUPERVISORS FACILITATOR: ADRIAN WILSON NOVEMBER 17 AND 19.
Matthew L. S. Gboku DDG/Research Coordinator Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute Presentation at the SLARI Annual Retreat 26 – 28 October, 2015.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
DOM Promotions Workshop Ashita Tolwani, M.D. Chair, DOM Appointment, Promotions and Tenure Committee Professor of Medicine, Division of Nephrology November.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 8, 2014  Review Clinical Statement of Endeavors  Review Supporting Materials Peer Evaluations of.
Tenure and Promotion Workshop November 1, Workshop Logistics Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion criteria Overview of SUNY tenure and promotion.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
ACADEMIC PROMOTIONS Promotions Criteria Please note, these slides only contain a summary of the promotions information – full details can be found.
Learning for All & LTFS UWE LTFS Aims: Enhance student learning Recognise and promote excellence in learning and teaching Identify, showcase and disseminate.
Demonstrating impact as a practitioner- researcher FORCE16 | Portland, OR | Monday, April 18, 2016 Heather Coates IUPUI University Library Center for Digital.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Promotion & Tenure Program
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Elisabeth Lonergan, PhD Professor – Animal Science
Associate Professor to Professor
What you need to know now to be promoted later!
University Bylaws Committee
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track
Faculty Affairs Committee
Maximizing Your Chances for Promotion and Tenure
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Tenure and Promotion: Article 6
Training for Reviewers Fall 2018
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Promotion and Tenure Workshop May 2005 PURPOSE CRITERIA Lou Malcomb 5/2005

To that end the University provides academic freedom and economic security, which are implicit in the principle of tenure…. Role of Tenure in Academic Libraries The principle of tenure imposes reciprocal responsibilities on the University as a body politic and on the faculty member and librarian. Librarians, on their part, are obligated to maintain high standards of professional service, research and creativity, and performance in the development of library services and the communication of information and knowledge to others. (Indiana University Academic Handbook, 2001, p.63).

Principles for promotion and tenure of librarians A librarian in the academic community is responsible for the collection and dissemination of information and materials and for services in support of the teaching, research, and general learning functions of the University. A librarian is obligated to keep abreast of the latest developments in the profession and with processes and services to improve library service. Indiana University expects that a librarian will, first and foremost, excel in the position held at Indiana University. Librarians who excel will want to share their accomplishments with others through professional activities.

General criteria for tenure Tenure shall be granted to those librarians whose professional characteristics indicate they will continue to serve with distinction in their appointed roles. Criteria for the assessment of each area are found in sections F, G, and H of the Library Faculty Handbook. A candidate for tenure must excel in performance be satisfactory in the areas of professional development, research and/or creativity, and service.

Promotion to any rank is a recognition of past achievement and a sign of confidence that the individual is capable of greater responsibilities and accomplishments. General criteria for Promotion Criteria for the assessment of each area are found in sections F, G, and H of the Library Faculty Handbook.

Criteria for assessment of performance The librarian rated excellent is proficient in the performance of professional responsibilities. There is evidence that the librarian thinks critically about his or her area of responsibility. The librarian uses professional experience, knowledge of appropriate research, and creativity to solve problems, improve services, and innovate. There is evidence of demonstrated impact on identified constituencies, the libraries, the specific campus, or the university. Excellent.

Professional development, research and/or creativity Satisfactory. The librarian rated satisfactory demonstrates a definite continuing program of relevant professional development. Beyond satisfactory. The librarian who has progressed beyond satisfactory demonstrates a definite continuing program of relevant professional development, marked by some degree of continuity and connection between individual activities. Excellent. The librarian rated excellent demonstrates a definite continuing program of relevant professional development, marked by focused pursuit of professional expertise and significant scholarly contributions. The librarian must demonstrate evidence of distinguished contributions to the university, profession, or community. Quality is considered more important than mere quantity.

Criteria for assessment of service Satisfactory: demonstrates a definite continuing commitment to service that reflects favorably on the university and the libraries. Beyond satisfactory: demonstrates a definite continuing commitment to service that reflects favorably on the university and the libraries, marked by increased levels of responsibility. Excellent: demonstrates a definite continuing commitment to service that reflects favorably on the university and the libraries, marked by a high level of responsibility and significant impact. The librarian must demonstrate evidence of distinguished contributions to the university, profession, or community. Quality is considered more important than mere quantity.

Remember from earlier slide: Promotion to any rank is a recognition of past achievement and a sign of confidence that the individual is capable of greater responsibilities and accomplishments. PROMOTION v. Tenure

Promotion from Affiliate Librarian to Assistant Librarian This promotion is based primarily on evidence of excellent performance. A promising beginning of professional development, research and/or creativity and service is expected.

Promotion from Assistant Librarian to Associate Librarian Excellent performance is the primary criterion. Professional development, research and/or creativity and service are secondary criteria. The candidate must demonstrate continued improvement beyond the satisfactory level in one and be satisfactory in the other.

Promotion from Associate Librarian to Librarian Promotion is based upon achievement beyond the level required for associate librarian. The librarian must demonstrate exceptional achievements in performance. Professional development, research and/or creativity and service are secondary criteria. The librarian must demonstrate excellence in one of the two areas and be at least satisfactory in the other area. The librarian’s performance and contributions to the secondary area must be carefully documented so that the quality is unquestionable and extraordinary in relation to peers.

The balanced case In exceptional cases, a librarian may be tenured or promoted based on excellent performance and a presentation of balanced strengths across the other two areas of professional development, research and/or creativity, and service. In such cases, where neither of these two areas reaches the appropriate level of distinction when considered separately, the consideration of the two areas together show a level of distinction appropriate to the rank under review. The balanced case may be particularly suitable for librarians whose professional development, research and/or creativity and service activities are very closely intertwined. The balanced case (see UFC Circular U13-94) will not compromise current criteria for performance and may be applied only to professional development, research, and/or creativity and service. Criteria for the assessment of each area are found in section E. of the Library Faculty Handbook.

DOES your Dossier present the Evidence?