Strategic Risk Management The Power of Disruption

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cognitive Biases Sunil Gupta January 2011.
Advertisements

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES: PERCEPTION
Exam 1 Review Purpose: Identify Themes Two major sections –Defining Social Psychology and Research Methods –Social Perception.
DISCOVERING THE GLOBE Human Rights, Cultural Forms, and Global Perspectives.
Social Cognition Over the next few days we’ll focus on social cognition and self justification. Tonight: overview of concepts election-related social cognition.
Prejudice.
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education Chapter 5 Individual Perception and Decision- Making 5-1 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 11/e Global Edition.
Mind the Gap: Evaluating Internal Controls in Pharmaceutical Supply Chains across Sub-Saharan Africa AIDS 2012: July Julianna Kohler, Revathi Avasarala,
Deloitte Consulting LLP June 22-25, 2014 IIS 50 th Annual Seminar, London 2014 Big Data in Insurance International Insurance Society.
Department of Industrial Management Engineering 1.Introduction ○Usability evaluation primarily summative ○Informal intuitive evaluations by designers even.
Navy Path to Cloud Commercial Services Integration (CSI) Team November 2013 ACT-IAC Pacific: Cloud Computing Panel & Roundtable.
Occam's razor – 1 The Occam's razor principle (of William of Ockham) states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible,
WebEx Training Wednesday, January 15 th Agenda Payment Locations Payment Extension Loss of Health Coverage on 01/31 Retroactive Special.
Interpersonal Perception Module Four. Watch This Video: 3-2.
Leveraging CPQ Cloud for Channel Enablement Self Service Quoting for One and Two Tier Networks.
Pacific Cities Sustainability Initiative – Second Annual Forum Session 4: Public-Private Partnerships Case Studies Jim O’Gara, Director Deloitte Transactions.
Week 8. ~ The process by which people organize and interpret the environment ~ StimulusBehavior Perception.
Deloitte in India APLG Annual Meeting Savannah, Georgia February 14, 2011.
Social biases - 1 Forer effect (aka Barnum Effect) - the tendency for people to give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality, that supposedly.
Social Beliefs and Judgments Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Social Psychology by David G. Myers 8 th Edition Social Beliefs and Judgments.
COGNITIVE BIASES Source:
Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies
Social Cognition: Thinking About People
WebEx Training Friday, January 31 st Agenda Clarification on Employer Coverage Disenrollment/Reimbursement In-House Patients providing Documentation.
Trade Across the Americas: Bolstering Security and Efficiency Supply Chain Risk Analytics May 2015.
The Changing US Electric Sector Business Model CATEE 2013 Clean Air Through Energy Efficiency Conference San Antonio, Texas December 17, 2013.
Recent Financial Products Developments Jeff Callender Partner Deloitte Tax LLC June 25, 2008.
Are you a penguin or a polar bear ? Unit 12 Social Psychology.
Social Cognition and Perception
Brand Resilience: Managing Risk and Recovery in a High Speed World Jonathan Copulsky Deloitte Consulting LLP Chief Executives’ Roundtable Series Lubbock,
Mike Wyatt, Director State Public Sector Cyber Risk Services
Chapter 5 Social Cognition. What is Social Cognition? The processes by which information about people is processed and stored Thinking about people Humans.
PERSON PERCEPTION Forming Impressions of Others. Effects of Physical Appearance Judgments of other’s personalities are swayed by their appearance Those.
Biases in Social Cognition  Self-Serving Biases General Self-Serving Bias Spotlight Effect Self-Righteous Bias False Consensus False Uniqueness.
Social Beliefs and Judgments Chapter Three. Explaining others Attribution Theory –Dispositional vs. situational attributions –Inferring traits –Commonsense.
Perception.
any rental, lease, or lending of the program.
The Perception Process
Chapter 5 - Social Cognition What is Social Cognition? Attributions: Why Did That Happen? Heuristics: Mental Shortcuts Errors and Biases Are People Really.
Social Cognition © 2014 Wadsworth Cengage Learning Chapter 5 Can you tell who was the silver medalist by only looking at their facial expressions?
Tok Reading 10: Imagination
Decision Making Week 6. Decision-Making Would you rather work alone or in a team? Do groups make better decisions?
Managing Change in the Face of New HCM Technology Dr. Katherine Jones Vice-President, HCM Technology Research Bersin by Deloitte Deloitte Consulting LLP.
Copyright 2016 © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images.
Managing Change 15:322 Fall 2003 John Van Maanen.
Thinking & Language. Obstacles to problem solving.
MGT 321: Organizational Behavior
Perception and Learning in Organizations Chapter 3 By Alice E. Ramos and Fabian Lopez.
PERCEIVING PERSONS Chapter Four. Social Perception  The processes by which people come to understand one another.  Three sources:  Persons  Situations.
1Third Party Assurance Optimization and Control RationalizationCopyright © 2016 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Third-Party Assurance (TPA)
How Do You Plan Inventory in an Omnichannel World? Integrated Merchandising, Planning, and Supply Chain Presentation and Panel Discussion Led by Jamie.
Doing better: Some practical advice
Organizational Behavior chapter 6 perception and individual decision making By : Osama Y. Barabea Abdullah Al Bassam Tariq Al Otaibi
Myers’ PSYCHOLOGY (5th Ed)
… and you suck at making decisions
Myers’ EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY (4th Ed)
Will you R.I.S.E. to the challenge?
Thinking & Language What effects how you think?.
Modernizing compliance: Moving from value protection to value creation
Phil 101: Logic Spring 2013.
رئوس مطالب معرفی مقدمه: تعاریف تفکر نقاد
Using LinkedIn for Your Job Search
Social Psychology Talbot
Chapter 8: Decision Making
Building sustainable HIV service delivery model at a local level in Ukraine Iaremenko Oleksii USAID HIV Reform in Action Project, Deloitte consulting LLP.
Maximizing the Impact of Learning & Development
The Deloitte Industry Proficiency Program
Electronic health records Deploying knowledge at the Point of Care
Chapter 8: Decision Making
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Risk Management The Power of Disruption TASSCUBO 2014 Primary Member’s Retreat Fort Worth, Texas| November 10, 2014 Kathie Schwerdtfeger Partner Strategic Risk Services | Crisis Management Deloitte & Touche LLP

One day you’re on top of the world…

Paralysis | Denial These are the two most common ways people deal with the experience you may have had. Paralysis that comes from too many possibilities, or a sense of being overwhelmed without any kind of framework for organizing the experience. Denial has many forms, from “that’ll never happen,” to the confidence of “I know exactly what will happen.” – The confidence that says I know enough to predict the future.

“They Couldn’t Hit an Elephant at that Distance.” John Sedgwick May 9, 1864 History is littered with stories of smart, well informed leaders who didn’t act, or acted foolishly, in the face of new information.   Not every one was quite as dramatic as this one …. The Union General who while preparing to go into battle at Spotsylvania Virginia, didn’t appreciate the changing technology of rifling at precisely the wrong moment.

“This ‘telephone’ has too many shortcomings to be taken seriously as a means of communication.” William Orton President Western Union 1876 There are those who didn’t take change seriously enough: William Orton, the premier telecommunications executive of his day, who saw no future in the telephone and turned down the offer to buy the patent. He wasn’t the only one… (Ken Olson (PCs), Kodak (digital photography), Edison (phonograph), AT&T (cellular)) – they could see the technology, but they couldn’t see a world different enough to make those technologies the new normal.

Born that Way Anchoring / Anthropic bias / Attributional bias / Availability bias / Barnum effect / Base rate neglect / Behavioral confirmation / Belief perseverance / Bias blind spot / Clustering illusion / Confirmation bias / Conjunction fallacy / Contrast effect / Cultural bias/ Dilution effect / Disconfirmation bias / Egocentric bias / Endowment effect / Expectancy effect / Experimenter’s regress / False consensus effect / Framing effect / Fundamental attribution error / Gambler’s fallacy / Group-serving bias / Group attribution error / Halo effect / Hindsight bias / Hostile media effect / Hyperbolic discounting / Illusion of control / Illusion of validity / Illusory correlation / Impact bias / Infrastructure bias / In-group bias / Just-world phenomenon / Kuleshove effect / Lake Wobegon effect / Logical fallacy / Loss aversion / Media bias / Memory bias / Mere exposure effect / Misinformation effect / Negativity effect / Negative perception of the color black / Notational bias / Out-group homogeneity bias / Overconfidence bias / Pathetic fallacy / Peak-end rule / Physical attractiveness stereotype / Planning fallacy / Picture superiority effect / Positivity effect / Preference reversal / Primacy effect / Priming / Projection bias / Pseudocertainty effect / Pseudo-opinion / Publication bias Recency effect / Regression fallacy / Reporting bias / Risk-aversion / Rosy retrospection Sample bias / Selection bias / Selective perception / Self-deception / Self-serving bias / Spacing effect / Statistical bias / Status quo bias / Sunk cost effects / Tunnel vision / Trait ascription bias / Valence effect / Von Restorff effect / Wishful thinking / Worse-than-average effect / Zeigarnik effect Our own minds trick us, and they do it in what we increasingly understand to be entirely predictable ways. (cf. Dan Ariely’s “Predictably Irrational.”) This is a partial list of cognitive biases –normal and predictable ways we misperceive and make mistakes about the world around us. Here’s a few that may be at work in people you know… Availability:  the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of events with greater "availability" in memory, which can be influenced by how recent the memories are or how unusual or emotionally charged they may be. Confirmation: the tendency to search for, interpret and remember information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions Hindsight:  the tendency to see past events as being predictable at the time those events happened. Overconfidence: excessive confidence in one's own answers to questions. (inability to calibrate) Projection: People exaggerate the degree to which their future tastes will resemble their current tastes. Selective Perception:  the tendency for expectations to affect perception

A VUCA World We live in a world the US Army War College has dubbed VUCA – Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous. In business the VUCA world is the culmination of 50 years of movement from an industrial to an information economy. It’s the result of everything from automation to outsourcing, deregulations to globalization, personal computing to the internet. These changes have vastly improved productivity and connectivity, paving the way for tremendous business innovations and consumer benefits. But there’s a flip side to this progress. In the VUCA world organizations face increasing demands from customers they’ve never served with needs they’ve never had to meet, relentless pressures thanks to competitors with lower costs, and business model threats from upstarts in new sectors. Throw in macro trends like social, mobile, and cloud based technologies as the ever changing demographics of customers and employees. If this was not enough, a 24/7 feedback culture allows customers and employees to vilify organizations and damage their reputation through social media in a matter of minutes and hours. The challenge is how to anticipate, adapt, maneuver, make decisions, and change course as needed in a VUCA world.

Risk Is Not a Game The only way to respond is by changing your approach to risk. Because of the complex world in which our organizations now operate, strategic risk has earned a rightful position at the top of the executive agenda. Boards want to know that the executive team is “ON IT” and CEO’s want to be sure they’re not “MISSING IT”.

Strategic risks are that ones that threaten to disrupt the assumptions at the core of the organization’s strategy Spotted early and handled well, they can be the basis for game-changing moves that reorder the expected Spotting and responding to this special category of risks is unfamiliar territory. Not every risk is a strategic risk. Strategic risk threaten to destroy value creation. Often no historical perspective to draw from to assess potential nature and impact. Strategic risks cannot be managed in traditional ways—ERM, GRC, SOX. Strategic Risk Management | The Power of Disruption

Why is it so challenging? Unclear what to look for Signals often weak Sources may be in other industries or geographies Why is it so challenging to define, identify, and manage strategic risks? Not clear what to look for Signals may be weak until its too late Sources of SR may be in other industries or geographies No historical precedent Methods/Tools don’t reliably capture or track them; designed for other important risks No historical precedent Traditional tools and methods don’t reliably detect what’s “over the horizon” Strategic Risk Management | The Power of Disruption

What smart organizations will do Fortunately the tools to help companies thrive in a VUCA world do exist. Smart organizations will develop a system to deal with unexpected change. Accelerate pace at which they discover source of surprises. Scan continuously--search for the tipping point, disruptive change may start with small changes Confront your biases--admit your biases and step out of yourself to observe them at work; Invite your most vocal critics in. Prepare for surprises--respond with confidence, clarity, and precision—rehearse readiness Strategic Risk Management | The Power of Disruption

Putting it into practice Discover Prepare Scan Preparing for strategic risk may not yet be on your performance evaluation but as a senior executive YOUR CERTAINLY ON THE HOOK FOR IT. Discover. Scan. Confront. Prepare. Dot it with the best knowledge you can find—about the world, yourself, and your team. Get ready—doing nothing could be the deadliest strategic risk of all. Strategic Risk Management | The Power of Disruption

Discover Simulations Scenario Planning Discover Research Scan Prepare To go one step deeper: Discover: Through a combination of analytical, behavioral science and foresight tools identify the strategic risks that attack the basis for competitive advantage, challenge the logic of an organization’s strategic choices, threaten it’s competitive position, and undermine its ability to achieve or maintain exceptional performance. Strategic Risk Management | The Power of Disruption

Prepare Identify New Strategic Options Discover Strengthen Roles, Systems & Governance Scan Prepare Contingencies & Hedges Prepare: Leverage existing tools to help establish risk ownership, reporting and governance procedures. War-gaming Strategic Risk Management | The Power of Disruption

Scan Discover Monitor Define Interpret Scan Prepare Scan: Engages a combination of technological and human analyst activities to systematically identify data that provides a clear, 360-degree picture of developments in the organization’s domain. Raw data is prioritize, synthesized, and analyzed to generate insights relevant to the organization’s strategy. Strategic Risk Management | The Power of Disruption

Putting it all together-An end-to-end system A systematic response to strategic risk can help mitigate traditional organizational constraints such as poor communication, bureaucracy, busyness, group think, and reactive governance. Putting it all together in a well designed end to end system helps leading organizations better anticipate, respond, and thrive in the face of disruption.

Headline is intentionally off of the slide, as it isn’t used. First “The task is not so much to see what no one has yet seen, but to think what nobody has yet thought about that which everybody sees.” Arthur Schopenhauer Because that’s what will close the loop between what’s possible tomorrow and what we need to do today. As I said before, in the face of an amazing array of possibilities, how will any of us make choices, with conviction, about how to prepare? How can we pull out what is relevant, even critical, for our future, when technologies are changing so quickly, social trends come and go, law and regulation here and abroad can surprise us? Fortunately, there is lots of information, once you know where to look, about what could shape the future. I suggest the work that remains is not to see what no one else can see, but to think what no one else in your field is thinking about what it means and how you’ll prepare. In strategy, in innovation, and in the development of your people. We know these technologies and trends will shape the world; what it will mean, and what you can do about it, is the challenge that lies ahead. Good luck! And thank you very much.

Questions?

As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Copyright © 2014 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited