Emergency Communications

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Advertisements

Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Idaho Statewide Interoperability Executive Council.
Georgia Interoperability Network
Radio Interoperability Initiative. Problems Facing Public Safety Communications Technology  Higher Frequencies  Lower Power  Trunking  User Expectations.
National Incident Management System Overview Briefing Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Implementation.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Executive Office of Public Safety. 2 National Incident Management System.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Overview Developed by Nevada Communications Steering Committee Version 2.0 – Adopted April 6, 2006.
Objectives Overview of the Inter Tribal Emergency Response Commission (ITERC) and its programs Overview of grant opportunities and the grant process.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Louisiana SIEC 03/25/2009. WCC History State Interoperability Executive Committee - Feb / Aug 2004 State Interoperability Executive Committee -
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 4c – Planning, Training, and Exercising.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
The National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 To prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks,
1 Indiana's Statewide Interoperable Communications Plan (SCIP)
The National Incident Management System
National Incident Management System (NIMS) Jim Reardon Michigan State Police Emergency Management Division
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.
1 Public Safety Wireless Network – State of Wyoming.
Kentucky Wireless Interoperability Executive Committee Briefing October 5, 2006 Mark Rutledge, Commissioner of Technology General Norman Arflack, Justice.
NGAC Interagency Data Sharing and Collaboration Spotlight Session: Best Practices and Lessons Learned Robert F. Austin, PhD, GISP Washington, DC March.
IWCE Conference - Project 25 Compliance Assessment Program and Beyond Wednesday, March 26, 2014 – 4:15-5:30 PM Chris Essid Deputy Director DHS Office of.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
National Incident Management System 5-Year Training Plan Al Fluman, Acting Director Incident Management Systems Division (IMSD), National Integration Center.
Idaho Statewide Interoperability Executive Council.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
1 Communication Assets Survey and Mapping (CASM) Tool A Short Introduction March 2011 OEC/ICTAP Office of Emergency Communications / Interoperable Communications.
The Functional Exercise Executive Briefing Overview (This slide to be deleted prior to briefing) The briefing should be scheduled at least 2 months prior.
Wisconsin’s INTER PERABILITY Initiative Seamless Public Safety Radio Communications Interoperability Update March 3, 2011 Jennifer Lord Communications.
TICP Preparation & CASM Data Entry Projects Overview Interoperable Communications Conference September 28, 2010 DRAFT v1.0.
CTA Communications... providing innovative and sustainable solutions for the future Nevada Interoperability Training and SOP Project Downloadable Presentation.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Overview Developed by Nevada Communications Steering Committee Version 2.0 – Adopted April 6, 2006.
2010 W EST V IRGINIA GIS C ONFERENCE Wednesday, June 9, 2010.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
1 Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant Program Laura Pettus, Program Specialist Public Safety Interoperable Communications.
Vermont Communications (VCOMM) November 06, 2008.
Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant Program Public Safety Interoperable Communications Grant Program July 2007.
1 Guiding Principles for Nationwide Interoperability A Brief Overview of Recent Efforts and Progress.
New River Valley Emergency Communications Regional Authority
1 SAFECOM/Interoperability Overview Dr. David Boyd, Director Public Safety Wireless Interoperability Policy Academy.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Emergency Management Training and Education System Protection and National Preparedness National Preparedness Directorate National Training and Education.
Greater Austin-Travis County Regional Radio System
1 Dr. David Boyd Director Office for Interoperability and Compatibility Command, Control and Interoperability Division Science and Technology Directorate.
Presenter’s Name June 17, eNATOA SAFECOM and Public Safety: a post 9/11 effort for local interoperability SAFECOM Overview Ken Fellman Mayor, Arvada,
National Incident Management System (NIMS)
Georgia Statewide Communications Interoperability Plan SCIP Jay Sexton GTRI.
Statewide Radio Feasibility Study (SIRN) Presented by Tom Harris SIEC Chair Mike Ressler.
Communications Interoperability Wisconsin Moves Forward.
Welcoming Address David C. Smith, Director of Implementation Integrated Public Safety Commission Interoperable Communications Adopted by resolution of.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,
Washington Traffic Records Committee Creating & Coordinating a Shared Vision for Traffic Records 2006 Traffic Records Forum August 1, 2006.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
1 Brian Carney National RECC Coordinator Regional Emergency Communications Coordination Working Groups (RECCWG) National.
National Emergency Communications Plan Update National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meeting February 16, 2015 Ron Hewitt.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
Status Report to the President under EO EPA ACTIONS 1 Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
National Emergency Communications Plan Goal 2
Arizona Health-e Connection Leadership from Governor Napolitano
Office of Emergency Communications
Communications Interoperability
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program
Presentation transcript:

Emergency Communications Nevada Digital Government Summit Thursday, December 6 3:20 - 4:20 PM Emergency Communications Jim O’Brien, PhD Director, Clark County Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security

Emergency Communications Natural disasters in recent months have shown more than ever the critical role of technology in business continuity and in the community as a whole. Communications, interoperability, quick response, information availability and public alerts are all vital concerns. This session will provide an overview of all state and local government emergency communications systems available in the state of Nevada.

Emergency Management “Emergency” – both a noun and adjective

OVERVIEW …what we’ll cover Our Vulnerabilities and Need for Communications …the situations and people who use it The Types and Applications of Communication Systems …the old, the new, and the glue Present Status and Direction …the problems and what we’re doing

IN NEVADA …we have Vulnerabilities and Need EVERYDAY PS OPERATIONS – 95% of Communications USE OCASIONAL Natural Disasters Flash Floods Earthquakes Wildfires POTENTIAL Man-caused Incidents HazMat Incidents Large Scale Accidents, e.g. Pepcon Explosion, Galaxy Crash Terrorist Vulnerability

IN NEVADA …we need Vulnerabilities and Need All three basic classes of communications in a large emergency: OPERABILITY INTEROPERABILITY PUBLIC COMMUNICATION

IN NEVADA …we need More INTEROPERABILITY, and the training to use it. Vulnerabilities and Need IN NEVADA …we need More INTEROPERABILITY, and the training to use it.

What is Interoperability? “Interoperability is the ability of appropriate officials and personnel to effectively communicate by radio across jurisdictions and with each other, when authorized, as needed and in real time.”

Interoperability Continuum - SAFECOM Designed to help the public safety community and local, tribal, state and federal policy makers address critical elements for success as they plan and implement interoperability solutions. Dimensions include: - Governance - Standard operating procedures (SOP) - Technology - Training and exercise - Usage, or how often is it employed

IN NEVADA …we have …challenges Vulnerabilities and Need IN NEVADA …we have …challenges Differing Frequency Bands in use VHF/150MHz UHF/450MHz 700/800MHz Differing Technologies Conventional & Trunking Wide and Narrowband Analog and Digital Differing Protocols Motorola Macom P25

Vulnerabilities and Need NCSC 5 years old Chartered by Executive Order Charged to produce InterOp Plan Representative body – 21 members Represent: - Multi Disciplines - Multi Jurisdictions - Multi Levels of Government & NGOs

GOVERNANCE - ORGANIZATION CHART Governor DEM Homeland Security Commission CCOEM&HS Nevada Communications Steering Committee (NCSC) InterOp Comm Working Group User Groups, Disciplines Local, State Fed, Tribal Agencies, NGOs Jurisdictions

2002 - Communications Conference Held NCSC Established Nevada Communication Interoperability PlanNCSC Established Existing Plan Overview - BACKGROUND 2002 - Communications Conference Held NCSC Established 2003 – Legislature : Create InterOp Plan 2004 - Planning Grant, consultant Survey, Recommendations 2005 - Plan v.1 Oct05 SAFECOM Assistance 2006 – Plan v.2 Apr06

NCSC starts work, many participants provide input to SCIP v.3 Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview - BACKGROUND 2007 DHS announces all states must create a State Communication Interoperability Plan (SCIP) by 3dec07 NCSC starts work, many participants provide input to SCIP v.3 SCIP Plan v.3 approved and submitted 3Dec07 !!!

Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview NCIP Plan v.2 SCIP Plan v.3 NCIP Plan v.1 Oct05 Apr06 3Dec07

NV Radios by Proportion Washoe Clark * Note: Esmeralda, Lincoln not shown

Status and Direction Standard Operating Procedures Needed to OPERATE effectively Not in place throughout Nevada ’06 grant funds - Initial Development Must Be Accepted, Adopted, Used

SOP & Training Module – ’06 HSGP To develop SOPs for use statewide by all public safety communications users Develop common nomenclature, terms & definitions Develop training materials & syllabus Develop policies for jurisdictional adoption, and present Lead agency: LV Metro Police Dept Budget : $556,400

Engineering Module – ’06 HSGP To complete technical data collection Perform detailed engineering for interconnects & gateways Produce comprehensive interoperable frequency plan statewide Produce individual system-oriented integration plans Lead agency: Dept of Information Technology Budget: $556,400

Status and Direction Four Technology Methods in Plan: Radio Caches Gateways Interconnects Standards Convergence

Status and Direction Four Technical Methods in Plan: Radio Caches - “swap radios” approach - Simple, easy to understand method - Basic contingency/backup provision Gateways Interconnects Standards Convergence

Radio Cache Module – ’06 HSGP Procure, maintain and hold available for use statewide, a cache of portable radios Lead Agency: LV Metro Police Dept. Budget: $500,000

Status and Direction Four Technical Methods in Plan: Radio Caches Gateways - “Cross-band” connected repeater - Creates one mutual aid channel - Fixed:Distributed on mtn top sites - Mobile: setup at incident site Interconnects Standards Convergence

Short-Term Gateway (3-5 yrs)

Short-Term Gateways Short-term proposal is to link the two main components of the Nevada radio system: 700/800 MHz (Core Four) & 150 MHZ (rural) Some gateways currently exist, but need to be expanded statewide. Preliminary estimate for short-term: $2.4M Cost does not include integration of other frequency bands.

Gateways & Interconnects Module – ’06 HSGP To procure, install and implement interconnections among major radio systems and geographically distributed gateways among radio bands Lead Agency: Nevada Department of Administration Budget: $2,400,000

Status and Direction Four Technical Methods in Plan: Radio Caches Gateways Interconnects - Similar to “shared channels” -Digital links btwn trunking systems - Multi “channels” provided btwn sys - All available through one radio Standards Convergence

The Core Systems Concept

Core Systems – Short & Long-Term By connecting the major trunked systems a single “virtual” system is created. Nevada Shared Radio System (NSRS) Southern NV Area Communication Council (SNACC) Washoe County Regional Communication System (WCRCS) Las Vegas Metropolitan Police (LVMPD) [ability to connect addition core systems]

Status and Direction Four Technical Methods in Plan: Radio Caches Gateways Interconnects Standards Convergence – P25 and IP - Migration to one open standard - Different mfr radios work together - Long term gradual change-out and upgrade at normal replacement times

Long-Term Convergence (10-15 yrs)

Status and Direction Radio Caches Gateways Interconnects Standards Convergence Technology Status - Detailed Engineering work funded w/ ’06 - Engineering Consultant – CTA – 11Sep07

Status and Direction TRAINING & EXERCISE Training and Exercises ID’d in SCIP Training Plan, Materials Development funded w/ ’06 HSGP grant Delivery of Statewide Training and Exercise program part of PSIC grant PSIC T&E request : $1.1M over 3yrs

Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant Status and Direction Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant ‘One-Shot’, one-time Grant for developing Interoperable Communications Nevada allocated $12.1M (total nationwide $964M) Three year performance period Application just submitted 3Dec07 for DHS/NTIA Approval

Status and Direction Grant Summary for Interoperable Communications HSGP FFY06 - $6.1M thru Jun09 HSGP FFY07 - $3.0M thru Jun10 PSIC one-shot - $12.1M thru Sep10

Thank you Questions? “Patience and perseverance have a magical effect before which difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish.” John Quincy Adams

Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview Mark Blomstrom – Blomstrom Consulting, Inc. Las Vegas Urban Area Program Manager

Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview This Overview: Brief Background and Process Existing Plan Contents – “NCIP” v.2 Q&A Later: New Draft Plan – “SCIP” v.3 Opportunity for Input to v.3

Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview Why is this important ? Strategy NCIP/SCIP PLAN Investment ‘06 ‘07 PSIC ‘08

Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview Definitions: NCIP : “Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan” – v.1, v.2 SCIP : “State Communication Interoperability Plan” – v.3 TIC Plan : “Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan”

The Beginning 2 years in the making by the Nevada Communications Steering Committee (NCSC). NCSC stakeholders representing northern & southern NV, rural & urban, & state, county and local governments. Prompted by AB441 legislation. Developed with assistance from the SAFECOM office of the Department of Homeland Security. A living document revised as conditions change.

Who are Public Safety Agencies? Fire Services Law Enforcement Emergency Management Government Administrative Services Emergency Medical Services Public Health Health Care HazMat Private Industry Volunteer Organizations Public Safety Communication Public Works

Statement of Principles NCSC encourages & maintains a governance structure emphasizing transparency, accountability and collaboration. NCSC encourages comprehensive focus on key success factors – governance, SOPs, technology, training and exercises. NCSC reviews research on best practices/ lessons learned. NCSC not to be controlled by the State – must remain representative of entire NV public safety community.

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview - CONTENTS Governance Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Technology Training and Exercise

Tech Standard for P25 To move towards long-term convergence, a technical protocol/standard must be adopted. P25 is an open system, developed nationally for over 15 years. P25 establishes a common protocol, allowing radios from different vendors to effectively communicate. P25 does not address radios operating in different frequency bands or issues such as standard operating procedures.

P25 Recommendations Long–range plan includes long-term convergence of all radios within the state to digital, open standards technology, implementing current version of P25. A phase-in timetable will be used. Exemptions considered upon written notice showing good cause and approved by NV Homeland Security Commission.

Assumptions “Capable” is defined as the ability to be quickly upgraded via the loading of a software program to actual P25 Common Air Interface operation. “Capable” in this context does not mean the equipment must actually operating in P25 mode when purchased, rather that it be “capable” of simple upgrade to such operational mode at a future time. In every case where purchase of P25 capability is mandated, the equipment is for capability to accommodate the most recently approved version of the P25 standard.

Long-Term Convergence The plan emphasizes convergence over time. Upgrading when equipment otherwise needs replacement on maintenance schedules, not a wholesale change out. Preserving the public’s existing investments in communications technology. Require new purchases comply with Plan. Allow existing equipment serve out its useful life.

TIMETABLE continued Effective July 1, 2009 Effective July 1, 2011 All radio equipment purchased for use in systems operating below 512 MHz shall be P25 capable. Mobile radios and portable radios purchased for use in existing radio systems operating above 512MHz shall be P25 capable. Core Four systems and any system directly connected shall be P25 capable. Effective July 1, 2011 All radio systems and equipment in the State, regardless of operating frequency or the system it is purchased for, shall be P25 capable. Effective July 1, 2013 All radio systems and equipment in the state shall be operating in P25 mode for normal, operational voice communications. Multi-mode operating, for interfacing with out-state systems, may be retained and used as needed.

TIMETABLE Effective October 1, 2005 (FED YR 2006) All radio equipment (end user, consoles and backbone) purchased using grant dollars shall be P25 Common Air Interface capable. The Core Four systems are exempt from mandatory compliance until July 1, 2009. Radio systems that do not use or apply for grant funding are exempt until July 1, 2007. Other exemptions granted by the Commission on a case-by-case basis. Effective July 1, 2007 All mobile & portable (end user) radio equipment purchased shall be P25 capable. All radio equipment (consoles & backbone) purchased shall be P25 capable.

Grant Funding Initiatives Nevada Working Group established for DHS Homeland Security Enhancement Plan and Grant Funding request Nevada Enhancement Plan is created, identifying 11 Initiatives Each Initiative results in an Investment Justification (grant app) for FFY06 Interoperability Communications ranked as #1 priority among the 11 Investment Justifications

Comm Interop - Program Concept Overview

Grants (continued) Nevada Awarded almost $20M in May 2006 Interoperable Communications justification receives $6.1M Funds became available in August 2006

Grants (continued) Communications Interoperability project consists of six modules: Engineering Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) & Training Microwave Engineering Gateways & Interconnects Radio Cache SNACC Simulcast

Microwave Engineering Module Complete detailed technical plans & engineering for expansion of multiple-user microwave systems within Clark County Lead Agency: Clark County Dept of Information Technology Budget: $180,200

SNACC Simulcast Engineer and implement a simulcast radio system for use with 16 or more designated interoperable talk groups (channels) within the Clark County Urban area Lead Agency: SNACC Grant budget: $1,700,000 Grant funding to be matched by SNACC funds

Progress To Date Project manager hired Project Team developed: - Lead Admin Agencies - Project Coordinators Engineering – Mark Blomstrom SOP & Training – Dennis Cobb Gateways – Dave McTeer Radio Cache – Brett Primas Microwave Engrg – Kathi Lowry SNACC Simlcast – Jim Wilson

Progress To Date (continued) Project Plan and Scope documentation completed Project Communication and Summary Status Report documentation completed Section 0 RCIP Project 0.1 Project Scope and Limitations 0.1.1 Project Scope and Objective Statement The overall objective of this project is to significantly advance the state of communications interoperability throughout Nevada to realize a commonly-understood and consistently-available level of basic interoperability, with additional capability available to be applied where and when needed. “The purpose of this [grant-funded project] is a well coordinated and pre-planned response to this problem [of communications interoperability]. In accordance with our established Plan, and using our developed Governance, we expect to complete detailed engineering and develop Standard Operating Procedures for interoperability. With the engineering, we expect to deploy emergency radio cache, build gateways between bands, and interconnect four major systems to create a “system of systems”. We expect to put policies in place throughout Nevada adopting the SOPs and use of this equipment to create a minimum common level of interoperability. Finally, we expect to create training materials for long term training on the above. Implementing these module steps using [grant] funds will result in the single largest and most effective advancement of interoperable communications possible throughout Nevada.” Extract from grant application for Nevada: “FFY06 DHS Investment Justification: Interoperable Communications”; part I.A. Project Objectives This describes the high-level project objectives. Obj. IDMajor Project Objectives1.0Complete the Engineering Module. (See section 1 in this document.)2.0Complete the SOP and Training Material Development Module. (See section 2 in this document.)3.0Complete the Gateways and Platform Interconnects Module (See section 3 in this document.)4.0Complete the Radio Cache Module. (See section 4 in this document.)5.0Complete the Microwave Engineering Module. (See section 5 in this document.)6.0Complete the SNACC Simulcast Module. (See section 6 in this document) Major Requirements Addressed Specific user requirements, functional requirements, needs and weaknesses previously identified are tied to the major objectives. These are keyed to sections of this document as numbered in the Table of Contents, and to the major objectives as defined in Section 0.1.2. References are to documents identified in C.3 References and Associated Documents. Req. IDRequirement, Need or Weakness Addressed1.1Addresses NCIP Action Items: T1, T3, T4, and T6.

Progress To Date (continued) Requirements definition for Engineering Module completed RFP process to procure engineering services for Engineering module proceeding SNACC Simulcast module approved as project and contract amendment by SNACC. Contract amendment executed. Microwave Engineering module underway with Clark County

Progress To Date (continued) Request made and commitment received from federal Dept of Justice – Wireless Management Office “Integrated Wireless Network” for technical review of pending engineering work involving federal communication interfaces

Progress To Date (continued) Request made of the federal Dept of Homeland Security – Interoperable Communications Technical Assistance Program (ICTAP) ….for technical assistance with - authority to use CASM system - development of state TIC plan - engineering review of work Request is still pending 12/06 (favorable)

Progress To Date (continued)

Communication Assets Survey and Mapping (CASM) Tool What is CASM? A web-based tool that assists public safety agencies to collect and visualize data on voice Land Mobile Radio (LMR) equipment and interoperability methods in a State or Urban Area. Map-based display interface that enables users to visualize their data and drill-down into more detail through hyper-linked text windows. Identifies interoperability gaps with its inter-agency interoperability analysis. Produces the Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan (TICP) Section 3 and Appendices B-E. Usage (as of November 2006) Currently 57 Urban Areas and States setup 45 UAs with data entered 12 with name, map, and geo-location info Averaging 700 logins and 9,000 entries per month More than 720 CASM user accounts

Resource Status – as of 12/31/06 Beginning balance $6.075M Exp/Encumbered $0.823M ______________ Remaining balance $5.252M Neither funding surplus nor deficiency is anticipated at this time

Proposed Modifications to Investments No modification to FFY06 Investment is proposed at this time Request for FFY07 will focus on Training Exercise and Microwave Request for FFY08 will focus on Equipment

Near Term and Delaying Factors Engineering module will not be done within FFY07 grant app timeframe Development of TIC plan may provide additional ‘course correction’ Senator Mark Amodei BDR

Ongoing Info: Progress reports given at monthly meetings of NCSC Next Meeting: March 6, 2007 Website: www.NCSC.nv.gov

Nevada Commission on Homeland Security established Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview - BACKGROUND 2003 Nevada Commission on Homeland Security established Legislature : Create InterOp Plan NCSC cogitating, gathering input ……

NCSC Applies for Planning Grant Consultant starts, work, survey Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview - BACKGROUND 2004 NCSC Applies for Planning Grant Consultant starts, work, survey NCSC continues cogitating, gathering input ……

Consultant provides recommendations SAFECOM requested to assist Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview - BACKGROUND 2005 Consultant provides recommendations SAFECOM requested to assist Plan v.1 Drafted, Approved Oct05 SAFECOM starts user focus process

SAFECOM completes user focus process Nevada Communication Interoperability Plan Existing Plan Overview - BACKGROUND 2006 SAFECOM completes user focus process Plan v.2 Drafted, with SAFECOM input v.2 Approved Apr06