1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz. Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools 2012-2013 2 26 schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Brandywine School District Race to the Top Scope of Work Overview Presentation.
Lesson Study Races to the Top in Florida A Report on Lesson Study Initiatives In The Sunshine State Collaborate Plan Align Learn Motivate Share.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
©2004 NCEE Archived Information America’s Choice High School Design Bob Mackin, Director America’s Choice High Schools National Center on Education and.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Wethersfield Board of Education December 10, 2013.
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
TITLE? Governor Bob Taft The Ohio Core : Preparing Students for Success in Work, College and Life SHEEO Conference August 15, 2006 Susan Bodary Jon Tafel.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Administrators Kick Off 2014 The Science of Implementation Practice: SIG Transformation/Reform Model Implementation Name: Tom Hiltz/Monica Cesarello School:
Ware County High School Goal 1, Objectives 2 and 4 Dr. Tim Dixon, Principal Mrs. Susan Zeigler, Graduation Coach Instructional Coaches: Mrs. Cindy Hitt,
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
1 Duval County Public Schools Summer Learning. Turnaround in Action District tiered model of clustering schools for lower performing schools; Additional.
Power Point Introduction The new Oregon Diploma raises the rigor of educational requirements in order to ensure that students graduate with the skills.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Angilee M. Downing, M.Ed. Vision: Educational Excellence For All Students.
Carlas McCauley Educational Program Specialist U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
Title I Annual Meeting State of School Address
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
M-DCPS Framework of Effective Instruction Part I: Dr. David K. Moore.
20 What is our plan? Bold, comprehensive, approach to transformation – focused on students and student achievement High achieving, engaged students Effective.
Persistently Low Achieving Schools Update September 14, 2010 Board of Education Jane A. Russo, Superintendent Dawn Miller, Assistant Superintendent, Secondary.
Closing the Achievement Gap : The Capacity Building Model ….. Strategies for continuous and sustainable improvement Presented By: Jason Murphy, Asst. Principal,
College Access Summit REGIONAL STRATEGY SESSION ON ACCESS TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS Race to the Top Update.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2015.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
Comprehensive K-12 Mathematics Improvement Plan Update May 9, 2013.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Archived Information California’s High Performing High Schools Initiative Improving High Schools.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Internship Administrative and Leadership Studies Rae Lin Howard Spring 2009.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council Moving the STEM Agenda Forward CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ONLY STEM Advisory.
Goshen Community Schools Elementary Schools’ PL-221 Improvement Plans.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Comprehensive Planning
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
World’s Best Workforce Update:
Presentation transcript:

1 Marie Izquierdo & Pablo G. Ortiz

Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office All Other Designations Non-SIG Schools within ETO assigned to ETO Office SIG Schools 40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools; supported by the Education Transformation Office “A”, “B”, and “C” schools that have demonstrated consistent improvement; supported generally by the district through region offices

Evolution of: The Education Transformation Office  19 schools selected as “persistently lowest-achieving” 6 elementary schools; 3 middle schools; 10 high schools. 14 million dollars for each of the next three years through School Improvement Grant (SIG)  Expanded to 26 schools in year two. Added 3 elementary and 4 middle schools. Additional 6 million dollars  Expanded to 66 schools in year three. Added 27 elementary, 11 middle and 2 senior high schools for a total of 36 elementary, 18 middle and 12 senior high schools. 3

Aligned and Structured Support Education Transformation Office SIG Schools Persistently Low- Achieving schools receive additional funding from School Improvement Grant 10 high schools 7 middle schools 9 elementary schools Non-SIG Schools 40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools receive additional funding through District Title I 2 high schools 11 middle schools 27 elementary schools 4

Criteria for Placement in ETO  SIG Schools  26 schools  Schools identified by the state as being in the “Lowest 100 Performing Elementary Schools”  10 Schools  Schools that received a “D” or “F” grade in 2012  28 Schools  Schools that received a “C” grade in 2012 but would have received a “D” if not held harmless by the state  4 Schools  Fragile “C” Schools that earned a “D” in at least one of the three previous years  18 Schools  Vulnerable schools that would have dropped 2 letter grades but were held harmless for  7 Schools 5

6 Develop Instructional Leaders Improve Teacher Quality Strengthen Parent & Community Involvement Expand Wraparound Services for Students 4 Pillars of Support

7 Recruit/Retain High Performing Educators Recruitment Fairs Teach for America University Partnerships Mathematics, Reading, and Science Instructional Coaches Each school will be allocated at least: 1 reading coach 1 math coach 1 science coach Job-Embedded Professional Development with Problem- Solving Focus Common Planning Lesson Study iCADS Aligned Support Coaching Academy Teacher Academy Innovative Instructional Resources and Strategies Differentiated Instruction Gradual Release Instructional Frameworks

8 Assign administrators to departments and grade levels Include assistant principals in all instructional coaches’ training to build instructional capacity and ensure alignment and iCADs Implement internship process for future principals and assistant principals through Project Lead Strong and Florida Turnaround Leadership Program Conduct instructional rounds with principals and focus on best practices and instructional rigor Create network of APs and Principals

9 Creation of four parent advocacy centers Focus on Parent Academy classes Expansion of PTA enrollment Expand days/times for parent- teacher conferences ETO Task Force Visibility Executive PASS: CEO and Principal Partnership Strengthen Parent & Community Involvement

Positive Behavior Support (PBS) Positive Reinforcement Appropriate Social Behaviors Improve School Climate and Student Behavior Academic Interventions City Year Saturday Academy Spring Break Academy Before/After- School Tutoring Enrichment Opportunities Dual-Enrollment Advanced Academics CTE IB Programs College Summit Mentoring and Outreach Programs City Year Big Brothers/Big Sisters Diplomas Now Communities in Schools 10

Prioritizing Tiered Support to Schools schools defined as “persistently low- achieving” by the requirements of the School Improvement Grant; supported by the Education Transformation Office All Other Designations Non-SIG Schools within ETO assigned to ETO Office SIG Schools 40 schools that have historically been vulnerable schools; supported by the Education Transformation Office “A”, “B”, and “C” schools that have demonstrated consistent improvement; supported generally by the district through region offices Develop district pacing guides to ensure instructional coherence and consistency across schools Provide ongoing communication and support to core content area department heads Provide information and support to region superintendents and their schools as new End of Course exams come on-line (i.e. Civics, U.S. History) Use Florida Continuous Improvement Model process to review data and identify Target and Focus schools Provide additional support to ETO schools as needed Serve as lead on the transition to full Common Core State Standards (CCSS) implementation

12