Communities In Motion Blueprint for Good Growth Preferred Growth Scenarios March – April 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to CHA/CHIP Work Groups August 17, 2012 Meredith Bossin Planning & Development Review.
Advertisements

Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:
Urban Sprawl. What is Sprawl? Sprawl is dispersed, auto- dependent development outside of compact urban and village centers, along highways, and in rural.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Multi-Family Development Trends in Delaware David L. Edgell, AICP Principal Planner.
Tampa Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Affordable Housing Policies.
Burnet County Comprehensive Plan. What Is the Comprehensive Plan? This is a county strategic plan that will focus on the areas where the county government.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Wallace Roberts & Todd, LLC Destination Erie: A Regional Vision Work Group Meeting.
August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Public Workshops July 12, 2011 | Napa July 14, 2011 | St. Helena WELCOME!
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
Climate Change Council November 2011 draft ACT Planning Strategy.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Beyond the Environment: Socio- Economic Sustainability & Meaningful Community Input in Land Use Decisions Sarah Muller March 7 th, 2008.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.
Blackstone Valley Prioritization Project Blackstone River-Users Conference September 18, 2012.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Alfred’s 2015 Comprehensive Plan update: shaping our future environment Justin Grigg: Mayor, Village of Alfred Kier Dirlam: Director of Planning, Allegany.
1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.
Central California Planning Commissioners’ Workshop May 13, 2011 Barbara Steck, AICP, Deputy Director Fresno Council of Governments 2035 Tulare Street,
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
Urban Sprawl.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Planning and Sustainability Paul Farmer American Planning Association M6: Protecting the Urban Environment and Historical and Cultural Heritage.
System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.
City of Suwanee 2030 comprehensive plan. TODAY’S AGENDA Process Update Community Agenda Framework “Compass” Review  Images and Questions  Comp Plan.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public Hearing May 19, 2009 Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Highlights  Describe Our Missoula Growth Policy Project  Relationship to Rattlesnake Neighborhood Plan  Next Steps.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
HALA & S EATTLE 2035 P RESENTATION TO THE M APLE L EAF C OMMUNITY C OUNCIL Geri Morris & Amy Gore Office of Rob Johnson Seattle City Council District 4.
Urban Sprawl. Read Read the excerpt from the National Geographic magazine article about urban sprawl. National Geographic magazine article about urban.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
City of Rexburg 2020 Comprehensive Plan.
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Land Use 101: The Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Communities In Motion Blueprint for Good Growth Preferred Growth Scenarios March – April 2005

We Are Here Today to: Provide you with information about CIM/BGG and why these projects are important Present two preferred growth scenarios Hear your opinions about the two preferred growth scenarios

WHY? Growth in the six county region! Regional Population 502,000  923,000 Employment 258,500  451,000 Equals two more Boise Cities or three new Canyon Counties

Anticipated Growth Means Increased traffic Increased demands for utilities and services leading to: –Major deficiencies –Fiscal impacts Increased need for new schools and other public facilities Increased land use conflicts

Potential Growth Problems Decline in existing built-up areas Degradation of the environment Drain on energy resources Strain on fiscal resources Deficiencies in public facilities Overburden of transportation facilities Loss of hillside and habitat areas

Communities In Motion Communities in Motion is a six-county, 25-year plan that will address issues on the major transportation system, evaluate the needs for future corridors serving regional needs and address the effects of growth on transportation needs. The counties involved are Ada, Boise, Canyon, Elmore, Gem and Payette.

Blueprint For Good Growth Blueprint for Good Growth will coordinate comprehensive plans and land use ordinances within Ada County, and propose local strategies to achieve shared growth goals.

CIM and Blueprint Both Communities in Motion and the Blueprint for Good Growth are coordinated to ensure consistency between the resulting projects.

CIM/BGG Process 1.Develop a preferred growth scenario using public input (CIM/BGG) 2.Develop tools to guide selection of the preferred growth scenario (BGG) 3.Identify transportation needs to support the preferred growth scenario (CIM) 4.Develop Long-Range Transportation Plan (CIM)

Importance of Planning Guide growth so it benefits our region. Agree to a preferred growth scenario to develop a meaningful 25-year long-range transportation plan. Develop a toolbox of regulations and other strategies to help Ada County and its cities achieve the preferred scenario.

Importance of Scenarios Compare various ways growth can occur Understand differences between our choices while focusing on a common goal Manage land uses that support an efficient transportation system Develop a transportation system that matches a good land use pattern

Scenario Development Fall 2004 –Developed initial scenarios Nov –Public workshops developed three more scenarios Feb –Public workshops focused on transportation systems March 2005 – Scenarios presented to the COMPASS Board Ongoing - Further refine scenarios by combining favorable features

General Guiding Principles Every community should plan for growth and share in the benefits and costs Facilitate growth in cities and areas of impact that efficiently uses public infrastructure Promote economic vitality and housing choices for all residents, while retaining our natural beauty

General Guiding Principles Support a successful central city to maintain our regional economic health and vitality Coordinate transportation and land use decisions to support travel choices

Prime Farmland Open Water Floodplains Hillsides Birds of Prey Preservation Priorities from November Workshops

Two Preferred Scenarios The COMPASS Board narrowed the six scenarios to two preferred scenarios: –Mixed-Use Corridors –Blended (Satellite Cities)

Mixed-Use Corridors Map

Blended Map

Attributes of Both Scenarios: Promote quality of development patterns by having: –Less land consumption than trend –Greatest potential for preservation of open space –Jobs and services closer to neighborhoods

Attributes of Both Scenarios: Provide greater housing choices, including: –Single-family homes –Condominiums –Affordable housing opportunities –Small-lot homes –Duplexes, town homes and apartments

Attributes of Both Scenarios: Promote quality of transportation patterns by having the: –Least congestion –Less travel delay –Shorter trips to and from work, shopping, entertainment and parks

Attributes of Both Scenarios: Promote quality of transportation options by offering: –More opportunities for transit –More opportunities for walking and cycling –Better coordination between land use and the transportation system

Mixed-Use CorridorsBlended Less consumption of new land Greater consumption of new land Regional housing split of 50% single family homes, 50% multi-family homes Regional housing mix of 65 % single-family homes and 35 % multi-family homes Scenario Comparisons

Mixed-Use CorridorsBlended Land uses support transit and other travel choices Less potential for transit Most intensive development occurs along major transportation corridors Less intensive development along major transportation corridors Scenario Comparisons

Mixed-Use CorridorsBlended High proportion of multi-family and other types of attached residences Relatively high proportion of large lot residential development in areas of impact Highest redevelopment in existing urbanized areas Additional growth in existing small communities Scenario Comparisons

Implementation Implementing a preferred growth scenario will ask communities to: –Develop and enforce regulations, inter-agency agreements and other growth tools –Fund capital improvements (e.g. transit, trails and other facilities) –Recognize market forces play a role guiding development

Implementation Implementing a preferred growth scenario will also ask communities to support: –Public improvements and services –Ongoing implementation and enforcement of policies BGG will assist Ada County communities to develop unique community guidelines based on common regulations and land- use policies

What’s Next Public Open Houses: – Tuesday, March 29, 4 to 8 p.m. Boise First Community Center on Eagle Road – Wednesday, March 30, Noon to 8 p.m. Hispanic Cultural Center of Idaho in Nampa – Thursday, March 31, 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. Idaho Historical Museum in Boise (Julia Davis Park)

What’s Next May 2005 — COMPASS Board selects preferred growth scenario May - July 2005 — Develop corresponding transportation scenarios Aug. - Nov — Develop Communities in Motion transportation plan and distributed for public review May – Dec — Develop local plan and code revisions by Blueprint for Good Growth

Thank you for your time and interest in Communities in Motion and Blueprint for Good Growth Please help us by taking a minute to complete our comment sheet For more information: Closing