ACB Module Assessment and Integration FCC and IC Michael Derby ACB Europe7 April 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD RF Exposure and Modular Equipment Considerations.
Advertisements

ITU-T Technical Session on EMF
How To Review a TCB Application
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD William H. Graff, American TCB Updates for Test Reporting.
Pieter Robben ACB MIC MRA Workshop 2014 update. MIC MRA Workshop 2014 The workshop took place on February 2014 Approximately 150 attendees A broad.
Presented by Glenn Tate IAPMO R&T Oceana Pty. Ltd.1.
5/9/2015TCB Council1 TCB Sharing of FCC KDBs Michael Derby TCB Council Chairman 9 th April 2014.
American Certification Body - Your Online Resource for Regulatory Training 1588 ENERGYSTAR®
5/10/2015TCB Council1 Navigating the FCC Online Resrouces Presented by: Chris Harvey Tim Dwyer Anne Liang.
TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Overview Presented by Mark Jenkins and Vina Kerai.
Slide 0 National Spectrum Managers Association Unlicensed Devices – An Update Mitchell Lazarus May 22, |
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD How to Create a Part 15C Report.
Unbounded media have network signals that are not bound by any type of fiber or cable; hence, they are also called wireless technologies Wireless LAN.
T24 Wireless Telemetry Advanced Intelligent Instrumentation.
How ISO Standards Relates to Usability:. INTRODUCTION/ Before we can relate the ISO standards to usability, first we need to know what the meaning of.
HARMONY XB5R SENSING RANGE & ROBUSTNESS. Schneider Electric 2 - Control – L.Bernier – August 2011 Typical distance transmitter / receiver 100m in free.
1 ® Intel Labs ® Slide No. *Third party brands and names are the property of their respective owners Module Approval Explained 04/18/02 Jeffrey Schiffer.
The Project AH Computing. Functional Requirements  What the product must do!  Examples attractive welcome screen all options available as clickable.
JENN SHAFNER BRIAN KROUSE CLINT KEHRES. Pre ISO 9000  The BS 5750 standard required factories to document manufacturing procedures.  BS 5750 was known.
Certification & Engineering Bureau CB notification Inquiries & Issues Nicolas DesMarais Certification Officer Agent d’Homologation TCB Workshop – February.
Tm Aug LXI Consortium – Conformance WG Page 1 CONFORMANCE WORKING GROUP Jochen Wolle August 25, 2005.
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
1 Preparing a System Security Plan. 2 Overview Define a Security Plan Pitfalls to avoid Required Documents Contents of the SSP The profile Certification.
Technician License Course Chapter 9 Lesson Module 21 Radio Frequency Exposure.
FCC Equipment Certification / Verification / Declaration of Conformity: What They Are & What Needs Work National Spectrum Management Association Mitchell.
Washington Laboratories (301) web: Lindbergh Dr. Gaithersburg, MD Desert William H. Graff President and Director of Engineering,
Doc.: IEEE /1119r0 Submission November 2005 Alistair Buttar, MotorolaSlide 1 Support for Emergency Calls Notice: This document has been prepared.
The University of Bolton School of Business & Creative Technologies Wireless Networks Introduction 1.
Doc.: IEEE COEX-02/011r0 Submission March 2002 Jim Lansford, Mobilian CorporationSlide 1 Simultaneous Transmission: Some comments from FCC Jim Lansford.
Doc.: IEEE j Submission May 2011 Dave Evans, PhilipsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Radiation Safety Plan Recommended by OSHA Elements of Plan  Site Specific Issues  Personnel Training  Safety Procedures  Definition of Controlled and.
They are not the same Dennis Ward ATCB. The FCC has a requirement that Applications for certification through the TCB program must contain test reports.
A new challenge – creating a regulatory environment for implementing geo-location databases for White Space Devices (WSD) Andy Gowans Date (26 th January.
Doc.: IEEE /0099r0 Submission Sept Slide 1 Geo-location Database Issues of CEPT Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been.
Company Confidential 1 © 2005 Nokia Thermal_Requirements_Guideline_v10.ppt / / OS Thermal Requirements and Uses Cases for SPR Guideline to SPR.
Doc.: IEEE /0014r0 & /0425r0 Submission March 2007 Rich Kennedy, OakTree WirelessSlide 1 RR-TAG Liaison Report Mar07 IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /0056r0 Submission July 2007 Peter Murray, MotorolaSlide 1 Japan MIC Study Group Radio Utilization Fee Proposal Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /1171r0 SubmissionRich Kennedy, MediaTek Summary of FCC Administrative Changes Proposed in NPRM FCC Date: Authors:
Air Products Solutions for EN th of November 2014 Air Products Internal Use Only Name of speaker.
Forced firmware lockdown? Christian
Doc.: IEEE /0192r0 Submission September 2006 Edgar Reihl, Shure IncorporatedSlide 1 Shure Comments to TG1 IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Committed to Connecting the World March 2011 Geneva, March 2011 Presentation of the Recommendation ITU-T K 100: Presentation of the Recommendation.
Doc.: IEEE /0132r1 Submission March 2006 Dr. Michael D. Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 1 Traceable OTA Performance Testing Presentation Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE /084r0 Submission March 2000 David Skellern, RadiataSlide 1 Comments by P WLAN WG on P WPAN High Rate Study Group PAR 7.
17/03/2016 Summary of FCC’s RF Exposure Proceeding Presented By: Bill Belt, TIA 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:TIA TITLE:Summary of FCC’s RF Exposure Proceeding.
August, 2012 MBANS FCC Rules Summary Information document for SRD/MG on the FCC adopted MBAN rules under part 95 MedRadio service on 24 May 2012.
Standards and Regulations Team Daedalus. Standards and Regulations 1.FCC – Part 15 2.Advanced Encryption Standard Description Prescriptions and Standards.
ACB ISED Canada Radio Certification
World Health Organization
Reveal™ Touch Screen Product Overview
FCC Regulations for Spread Spectrum Devices
Wireless Fidelity 1 1.
Test Requirements and Procedures
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Waveform Generator Update– September ‘06
SL026/17 – Product Acceptance
GSM Base Station Antennas
Tutorial Introduction Section
CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT REDCapCloud What it can do for you.
Integrating Bluetooth Technology into Mobile Products
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications
SENSING RANGE & ROBUSTNESS
TGT Definitions Ad Hoc Report
Requirements for TGT Proposals
Tutorial Introduction Section
What is a CA document? Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
RR-TAG Liaison Report Mar07 IEEE
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications
Waveform Generator Update– September ‘06
Location Presentation
Presentation transcript:

ACB Module Assessment and Integration FCC and IC Michael Derby ACB Europe7 April

Introduction Modules Why do we always discuss modules? Modular Approvals (assessing the module) Including Limited Modular Approvals Using approved modules (Integrating modules) USA and Canada This presentation is of the basic fundamentals I will not cover RF Exposure in detail But I will mention it 2

Why modules? A change in Industry Radio boffins, no more It’s a wireless world Buy a pre-approved module Integrate modules into hosts Entrepreneurs and marketing people Laptops with WWAN, WLAN and Bluetooth A challenge for our industry 3

Modular Approval Types Some examples: A radio module to be approved for use in any host and sold to anyone The transmitter module is fully assessed to all the requirements The module is intended for any environment Within the scope of the certification parameters In certification terms, this is known as: Full or Single Modular Approval 4

Modular Approval Types A radio module to be approved for use in a specific host or environment and used under control of the module manufacturer The transmitter module is assessed to specific, applicable requirements The module is intended for a use or an installation in specific environment(s) In certification terms, this is known as: Limited Modular Approval 5

Modular Approval Types A series of similar devices require certification and they share a common radio module or radio circuitry The transmitter module is assessed to applicable requirements, for use with hosts The module is intended for those specific hosts and environments In certification terms, this is known as: Limited Modular Approval 6

FCC Modular Approval Modular Approval The Module will have the FCC ID The module must be labelled with the FCC ID Any host incorporating the module will show that the module is contained within it Contains FCC ID: XXXYYYYY FCC ID will relate to module, not host Modular Approval is defined in Part Part 15 C, which is unlicensed intentional radiators Licensed devices do also get certified as modules 7

FCC Modular Approval Technical, administrative, testing and certification requirements for Modular Approval A set of criteria exist for getting full Modular Approval certification and allowing the module to be used in any host If you do not meet all criteria, then you cannot achieve full Modular Approval Modular Approval criteria shown on the next page: 8

FCC Modular Approval Eight criteria for Modular Approval (15.212) 1.Transmitter must have its own shield 2.Must have buffered modulation/data inputs 3.Must have power supply regulation 4.Must meet Part 15 antenna requirements 5.Must be tested in stand-alone configuration 6.Must be labelled with the FCC ID 7.Must meet its own FCC rule part 8.Must meet RF Exposure requirements 9

FCC Modular Approval Eight criteria for Modular Approval (15.212) During the certification application, provide a cover letter to explain compliance with all eight requirements in You cannot exclude one of the eight and hope it’s ok “But we pass the tests, even without a shield!” “But it only operates when it’s inside the host!” It’s a clear certification process Or, it is Limited Modular Approval 10

FCC Integrating Modules Using a compliant module Rely on certification of the module for compliance The host must state that it contains the module and the host must show the module’s FCC ID You do not get certification of the host, based on the certification of the module You must follow the module’s Grant limitations Distance and co-location for RF Exposure Host must still comply with its own requirements For example, Part 15B, Verification or DoC And 15.5 ! 11

FCC Integrating Modules Using a compliant module May need to work with module manufacturer If co-location or SAR is a problem on module’s Grant, they may need to change their Grant Responsibility for compliance remains with the module Grantee, even after installation This is why the module’s installation instructions are so very important FCC gets calls “I bought a module, what do I do?” This should not happen! 12

FCC Integrating Modules User Installation of the module Manufacturer selling a certified module for installation by a user, not an installer Two Way authentication technology may be required to only allow module operation in acceptable hosts (such as for RF Exposure) A Bios Lock is an acceptable example of this 13

FCC Limited Modular Approval If it doesn’t meet all eight criteria, it could get “Limited Modular Approval” for a specific host If the host or end environment is known, Limited Modular Approval ‘may’ be possible Limited to application Limited to host Limited to installer (typically Grantee or partner) There are differences in test method There are differences in certification process 14

FCC Limited Modular Approval You can’t just sell an LMA module to anyone, as if it had full Modular Approval That’s the whole point of modular approvals! You can’t miss one of the eight, so call it LMA and sell it as if it was a fully certified module The Grantee is always responsible for compliance in any host, full or limited module Can’t rely on OEM to re-test in their host LMA means that limitations exist 15

FCC Limited Modular Approval The LMA module will be certified for a range or series of devices, similar in construction The LMA module will be certified for use in that range or series of devices only Compliance with that range of hosts will have been demonstrated, no other hosts covered Additional host series can be added through PC The module is tested in (with) the host or a representative of the series of hosts 16

FCC Limited Modular Approval The LMA module will be certified for use by the Grantee or an authorised OEM The Grantee must maintain control of the installation, so typically installation is only permitted by the Grantee Installation by an OEM may be permitted, for example if there is a contractual agreement OEM must understand the limitations of installation It is more than simply following the Grant notes 17

FCC Limited Modular Approval The LMA module will be tested in a representative host The LMA does not meet all eight criteria, so it must show that it can comply when in the host Cross-coupling if no shield Voltage input if no regulator Data input if no buffer The LMA should not be tested stand-alone Dissimilar hosts may require separate testing 18

FCC Limited Modular Approval The device will be certified under the title: Limited Modular Approval The Grant notes will describe the series of hosts and/or limitation(s) of use The filing will list all hosts and/or conditions permitted for that module 19

Split Modular Approvals RF transmission (radio front-end) is separate from the control element These are called Split Modules These can be certified by TCB with a PBA Modules where the transmitter firmware is held on a host, is a split module Even bespoke software supplied with module, such as files downloaded at each start-up 20

FCC Licensed Modules Licensed devices do get Modular Approval Modular Approvals are contained in Part 15C and therefore only for unlicensed devices It is possible to certify a licensed module, with ‘Modular Approval’ Split Modular is not permitted for Licensed Devices The eight criteria of may be used as a guide but are not mandatory Expect changes, possibly this week! 21

FCC Licensed Modules Requirements for Licensed Modular Approval Testing and cover letter justification must demonstrate compliance Clear instructions must be provided to OEM or other installers, to define Grant conditions; installation requirements and need for a license Instructions for placing the FCC ID on the host must be supplied to the installer (electronic is ok) The Grantee is always responsible for compliance in the end host installation 22

Useful Module KDB If you are in the module business Sleep with KDB under your pillow KDB contains labelling requirements KDB contains RF Exposure, MPE and SAR test guidance KDB contains SAR host guidance 23

IC Modular Approvals Canada has Modular Approval RSS-GEN section 3.2 contains information Requirements and Labelling similar to FCC The module must show the IC number The module must show the model (“Model: “) The host label states: Contains IC: XXXX-YYYYY The host label does not need to show the module’s model number FCC will allow an electronic version of the module’s ID on the host and IC is considering it 24

IC Modular Approvals Canada has Modular Approval The eight technical criteria are very similar A letter must be supplied during application Letter must be for RSS-GEN, not for FCC For IC, Licensed Modules use the same eight criteria as Unlicensed Modules, unlike FCC We expect the FCC to add licensed modular in an NPRM to be announced in April

IC Modular Approvals Canada has Limited Modular Approval too RSS-GEN section contains information Similar to FCC Limited Modular Approvals Same approach to be followed 26

IC Modular Approvals Modular approvals, RSS-GEN, section 3.2 Host label must reference the module’s IC number but not the Model number 27

RF Exposure RF Exposure for the FCC and IC Mobile Devices More than 20cm from any user Typically a calculation based on output power Quite a general, calculation assessment Based on power and distance Portable Devices Less than 20cm from a person This is an exact measurement of a specific product Antenna, enclosure, configuration specific 28

RF Exposure Most modules are therefore Mobile MPE assessment at 20cm Calculation based on output power and antenna gain With modules, antenna gain may not be known Worst case values might be used Grant Notes state that the module is “Mobile” More than 20cm from users There is a power threshold to trigger a SAR assessment Must not co-locate with other transmitter antennas “Except in accordance with FCC procedures” Common use of a Class 2 Permissive Change 29

RF Exposure Most modules Mobile Modules may be co-located in real installation Transmit antennas within 20cm of each other Transmit at the same time Co-Location can be handled theoretically at the time of certification for the Module Even if future co-locations are not known Typical co-location scenarios Examples Grant notes state “No co-location, except as detailed in filing” Any co-location which has been calculated at the time of certification would not require a Permissive Change 30

RF Exposure It is possible to certify a module as Portable If the output power of the module is below the power threshold to allow Portable use without SAR testing Section 4.3 of KDB Based on maximum transmitter output power, antenna distance from user, and transmitter frequency This could allow Portable use in any host May need installation control and/or professional installation Power to be added to other modules for co-location If output power of the module is above the power threshold to allow portable use without SAR testing Then SAR testing of the module could be possible! 31

RF Exposure It is possible to certify a module as Portable SAR test on the module with an antenna Limitations are based on SAR result Lower SAR result allows greater flexibility <0.4 W/kg = any host <0.8 W/kg = any range of suitable hosts <1.2 W/kg = single platform type <1.4 W/kg = re-test for any host SAR is specific to antennas Only certified for use with tested antenna(s) Other antennas through Class 2 Permissive Change Grant notes list SAR and hosts 32

RF Exposure Mobile Module into a Portable Host Module certified as Mobile at >20 cm Installer wishes to put into a Portable Host The Grant notes might say “more than 20cm” Is the output power above the threshold? If not, then SAR is not required If power is above threshold, then SAR testing needed Perform SAR test on host and module combination Module Grantee to complete a Class 2 Permissive Change If host uses proximity sensors Module will require new FCC certification with that host And agreements with OEM 33

Modules Good luck! 34

Questions? Contacts: 35