FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metadata Lecture 7 October 5, Value of Documents Two very similar paintings of circus performers by Picasso from 1904 are put on the auction block;
Advertisements

Metadata Workshop Frank Roberts, Coeur d’Alene Tribe GIS Bruce Godfrey, U of I, Inside Idaho Project (Funded by FGDC)
Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors Contextualizing Geospatial Data January 6, 2006.
Spatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts and Components Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 6, 2006.
4/26/2015LICJ Monthly Meeting - May, Metadata made Simple.
EPA GIS Workgroup - Metadata National Geospatial Overview: Metadata EPA GIS Workgroup Meeting Fall 2004 Las Vegas, NV.
Merging Metadata Standards: FGDC CSDGM and ISO Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Metadata Coordinator
CDC Environmental Public Health Tracking Metadata Subgroup Meeting Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, FGDC April 19, pm Eastern.
Oregon Spatial Data Library Partnership Metadata Training OU Knight Library Eugene, Oregon December 3, 2009 Kuuipo Walsh Institute for Natural Resources.
Caro-COOPS Data Management: Metadata. Cast-Net addresses the need for improved connectivity among coastal observing systems by creating a regional framework.
1 ISO – Metadata Next Generation International consensus being built on structured metadata within a broader Geomatics Standard under ISO Technical.
1 Applying ISO/TC 211 standards to the development of standards through Geospatial One-Stop Presented at ISO TC 211 Standards in Action workshop by Julie.
Geospatial standards Beyond FGDC Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 3, 2006.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Leveraging Metadata Standards for Supporting Interoperability in ArcGIS Aleta Vienneau, David Danko.
CSDGM: Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata February 7, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
Status of US Implementation of ISO Metadata October 2005 Lynda Wayne US Federal Geographic Data Committee / GeoMaxim Sharon Shin US Federal Geographic.
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
The US Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) ISO TC Harmonization Activities “Moving From a National Metadata Standard to an International.
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
ISO/TC211 Geographic Information/Geomatics Implementing ISO Metadata David Danko Work Item 15—Project Leader
Amended Oregon Geospatial Metadata Standard DRAFT PROPOSED BY METADATA WORKGROUP 18 TH FRAMEWORK FORUM, MAY 20, 2015, SALEM Bob DenOuden, GEO.
Geospatial Metadata Overview WV AGP GIS Conference, June 2008 Presented by: Eric Hopkins, GIS Analyst West Virginia GIS Technical.
Metadata (for the data users downstream) RFC GIS Workshop July 2007 NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC Documentation.
Oy Metadata Content j of Metadata. Discovery Access Understanding Levels of Metadata joy of Metadata Metadata Standards Why standards Which standards.
Metadata Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation Exercise 2 Reading a Metadata File Exercise 3 Using the Workbook Exercise.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Geographic Metadata North American Profile Development for ISO Geographic Metadata.
The Role of Metadata in the SDI Lynda Wayne GeoMaxim / FGDC Metadata Education Coordinator Spatial Data Infrastructures Workshop Denver June 2002.
Coastal GeoTools Charleston SC January 2003 Making Metadata Work for You Lynda Wayne FGDC Metadata Education Coordinator / GeoMaxim.
North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands.
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
FGDC Metadata Working Group Update July Agenda NAP Status InCIT – L1: friend of the committee NAP as CSDGM vers. 3.0 Transition Resources ISO
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
1 Integrated Services Program The Virginia Metadata Training Workshop Summer, 2006 Lyle Hornbaker Integrated Services Program
GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY Éamonn Ó Tuama Senior Programme Officer, IDA 21 June Metadata publishing with the IPT.
Esri UC2013. Technical Workshop. Technical Workshop 2013 Esri International User Conference July 8–12, 2013 | San Diego, California Leveraging Metadata.
Creating Archive Information Packages for Data Sets: Early Experiments with Digital Library Standards Ruth Duerr, NSIDC MiQun Yang, THG Azhar Sikander,
CSDGM Overview CSDGM Tools and Resources. Resources Series Materials: ftp://ftp.ncddc.noaa.gov/pub/Metadata/Online_ISO_Tr aining/Intro_to_Geospatial_Metadata/
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Intermediate Course Module 1: Introduction and Standards Overview.
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Introduction Module 4: ISO 19115/19139 Metadata.
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Introduction Module 1: Introduction & Overview of the FGDC CSDGM.
Metadata Content. Levels of Metadata Discovery Access Understanding Metadata Standards Additional Metadata Common Core Metadata Why standards Which standards.
FGDC Standards Facilitating data accessibility, and integration Sharon Shin FGDC Metadata Coordinator Air Force Space Command Emergency Services Symposium.
Comparison of CEN, FGDC and ISO standards for metadata Ing. Jan Ruzicka Institute of Economics and Control Systems VŠB – Technical university Ostrava 17.
NSDI Implementing The National Spatial Data Infrastructure Its Role in Indian Country Bonnie Gallahan American Indian Liaison Federal Geographic Data Committee.
Why Standardize Metadata?. Why Have a Standard? Think for a moment how hard it would be to… … bake a cake without standard units of measurement. … put.
Sneak Preview: Sneak Preview: The New US Geospatial Metadata Standard GeoMaxim Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Lynda Wayne, GISP Sharon Shin.
Introducing Geospatial Metadata ---1 Don’t Duck Metadata Introducing Geospatial Metadata A Metadata Workshop.
The FGDC and Metadata. To maintain an organization's internal investment in geospatial data To provide information about an organization's data holdings.
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – FGDC CSDGM National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center Please .
1 The FGDC Standards Program Presented by Julie Binder Maitra FGDC Standards Coordinator To Interagency Council on Standards Policy June 4, 2003.
ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 Introducing ArcCatalog: Tools for Metadata and Data Management.
Merging Metadata Standards: FGDC CSDGM and ISO and Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Metadata Coordinator
ISO 191** Overview A “Family” of Standards. Resources ISO Standards Web Page – Technical.
Getting Familiar with Metadata Laurie Porth Rocky Mountain Research Station Audience: Scientists/researchers who have heard of metadata and now need to.
The Proliferation of Metadata Standards and the Evolution of NASA’s Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Standard for Uses in Earth Science Data Discovery.
A look to the past for the future- The North American Profile Sharon Shin Metadata Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee.
1 Preparing for the New Geospatial Metadata Horizon ESRI User Conference San Diego, CA ● July 9, 2003 Lynda Wayne Federal Geographic Data Committee GeoMaxim.
The North American Profile A journey begins Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Tribal College Forum Northwest Indian College August 19, 2009.
Quality Metadata Lynda Wayne Federal Geographic Data Committee GeoMaxim.
Standardized Metadata Standardized Metadata The FGDC Content Standard For Digital Geospatial Metadata The FGDC Content Standard For Digital Geospatial.
North American Profile Briefing FGDC Coordination Group May 1, 2007 Sharon Shin, FGDC Metadata Coordinator.
Geog. 377: Introduction to GIS - Lecture 16 Overheads 1 5. Metadata 6. Summary of Database Creation 7. Data Standards 8. NSDI Topics Lecture 16: GIS Database.
Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation 5-1 At the conclusion of this module the participant will be able to List the seven.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
Harold Moellering Geography Department Ohio State University
Geospatial Metadata, Standards and Infrastructure
NORTH CAROLINA state and local government METADATA PROFILE
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
Presentation transcript:

FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR

Current Federal geospatial standards Transition to ISO North American Profile Status Considerations Topics

Current Federal Geospatial Standards Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (version 2) Profiles: – Biological Data Profile – Remote Sensing Profile – Shoreline Data Profile

Origin of the FGDC Standard Executive Order 12906: Signed in 1994 by then U.S. President Clinton Defines the responsibilities of the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Outlines three major uses of metadata: – (1) to maintain an organization's internal investment in geospatial data – (2) to provide information to data clearinghouses and catalogs – (3) to provide information needed to process and interpret data transferred from another organization. Requires creation of metadata for data sets from 1995 forward

The Federal Geographic Data Committee – development of the NSDI – establishment of the National Geospatial Data Clearinghouse – cooperative efforts with state, local, and tribal governments, and the private sector – implementation of digital geospatial data framework – development of standards The FGDC is a 19 member interagency committee working to implement the six basic building blocks of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI): metadata, clearinghouse, standards, framework, geospatial data, and partnerships. Responsibilities:

FGDC Structure:

FGDC.gov home page

ISO and FGDC: The Transition

The international community, through the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) designed a standard for geospatial metadata. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Metadata Standard Essentially, two standards were developed: ISO 19115: has been approved – it is an abstract standard that specifies general content for the metadata, but does not specify the format ISO 19139: XML implementation schema specifying the metadata record format.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) The NAP will replace the current Version 2 FGDC Standard, and essentially become Version 3 The ISO allows profiles to be developed for groups sharing a common interest. The FGDC has teamed with Canada to produce the North American Profile (NAP).

NAP Editing Committee Canada Natural Resources Canada Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Canadian Geospatial Standards Board- Committee on Geomatics (CGSB-CoG) USA Federal Geographic Data Committee – FGDC Metadata Working Group International Committee for Information Technology Standards- Geographic Information Systems(INCITS- L1)

North American Profile - ISO Goal: – Meet the geospatial metadata implementation needs of the US/Canada through the development of a Profile guidance document Objectives: – Comprehensive profile – Identical content: US and Canadian Profile. – Release by ANSI same date and time as Canadian Standards Board

North American Profile: Approach No new attributes Increase attribute obligations (mandatory, optional, etc) Modify some codelist content Create new codelists for some free text fields Recommend structure with in text fields (e.g. address) Modify/simplify diagrams Adding best practices to guide implementation

ISO ISO enables describing: – Geospatial data sets – Maps – Non-geospatial resources (example: tabular data) – Services: portals, web mapping

What are the differences between the FGDC CSDGM and the NAP?

Organization and Terminology FGDC – Sections – Elements – Compound Elements – Domains ISO / NAP – Classes – Subclasses – Attributes – Domains

Obligation Terminology: FGDC to ISO FGDC: – Mandatory – Mandatory-if-applicable – Optional ISO/NAP: – Mandatory – Conditional – Optional

Metadata Entity Set Information Data Identification Information Service Identification Information-new Constraints Data Quality Information - new Maintenance Information – new Spatial Representation Information Reference System Information Content Information Portrayal Catalogue Information- new Distribution Information Application Schema Information - new Major Classes

ISO Metadata: Core Elements Dataset titleSpatial representation type Dataset reference dateReference system Dataset responsible partyLineage statement Geographic locationOn-line resource Dataset languageMetadata file identifier Dataset character setMetadata standard name Dataset topic categoryMetadata standard version Spatial resolutionMetadata language AbstractMetadata character set Distribution formatMetadata point of contact Additional extent info (vertical / temporal) Metadata date stamp

Formats

NAP Diagrams - current model

Graphic Representation

Status The North American Profile (NAP) of ISO 19115: Geographic Information - Metadata – formally adopted by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in June of 2009 However, work continues on the NAP to: – integrate the geospatial database documentation specified by a related standard, ISO 19110: Geographic Information: Feature Catalogue Once complete, the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) will: – process the NAP as a Federal standard – promote implementation to the geospatial community

Transition Considerations Monitor FGDC website: Until FGDC recognition /adoption of NAP: – Continue use of FGDC CSDGM (Version 2) – Post metadata to clearinghouses (most use xml format) Consult FGDC document “Preparing for International Metadata: North American Profile of ISO Geographic Information - Metadata – standards#nap

Considerations, con’t Metadata Creation Tools: – FGDC has evaluated 11 editors based on: Metadata Development Operating Environment Metadata Management Note: Further evaluation will take place when support for the NAP is reflected in these tools

Considerations, con’t NOAA has been working on “transforms” based on XML for metadata conversion from FGDC CSDGM to ISO

Thank you! Questions? Comments? Viv Hutchison USGS CSS