Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT SUCCESSION PLANNING Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D Coordinator of Graduate Education Wilmington College SAELP.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT I & II Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. SAELP Project Director.
An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
August 22, 2014 ELA Coordinators Meeting
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
Most current teacher evaluations provide little information that can be used to give teachers the training and tools they need to be effective; better.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
Delaware’s Performance Evaluation System II for School Administrators Jackie O. Wilson, Ed.D. Interim Director Delaware Academy for School Leadership College.
NTEP – Network for Transforming Teacher Preparation A presentation to the State Board TAC on Tiered Licensure and Career Ladders April 6, 2014.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Growth, Not Gotcha: Evaluating and Supporting Beginning Teachers INTC 8 th Annual Induction and Mentoring Conference February 26, 2013 Liam Goldrick Director.
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
QUALITY COMPENSATION FOR TEACHERS OR “Q COMP” Minn. Stat. 122A Enacted by the 2005 Minnesota Legislature and Signed by Governor Tim Pawlenty.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
CCSSO Task Force Recommendations on Educator Preparation Idaho State Department of Education December 14, 2013 Webinar.
Developing Instructional Leaders in Brevard County.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
PUSD Reading Intervention Plan Read 180 and System 44 Implementation Plan August 5,2014.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Using Teams for a Collaborative Evaluation of Principals National Summit for Principal Supervisors May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director,
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Presentation transcript:

Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware Academy for School Leadership, University of Delaware

Presenters Dr. Jackie O. Wilson Dr. Sharon Brittingham 2000 Lt. Governor’s Award for Innovative School 2001 USDOE Blue Ribbon School 2002 DE National Distinguished Elementary Principal (NAESP) Executive Director, Delaware Academy for School Leadership 2002 USDOE Blue Ribbon School 2003 DE National Distinguished Elementary Principal (NAESP) 2004 ED Trust Dispelling the Myth School Project Director, RTTT Development Coaches/DPAS II Training

Theory of Action School leadership is a highly challenging, complex and knowledge-based professional career. School leaders need sophisticated knowledge and skills to be effective in improving schools and increasing student achievement. School leaders develop sophisticated knowledge and skills when provided with appropriate highly quality professional learning experiences, specific interventions and follow up support. School Leadership has a powerful effect on school improvement and student achievement. Highly challenging, complex and knowledge-based professional career. School leaders need sophisticated knowledge and skills to be effective High Quality Learning Experiences Interventions and Support Student Achievement

Beliefs about Leadership Agree or Disagree 1.The school is only as good as its weakest link. 2. Developing the staff is the greatest way to improve student achievement.

Measuring Educator Effectiveness Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Delaware Performance Appraisal System SB 260 (2001) was the lever for Phase 1 of statewide reform Appointment of Professional Standards Board responsible for developing regulations in collaboration with DOE in the following areas: – Licensure & Certification – Educator Standards – DOE Approval of University Preparation Programs – Revising DE’s Performance Appraisal System – Professional Development aligned to educator standards – Mentoring support for teachers and principals Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Revising Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Administrators Teachers & Specialists Assistant Principal/Principal School Leader 1School Leader 2 TeachersSpecialists

Professional Standards Board & DOE CommitteesRegulations Delaware Academy for School Leadership Process

Performance Appraisal Standards Recruitment & Hiring DEEDSData Management Professional Development Career Continuum Licensure & Certification University Preparation Program Redesign

Measuring Performance STANDARDS Recruitment, Licensure, Hiring Coaching Retention Performance Evaluation Pre-Service Preparation University Preparation Programs Professional Development for Licensure Renewal Feedback

Phase 1 ( ) Work Groups Develop Appraisal Systems PSB Develops Regulations PSB Approval of Regulations State Board Approval of Regulations Phase 2 ( ) Operationalize Regulations Pilot Sites Determined Training Pilot & Evaluation Revisions Phased Training Statewide Implementation Phase 3 ( ) RTTT –new regulations Advisory Committees revise regulations Phase in changes over four years Work Groups Training, training & training Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Delaware Performance Evaluation System for Teachers & Specialists Based on Danielson's Frameworks Twenty plus years as the framework for the statewide evaluation system of Delaware

DPAS II Framework – 5 Components 1.Planning and Preparation 2.Classroom Environment 3.Instruction 4.Professional Responsibilities 5.Student Achievement Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Criteria Listed under each Component 1a. Selecting Instructional Goals Criterion 1a. Performance: Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished Not Observed

Ratings Teachers are rated for every Component and Criteria. Feedback: Recommendation Expectation Commendation Improvement Plan

Results: Increase in Number of Expectations and Improvement Plans 97% of Teachers who were placed on an Improvement Plan improved. 98% of Teachers who were given Expectations met those Expectations. Those who did not complete their Improvement Plans retired, left the profession, or transferred to another district.

Rubrics

Current DPAS II Key Points Evaluators have to be credentialed by completing DPAS II e- Learning Modules. DPAS formative and summative evaluations are audited by the Department of Education monthly for completion. Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Development Coach Project 7 coaches throughout the State 63 participating schools representing 18 Delaware School Districts and five charters Supported over 140 principals, 400 assistant principals, and district expert evaluators Reviewed and provided feedback on over 2000 formative and summative evaluation reports for school administrators Participated in 100’s of pre/ post conferences, observations and walkthroughs with school administrators.

DPAS II Modules Presented Understanding the Frameworks (Danielson) Writing Expectations and Improvement Plans Observing Specialists Goal Setting (Component 5) Conferencing – Pre and Post Conducting Difficult Conversations Calibrating Observations Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Supports for Principals New Leader (Boot Camp) –Three day Training on the Teacher and Specialist Evaluation System -Provided three different times (August, December & February) Process Procedures Practice All newly hired administrators are encouraged to attend by DOE and their districts. Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Development Coaches Are the experts in DPAS II Provide DPAS II training Support “deeper and richer” conversations about instruction Increase the level and degree of accountability

Development Coaches Work three hours a week with Principal and or the Administrative Team. Provide support for the implementation of the revised DPAS process. Collaborate with District Office to calibrate formatives, provide professional development, and determine training needs. Support the principal as the instructional leader of the school and in non DPAS related areas. Provide additional instructional resources for teacher development.

Principal Role in Project Debrief with Development Coach weekly Learn to prioritize formative observations Work with the Development Coach to enhance their knowledge and skills in the DPAS process. Learn to use data from PLCs and Component V to help individual teachers work toward instructional growth.

Implications What gets monitored, gets done. Schools, districts and DOE need to monitor the process and content of any evaluation system. Districts must have a clearly defined procedure for monitoring DPAS and provide resources and supports. School leaders need supports and resources. Delaware Academy for School Leadership

Coming Attractions in Nashville Learn about the day to day life of a Development Coach Participate in calibration activities Learn how to have difficult conversations

Questions

Contact Information Sharon Brittingham Jackie Wilson