Peralta 2011 ARCC Report Mike Orkin, Ph.D. Office of Educational Services Peralta Community College District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DR. CHIALIN HSIEH DIRECTOR OF PLANNING, RESEARCH & INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS APRIL 20, 2010 ARCC 2010 Report Accountability Reporting for the Community.
Advertisements

Success is what counts. A Better Way to Measure Community College Performance Presentation about the ATD Cross-State Data Workgroup NC Community College.
California Community Colleges Student Success 2014 Scorecard 2014 Scorecard College of the Desert Board of Trustee Presentation Dec. 19, 2014.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges 2010 Report: Moreno Valley College Calculation presented by presented by David Torres, Dean Institutional.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN PROGRESS PRESENTATION TO BOARD FEBRUARY 28, 2012.
1 Demographic and Enrollment Information Office of the Chancellor Academic Affairs October 2006.
 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
1 Office of Institutional Research and Planning The mission of the Foothill-De Anza Community College District Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
SBVC Student Equity Plan A Update and Historical Overview James E. Smith, Ph.D. Dean, Research, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness.
Academic Attainment in California Community Colleges: Racial And Ethnic Disparities in the ARCC 2.0/Scorecard Metrics Tom Leigh Alice van Ommeren.
Summary of Emerging Trends in Higher Education Spring 2011.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Equity Scorecard Update A presentation to the Madison College Board of Trustees February 09, 2011.
Finding the Data 1 AN OVERVIEW OF WEB SOURCES FOR INSTITUTIONAL DATA Fall 2012.
Student Success Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges September 2011.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC) Presentation to the Mt. San Jacinto College Board of Trustees Thursday – Oct. 9, 2008 Dr. Dennis.
Click to edit Master title style 1 What Data? California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Dr. W. Charles Wiseley, “Chuck” Career Technical Education.
ARCC Accountability Report for the Community Colleges Focus on Quality.
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges, 2012 Report Riverside Community College District Riverside Community College District Teaching & Learning.
Student Performance Profile Study: An Examination of Success and Equity Matt Wetstein, Interim Vice President of Instruction Office of Planning, Research,
The Student Success Scorecard Dr. Matt Wetstein Interim Vice President of Instruction April 16,
Board of Trustees Presentation 2014 Student Success Scorecard Report and District Strategic Plan Metrics Presented by Mallory Newell August 25,
Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC) 2007 Report for Cerritos College Bill Farmer and Nathan Durdella.
1 ARCC (Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges) Board of Trustees Study Session Presentation October 10, 2007 Cathy Hasson (Skyline) Jing Luan.
Expenditures & Outcomes Edward R. Karpp Director of Institutional Research Glendale Community College.
Cuesta College ARCC Data Report to the San Luis Obispo Community College District Board of Trustees May 5, 2010.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
2014 Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation May 7, 2014 E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Scorecard PaRC Presentation April 17, 2013 FOOTHILL COLLEGE E. Kuo FH IR&P *Formerly known as the Accountability Reporting for Community.
Merritt College’s plan based on the principles Improve student access to college programs and services. Increase and balance student equity and diversity.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
2010 ARCC Overview Michael Orkin, Ph.D. Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs Peralta Community College District.
STUDENT EQUITY PLAN CAMPUS-BASED RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.
Mallory Newell Office of Institutional Research and Planning
Board of Trustees Retreat December 9, 2015 Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants Success Indicators and Key College Profile Data 2015.
Board of Trustees Retreat May 10, 2013 Dr. Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning & Grants.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning January 24, 2008.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
Trends for Planning Team A Meeting - October 10, 2012.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2010 Data Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010.
Fall Enrollment by Ethnic Group and Year Grant Campus Year ETHNIC GROUP Nonresident alien Hispanic/Latino American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2008 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 15, 2008.
1 A ccountability R eporting for the C ommunity C olleges (ARCC) 2008 Presentation to Peralta Community College Board of Trustees Merritt College Office.
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting 2009 Data Edward Karpp Associate Dean, Institutional Research & Planning December 21, 2009.
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Student Success Scorecard 2017
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2017
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 15, 2010
Student Success Scorecard Spring 2016
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants November 19, 2012
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Contra Costa Community College District
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Board of Trustees Review
SOCCCD Board of Trustees’ Meeting
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)
Student Success Metrics
Student Success Metrics
Disproportionate Impact Study
2010 ARCC Report Findings May 3, 2010
Edward Karpp Dean of Research, Planning, and Grants January 17, 2012
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting Data
Glendale Community College: Statewide Accountability Reporting
Presentation transcript:

Peralta 2011 ARCC Report Mike Orkin, Ph.D. Office of Educational Services Peralta Community College District

ARCC ARCC – Accountability Report for the Community Colleges ARCC documents on Institutional Research website:

ARCC Demographics Performance Indicators Cohorts and Peer Groups

ARCC Performance indicators measure student success. Cohorts follow groups of students over time. Peer groups allow comparisons among similar institutions.

ARCC Demographics - Fall 2011, Peralta BI Tool.

Peralta Fall Ethnicity

Peralta Fall Headcount by City

Peralta Fall Gender

Peralta Fall Day/Evening

Peralta Fall Residency

Peralta Fall Age Distribution

College Performance Indicators Seven Performance Indicators in Two Categories: I.Student Progress and Achievement II.Pre-Collegiate Improvement Performance Indicator data comes from state MIS

College Performance Indicators I.Student Progress and Achievement Degree/Certificate/Transfer A.Student Progress and Achievement Rate B.Earned at Least 30 Units C.Persistence Vocational/Occupational/Workforce Development D.Success Rate for Vocational Courses

College Performance Indicators II.Pre-Collegiate Improvement Basic Skills, ESL, and Enhanced Noncredit E.Success Rate for Basic Skills Courses F.ESL Improvement Rate G.Basic Skills Improvement Rate

Cohorts Three cohorts of first-time students followed for six years: to to to

Peer Groups (similar colleges) Based on statistical analyses of demographic variables that correlate with performance indicators. Provide a basis for comparison of similar colleges. Peralta colleges generally (but not always) have the same peer groups.

Performance Indicators Student Progress and Achievement Degree/Certificate/Transfer A.Progress and Achievement. E arned at least 12 units, attempted a higher level course, and achieved: (1) transferred to a four-year college; (2) earned degree or a certificate; or (3) achieved transfer status. B.Earned at least 30 Units. Same as A, but earned at least 30 units within CCC system. C.Persistence. E nrolled in the fall and still enrolled in CCC system one year later.

Peralta Peer Group A4 Progress and Achievement Indicator A.Progress and Achievement. Peer Group A4 Colleges (Table A1, Appendix A p. 741) Alameda; American River; Berkeley City College; Cabrillo; Canyons; Foothill; Glendale; Irvine Valley; Laney; Marin; Merritt; MiraCosta; Monterey; Ohlone; Palomar; Saddleback; San Diego City; San Diego Miramar; San Francisco City; San Mateo; Santa Rosa; West L.A.; West Valley Predictors (“uncontrollable” factors, Appendix C, p. 787) Pct Students Age 25+ Fall 2005 Pct Basic Skills Fall 2005 Bachelor Plus Index (age 25+, 2000 Census)

Peer Groups

Peer Groups Summary Degree/Certificate/Transfer Alameda, Berkeley, and Laney higher than average in 2 out of 3 categories. Merritt close to top in 2 out of 3 categories.

Cohorts

Cohorts Summary Degree/Certificate/Transfer Alameda flat Berkeley persistence dips and recovers Laney improves in 2 categories Merritt improves in all categories

Transfers to UC and CSU by Ethnicity Disaggregated demographic data - not in ARCC Peralta ranks high in African American student transfers to U.C. and CSU ( data).

Transfers to UC and CSU by Ethnicity African American student transfers to U.C. 109 colleges ranked Laney 2 nd (21 transfers, tied with El Camino) Berkeley 9 th (12 transfers) Alameda 11 th (10 transfers) Merritt 27 th (5 transfers) Source CPEC:

Transfers to UC and CSU by Ethnicity African American student transfers to C.S.U. 110 colleges ranked Laney 10 th (47 transfers) Merritt 13 th (38 transfers) Alameda 36 th (18 transfers) Berkeley 38 th (16 transfers) Source CPEC:

Additional Disaggregated Data Also not in ARCC Additional success, persistence, and transfer data by gender, ethnicity, and age: Peralta Equity Report:

Performance Indicators Student Progress and Achievement Vocational/Occupational/Workforce Development D.Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Vocational Courses

Peer Groups

Peer Groups Summary Vocational/Occupational/Workforce Development All colleges below average.

Cohorts

Cohorts Summary Vocational/Occupational/Workforce Development All colleges trend down.

Performance Indicators Pre-Collegiate Improvement Basic Skills, ESL, Enhanced Noncredit E.Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Basic Skills Courses. F.Improvement Rate for Credit Basic Skills Courses. G.Improvement Rate for Credit ESL Courses.

Peer Groups

Peer Groups Summary Basic Skills, ESL, and Enhanced Noncredit Alameda above average 3 out of 3. Laney above average 2 out of 3. Berkeley and Merritt below average 3 out of 3.

Cohorts

Cohorts Summary Basic Skills, ESL, and Enhanced Noncredit Alameda down in ESL and up in Basic Skills Improvement. Berkeley up in Basic Skills course completion, down otherwise. Laney and Merritt up in Basic Skills Improvement, down otherwise.

Conclusions Peralta Colleges typically above or close to average when compared to peers. Strong in degree/certificate/transfer. High in African American student transfers to UC and CSU. Need improvement in vocational successful course completion. Some issues system-wide.

Student Success Task Force Dec 2011 “More than 70 percent of community college students enter the system under-prepared to do college-level work. A majority of these are first generation college students, low-income, and/or underrepresented groups. They face the most challenging obstacles for success and unfortunately, have the lowest completion rates in the system. A major focus of the Task Force is to give these students the tools, supports, and academic foundation to succeed.”