Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Critical Reasoning – or When Philosophy Meets Language…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Communication for Managers Testing the Evidence What is the source of the evidence? Is the source valid and credible? Is the evidence accurate, current.
Advertisements

What is the relationship between…?
By Anthony Campanaro & Dennis Hernandez
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Evaluating an Author’s Argument. © 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2 Author’s Argument An author’s argument.
1 Charles Chaney’s VR Mastery Curriculum for Increasing Verbal Reasoning Scores.
GMAT CRITICAL REASONING Spring GETTING STARTED 1. Read the question 1. Read the question 2. Identify the type of question 2. Identify the type of.
(June 2011 Session; repeat possible in July also) By: Satyadhar Joshi GMAT Verbal Class Covering: Critical Reasoning
Improving Argumentative Stance Prewriting and Organizational Strategy.
Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Sessions 3/4GMAT Verbal Success GMAT Reading Comprehension Section Or how to read the GMAT way…
Lecture Notes for the GRE Analytical Writing Strategies Lesson #1 Analytical Writing Strategies.
Critical Thinking Skills: Reading and Communication.
I. The Rational Appeal section -179 Reasons are the key points you’ll use to defend your ideas. Convince the audience with evidence. Appeal to Reason.
Lecture Notes for Verbal Reasoning Lesson 6 Handling the Questions According to Kaplan.
Study vocabulary words. Unit 1 quiz on Thursday! Objective
The SAT Critical Reading Section Continued: Passage-Based Questions
1 Verbal Reasoning Strategies Curriculum for Increasing Verbal Reasoning Scores.
Scientific Method Lab.
ACT Reading.
Passage Based Reading SAT Prep. The Facts words long. Single source or a pair to C & C Humanities, social studies, natural sciences, and literary.
SAT Prep- Reading Comprehension Strategies- Short Passages
Persuasive Speech Speaking to Persuade.
THE GMAT What is the GMAT and how is it used? What does the test involve? How can you best prepare?
An Introduction to Argumentative Writing
After Reading KEY TRAITS Writing Workshop Persuasive Essay...continued 1.IDEAS 2. ORGANIZATION Presents a thesis statement taking a position on a clearly.
Four main types of claims Issues of Definition- ex. What does it mean to be a person? Issues of Causation- ex. What is the cause of autism? Issues of Evaluation-
WEEK 3 THE TERM PAPER. WHAT IS A TERM PAPER? An academic essay that is rather lengthy, prepared by an academic writer Written in a concise and well documented.
Debate: Reasoning. Claims & Evidence Review Claims are statements that serve to support your conclusion. Evidence is information discovered through.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
Responding Critically to Texts
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
(June 2011 Session; repeat possible in July also) By: Satyadhar Joshi GRE Verbal Class Covering: Critical Reasoning
Critical Analysis Key ideas to remember. What's the Point? Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you analyze: So what? How is this significant?
Biological Science.
CHAPTER 9 THINKING CRITICALLY IN THIS CHAPTER YOU WILL LEARN: What it means to think critically, and why it is important What facts and opinions are, and.
INFORMAL FALLACIES The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize and resist fallacious arguments.
Argumentative vs. Analytical Writing An Introduction to Terms and Concepts.
Philosophy 148 Inductive Reasoning. Inductive reasoning – common misconceptions: - “The process of deriving general principles from particular facts or.
GRE READING COMPREHENSION. READING COMPREHENSION PASSAGE STRUCTURES Three Classic GRE Passage Structures Arguing a Position Discussing something specific.
Persuasive Essays And how to write them. The Persuasive Essay usually includes: An introduction Statement of the facts Confirmation Refutation conclusion.
 Students will construct logical, well-reasoned arguments in writing.  Students will identify and use credible primary and secondary sources to support.
Old Fallacies, Emotional Fallacies, Groupthink Sign In HW Due Quiz! Review Quiz! Fallacies Review New Emotional Fallacies Fallacies and evaluating arguments.
Mrs. Paloti SAT Prep  They are designed to test a student’s ability to comprehend the passage they read and are not intended to test for knowledge,
The Open Prompt: Timing 1-3 minutes reading and working the prompt. 3 minutes deciding on a position minutes planning the support of your position.
Evaluate Inductive Reasoning and Spot Inductive Fallacies
ACT Reading Strategies. Before the testing day Get a GOOD NIGHT’S SLEEP! Get a GOOD NIGHT’S SLEEP! *You are paying for this test AND it could earn you.
Jaime Smith. Quiz! Review Homework Must Be True Questions Critical Thinking Vocabulary Puzzle Homework.
GMAT Verbal a success recipe.
Reading – Approaching the Questions
GMAT Critical Reasoning Method/Flaw
Identifying Question Stems
READING COMPREHENSION
Logical reasoning The 7 WRONG ANSWER TYPES ADVANCED STRATEGIES FOR
Argumentative Writing Project Notes
Introducing the Counter Claim and Rebuttal
Elements of Reasoning:
WHAT IS READING COMPREHENSION?
Strategies for Success
The In-Class Critical Essay
Deductive & Inductive Forms of Reasoning
Strategies for Success
The In-Class Critical Essay
Introducing Claim, Counter Claim and Rebuttal
By Rachel Carson English II Literature Textbook pp
Making Inferences - Reading between the lines
Definitions: Evidence-Based Claims- 1.) the ability to take detailed
LSAT EXAM Test Day Instructions.
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Critical Reading Long and Short Reading
9th Literature EOC Review
Presentation transcript:

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Critical Reasoning – or When Philosophy Meets Language…

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Types of Questions Using language to justify / analyze statements or situations logically. Questions deal typically with: –Assumption –Strengthen / Weaken –Flaw –Inference –Explain

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Assumption Questions— Wrong Answers Go beyond scope of argument Use language too extreme Do not support argument

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Assumption Question— Phrasing Which of the following is assumed by author? Which of the following, if added, would make the conclusion valid? The validity of the argument depends on which of the following? Which one does the argument presuppose?

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Assumption Questions— Method Identify the conclusion & evidence in stimulus Spot the author’s key assumptions Denial Test: –Deny / Negate Statement –Does the argument fall apart?

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Strengthen / Weaken Questions Most common type of questioning Phrasing: –Which most strengthens/weakens? –Which would provide the most support for / most seriously damage the argument?

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Strengthen / Weaken Questions Phrasing: –Which, if true, would make the argument more persuasive? –Which, if true, would cast the most doubt on the argument?

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Strengthen / Weaken Questions—Method Identify evidence & conclusion Find author’s key assumptions  Look for answer that reinforces or undermines the validity of the author’s conclusion.

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Strengthen / Weaken Questions—Method S/W questions commonly: –Go outside the scope of the argument. –Introduce irrelevant comparisons. –Do the opposite of what they’re supposed to do. Look for qualifying modifiers (some, occasionally, possibly) which might not make the argument strong enough.

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Flaw Questions Less common Which statement corrects the flaw (absurdity, defect, mistake, etc.) in the stimulus?

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Flaw Questions Resemble “weaken” questions: –Weaken: find information that, if true, would weaken the argument. –Flaw: you know the argument or stimulus is flawed (= is weak); you don’t have to prove it. Method: process of elimination

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Inference Questions Use the entire stimulus as evidence and draw your own conclusions. Remember on GMAT: inference = reading between the lines Rely on the TRUTH: If a choice needs any assumptions, throw it out!

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Inference Questions Wording—many different ways, among which: –Do the stimulus facts support the following conclusions? –What conclusions can be properly drawn from the stimulus? –If the stimulus is true, which statement must be true?

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Inference Questions Wrong answers: –Outside scope of passage –Too extreme (exclusive adverbs: never, always, must, etc.) –Could be true, but could also not be true (= aren’t necessarily true)

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Explain Questions Do not present an argument Describe a situation with 2 (or more) apparently contradictory facts Wording: –Which, if true, would explain…? / contributes most to…? / best helps to…?

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success Explain Questions Wrong Answers: –Touch upon only one fact / side in the argument –Deepen the incomprehension –Make an irrelevant comparison –Misrepresent the situation’s scope Method: get a good grasp of the situation that needs to be explained

Centre de Ressources Linguistiques Session 5GMAT Verbal Success How ETS builds arguments? ConclusionPremiseAssumptio n