Race to the Top-District Grant Proposal Winston-Salem Forsyth County Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
NETS-TF Standards Take this quiz to test your understanding of the NETS- TF standards! Start quiz!
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Addressing Common Core Standards Using
Race to the Top Years 2 to 4 Finish line webinars July
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
Blended Learning Rubric BMS Faculty Meeting – September 10.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Ipswich High School. Mission Statement The mission of Ipswich High School is to provide a student-centered, collaborative learning environment which motivates.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
Virginia’s State Improvement Grant and State Personnel Development Grant The Content Literacy Continuum & Response to Intervention.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York September 15, 2010.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 National Findings June 26, 2013 Speak Up Findings & Trends: Informing the changing role of educators 9.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Elementary School Improvement Planning
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Technology Update Barrington School Committee December 15, 2011.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Objectives The participants will be able to: understand Project Based Learning (PBL) through Technology and its features; comprehend the characteristics.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
54321 Michigan Technology Readiness: are YOU ready for Any Time, Any Place, Any Way, Any Pace March 26, 2012.
1:1 Computing Initiative RttT Fidelity Check Spring 2013.
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York December 2, 2010.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness coaches.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
What Is Blended Learning??? BL Expectations: Daily classroom practices that incorporate differentiated instruction and personalized learning (regardless.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
ICT Implementation in Students team 3 rd December, 2012 Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi Points for discussion Education Draft Document.
 Defined STEM and 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Evelyn Wassel, Ed. D.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
An Action Plan on: The importance of Educational Technology in fourth year high school Student in Luga-it National High School. What are the key goals?
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Race To The Top West Virginia Proposal.  July 2009 – DRAFT Notice released  4.3 billion dollar funding opportunity ◦ Flexible funding to incent serious,
Governor’s Teacher Network Pathway 1 – Professional Development Pathway 2 – Instructional Resources.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Curriculum Specialist Introduction to Pearson Forward.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Drafts of the North Carolina Essential Standards STEM Design Team Webinar Middle Grades Summer PD June 15-17, 2010 Asheboro City Schools.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Regional 3 Wireless Update October 30, 2014 Friday Institute, NC State University.
NC State Improvement Project
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Local Control Accountability Plan
EdTPA: An Overview.
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Presentation transcript:

Race to the Top-District Grant Proposal Winston-Salem Forsyth County Schools

Why are we meeting AGAIN? Race to the Top-District grant proposal Paints the “big picture” DRAFT form Lots of details still to be determined Schools will have input into final implementation model

What does it mean FOR ME? Personalized instruction model LOTS of support School-based Instructional Technologist School-based technology support Professional development A device for EVERY STUDENT Classroom-based technology tools

RttT-D Overview Focus: Personalized learning environment with a student-focused approach to teaching and learning Amount: $20-25 million over 4 years Application Deadline: 16 September for DPI and mayoral review (3 October for DOE) Former NC Recipients: Guilford County and Iredell-Statesville Schools

RttT-D Overview What exactly IS personalized learning? Video It is what happens when students think well about life.

RttT-D Overview 4 Core Assurance Areas Adopt standards and assessments that prepare students for life after high school Build data systems that measure student growth and success Develop effective teachers and principals Turn around lowest-achieving schools Competitive Priority Social and emotional supports for both students and teachers

RttT-D Overview WSFCS Focus Middle school Literacy across the content areas

RttT-D Overview Why middle school? Personalized learning works with middle school students’ developmental stage Concrete to abstract thought Desire for control over environment Middle schools are open to innovative approaches to instruction

RttT-D Overview Why literacy across the content areas?

RttT-D Specifics: Instructional Model Standards driven (Based on student achievement data) Teacher chooses standards Teacher facilitates learning Student-centric (Based on student learning styles data) Student explores content Student applies content Student demonstrates mastery of content

RttT-D Specifics: Instructional Model Blended learning (Based on task and digital tools) Technology is integrated into all aspects of learning Students choose tool and application Feedback is ongoing and specific Students use adaptive instructional software to reduce achievement gaps

RttT-D Specifics: Instructional Model Skill-based interventions (Based on reading diagnostic) Student receives one-on-one support (for specific comprehension skill) Student uses adaptive instructional software (for general comprehension deficiencies) Student receives extra instructional time (for decoding and fluency deficiencies)

RttT-D Specifics: Instructional Model Enrichment model (Based on reading and learning style diagnostics) Students participate in enrichment activities specific to learning styles Students and teachers may use project- based assignment wizard

RttT-D Specifics: Teaching & Leading Personalized professional development Technology integration Differentiation Instructional model Interpersonal competence (social & emotional needs) Alignment with NC Teacher Evaluation System (Standard IV)

RttT-D Specifics: Technology Personnel Digital Teaching & Learning Coaches Technology Support Personnel Hardware Devices for students and teachers “Classroom Solutions” Infrastructure

Teacher Expectations Teachers will Participate in all required professional development Implement the instructional model with support Embrace the personalized learning approach Facilitate a blended learning environment integrating technology with support

Implementation Approach Year 1: ELA, Social Studies, EC, ESL & “Early Adopters” in Science & Mathematics Year 2: Science, Mathematics & “Early Adopters” in Encore Subjects Year 3: Encore Subjects Year 4: Deepen Implementation

What does it mean FOR ME? Personalized instruction model LOTS of support School-based Instructional Technologist School-based technology support Professional development A device for EVERY STUDENT Classroom-based technology tools

Questions?

Timeline for School Input 5-9 September: Principals present proposal and faculties vote 10 September: School vote due to central office 9-13 September: Teacher, parent, and student surveys available online

Time to Vote! Please navigate to the following site to record your vote: You may use a smart phone, tablet, or computer to vote.

Time to Provide Input! Starting Monday, September 9, an online survey will be available: We want your input! We care about what you think! Please respond honestly! Thank you for your support!