Measures of Short and Long Term Viability of an Agricultural Region Researchers: Xianfeng Su, Geoff Carlin Project leaders: Senthold Asseng, Freeman Cook, Peter Campbell, Michael Poole Main collaborators: Steven Schilizzi, Henry Brockman, Blair Nancarrow, Mescal Stephens, Atakelty Hailu, Angela Wardell-Johnson, Shams Bhuiyan, Scott Heckbert, Mick Harcher, Tom McShane, Art Langston University of Western Australia
Project Aims & Background Biophysical, Economic and Social Components Analysis Model Design Model Framework Simulation OUTLINE Simulating Farmers and Land-Use Change
Improve the long-term viability of agricultural regions ? Natural Resource Condition and Trend Stable & resilient local communities Long-term viability characterised by outcomes from: Yield/profit, economic sustainability region
Objectives, Scenarios and Case Study Areas Objectives To understand the complex interactions between human and landscape change processes To study emergent behaviours in human-landscape systems To improve the long-term viability of an agricultural region Scenarios Climate change Environmental risk perception/management New technology Policies Market Social values Katanning Region in Blackwood Catchment Burdekin Delta
Biophysical, Economic and Social Changes Trajectory -Individual farmers information -Shires record -Regional data Drivers found -Farmer interviews -Consultants -Literature reviews -Historical land-use change analysis
30 km risk Natural/planted vegetation Digital Elevation Map
Historical Land-use Changes Resource: CMIS CSIRO Salinity & Waterlogging riskNatural/planted vegetation cover 30 km
Change in crop/pasture ratio, Katanning/Kent shire & Auction Price of Greasy Wool Data: Hailu, UWA Wool price (cent/kg) Years % of total area Years
Other changes: Population & age pattern Katanning town Data: ABS
Population decreased, old age trends cropped area increased & pasture area decreased Land value increased Costs of farm operating increased Market price changed New technology: canola has become a major income for some farmers Land degraded Summary
Model design Integrating biophysical, economic and social models Cropping model Social Network Model Economical Model Policies Landscape Soil (erosion, degradation) Surface and ground water Land cover (crops/crop trees/pasture/natural vegetation, infrastructure, town) Livestock Hydrology model Output Land cover and livestock dynamics % degraded land Nutrient cycling Society Farmer: attributes and behaviours. Household: structure, status, management strategies Community: relations & structure, functions Demography dynamics Economics International and National market Bank: interest Household: productions, investment and consumption Output Household cash flow Loan Atmosphere Output Agent’s Courses of Actions; Demographics pattern; Communities structure and changes Information diffusion
Concept Behind the Decision Making Process Capacities & Constrains of biophysical, economic and social components Model design
Abstraction of Main Objects Biophysical Capacities & ConstraintsFinancial Capacities & ConstraintsSocial Capacities & Constraints
Decision Making Process Model design Agent Beliefs + Situation-action rules behaviour (reactive agents) (Doran 1999) Agent Beliefs + Goals + “Rational” Planning behaviour (deliberative agents) (Doran 1999) Person needs and value Ability/capability Opportunity Uncertainty Behaviour
Decision making drivers - land use Market Economic scale and margin Rotation Time Profit Habits Do the same as last year -- from Farmer Interviews Model design
Money Time Successful plan Family Skilled casual workers Farm size Risk management -- from Farmer Interviews Constraints for running a farm: Model design
Evaluate Lifestyle Factors COA Farmer – farm diary driven COA Adopt new farming technology or new crop COA Evaluate environmental perceptions COA Non-farmer low resolution collection of COA’s Employment COA Evaluate Regional Amentities/Services COA Major employer viability COA Abbatoirs Tree Nursery Sheep Saleyards Lumped Retail Lumped Farm Wholesale Government & other organization regional services viability COA Health Services Education Services Local Government Services Sports Clubs Other Recreation & Service Clubs, etc. Top Level COA VIEW
Simulation For Farmer Action A set of Actions A C Behaviour-oriented Finance flow Trigger Action Information organization Individual /household consequence Gov. Market community D JanFebDecMar. Action AAction B Start End Year Information Information transfer -> Make a decision-> take a action ->Behaviour Change Model design
An Example of COA in Programming Model design
A simple Time Template used in the program
Framework – DIAS/FACET/JEOVIEWER Domain model -- DIAS framework Connect: -Hydrology Model -Economic Model -Social network model Social network & COAs -- FACET Output -- JEOVIEWER
Simulation