2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California Common Core Standards for Mathematics
Advertisements

Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 2.
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades K-5) Day 1.
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Training Revised (Grades K-5) Day 2.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Research-based learning progressions Internationally.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Number and Operations Standard Instructional programs from prekindergarten through grade 12 should enable all students to— Understand numbers Understand.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
Virginia Mathematics 2009 Grade 5 Standards of Learning Virginia Department of Education K-12 Mathematics Standards of Learning Institutes October 2009.
Wheeler Lower School Mathematics Program Grades 4-5 Goals: 1.For all students to become mathematically proficient 2.To prepare students for success in.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Sunnyside School District
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) An Overview. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin.
Overview Criteria Item Examples.  Create a sense of “measured urgency” ◦ Timeline is not immediate, but close ◦ Urgency in you and your teachers ◦ Difference.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Patty Stephens, M.Ed, NBCT 7-12 Math Instructional Specialist, Northshore School District Jeanne Flahiff, M.A., NBCT 7-9 ELA teacher & instructional coach,
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Year 6 Block A. 6A1 I can solve practical problems that involve number, place value and rounding. I can compare and order number to at least 10,000,000.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge as it Relates to Unpacking the WV CSOs Adapted from the Office of Instruction’s Presentations posted on Teach st.
How to design better questions!
Thornton Elementary Third Quarter Data rd Grade ELA Which standard did the students perform the best on in reading? Which standard did students.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Grade 4: Alignment to Mathematics Grade-Level Standards.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Year 6 Block A.
Definitions & Examples
Depth of knowledge (dok)
PROM/SE Ohio Mathematics Associates Institute Spring 2005
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
Preplanning Presentation
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels
Norman L Webb.
Presentation transcript:

2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 1 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

2007 Mississippi Department of Education Sweet Thoughts Select the number of times per week that you’d like to have chocolate. Multiply this number by 2. Add 5 to the product. Multiply your answer by 50. If you’ve already had your birthday this year, add 1757. If you’re still waiting for your birthday, add 1756. Subtract the four-digit year of your birth. 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Definition of Problem Solving The process involved to solve a problem or situation for which the individual who confronts it has no procedure that will guarantee a solution 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Definition of Algorithm A series of steps which, if followed correctly, will lead to a correct answer 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

What level of thinking is required by each task? 1. Solve for x: 2x – 5 = 17 a. 6 b. 11 c. 17 d. 22 2. Write an equation whose solution is 3. 3. Find two fractions with unlike denominators in simplest form whose difference is . 4. Draw the 5th term. Describe the pattern in words and symbols. Without drawing, describe what the 7th and 8th terms would look like. 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Thinking Levels of Tasks What is the cognitive demand of each task? Cognitive demand refers to the level of thinking required by the task or problem. How are the problems alike related to cognitive demand? How are they different? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Norman Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level 1 (Recall) recall information such as a fact, definition, term, or a simple procedure perform a simple algorithm or apply a formula (one-step, well-defined, and straight algorithmic procedure should be included at this lowest level) Key words: identify, recall, recognize, use, and measure 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Norman Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level 2 (Skill/Concept) engage in some mental processing beyond a habitual response explain the purpose and use of experimental procedures; carry out experimental procedures; make observations and collect data; classify, organize, and compare data; and organize and display data in tables, graphs, and charts Keywords: classify, organize, estimate, make observations, collect and display data, and compare data (imply more than one step) 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Norman Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level 3 (Strategic Thinking) reason, plan, use evidence, and engage in a higher level of thinking than the previous two levels (require students to explain their thinking) require students to make conjectures engage in activities that have more than one possible answer and require students to justify the response they give draw conclusions from observations; cite evidence and develop a logical argument for concepts; explain phenomena in terms of concepts; and use concepts to solve problems 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Norman Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level 4 (Extended Thinking) require complex reasoning, planning, developing, and thinking most likely over an extended period of time require high cognitive demands in the task and the work should be very complex require making several connections—relate ideas within the content area or among content areas—and select one approach among many alternatives on how the situation should be solved include designing and conducting experiments; making connections between a finding and related concepts and phenomena; combining and synthesizing ideas into new concepts; and critiquing experimental designs 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Curriculum materials and DOK Each group has been given a DOK level. Find instances or evidence of the characteristics of that level in your curriculum materials. 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Continuous models for fractions Continuous models could be related to length, area, volume or mass. The quantity represents . 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Discrete models for fractions Discrete models are typically sets of objects. This represents (ratio of purple to the total). 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

2007 Mississippi Department of Education Benchmark fractions: Provide a referent for estimating size of fractions 1 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

2007 Mississippi Department of Education Which benchmark is each fraction closest to: 0, , or 1? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Curriculum materials and fractions Using your curriculum materials, discuss the following: How are fractions introduced or reviewed? Are both continuous and discrete models used? How are the models connected or related for students? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

2007 Mississippi Department of Education Benchmark fractions Using your ideas from the benchmarking task, estimate the sum, difference, product and quotient of the following problems. How does use of the benchmarks impact student learning? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Rational number development Using the curriculum framework, look at the number strand. What do you notice about rational number development? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Curriculum framework discussion (Bingo problem) What objective(s) in the framework link to tasks of this type? How is this task related to non-routine problem solving? What mathematics can be developed from this task? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Toothpick Lab and Bingo Problem How are these tasks alike? How are they different? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Curriculum framework comparison How would the Toothpick lab be used in the classroom? What mathematics does it promote as related to the curriculum framework? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Comparison to curriculum framework: Knotty Problem Where does the Knotty problem fit with regard to the curriculum framework? What type of thinking is required for this type of task? What DOK level might describe it? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

2007 Mississippi Department of Education Focus Questions How were the topic developments today similar to or different from the way you thought about these ideas? What do you notice about the objectives in the curriculum framework with regard to number and algebraic development? What level of thinking does the topic development of this type promote? 2007 Mississippi Department of Education