Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation
Table 4. Age group distribution of enteropathogens
Intermediate-level learner
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
UNICEF funded Projects
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
Teachers Response (N= 11)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.
in the last evaluation of the software
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Age-sex literacy rates by various surveys.
Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions
Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
Rating of Water Quality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Actual descriptive example
Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. Population by University
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Cumulative Percentage
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
Geometry and Mensuration
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels Categorical Group Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade Third Grade Norm Group 139-186 163-201 176-208 161-226 SLI-A 142-181 150-197 167-202 167-205 SLI L&A Comorbid 116-168 128-179 140-188 151-206 Erin White-Canales et al. The Effects of Speech Sound Disorders on Literacy Outcomes of School-age Children. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 10, 1270-1278. doi:10.12691/education-3-10-10 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.