Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

No. 8, 863-870. doi:10.12691/education-5-8-5 Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

Published byLambert Carpenter Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "No. 8, 863-870. doi:10.12691/education-5-8-5 Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal."— Presentation transcript:

1 No. 8, 863-870. doi:10.12691/education-5-8-5
Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances Study Control Mean Variance Observations 390 558 Hypothesized Mean Difference df 735 t Stat P(T<=t) two-tail t Critical two-tail Victor Wakeling et al. A Comparison of Student Behavior and Performance between an Instructor-Regulated versus Student-Regulated Online Undergraduate Finance Course. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 8, doi: /education-5-8-5 © The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Download ppt "No. 8, 863-870. doi:10.12691/education-5-8-5 Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal."

Similar presentations

Trial Group AGroup B 12045 22350 32342 42340 52530 62056 73053 82441 92345 102650 112550 122041 Mean23.545.3 P value 2.8E-07 Means of Substances Group.

Trial Group AGroup B Mean P value 2.8E-07 Means of Substances Group.
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Intermediate-level learner

Intermediate-level learner
Hospital live Deliveries

Hospital live Deliveries
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Regression Statistics

Regression Statistics
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
Teachers Response (N= 11)

Teachers Response (N= 11)
Management Philosophy

Management Philosophy
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores

student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google