SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Done by Nada Al ghali(37B). What are>>performatives?? ***it is one of the interesting functions of language, or type of speech act Definition of performatives:
Advertisements

A bit of history 30 logical positivism : sentence is meaningful i it can be veried (i.e. testedfor truth and falsity). Wittgenstein 1958: meaning is use:
DOING THINGS WITH LANGUAGE
Pragmatics SPEECH ACTS & EVENTS.
Review Exercises 1) Do the COMPONENTIAL analysis (not the compositional one) of the following words: hen b) rooster Componential analysis 2) Does ‘A’
SPEECH ACTS “Action speak louder than words” is a well-known proverb. However, it is not completely correct because speech is action and language can.
Philosopher J.L.Austin’s book How to do things with words (1962)
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
A CTING AND C ONVERSING Drs. Liliek Soepriatmadji, M.Pd.
CAS LX 502 Semantics 12a. Speech acts Ch. 10(3). Conventional sentence types Declarative. (Assertion) Declarative. (Assertion) I seem to have forgotten.
CAS LX 502 7a. Speech acts Ch. 8. How to do things with words Language as a social function. — I bet you $1 you can’t name the Super Tuesday states. —You’re.
Yule, Politeness and interaction Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
Presentation on Formalising Speech Acts (Course: Formal Logic)
Speech acts and events. Ctions performed To express themselves, people do not only produce utterances, they perform actions via those Utterances, such.
Macropragmatics Speech act theory.
Direct and indirect speech acts
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Computer Science 30/08/20151 Agent Communication BDI Communication CPSC /CPSC Rob Kremer Department of Computer Science University of Calgary.
SPEECH ACT THEORY J. Austin & J.Searle
Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making.
PS429 Social and Public Communication PS429 Social and Public Communication Week 4 (25/10/2005) Reading group discussion.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.
6.3 Macropragmatics Speech act theory The cooperative principle The politeness principle.
Theories of Discourse and Dialogue. Discourse Any set of connected sentences This set of sentences gives context to the discourse Some language phenomena.
Topic 9: perlocution and illocution
Yule, Speech Acts Pertemuan 8 Matakuliah: G1042/Pragmatics Tahun: 2006.
EEL 5937 Agent communication EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 10, Feb. 6, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
SPEAKING:. Contents: Making the request and offers Replying the requests and offers Task 1 Task 2 Being polite: white lies Task 3.
Semantics by John I. Saeed
Standards Of Textuality And Speech Acts.
Your host E. Aminudin Aziz. Austin’s observation on (many or even most) acts realised through speech  People do things with words  The idea sharply.
Speech Act. Speech act theory was proposed by John. L. Austin and has been developed by J. R. Searle. They believe that language is not only used to inform.
EEL 5937 Agent communication EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lotzi Bölöni.
Speech Act Theory Mohammad Alipour Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Pragmatics (1) Dr. Ansa Hameed.
Speech Acts and Speech Events Austin (1962) and Searle (1969)-it is possible to classify utterances into very small set of functions. We ought to assign.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing See R. Nofsinger, Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991.
Speech Act Theory Instructor: Dr Khader Khader.  Outline:  How Speech Act Theory began  What is the theory about  Levels of performing speech acts.
Introduction to Linguistics
Speech Acts Actions performed via utterances e.g. You are fired
Discourse and Pragmatics Speech Acts Lecture 4: Paltridge, pp
Direct and indirect speech acts
PRAGMATICS 2.
Aristotel‘s concept to language studies was to study true or false sentences - propositions; Thomas Reid described utterances of promising, warning, forgiving.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
7 Pragmatics Definition of pragmatics Pragmatics vs. semantics Context
Utilization of Sentences Lec. 3
PERLOCUTIONS AND ILLOCUTIONS
Pragmatics within Linguistics
SPEECH ACT AND EVENTS By Ive Emaliana
LECTURE 9: Agent Communication
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Three Kinds of Act.
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions.
conversation takes place in real time, is spontaneous and unplanned
Lecture 7 Speech Acts II.
Speech Acts: some notes useful for the assignment
Speech Acts.
Welcome back!.
SPEECH ACTS AND EVENTS 6.1 Speech Acts 6.2 IFIDS 6.3 Felicity Conditions 6.4 The Performative Hypothesis 6.5 Speech Act Classifications 6.6 Direct and.
Week 9 language in context
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing
Semantics Seven kinds of speech acts
Pragmatics.
How To Do Things With Words
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing Professor Lenny Shedletsky
Direct and indirect speech acts
Ethnography of Communication / Speaking
Presentation transcript:

SPEECH ACT THEORY: Felicity Conditions

Felicity Conditions Felicity conditions are the conditions which must be fulfilled for a speech act to be satisfactorily performed or realized. For a speech act to work, as Austin argues, there are a number of felicity conditions that must be met. There must be a generally accepted procedure for successfully carrying out the speech act. Also, the circumstances must be appropriate for the use of the speech act and the person who uses the speech act must be the appropriate person to use it in the particular context. For example: In a wedding ceremony a priest might say ‘I now declare you husband and wife’. In a launching of a ship the person who has been invited to launch the ship might say ‘I hereby name this ship the Titanic.’

Felicity Conditions 2. The procedure must be carried out correctly and completely. Thus, the bride and groom should reply ‘I do’ (rather than ‘Okay, I suppose so’) and the marriage license must be signed. 3. The person must (in most circumstances) have the required thoughts, feelings and intentions for the speech act to be felicitous. That is, the communication must be carried out by the right person, in the right place, at the right time and, normally, with a certain intention, or it will not work. If the first two of these conditions are not satisfied, the act will not be achieved and will misfire. If the third of these conditions does not hold, then the procedure will be abused.

Felicity Conditions According to Searle, the felicity conditions of an utterance are constitutive rules, because they are not just something that can go right (or wrong) or be abused but something which make up and define the act itself. That is, they are rules that need to be followed for the utterance to work. Thus, they constitute the particular speech act. Searle classifies felicity conditions into: Preparatory conditions which concern real-world prerequisites to each illocutionary act. Propositional content conditions that specify restrictions on the content of the complement sentence. Sincerity conditions that state the requisite beliefs, feelings, and intentions of the speaker, as appropriate to each kind of action.

Promising The conditions for the speech act of promising are: I say I will perform an action in the future. I intend to do it. I believe I can do it. I think I would not do it anyway in the normal course of my actions. I think the other person wants me to do it. I intend to place myself under an obligation by the act of promising. We both understand what I am saying. We are both normal, conscious human beings. Both of us are in normal circumstances (e.g. not performing in a play). The utterance contains some illocutionary force indicating device which is only uttered if all the appropriate conditions hold.

SPEECH ACT CLASSIFICATION Declarations Representatives Expressives Directives Commissives

DECLARATIONS Declarations are kinds of speech act that change the world via utterances. The speaker has to have a special institutional role, in a specific context, in order to perform a declaration appropriately. Example: a. Priest: I now pronounce you husband and wife. b. Referee: You’re out. c. Jury Foreman: We find the defendant guilty. In using a declaration, the speaker changes the world via words.

REPRESENTATIVES Representatives are those kinds of speech acts that state what the speaker believes to be the case or not. Statements of fact, assertions, conclusions, and descriptions are all examples of the speaker representing the world as he or she believes it is. Example: a. The earth is flat. b. Chomsky didn’t write about peanuts. c. It was a warm sunny day. In using a representative, the speaker makes words fit the world (of belief)

EXPRESSIVES Expressives are those kinds of speech acts that state what the speaker feels. They express psychological states and can be statements of pleasure, pain, likes, dislikes, joy, or sorrow. They can be caused by something the speaker does or the hearer does, but they are about the speaker’s experience. Example: a. I’m really sorry! b. Congratulations! c. Oh, yes, great, mmmm, ssahh! In using an expressive, the speaker makes words fit the world (of feeling).

DIRECTIVES Directives are those kinds of speech acts that speakers use to get someone else to do something. They express what the speaker wants. They are commands, orders, requests, suggestions, etc. Examples: a. Give me a cup of coffee. Make it black. b. Could you lend me a pen, please? c. Don’t touch that! In using a directive, the speaker attempts to make the world fit the words (via the hearer).

COMMISSIVES Commissives are those kinds of speech acts that speakers use to commit themselves to some future action. They express what the speaker intends. They are promises, threats, refusals, pledges. They can be performed by the speaker alone, or by the speaker as a member of a group. Example: a. I’ll be back. b. I’m going to get it right next time. c. We will not do that. In using a commissive, the speaker undertakes to make the world fit words (via the speaker).