ECOLOGISATION OF VARNA TPP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Sustainable Environmental Programme Enel Maritza East 3 Mike Foster CEO Enel Operations Bulgaria.
Advertisements

Mitigation Strategies What and Why?. What is mitigation? To decrease force or intensity. To lower risk. Earthquake mitigation Flood mitigation Climate.
1 ERC Anya Boyd Energy Research Centre University of Cape Town 4th March 2011 ERC Response to the NCCRGP.
1 Future Changes in Fuel Mix of Electricity Generation in Hong Kong and Implications By Larry Chuen-ho Chow Professor, Department of Geography Director,
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Prague Plant Data Kilns 2 x 1,300 tpd clinker  Vertical Coal Mill 15 tph  Cement Mills 3 x 100 tph + 1 x 30 tph  Own Quarries for Marl, Limestone.
1 The Bulgarian Natural Gas Market: The TSO’s point of view Angel Semerdjiev, Executive Officer, Bulgartransgaz EAD 30 January 2009, Sofia.
Maximizing production efficiency for existing and new power infrastructure: Enel experience in Russia and technologies Enrico Viale Chief Executive Officer,
中国环境科学研究院 Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences Air Pollution Control Strategy for China’s Power Sector 中国环境科学研究院 中国环境规划院 Chinese Academy.
EMPIRE- modelling the future European power system under different climate policies Asgeir Tomasgard, Christian Skar, Gerard Doorman, Bjørn H. Bakken,
Governor’s Conference on Energy Federal/State/Local Role in Permitting & Regulating Energy Projects October 16, 2013.
750 kV Rivne-Kyiv High Voltage Line Construction Project with attraction of loan proceeds from European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and European.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Prague, 7 October.
Solution for Future Electrical Supply in the Middle Europe Nuclear Power Ivo Kouklík
TRANSPOSITION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IPPC, LCP, SEVESO II, VOC DIRECTIVES – EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS LEARNT Kalin Iliev Nikolay Savov Ministry of Environment.
1 SUSTAINABLE WORLD COAL MINING AND USE: PERSPECTIVES TO 2030 by Dr. Klaus Brendow World Energy Council, Geneva / London INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
 Each day we rely on electricity-gobbling gadgets that didn’t exist years ago.  Americans are devouring much more energy than ever.  We need.
Updates on the RFE Energy Sector and the RFE LEAP model, and Implications of a Regional Alternative Path for the Russian Far East Victor Kalashnikov Economic.
Policies and Measures to Address Climate Change in Korea Shin Boo-nam Deputy Director-General MOFAT, KOREA Shin Boo-nam Deputy Director-General MOFAT,
CGC All you ever wanted to know about the electricity crisis.
Legislation in the EU and the impact on existing plant Lesley Sloss FRSC FIEnvSci Principal Environmental Consultant
Hydro power 16.3 % Wind power 0.1 % Peat 6.9 % Other renewable 11.4 % Nuclear power 26.8 % Natural gas 10.3 % Coal 14.1 % Oil 1.9 % Net imports 12.2 %
REVISION OF THE IPPC DIRECTIVE  DIRECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS.
Perspectives of Nuclear Energy Further development in Armenia A. A. Gevorgyan Obninsk, RF 27 June – 2 July 2004.
Donor Conference Ministry of Energy of Georgia. Current situation Technical problems –Power sector of Georgia – not build to operate independently Economic.
The IED/ELVs as seen through the Eyes of a User of Combustion Plant Dr Tim Rotheray.
CAFE Baseline dissemination workshop 27/09/2004 Dr. Leonidas Mantzos E3M-LAB/ICCS NTUA contact: Energy projections as input to the.
Wind Production intermittency Cross border compensation: what to expect in Western Europe? Analysis of Winter 2010/2011 Hubert Flocard and Jean-Pierre.
Energy Sector of Turkey “General Overview and Policy Objectives” Sinem ÇAYNAK General Directorate for Energy Affairs IEA Turkey IDR Meeting December 8,
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
LCPs – Large Combustions Plants – what ist a large combustion plant?  > 50 MW rated thermal input  Irrespective of type of fuel, age and branch  Heat.
THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER IN EUROPE THE BULGARIAN CONTEXT Milko Kovachev Chairman Bulgarian WEC Committee.
“Electricity System Operator” EAD S tate and Prospects for Development of the Bulgarian Electrical Power System Ventsislav Zahov, Head of Electrical Regimes.
Energy Management and Planning MSJ0210 Energy generation Eduard Latõšov.
ELECTRICITY MARKET IN BULGARIA an attempt for realistic point of view Lubos Pavlas Regional manager of CEZ for Bulgaria Sofia,
Nuclear Power Economics and Project Structuring 2017 Edition
OF THE ХI KAZENERGY EURASIAN FORUM “SECURING THE FUTURE OF ENERGY”
NS4960 Spring Term 2017 Korea: Energy Policy
MJAC Founded 1928 December 2016
Bulgaria Electricity Sector Forecast till year 2030 ENERGOPROEKT – JSC
Telecommunications & Electronics
UNIT MW TPP KAKANJ Sarajevo, May 2017.
State Electricity Regulatory Commission BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Types of Power Plants in Bulgaria
Prof. Dr. V. Zebergs, Prof. Dr. N Zeltins
CENERG 3rd TEMATIC WORKSHOP
Eskom’s response to Minimum Emission Standards
Chapter 9 Myth: Wind Power Reduces CO2 Emissions
The world trade in coal Lesson outcomes:
Today’s Energy Picture
STATE ENERGY AND WATER REGULATORY COMMISSION
Overview on Renewable energy in Bulgaria
Poland - Perspective and current status of introducing nuclear power
2018 OUR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Alexandria Portland
2017 OUR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Alexandria Portland
Outline Energy demand and prices Reserves and new sources of energy supply.
NS4960 Spring Term 2018 Korea: Energy Policy
NS4960 Spring Term, 2018 China: Expanded Renewables
Status of compliance with Minimum Emission Standards
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
2017 OUR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Alexandria Portland
Challenges and opportunities on Islands’ decarbonisation
2018 OUR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Alexandria Portland
NS4960 Spring Term 2018 China: Nuclear Expansion Issues
Chesterfield Neighborhood Coal Ash Update January 9th, 2019
2018 OUR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Alexandria Portland
Comparison of Nonrenewable Energy Fuels
ROMANIA 2019 NEEDS IDENTIFICATION ROMANIA 2019.
Industrial Value Chain: A Bridge Towards a Carbon Neutral Europe
2019 OUR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Alexandria Portland
Presentation transcript:

ECOLOGISATION OF VARNA TPP Kamen Boshnakov ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN THE CHANGING WORLD – STRATEGIES, CHALLENGES, OPTIONS Sofia, 11-12 December, 2012, Sheraton Hotel Balkan PRG-ZPD013-20050929-13229P1E

THE ROLE OF VARNA TPP AS PART OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEM With three out of its six units, it provides 60% of the cold back-up of the national power system, which was activated 41 times in 2011 Furthermore, it is an essential source for Northeastern Bulgaria Over the last few years Varna TPP has repeatedly managed to prove its exceptional significance in the event of emergency situations, repairs of other capacities of the electrical energy system, increased consumption of electricity, or in energy crisis situations The power plant was crucial for ensuring energy stability in Bulgaria when the deliveries of Russian gas stopped in January 2009, as well as during the prolonged repairs at Unit 6 at Kozloduy NPP in the autumn of 2010 The capacities of the power plant have been used time and again in force majeure circumstances to meet abrupt increases in the demand of electrical energy Varna TPP plays a key role for the energy balance of the country and for ensuring stability of power supply These are all but a few examples that evidence the great significance of Varna TPP, not only locally, but also on a national level Ecologisation of Varna TPP

ECOLOGISATION OF VARNA TPP I. Air Emissions 1. Emission restrictions for the units at Varna TPP: UNIT № 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Units №1, 2 and 3 700 h/y per unit NOx– 1200mg/Nm3 SO2– 2500mg/Nm3 Dust– 350 mg/Nm3 Unit № 4 NOx– 1200 mg/Nm3 SO2– 2500 mg/Nm3 Dust – 230 mg/Nm3 NOx – 1200 mg/Nm3 Unit № 5 SO2 – 400 mg/Nm3 Unit № 6 Dust – 50 mg/Nm3 - derogation of Article 4, Directive 2001/80/ЕС - compliance with Directive 2010/75/ЕС - compliance with Directive 2001/80/ЕС or decommissioning - transitional period for Directive 2001/80/ЕС - decommissioning 2. Scheduled measures to ensure compliance: Decommissioning units 1, 2 and 3 by the end of 2015 Ecologisation of units 4, 5, and 6 to reach the limits as per Directive 2010/75/EC by constructing desulphurization installation, reconstructing the electrostatic precipitators and installing deNOxing units Ecologisation of Varna TPP

ECOLOGISATION OF VARNA TPP II. Emissions of greenhouse gases Emissions of greenhouse gases Realization of investments in the amount of 64 033 000 euro, included in the national investment plan for the 2013 - 2020 period The main issue is the lack of clarity in the legislation regarding the reimbursement of the expenses on free quotas Ecologisation of Varna TPP

ECOLOGISATION OF VARNA TPP III. Reconstruction and environmentalisation of the coal ash pond of the plant Operational limitations of the coal ash pond Coal Ash Pond Section 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Section one 649 374 t Section two 1 067 171 t - operation in the conditions of wet disposal - decommissioning, environmentalisation and reconstruction - operation in the conditions of dry disposal Ecologisation of Varna TPP