Course of Action Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course of Action Analysis
Advertisements

Course of Action Development
Joint Operation Planning Process:
Training Briefing Slide Format
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
MISSION ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Maj Tom Woods
Commander’s Intent & Guidance Deployable Joint Task Force Augmentation Cell (DJTFAC) Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) Major Paul Zavislak.
Expeditionary Training Group (ETG) ETG Maritime Security Operations Ready UNCLASSIFIED Navy Staff Planning EODGRU TWO AUG 14.
Course of Action Development
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Commander’s Intent & Guidance
Crisis Action Planning Commander’s Guidance and Intent
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 7 – Prepare Operations Plan (OPLAN) / Operations Order (OPORD) & Assess UNCLASSIFIED.
Joint Special Operations University
The Military Decision Making Process
Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Course of Action Development UNCLASSIFIED CTF Training.
Multinational Force Staff Estimates
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Chapter. Date: AUG 2010Briefer: Mr. Russell Woody, Director, MCIWEST Regional PlansSlide: 2 Analyze Define problem/opportunity.
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
Mission Analysis (MDMP)
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
Military Decision Making Process – Multinational (MDMP-M)
Certification and Accreditation CS Syllabus Ms Jocelyne Farah Mr Clinton Campbell.
1 The Military Decision- Making Process (MDMP). 2 MDMPAgenda MDMP Agenda 1. Module 1: MDMP Overview/Receipt of Mission/Mission Analysis PE # 1 – Cdr’s.
Military Decision-Making Process
THE MILITARY DECISION MAKING PROCESS (MDMP)
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Comparison.
CTF PACIFIC Date Course of Action Development Brief UNCLASSIFIED.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
February 2009 Credentialing the FEMA Disaster Workforce Reservist Briefing Date: February 2009 Paul Geiger, Readiness Branch Chief, Disaster Reserve Workforce.
Campaign Planning Process 28 March 2006 Step 4C – Campaign Evaluation UNCLASSIFIED.
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
U.S. Agency for International Development Office of Military Affairs District Stability Framework (DSF) and the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Analysis.
COA Development Steps Analyze available forces.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 1 Course of Action Development (MDMP) 3 Mar 08 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Campaign Planning Process Guide / Brief Template
Purpose To understand Commander’s Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action planning Intent & Guidance and their importance in crisis action.
Campaign Planning Process Step 5 – Linking Planning to Execution
Military Decision Making Process (MDMP)
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
Campaign Planning Process 29 March 2006 Step 4E – Determine Prioritized Supporting Effects UNCLASSIFIED.
Staff (Running) Estimate
Crisis Action Planning & the Commander’s Estimate Process 23 February 2001.
Crisis Action Planning (CAP) and The Commander’s Estimate Joint Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Joint Operations Joint Pup , Joint Task Force Planning Guidance.
Critical Facts & Assumptions
Major William B. Pittman 18 September 2015
Multinational Force Course of Action Development
MNF SOP Planning Options & Campaign Planning Process
Course of Action Development
Course of Action Analysis (MDMP)
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team Course of Action Analysis
Campaign Planning Process Step 4 – Campaign Formulation
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE
CRISIS ACTION PLANNING (CAP) and COMMANDER’S ESTIMATE Maj Kelly Lawson
Religious Inputs/Outputs
The MDMP Process MDMP Inputs MDMP Outputs Step 1 MDMP Inputs Step 5
Administrative Instructions – Short Version (Option 2)
Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute The Army’s only organization for Peace and Stability Operations at the strategic and operational level.
Risk Assessment Matrix
Safety Risk Management (SRM) Process Overview
ASLO CSS BOS SMAP PLANNING PROCESS CHART
TYPES OF ORDERS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: COVERS NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS IN GARRISON OR IN THE FIELD. THEY INCLUDE GENERAL, SPECIFIC, & MEMORANDUM.
OPERATIONAL READINESS
Military Decision Making Process-Multinational (MDMP-M) Overview
Military Decision Making Process - Multinational (MDMP-M) Overview
Presentation transcript:

Course of Action Development CTF PACIFIC Course of Action Development Brief Date UNCLASSIFIED

Purpose of Brief Present COAs in accordance with Comd guidance Seek guidance on: COAs to be fully developed COA Modifications COAs to be Wargamed Threat COAs to be wargamed against COA Comparison criteria

HHQ MISSION & INTENT Mission – Intent Purpose – Method – End State –

Restated Mission Statement  

CTF Commander’s Intent Purpose: Method: End State:

CTF Commander’s Guidance  

ASSUMPTIONS

DECISIVE POINTS

COA 1 Statement  

COA 1 Overview  

COA 1 Task Organization  

COA 1 Phase I CTF HQ: Component: Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 1 Phase II CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 1 Phase III CTF HQ: Component: Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 1 Phase IV CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 1 Phase V CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 1 Risks  

COA 2 Statement

COA 2 Overview  

COA 2 Task Organization

COA 2 Phase I CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 2 Phase II CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 2 Phase III CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 2 Phase IV CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 2 Phase V CTF HQ: Component:   Phase begins with……. Purpose is to ………….. Main Effort is to ………….. Phase ends when …………….

COA 2 Risks  

COA PRELIMINARY COMPARISON

Test the Validity of Each COA Test for suitability Test for feasibility Test for acceptability Ensure COAs are distinct (variety) Test for completeness

Test the Validity of Each COA Validity Criteria COA 1 Name COA 2 Suitable Y/N Feasible Acceptable Distinct Complete

SEs Met by each COA SEs Met COA 1 Name COA 2 SE Y / N / ?

COA Advantages/Disadvantages Initial Assessment

Staff Recommendations Recommended COA Comparison Criteria:

Staff Recommendations Threat COAs to be Wargamed Against: COA 1 (Most Likely): COA 2 (Most dangerous):

CTF Commander’s Guidance

Discussion UNCLASSIFIED