© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Parameters BD PP CP TC (mg. dl-l) ± * ± 5.8

Advertisements

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

before and after rehabilitation

Intermediate-level learner

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

Table 2. Changes in body composition, energy and water intake

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

No. of runs Xo X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Si

osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)

Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Regression Statistics

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value

Table 1. Descriptive data of movement form scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Educational Qualification of Respondance

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

Variables Coefficient Prob.

Table 4.5. summary of anovabunder multiple regression

Table 1. Descriptive statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Social capital comparison of adopters and non-adopters

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

t-test for Equality of Means

Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Drug use among family members and friends of the students

and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

institution N Mean S.D SEM df t P

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 5. Daily Standard Deviation of Items

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 2. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at Non-Executive level

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Figure 2. Changes in each parameter

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 4. Analysis of Variance of Motor levels among Women Football Players of Three Different Levels Motor Fitness components Source of Variance df Sums of Squares Mean Square F-Value Zigzag run Between Groups 2 15.73 7.87 1.24 Within Groups 47 2.98.35 6.35 Shuttle run 1.50 0.75 1.07 33.00 0.70 Medicine ball Throw 3.70 1.85 1.42 61.20 1.30 Standing broad jump 0.01 0.005 0.52 0.43 0.009 Non-significant at .05 level, F.05 (2, 47)= 3.18 Rajkumar Sharma et al. Assessment of Motor Fitness, Physical Fitness and Body Composition of Women Football Players at Different Levels of their Participation. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 2, 47-54. doi:10.12691/ajssm-3-2-4 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.