© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation

Table 4. Age group distribution of enteropathogens

Intermediate-level learner

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

UNICEF funded Projects

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Nilai rata-rata total validitas

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

in the last evaluation of the software

Age-sex literacy rates by various surveys.

Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Actual descriptive example

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Population by University

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Cumulative Percentage

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 8. Mean comparisons of NWEA overall subgroup (norm, SLI-A, and SLI L&A comorbid) scores across grade levels Kindergarten First Grade Second Grade Third Grade Norm Group 163.6 177.15 196.3 197.05 SLI-A 154.4 175.2 186.1 192.1 SLI-A/L 149.3 157.75 168.45 170.85 Erin White-Canales et al. The Effects of Speech Sound Disorders on Literacy Outcomes of School-age Children. American Journal of Educational Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 10, 1270-1278. doi:10.12691/education-3-10-10 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.