Space Planning & Management Description Employ current understanding of potential of building stock (through undertaking building condition assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recycling Waste Heat – CHP as an alternative
Advertisements

Demand Response in Ontario Paul Grod, CEO, Rodan Energy July 11, 2013.
Mid West Regional Authority Greenhills hotel, Limerick Energy Solutions for Sustainable Development Renewables for Sports Facilities.
Name: Date: Read temperatures on a thermometer Independent / Some adult support / A lot of adult support
INVESTMENTS IN POWER SECTOR
Dokumentname > Folie 1 > Vortrag > Autor Potentials for Renewables in Europe Wolfram Krewitt DLR Institute of Technical Thermodynamics Systems.
Renewables (CHP), Global Warming, and Energy Efficiency Richard Brent Solar Government Affairs Lake Tahoe, California July 28, 2005 California Manufacturers.
Source Separated Organic Materials Anaerobic Digestion Feasibility Study Prepared for Ramsey/Washington Counties Resource Recovery Project Board And the.
Planning for a Low-Carbon Future at San Diego Gas & Electric Rob Anderson Director of Resource Planning San Diego Gas & Electric Western Resource Planners.
Wood to Warmth – Case Studies Alison Wilshaw, TV Energy 16 February,
Energy policy and its implementation in Estonia Renewable energy Madis Laaniste, Energy Department.
Presented by: Rod Meredith Assistant Director Public Works Riley County, KS Matthew Leaper Business Development Manager Johnson Controls, Inc. IMPLEMENTING.
Technology, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy for Emission Reduction John Morrison and Ward Lenz Advanced Energy April 20, 2004.
Insights on Economic Impacts of Utility Mercury and CO 2 Controls Anne Smith Charles River Associates North Carolina DENR/DAQ Workshop on Mercury and CO.
1 Comments for Workshop on EEU Budget for August 6, 2008.
CRed carbon reduction Reader Emeritus in Environmental Sciences; Energy Science Adviser Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia:
Facilities: A Sampling of Sustainability Efforts Guaranteed Energy Savings Agreement (GESA) Geothermal LEED Building Construction Natural Gas Vehicles.
Steve Crawford, M.Sc Environmental Director 1. Overview and Background Tribal energy mission statement: To be 100% self- sufficient in energy, while safeguarding.
Solar Water Heating as a Green House Gas Reduction and Energy Conservation Strategy Florida Solar Energy Industries Association and Florida Solar Energy.
June Energy consumption in Korea 4 primary & final energy consumption CO 2 emissions LNG Nuclear Renewables, etc Oil Coal Energy Industrial.
Solar Motor Works 90% of the fuel load gone 1)Engine 2)Solar collector 3)Thermal energy storage Solving our energy needs All three together is Engine system.
BREAKOUT SESSION 2 Smart Grid 2-B: Grid Integration – Essential Step for Optimization of Resources Integrating Intermittent Wind Generation into an Island.
Jenny Wright Product Manager, Green Power Switch Tennessee Valley Authority.
* A chiller capable of producing water temperatures of low 40s on the evaporator side and above 135° on the condenser side.
Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
| 1 Anshan 2015 – A world leading low carbon District Heating system
Financing Renewable Energy: an introduction to FITs and RHI Andrej Miller Renewable Financial Incentives Office of Renewable Energy Deployment
Heat and Power Sources for Buildings. Overview energy requirements of buildings traditional energy sources carbon emissions calcs LZC energy sources –low-carbon.
UCSD Medical Center - Hillcrest Campus Case Study Gerry White Facilities Design & Construction University of California, San Diego.
New Technology Improves Efficiency of Universitys Energy Infrastructure Frank Brewer Associate Vice President for Facilities Management University of Maryland.
Geoexchange at CMU Regional public higher education institution 3 campuses in Grand Junction, CO. Main campus 78 acres and 1.5 million s.f. under.
Evaluating Costs and Benefits of a Smart
By Martín Gesualdi, Tecnolatina S.A, Suipacha 1111, Buenos Aires, Argentine, Phone/Fax ,
DAC PROJECT Capacity Building in Balcan Countries for the Abatement of Greenhouse Gases Setting priorities for GHG emissions reduction George Mavrotas.
Taskforce Meeting March 4, Focus on food waste Also other organics such as leaves and yard waste and agricultural wastes Food waste about
Energy Efficiencies Opportunities for SMEs … An effective tool to sustain bottom line Tuesday, April 2, 2013.
© Vattenfall AB The Swedish Power Market Presented for Invest in Sweden Agency and Sun Microsystems Stockholm 20 March, 2009 Sandra Grauers Nilsson, Vattenfall.
First Solar FuelSmart™: Powering Energy Security
Climate Change Mitigation in Developing Countries: South Africa Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change by Ogunlade.
Lessons from community energy projects in Wales A brief overview Matthew Leese 1.
Regional Energy Markets Assistance Program Kazakhstan November 8-11, 2010.
EnvironmentEnvironnementCanada Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia September 5 – 7, Part 4: LFG Utilization.
California Energy Commission 1 Energy Workshops for W&WW Agencies UTILITY STRATEGIES FOR SHIFTING PEAK DEMAND PERIOD WATER & ENERGY USE REGIONAL STRATEGIES:
NARUC 2015 Winter Meeting February 16, 2015 Combined Heat and Power and the Clean Power Plan Bruce Hedman Institute for Industrial Productivity.
Tenth Annual Midwest Energy Conference March 7, 2007 How Best Satisfy Midwest Electric Load Growth? Thomas R. Casten Chairman Recycled Energy Development.
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
Sustainability in Campus Operations at Three Higher Education Institutions in Tompkins County, New York Nick Goldsmith TAITEM Engineering, PC AASHE Conference.
FIFTH ANNUAL FEDERAL ENERGY WORKSHOP & DEFENSE ENERGY PARTNERSHIP FORUM | PAGE 2 Bruce Hedman, Institute for Industrial Productivity September 16, 2014.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Potential Impacts of an Advanced Energy Portfolio Standard in Pennsylvania Ryan Pletka, P.E. Black & Veatch April 12, 2004 Supported by: Heinz Endowments.
UTSW Thermal Energy Plants, Power Generation and Electrical System What do we do to meet the Emission Reduction, Energy usage Reduction and Electrical.
Transitioning to a Cleaner Energy Supply. Catalyzing climate solutions …in the lab …in the classroom…on our campus.
Charles F. Hurley Building Case Study B.J. Mohammadipour Bureau of State Office Buildings.
1 Progress Toward Sustainability at Williams College.
Cogeneration at UC July 18, Welcome 3 Transformation of the Power Plant POWER PLANT CENTER OF CAMPUS CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT 2007.
1 Progress Toward Sustainability at Williams College.
Sustainability and Public-Private Initiatives Sean Patton Director, Energy Solutions LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION JUNE 8, 2012 Sustainability for the Future.
City of Fort Collins Wind Power Program March 24, 2004 John Phelan, PE Energy Services Engineer.
March 30, 2010 Michael Kelleher SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Energy Use, Renewable Energy and SUNY ESF Climate Action Plan.
Net-Zero Rubenstein 5% Energy Reduction Goal Main campus electricity is supplied by the Burlington Electric Department (BED). Nuclear energy, which comprised.
Utah State University Logan Utah. Founded 1888 as a Land Grant Institution Host City – Logan, Utah (48,ooo+ population) ~ 15,000 Students (~ 28,700 students.
1 Summary of Phase I – Phase III Progress and Accomplishments and Phase IV Work plan April 27, 2004.
London 2062 Symposium London’s Energy Future Peter North 19 th March 2012.
Cogeneration at UC March 09, Welcome Central Utility Plant.
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
UMCP Learning Objectives
APTA Sustainability Workshop 2016
campus carbon footprint
Energy Conservation CERD /12/2017
Presentation transcript:

Space Planning & Management Description Employ current understanding of potential of building stock (through undertaking building condition assessment and developing new standards for space management and scheduling) and use this as the basis for revising the campus master plan. Objective is to increase space and building use efficiency to limit the need for new construction. If growth rates experienced between 1980 and 2010 continue, CWRU is projected to add approximately 3.6 million new gross square footage by If this growth was limited, the capital costs, operating expenses and associated energy expenses would be avoided Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Draft specific Space Planning & Management policy that outlines discrete steps and processes that need to be put into place to enable this abatement opportunity. Define specific projects and objectives for the next X years. Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)Incremental Cost of Renovations: $0 O&M (2010$)$2.84 / GSF Avoided Operating Cost Change in Demand Reduce Purchased Electricity demand by 54,000 MWh by 2050 Reduce Steam Demand by 303,000 MMBtu by 2050 Reduce CHW demand by 30,000 MMBtu by 2050 Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Average Scope 2 Emissions by 74,000 MTCDE by 2050 Useful LifeLife of CAP Other SourceAEI, ES

Reduced Air Travel Description This option impacts 20% of air travel. The first 5 years will see a reduction of 10% of emissions associated with the 20% impacted air travel. Within 10 years, the above amount will be reduced by 15%. The increase use of telepresense will move this objective forward. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)No Capital Costs O&M (2010$) $220.07: Air travel cost per GHG emitted $2,770,540: Avoided Operating Costs over life of project Change in Demand None Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduction of Scope 3 Emissions by 850 MTCDE/ year Useful LifeLife of CAP Other $6,132,510: Total Air Travel Cost (2009) $220.07: Air travel cost per GHG emitted SourceSasaki, CWRU

Green Information Technology Description The university will explore means of transitioning to centralized energy management, including the integration of asset and power management software campus-wide. This will enable energy reductions through centralized IT management. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)$28,000, spent over 3 years for software and implementation. O&M (2010$) $1.50 per computer/per year 14,000 computers Change in Demand Reduction in Electricity by 8,230 MWh per year Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduction of Scope 2 emissions by 5,855 MTCDE/ year Useful LifeLife of CAP Other SourceAEI, CWRU (Jeff Gumpf)

Short-term Energy Conservation Measures Description The university will implement its already-developed program for installing campus-wide energy conservation measures. This measure targets the lowest hanging fruit of energy conservation potential. These ECMs have the shortest payback times, often under 2 years. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)$1,950,000 spent over 5 years (~$390,000/year) O&M (2010$)$25,350,000 Incremental fuel savings Change in Demand Reduce Purchased Electricity demand by 6,500 MWh per year Reduce Natural Gas Demand by 56,300 klb per year Reduce CHW demand by 1,336,000 ton-hrs per year Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 13,700 MTCDE Start Date2011 Useful Life5 years Other SourceAEI / CWRU (Gene Mathews)

Conservation Outreach & Behavior Change Description Through a targeting and aggressive marketing effort, CWRU will reduce electricity consumption by campus population by a 3% reduction in 5 years and a 5% reduction in 10 years. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $100,000 annual costs, years 1-5 (Human resources + promotional materials) $50,000 annual costs, year 5-10 (Human resources + promotional materials) O&M (2010$)$6,300,000 Incremental fuel savings Change in Demand Reduce Purchased Electricity demand by ~5,500 MWh per year Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 3,885 MTCDE Start Date2012 Useful Life10 years Other SourceSasaki/AEI

Mid-term Energy Conservation Measures Description The university will implement its already-developed program for installing campus-wide energy conservation measures. This measure targets the energy conservation measures that have 2-5 year payback. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)$6,025,000 spent over 8 years (~$753,000/year) O&M (2010$)$25,350,000 Incremental fuel savings Change in Demand Reduce Purchased Electricity demand by 8,320 MWh per year Reduce Natural Gas Demand by 51,000 klb per year Reduce CHW demand by 577,000 ton-hrs per year Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 13,334 MTCDE Start Date2016 Useful Life8 years for full implementation Other SourceAEI / CWRU (Gene Mathews)

Steam Line Improvements Description The starting steam loss in the distribution network is 9%. In this measure, CWRU will invest in upgrades to the steam distribution loop, through the installation of new lines and abandoning the steam tunnel. This will lead to an improvement of steam loss by 4%. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)$600,000 O&M (2010$)none Change in Demand Reduction in Steam Demand by 4% per year, approximately 40,000 MMBtu by 2050 Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 4,317 MTCDE Start Date2012 Useful Life25 Other SourceAEI / CWRU (Gene Mathews)

Long-term Energy Conservation Measures Description The university will implement its already-developed program for installing campus-wide energy conservation measures. This measure targets the energy conservation measures that have 2-5 year payback. Assumptions Time Frame Years Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)$8,300,000 spent over 10 years (~$832,000/year) O&M (2010$)$25,350,000 Incremental fuel savings Change in Demand Reduce Purchased Electricity demand by 2,700 MWh per year Reduce Natural Gas Demand by 49,000 klb per year Reduce CHW demand by 1,400,000 ton-hrs per year Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 10,000 MTCDE Start Date2024 Useful Life10 years for full implementation Other SourceAEI / CWRU (Gene Mathews)

Building Design & Construction Standards Description Create building design and construction standards to ensure that construction of all new and renovated buildings employ aggressive energy standards as prime among all aspects of sustainability. The building design and construction standards will result in a 30% reduction in Business as Usual energy use intensity. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$)Premium for Green Building costs = 5% O&M (2010$)$2.84 / GSF Avoided Operating Cost Change in Demand Reduce Purchased Electricity demand by 54,800 MWh by 2050 Reduce Natural Gas Demand by 236,000 MMBtu by Reduce CHW demand by 10,800 MMBtu by 2050 Change in Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 28,000 MTCDE Start Date2011 Useful LifeLife of CAP Other New Purchased Electricity EUI = 51 New Purchase Steam EUI = 61 New Purchased CHW EUI= 21 SourceAEI

Combined Heat & Power Description It is assumed that conversion to Natural Gas fueled Combined Heat & Power will take place in two phases. Phase I will be the additional of two new natural gas boilers; Boiler 7 & Boiler 8. It is assumed that these two boilers will be on-line at the beginning of calendar year 2014 and that the cost of these is already being incorporated into the CWRU rates. Between now and when these boilers are online no changes will take place in the fuel mix used to produce steam at the MCCo. Phase II will consist of a full conversion to a combined heat & power system. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) Phase I: Not valued for CAP, Phase II: $90MM (CHP), assumes that 40% to 45% MCCO load is attributable to CWRU and that same portion of cost will flow through to CWRU in rates adjustments. O&M (2010$) This analysis assumes that all avoided and incremental O&M with the switch to CHP will flow proportionately through to CWRU Change in Demand No incremental change in CWRU demand for electricity, steam and chilled water associated with this initiative. Change in Supply Reduction in electricity purchased from the grid through MCCo, but CWRU will still purchase all electricity and steam from MCCo Carbon Reduction in 2050 Average annual Scope 2 emission reductions: 65,000 MTCO2e Start Date2016 (online) Useful Life20 years (reinvestment in renewal of plant after 20 years) Other Source

Waste Reduction Description The campus will improve its recycling program to capture a greater proportion of materials already recycled and composted and to expand this program to include more materials. This initiative will focus on the activities of three campus entities: residential life, dining and food service, and general campus maintenance. There will be a reduction of 8% of solid waste-related emissions by Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) None O&M (2010$)$5,000/year for community education Change in Energy Demand None Change in Energy Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 3 Emissions by 205 MTCDE Start Date2012 Useful LifeLife of CAP Other SourceSasaki/ CWRU

GeoExchange Heating and Cooling Description A geoexchange heating and cooling system will installed for 2 acres and 218 wells on CWRU campus property. This analysis assumes that the fields will be sited in close proximity to a balanced heating and cooling load with vertical wells of 300 linear feet.. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $1,725,000 in 2018 O&M (2010$)$30,0000 Change in Energy Demand Reduction in Natural Gas Demand by 23,000 MMBtu Increase in Electricity Demand by 1,000 MWh Change in Energy Supply Source of 23,000 MMBtu of Natural Gas Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 3 Emissions by 1,360 MTCDE Start Date2020 Useful Life30 years Other SourceAEI

Solar Domestic Hot Water Description Solar thermal heating is a commercially available technology that employs the radiation from the sun to heat water for domestic use. This solar system is comprised of approximately 95 panels with a 3,000 gallon storage tank. This assumes a solar domestic hot water system will be installed one residential building. (Sherman Hall - North Residential Campus ). Emerson/Veale is also a candidate, but has not been modeled. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $61,000 O&M (2010$)$0 Change in Energy Demand Reduction in Steam by 391 MMBtu Change in Energy Supply Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 42 MTCDE Start Date2012 Useful Life25 years Other SourceAEI

Coal to Natural Gas Steam Plant Description Currently coal is combusted to produced steam. The university will pursue conversion of coal to natural gas, to be accomplished through the Medical Center Company. This measure proposes the conversion of 50% of coal combustion to a cleaner fuel of natural gas. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $61,000 O&M (2010$)$0 Change in Energy Demand None Change in Energy Supply None, simply changing fuels to meet projected demand Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 3 Emissions by 24,100 MTCDE Start Date2015 Useful LifeLife of CAP Other SourceCWRU

Green Power Purchases Description $25.00 /MWh Premium per MWh. Current placeholder assumption is 50,000 MWh (roughly 20%of the current electricity purchased by Case). Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $0 O&M (2010$)Increase in annual purchased electricity cost of $1,250,000 Change in Energy Demand None Change in Energy Supply None Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 36,000 MTCDE Start Date2015 Useful LifeLife of CAP Other Displacement of 50,000 MWh (placeholder) with green electricity purchase SourceES

Unitary Chiller Upgrades Description This measure addresses the inefficiencies of older building level unitary chillers that can be replaced with higher efficiency systems. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $2,450, $2,775, $1,125,000 O&M (2010$)None Change in Energy Demand Electricity reduction of between 1,280 and 3,400 MWh Change in Energy Supply Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 3 Emissions by 2,375 MTCDE Start Date Useful Life20 years Other75% Utilization Rate SourceCWRU

Green Power Purchases – MCCo Reserve Fund Description It is assumed that the University will pay a premium of $0.005 for each kWh purchased through MCCo. The revenue from this premium will be placed into a reserve fund managed by MCCo until funds have accumulated sufficient to purchase a 2MW wind turbine and install it near Lake Erie. It is assumed that this premium will continue for 10 years and that 6 MW of wind will be installed. It is also assumed that savings from avoided electricity purchases from the grid will be reinvested into the reserve fund. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $0 O&M (2010$)$640,000 per year for 10 years Change in Energy Demand None Change in Energy Supply By 2020 more than 9,000 MWh will be supplied by these wind turbines (assumes a 35% capacity factor) Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 6,500 MTCDE Start Date2011 Useful Life20 years per turbine Other SourceES

Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Description Solar photovoltaic panels use the suns radiation to create electricity. This panels on CWRU campus would be tied directly into the campus electric grid. 572 kW of PV on campus buildings : 37 kW on Kelvin Smith Library and 525 kW on Parking Lot #61. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $4,243,000 O&M (2010$)$0 Change in Energy Demand Change in Energy Supply Annual production of 700 MWh of electricity Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 498 MTCDE Start Date2015 Useful Life25 years Other SourceAEI

Central Chiller Expansion Description Multiple phases of connecting additional CWRU building to MCCo central plant are anticipated. Phases I & II are underway and will result in the Millis Loop and the Crawford loop being connected. Phase III will result in the Nord Loop being connected. Phase IV will result in Bingham being connected. It is assumed that CWRU will be responsible for the indoor work and a portion of the soft costs and fees. The rest of the costs will flow through to CWRU in the form of rate increases. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) Phases I & II: $600K, Phase III: $1 million, Phase IV: $500K O&M (2010$) Rate increases: Phases I & II: $0.013 / ton-hr, Phase III: TBD, Phase IV: TBD Change in Energy Demand None Change in Energy Supply Avoided purchased electricity: XX MWh / year Carbon Reduction in 2050 XXX MTCDE / Year Start Date2011 Useful Life Other Source

Dish Stirling Description A Stirling engine is placed at the focal point of a large dish mirrors kW nameplate capacity. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $3,014,000 O&M (2010$)$140,000/year Change in Energy Demand Reduction of electricity by 762,000 kWh Change in Energy Supply Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 405 MTCDE Start Date2015 Useful Life25 years Other8.7% capacity factory SourceAEI

Parabolic Description 890 kW nameplate capacity. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Capital (2010$) $8,000,000 O&M (2010$)$140,000/year Change in Energy Demand Reduction of electricity by 865,000 kWh Change in Energy Supply Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2 Emissions by 405 MTCDE Start Date2020 Useful Life25 years Other8.7% capacity factory SourceAEI

On-Site Wind Description The university will continue its collaboration with industry relative to wind energy generation. This includes research and a plan to install three wind turbines on or near campus. These will support university needs and provide local companies to test and launch commercialization of their wind energy- related technologies. Currently modeled is a 100 kW wind turbine on campus with an assumed capacity factor of 20%. Assumptions Time Frame Years 1-10 Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Reinvest in plant after useful life? At what cost? Hold cost per kwh constant? Or increase? Capital (2010$) $100,000 O&M (2010$)$0 Change in Energy Demand None Change in Energy Supply Annual production of 175 MWh of electricity Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 2Emissions by 125 MTCDE Start Date2011 Useful LifeLife of CAP Other20 years SourceCWRU

Reduced Automobile Reliance Strategies Description Analyze and implement programs to reduce carbon associated with university commuting travel. This includes shifting to human-powered and mass transit and reducing work week and work-at-home opportunities. This will reduce the number of parking permits on campus. Assumptions Time Frame Years Next Steps Issues & Opportunities Reinvest in plant after useful life? At what cost? Hold cost per kwh constant? Or increase? Capital (2010$) $100,000 years 1-5 $150,000 years 6-10 O&M (2010$) Change in Energy Demand None Change in Energy Supply Annual production of 175 MWh of electricity Carbon Reduction in 2050 Reduce Scope 3 Emissions by 1,600 MTCDE Start Date2020 Useful LifeLife of CAP Other SourceES