Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Code Governance Review: WWU views on potential changes to UNC and the Modification Panel Simon Trivella – 30 th March 2010 Governance Workstream.
Advertisements

Nexus Workgroup Transition Approach Update 8 th January 2014.
Energy24 limited Modification Proposal 0502: Amendment to Gas Quality NTS Entry Specification at the px Teesside System Entry Point.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21 st August A: Mod Title: Inclusion of as a valid UNC communication.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May : EU Capacity Regulations – Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
MOD506 – Gas Performance Assurance Framework and Governance Arrangements.
Proposer: insert Panel Date: insert 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title Guidance: These slides are meant to provide a brief overview for the UNC Panel, to introduce.
Overview of Balancing & Settlement Code Change Process By Gareth Evans on Behalf of Gazprom Marketing & Trading –Retail.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May 0501: Treatment of Existing Entry Capacity Rights at the Bacton ASEP to comply with EU Capacity Regulations.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Enquiry Service
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 20/10/16
DSC Change Governance Review Group
Distribution Workgroup 24/11/16
Grid Code What is the Standard Modification Process? Panel
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Overall Project RAG Status
CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011
UNC Modification 0663S Extending the data comprised under the definition of Supply Point Premises Data (TPD V5.18.1) and iUNC Modification 114 Extending.
Proposer: BP Gas Marketing Ltd Panel Date: 17 April 2014
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
UNC Modification – Non Effective Days
2019 Release Planning Options inc Modification 0621 / GB Charging Project DSC Change Management Committee update July 2018.
UNC 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Overall Project RAG Status
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
Chris Warner UNC Modification Panel 21 December 2017
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Flow Swaps at NTS / LDZ offtakes
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 7 February 2014
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Modification Proposal 0474: Inclusion of the guidelines relating to the “Customer Settlement Error Claims Process” within UNC governance.
Proposer: Transporter /
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Modification 0448 – European Driven Change Process Flow Diagram
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Part B Suspension When Suspended Under Part A
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd
UNC Modification Performance Assurance Framework Incentive Regime
Title slide [from Title Slide master]
Performance Assurance Framework (‘PAF’):
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UNC Modification 0229 Role of the UNC Committee
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Joint Office UNC Elections
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Joint Office UNC Elections
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Joint Office UNC Elections
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Capacity Access Review
Proposer: Tracey Saunders, Northern Gas Networks
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Presentation transcript:

Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014 0509: Mod Title: Permission to release Protected Information to Authorised Third Parties Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014

Why change? Industry initiatives such as the Performance Assurance proposals being developed under the Performance Assurance Workgroup will require industry data to be made available to selected third parties (for example an academic partner to assess the Gas Market Settlement Risk). Currently as drafted the UNC does not permit the release of this data to those parties. Development of future modifications may require independent analysis of data and without an approved modification the UNC there permission to release the data nor is there a mechanism for costs to be agreed and paid/recovered.

Options New governance arrangements are needed to authorise the release of protected/confidential data to designated third parties. The group need to consider how any costs incurred by Xoserve in supplying data to approved third parties would be recovered for mods that haven’t yet been approved or which ultimately may be rejected.

Solution Extend the provisions of Section V 5.1 to allow Authorised Third Parties to receive Protected Information. Agree governance arrangements for the designation of an organisation as an Authorised Third Party, and Produce a guideline document detailing under what circumstances data may be released and the necessary safeguards that need to be put in place for management of that data and it’s treatment at the conclusion of the permitted activity.

Recommended Steps The Proposer recommends that this modification should be: Not be subject to self-governance because it may have a material impact on the uniform network code governance procedures or the network code modification procedures; Sent for workgroup assessment to develop the modification for 3 months.