Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER Water Statistics, Vienna, June 2005 slide 1 overview of emissions to water existing data collections Dominique PREUX.
Advertisements

Pollutant Emissions to Water E-PRTR Reporting requirements Thematic Eionet Workshop 11 September 2008.
Reporting sheets Peter Kristensen. WFD Art. 5 & 2010 National montoring and characteri- zation UWWT Directive Reporting By agglome- ration E-EPRT Reporting.
Reporting sheet 3 QNT_SW Reporting sheet 3 QNT_SW State & quantity of surface water resources Maggie Kossida National Technical University of Athens -
Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen SoE meeting 12 June 2007, Copenhagen.
Reporting sheet no.3 State and quantity of water resources.
Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen, EEA Joint Eionet NRC Freshwater and Drafting group State of the Environment and Trends meeting.
Date/ event: Author: Overview of ETC Water data outputs 2010 Miroslav Fanta ETC Water data manager WISE TG Meeting Madrid Miroslav Fanta.
WISE SOE reporting on Transitional and Coastal waters Beate Werner.
1 Update on progress in SOE-drafting group. 2 Water Directors Steering of implementation process Chair: Presidency, Co-chair: Commission Strategic Co-ordination.
Source apportionment of nitrogen and phosphorous inputs into the aquatic environment - An EEA assessment presented by János Fehér h. Associate Professor.
| Slide 1 Waste Water Emissions in Austria Challenges of Accounting Michael Nagy.
7-8 November 2006 Belgrade, Serbia Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water 1 The EIONET-Water.
Monitoring of UWWTPs and Reporting in Germany, Nicosia, 17 February Control and Monitoring of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Plants and Data Reporting.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
Pollutants in Europe: what, where and how much European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data 11 th May 2010.
Date/ event: Author: Overview of the emission data received Pollutant Emissions to Water, Copenhagen Hana Prchalova, CENIA.
Priority Substances Inventory Guidance a step towards international harmonization Joost van den Roovaart.
1 Reporting on State of Environment and trends First meeting of the Drafting Group 15. June 05 Introduction Beate Werner.
Water.europa.eu Priority substances inventoryemissions, discharges and losses Priority substances inventory emissions, discharges and losses Working Group.
| Slide 1 Reporting Requirements Michael Nagy Umweltbundesamt Wien Workshop on Environment Statistics Budapest, 23 April 2004.
EEA water report 2012 Upcoming EEA report state of our water environment 2012 In support of the Commission Report on WFD implementation Peter Kristensen.
1 SoE content review - Maintenance and content development of data flows (SoE and WFD) Freshwater Eionet Workshop, June 2015 Ursula Schmedtje, Federal.
Test data exchange on water quantity and emissions to water
From data collection to reporting - experiences and boundary conditions for an aggregating reporting system Michael Nagy Umweltbundesamt Wien Experience.
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Principles and Key Issues
Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016
Agenda item 8b WISE SoE reporting 2015 state of the play
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Inventory preparation for priority substances
Emissions inventory formats - EEA information, input to discussion
Progress SOE Reporting NRC/NFP water workshop – 2nd October and SOE-DG/NRC meeting – 3rd October Beate Werner; EEA.
Preliminary feedback on analysis of Article V reports
Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements
Unit D.2 – Water and Marine, DG Environment, European Commission
EEA work on contaminants in water
UNECE/Task Force on EIP
Progress SOE –drafting group
Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.
Date/ event: EEA Drafting group meeting SoE guidance, Copenhagen
Stefan Jensen EU water directors meeting, Saarisälkaa, FI
EEA State of Environment WISE Maps and Graphs, examples
WISE - State of the art --- WISE - in the context of SEIS
Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
Anne Lyche Solheim, NIVA, team-leader for freshwater in ETC/W
Work on Agriculture and Water Linkages EEA in cooperation with JRC
State of Environment and Trends
EPER European Pollutant Emission Register
WATER QUALITY Nitrate and Pesticide pollution IRENA No and 27
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
Quality aspects of EPER
HELCOM and the Baltic Sea
CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels
Progress SOE –drafting group
Action points EEA Document listing all the recent reports and the data/map viewers (and the related web links) on Forum Short and concise minutes of the.
2018 Freshwater data call Stéphane Isoard
Benoît FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Emissions to surface waters
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
Current possibilities of the WISE system
Reporting under UWWTD Information needs for UWWTD Questionnaire 2007
State-of-play of current Water Directive integration into WISE
Presentation transcript:

Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen, EEA Joint Eionet NRC Freshwater and Drafting group State of the Environment and Trends meeting (7th Meeting) 3 October 2007, Copenhagen

Pollution from point sources Source: A. Margeriene Lithuania EPA 2007

Point and diffuse source Information used by other organisations Eurostat/ OECD Joint Q. Emissions at country level Emission information in WISE UWWT E-EPRT E-EPTR Reporting By instalation National montoring and characteri-zation Reporting sheet Point and diffuse source emissions Aggregated by RBD WFD Art. 5 & 2010 SoE reporting - Trend in emission - Source apportion- ment - Indicators International emission inventories Rhine; Danube HELCOM; MED-POL UWWT Directive Reporting By agglome-ration European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER); European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (European PRTR); Urban Waste Water Treatment (UWWT)

Avoid duplication of reporting EEA is exploring the possibility of using information from other reporting such as reporting in relation to the UWWT Directive and EPER/E-EPTR to avoid duplication of reporting by Member States. However, there may be some quality assurance benefits from the countries/RBD authorities doing the emission aggregation at the RBD or WFD sub-unit; instead of aggregation by EEA.

Country comments (June/July 2007) (1) Comments received from five countries (NL; DK; SE; HU & AT/UWWTD consultant) and Eurostat plus comments received during June meeting Definition of “significant point and diffuse sources“ - footnote added Significant point sources – all sources reported under UWWT and IPPC Directive plus additional smaller sources contributed significantly to pressure of individual water bodies Significant diffuse sources – all sources contributed significantly to pressure of RBD or individual water bodies

Country comments (June/July 2007) (2) Some of the proposed substances (e.g. TSS or diffuse loads of hazardous substances) are not measured by the specific country and the level of detail at sources is not available Data can only be reported if available. In the first years of reporting the methodologies used may be heterogeneous. This has to be taken into account when comparing results. The WFD implementation will lead to harmonization of the methodologies such as learning by good practices. Errors (e.g. Double counting of industry) and inconsistencies have been corrected Catchment level changed to WFD sub-unit

Proposal: Test data exchange of emission data during 2008 It is recognised that some information may not be available in the first years of reporting in the level of detail ideally required. Need for coordination with UWWTD and E-EPRT reporting Test data exchange of emission data during 2008 January/February: Based on the reporting sheet EEA prepares reporting format (data dictionary and table) for a test data exchange via Reportnet March/April: reporting of available information aggregated to RBD level – test scheme; no evaluation of performance. May: EEA analyse the reported information and prepares a background document on data availability and possibilities of streamlining reporting June: Joint Eionet/SoE Group meeting (emission experts) with experts from UWWTD and E-EPTR to discuss the reporting in relation to emissions 2009: Regular reporting of emission data according to the agreed structure

Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions What should be reported? Why is it needed? How should it be reported? Data & Determinants Aggregation of data Aggregation by source categories Data description

Reporting sheet 4: Emissions (1) What should be reported? Total loads of each identified pollutants emitted from significant point and diffuse sources at River Basin Districts (RBD) level. Why is it needed? The information reported will be used to formulate indicators of emissions that will be used in the assessment of pressures and states of Europe’s waters and trends to monitor progress with European policy objectives. Indicators may present: Time series of the annual values of the selected emissions aggregated at a country or regional level and at the source category level (e.g. urban, industry, agriculture). Are emission increasing or decreasing? Apportionment of emissions by source or by determinand within each country or RBD.

Reporting sheet 4: Emissions (2) How should it be reported? – Data & Determinands The annual load estimates (tonnes/year) of the pollutants from significant point sources and diffuse sources aggregated at RBD level Organic load (as TOC, BOD, COD and TSS (if available)); Nitrogen (as N-NH4+, N-NO3- and total N); Phosphorus (total P); Priority Substances (33 substances identified in Decision 2455/2001/EC); Other significant pollutants (especially those listed in Annex VIII of the WFD).

Reporting sheet 4: Emissions (3) Aggregation of data Spatial aggregation Pollutants emitted and aggregated at the RBD level are required. If more detailed information is available at administrative areas such as regions or provinces; sub-unit or water body level this information is appreciated. Temporal aggregation Time series of annual totals of loads of all pollutants in tonnes per year. For as many years as possible.

Reporting sheet 4: Emissions (5) Aggregation by source categories The load estimates should be reported from each of the following sources where appropriate. a) Point sources Loads from Urban Waste Water Treatment (UWWT) plants. If possible the reporting may be split by agglomerations in the following categories divided in according to the number of population equivalent (p.e.) (Categories from the UWWT Directive). p.e. < 2000 2000  p.e.  10 000 10 000 < p.e.  100 000 p.e. > 100 000 Loads from industrial point sources, direct (IPPC installations and non IPPC installations ); Other point sources (e.g. fish farms, large animal units, mining, peat production) b) Diffuse sources, emissions from Agriculture Atmospheric deposition Scattered dwellings Background Other diffuse sources

Jucar Pilot River Basin Report Urban waste water discharges Industrial discharges Nutrient surplus Pollutants emitted and aggregated at the RBD level are required

3200 Waste water treatment plants

Thank you for your attention