Rubric for Group Activity or Group Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONSENSUS BASED DECISION MAKING CBDM CANA/ACNA. THIS MAY BE TITLED MORE APPROPRIATELY… DISCUSSION BASED CONSENSUS BUILDING.
Advertisements

CATEGORY Exemplary (3 points) Proficient (2 points) Partially Proficient (1 point) Incomplete (0 points) POINTS Focus on the task and participation Consistently.
Using the FIRO-B To Improve Interpersonal Effectiveness.
Through the eyes of a child
Rubrics YOU can do this!. Rubric Achievement relative to a level of mastery (criteria) is compared  Need to know the criteria ahead of time  Need to.
EVALUATING WRITING What, Why, and How? Workshopping explanation and guidelines Rubrics: for students and instructors Students Responding to Instructor.
Introduction TaskProcess EvaluationConclusion Return to Home Page Introduction: “Books are divided into two classes, the books of the hour and the books.
Teamwork 101.
Literature Circles.
Team-Based Exercise Grading Rubrics
Team Growth and Performance
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation
Go to my group zap and share your thoughts on interaction in the classroom. How often do you use student to student interaction in class?
TEAMWORK.
INTRODUCTION The observance of Earth Day began in 1970 to increase awareness of problems with the environment. April 22 nd has been set aside for Americans.
Easy “A” Anatomy Webquest. Introduction Have you ever wondered how the body heals itself or why certain injuries take longer than others to heal? Well.
Working in Teams, Unit 4 Individual Roles and Team Mission Working in Teams/Unit 41 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
TOPIC: TAMARAW: AN ENDANGERED ANIMAL Prepared by: RACHEL JOY N. ALVARO DIVISION OF OCCIDENTAL MINDORO.
Class Participation Rubric – Grades given at mid-point and end of each marking period. Advanced ProficientProficient Emerging Proficient Below ProficientNo.
Group Roles Small Group Communication. Task Roles The group's task is the job to be done. People who are concerned with the task tend to: 1. make suggestions.
Intro to Engineering Design
©Prentice Hall, 2001Chapter 91 Understanding Work Teams.
What happened to the Dinosaurs ? Introduction Task Process Evaluation Conclusion Teacher’s Page Teacher’s Page.
What Makes a Good Discussion in a Grand Conversation?
Self Evaluation. How well did your group work? A: Really well B: Fairly well C: OK D: poorly E: very poorly.
With a partner chose one scientist to interview using podcasting. One student will play the scientist and the other will be the interviewer. Together come.
PROYECTO: ¿Cómo vas? Student Instructions Overview: MINI TEATRO: Your friend is new to town and needs to get to a specific place (chosen by you) but does.
COACHING CONVERSATIONS
Advanced Proficient Proficient Emerging Proficient Below Proficient
Getting Everyone On Board
THM 243 Mid-Semester Evaluation
ICTA Grading Rubrics: Research
Team-Based Exercise Grading Rubrics
Level 1 group discussions
Rubrics, Rubrics, & More Rubrics
Sullivan County 4-H Activities Day
Leadership Skills.
Soft Skills Anthony Stewart.
Interpersonal communication
Simple Machine INVENTION CONVENTION
Be ready to check 90 seconds after the bell.
Healthy Relationships
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Grade 9 Drama ADA 1O.
Survey Says…… Unit 2 IB Project.
K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment
Employee Engagement Training
1. I have the final say over decisions made within my group.
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
: Honor Speech Name Per %
Pilot/Copilot Socratic Seminar
THM 243 Mid-Semester Evaluation
Types of Instant Challenge and Strategies for Success
THM 415 Mid-Semester Evaluation
The Three R’s 4rd Grade Science Lesson By: Gisell Groff
Evaluation / Presentation
Communication Problem Solving Decision Making Team Working.
Open my powerpoint, google docs, and canvas
Group Norms.
Examples of Different Rubric Styles
Group Communication.
Avoiding conflict due to cultural differences
Good Morning Please sit in your assigned seat and take out a piece of paper and something to write with.
Healthy Relationships
Personal and social development
Suggestions for developing trust:. 1
Debate Skills.
The Fundamentals of Communication LANIER Fall 2015
Techniques For Leading Group Discussions
FAMILY PATTERNS OF COMMUNICATION
Presentation transcript:

Rubric for Group Activity or Group Project

Task Description: (Teacher may explain specific assignment in this space.)

Criteria. weight. 4 – Exemplary. 3 – Accomplished. 2 – Developing Criteria weight 4 – Exemplary 3 – Accomplished 2 – Developing 1 – Beginning Cooperation 25% Does a full share of work or more

Assigns a clearly defined role; group members perform roles effectively

Always considers all views and helps team to reach fair decision

Never argues with teammates Group tries to solve its problems by itself without seeking outside help Does an equal share of work

Assigns roles, but roles are not clearly defined or consistently adhered to

Usually considers all views and helps team to reach fair decision

Rarely argues Group seldom solves its problems as a team and asks classmates or teacher for help Does almost as much work as others

Assigns roles, but roles are not adhered to

Often sides with friends instead of considering all views

Sometimes argues Group settles problems and gives up easily Does less work than other group members

No effort made to assign roles to group members

Acts as cliques or individuals rather than group

Arguments within group

Little attempt to solve problems; gives up easily Organization 20% Takes initiative in helping the group get organized and setting times and places to meet

Product is extremely well organized with an introduction, body, and conclusion

Has realistic, prioritized, and measurable goals Highly productive in accomplishing assignment Works agreeably with partner(s) concerning organization and times and places to meet

Product is organized with an introduction, body, and conclusion

Goals are established, but some are too general Accomplished basic assignment Can be coaxed into meeting with other partner(s)

Somewhat organized ideas; not presented in sequence

Goals not clearly defined Barely accomplishes the job Did not meet partner(s) at agreed times or places

Lack of organization; choppy and confusing; format difficult to follow

No goals established

Does not accomplish assignment Research 20% Collects and contributes accurate content

Goes above and beyond to research information

Communicates and shares all information with the group Always does the assigned work without having to be reminded Collects and contributes mostly accurate content

At times, takes initiative to find extra information

Shares information with the group Usually does the assigned work; rarely needs reminding Collects and contributes somewhat accurate content

Uses only materials provided

Shares some information with the group Rarely does the assigned work; often needs reminding Collects and contributes inaccurate content

Does not utilize resources effectively

Keeps information to self; does not share with group

Relies on others to do the work Member Responsibility 25% Provides many ideas for the assignment

Clearly communicates desires, ideas, personal needs and feelings

Listens and speaks a fair amount

Each team member is treated with respect and is encouraged Hands in all assignments on time Participates in discussions about the assignment

Usually shares opinions and thoughts with other partner(s)

Listens, but sometimes talks too much or too little

Often encourages and respects team members Hands in most assignments on time Listens to others; on some occasions, makes suggestions

Rarely expresses feelings or preferences

Usually does most of the talking, rarely allowing others to speak; or seldom talks, allowing others to dominate

Some members are not encouraged or respected Hands in most assignments late Seems bored with conversations about the assignment

Never/almost never spoke up

Monopolized conversation; does not allow others to speak

Does not respect or encourage other members

Does not hand in some/all assignments

Presentation 10% Presentation is clever and original

Engaging; captures interest of audience

Appropriate variety of visual aids

Visual aids add to or clarify presentation

Each presenter speaks clearly and loudly; good eye contact; appropriate body language Members contribute equally to the presentation Presentation is thoughtful

Presentation is well done; interesting to audience

Some use of visual aids

Visual aids somewhat add to or clarify presentation

Most of the time, presenter speaks clearly and loudly; some eye contact; some use of appropriate body language Most of the members contributed equally to the presentation Presentation is at times clearly presented

Presentation is at times interesting to audience

Limited use of visual aids

Visual aids do not clarify or add the presentation

Presenter is hard to hear; little eye contact; poor body language Some members did not contribute equally to the presentation Little creativity used; bland

Presentation is hard to follow; poorly organized

No use of visual aids

Presenter cannot be heard; no eye contact; poor body language

Some members did not contribute to the presentation

Assignment Score ______________ + Beyonder/Bonus ______________ = Assignment Score ______________ + Beyonder/Bonus ______________ = Final Score ________________