Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
The Logical Framework. 2 Definition of a Project A “project” is defined as: a set of executed interventions, over an established timeline and budget,
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Program framework 1.Articulate program goals 2.Develop system level model for goal attainment 3.Assess current management efforts – identify gaps 4.Develop.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
Higher Physical Education
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Mothers unwilling to go to clinics Low staff skills Inadequate number of clinics Shortage of drugs High infant mortality rates Commercial pressure for.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
SUB-MODULE 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK RESULTS BASED LOG-FRAME TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2 )
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making.
WEAP Workshop Work Plans/Progress Reports Geoff O’Brien.
Chesapeake Bay Program Decision Framework Implementation.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Logical Framework Approach to PSIP formulation By Edward Joshua (Chief Economist, EP&D) Presentation 10 : 2015 PSIP Process Review Workshop 1.
Building an ENI CBC project
Governing Body: School Development Plan
M&E Workshop for Full Proposal
Implementation Plan I want to plan a project
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
The Logical Framework Approach
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Day 2 The LogFrame.
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
EVALUATION RESEARCH Research Methods
M&E TRAINING MODULES What is an IMEP?.
Project Implementation Plan
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Project Closure Checklist
program framework Articulate program goals
Logical Framework I want to design a project by planning out the logic
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Monitoring & Reporting 2019
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Project Management Training
Monitoring and Evaluation
Describe result frameworks
Good practice in preparing an application
Logframe Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu.
Understanding logic, structure and documentation of the project
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
Monitoring programs and projects
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
MAIN CHANGES TO LOGFRAME TEMPLATE – PRAG 2015 / PRAG 2016
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Appraising result framework
Presentation transcript:

Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL

How to check the internal logic of a LFM

Indicators, baselines & targets Sources & means of verification Vertical Logic Results Chain Indicators, baselines & targets Sources & means of verification Assumptions Impact Outcome Outputs Activities « For each level of the intervention logic, if “results” are achieved and assumptions hold true, then ... » 13

The intervention logic in design AND management A detailed and clear vertical logic is required by the action document (§4.3 “ Intervention Logic”) by articulating the Logframe’s first column (Results chain) and the Logframe’s last column (assumptions) into a structured narrative that explains how and why the action will bring about change. Results-based management requires the intervention logic to be regularly questioned By regularly thinking through the extent to which the implemented activities and outputs have a reasonable probability of attaining the desired results, and by making continuous adjustments as needed to ensure that they are achieved. 4

Indicators, baseline & targets Sources & means of verification Horizontal logic Indicators, baseline & targets Results chain Sources & means of verification Assumptions Impact Outcomes Outputs Activities How to verify ‘success’ in achieving objectives

Indicators, what for? Indicators: Specify how success/performance can be assessed and measured Support decision making (but do not replace it!); monitoring and evaluation for tracking progress and improving the quality of operations

Sources & means of verification in the LFM Check carefully the consistency between objectives, indicators and sources of verification Sources of verification should be identified when selecting an indicator. This source is not neutral in terms of time, money and skills required. A cost-benefit assessment is necessary when designing a performance measurement framework.