Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electrical and thermal testing at Glasgow and Liverpool.
Advertisements

1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 Faulty Channel Sources (TOB) Fault Sources (excluding cable breaks and CMN)  Hybrid-0.004%
1/8/04Lance Simms Thermal Testing of TOB/TEC Hybrids at UCSB.
Slide 1L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder (for the UCSB module testing group) Current testing.
Thermal Testing of TEC/TOB Hybrids at UCSB 1/20/04 Slide 1 Thermal Testing of TOB/TEC Hybrids at UCSB.
Slide 1Module Testing Meeting March 7, 2003US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model-Anthony Affolder US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model Anthony Affolder (for.
US Production Report - September 4, Incandela 1 US Production Report CMS Tracker Steering Committee 4 September 2003 J. Incandela University of.
Slide 1 Anthony Affolder US Module LT meeting June 17, 2004 UCSB Module LT Testing.
1 Long Term Module Testing-Anthony AffolderTPO, December 11, 2003 Current Module LT Testing Capability Only Vienna Boxes Available  10 slots at each site.
Slide 1CMS Database Issues-Derek BargeDOE review, January 20, 2004 CMS Database Issues Derek Barge.
Slide 1US silicon group meeting 5/6/2003 Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested à 9 tested with no flaws à 1 had 1 chip + 1 wirebond.
4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”
1 Hybrid & Module Testing Status Week of 6/6-6/10.
Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 13 October 2003 Sam Burke Lance Simms.
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Slide 1UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 UCSB Rod Production UCSB Rod Production, Jan , presented by Jim Lamb.
Slide 1Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 20, 2004 Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids, Modules, & Rods Anthony Affolder On.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
Slide 1Rod Production presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)April 9, 2004 Rod Production Rod Production, April , presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)
UCSB Encapsulation Studies UC Santa Barbara Based upon a 6 week study by F. Garberson in collaboration with A. Affolder, J. Incandela, S. Kyre and many.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
Slide 1Susanne KyreDOE review, January 20, 2004 Wirebonding for TOB and TEC Susanne Kyre University of California, Santa Barbara.
Slide 1 Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 18, 2005 Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids & Modules Anthony Affolder On behalf.
US Module Production June 2, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
1 TEC pilot run status Goal : test TEC module production rate capabilities - 15 R6 modules assembled on Brussels Gantry and bonded in Aachen I - 15 R7.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
Catania Production Center S.Albergo Universita’ & INFN Catania.
Planning for Proto-DUNE PD Installation and Cabling at CERN
UCSB Hybrid Bonding & Testing
FNAL Production Experience
ROD assembly and test in US
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
Update of US Testing Status
US Module Production Status
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
Results from module testing
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
US Module Production Quality
Recent TOB Developments
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
First Assembled Rod in US
Module production in Italy
US Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group)
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
Operations/Failure Analysis
Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested
Sensor probing (Summary)
US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model
Module Testing at UCSB: Simulated Production 11-04
Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids & Modules
US Module Testing Progress Report
Current Module LT Testing Capability
Operations/Failure Analysis
Current Module LT Capability
Operations/Failure Analysis
TOB Module Production Overview and Plan
FNAL module testing summary
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Wirebonding UCSB FNAL Machines
Recent TOB Developments
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Module Failures on Rods
US Module Testing Progress Report
Operations/Failure Analysis
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Equipment Status ARCS equipment status DAQ equipment status
Hardware needs (ARCS) Current ARCS capabilities at both sites should be able to keep up with production assuming software changes Automatic I-V curves,
Presentation transcript:

Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing Outline Overview of Current Testing At UCSB Estimates of time/manpower/equipment needed How we can shorten times Reductions of tests Improvements in automation

Hybrid Testing Cycle 28 hybrids per day expected rate per site Wirebond PA (28) Mount/Inspect Hybrids (28) Quick Test Hybrids (28) Thermal Cycle Hybrid (28) Assemble into Modules (15) 28 hybrids per day expected rate per site Ship to TEC/FNAL(13)

Module Testing Cycle Repair (If necessary) Repair (If necessary) Gantry makes modules (15) Quick test unbonded modules (15) Wirebond (15) Repair (If necessary) Bonded module tests (15) Thermal cycle modules (15) Repair (If necessary) Final pinhole tests (15) Storage/Mount on Rods

Mount/Inspect Hybrid Upon receiving hybrid, must attach test tail and mount onto hybrid plate After mounting, hybrid wire bonds inspected quickly for damage ~ 5 minutes need in total per hybrid ~2 ½ man hours

Quick Test Hybrid Hybrids are tested on ARCS stand prior to PA wire bonding Ensure no damage has occurred during shipment No/little faults found No repair Test takes 10-15 minutes per hybrid 4 ½ - 7 hours ARCS stand time Takes ~5 minutes manpower per hybrid ~ 2 ½ man-hours Includes mounting/unmounting, determining test result and local database entry During production, we should drop this test. We would find all these problem in 4-hybrid test or visual inspection If problem is found in 4-hybrid test, then we quick test rest of shipment

Hybrid Thermal Cycler-Pulser 4 hybrids are taken to operating temperature (-20 C) and charge injecting into chip through capacitive coupling of pulser to PA Checks wirebond quality and first “long” test of hybrid ~45 minutes to thermal cycle 4 hybrids ~9 cycles per day possible ~20 minutes of manpower needed per cycle Includes data analysis, mounting/unmounting and database ~3 man hours No opens or shorts caused by bonding so far

ARCS Module Test Before Bonding Checks if assembly damaged sensors/hybrid Quick hybrid Test + IV test Test takes ~20-25 minutes per module ~5-6 hours of ARCS stand needed About ~20-25 minutes of man-power per module needed ~5-6 man-hours needed per day Includes data analysis, loading/unloading, and local database entry Test only for first few modules of each type (will NOT be performed during full production)

ARCS Module Test After Bonding Main tests to find faults introduced during assembly Full set of test run Test takes ~20-25 minutes per module TIB/TEC also report 20-25 minute test time ~5-6 hours of ARCS stand needed Includes tests performed at multiple bias voltages About ~10 minutes of man-power per module needed ~2 ½ man-hours needed per day Includes data analysis, loading/unloading, and database entry

Wien Cold Box/Burn-in Wien cold box cycles modules from –20 C to 20 C while reading out up to 10 modules Module burn-in/tests modules at operating temperature Modules cycled ½ day with ~2 thermal cycles per load 2 loads/unloads needed About 1 hour to unload/load box Assume another 1 hour per load for data analysis, database, etc. ~ 4 man-hours per day This time could be shrunk considerably if we make two set of cold plates per site Load one as we test bonded modules, unload other set as post-cycle LED test proceeds

ARCS Pinhole Test After thermal-cycling, module retested on ARCS with noise and LED pinhole test Ensures no new faults from thermal cycle/burn-in Test takes about ~10 minutes per module ~2 ½ hours of ARCS stand time ~2 ½ man-hours per day

Man-Hours/ARCS Stand Time Man-hours Needed ARCS Stand Time Needed Mount/inspect hybrids ~2 ½ hours N/A Quick Test Hybrids ~4 ½ -7 hours Thermal Cycle Hybrids ~3 hours Mount Module Cables ~ ½ hours Unbonded Module Test ~5-6 hours Bonded Module Test Wien Box Test ~4 hours Pinhole Test TOTAL ~22 ½ - 23 ½ hours (3 techs) ~17-21 ½ hours (3 stands)

How we shorten times necessary Reduction of tests taken Removal of hybrid quick test and unbonded module tests Test bonded modules at only one voltage Improved automation of testing “One button” testing (for ARC hybrid/module tests and Vienna box) Man-hours per test dominated from starting/stopping test, changing test settings, etc. Clear progress is being made with both ARCS and LT software Improve creation of local/global database entry Database group and Derek providing more/faster tools Multi-tasking Mount/inspect hybrids while hybrid quick test and 4 hybrid test are running Mount modules onto cold plates during bonded modules test Unmount modules onto cold plates as post-thermal cycle testing Database entry during tests Construction of second set of cold plates

Man-Hours/ARCS Stand Time (Shortened) Assumes only reduction of time due to removed tests Man-hours Needed ARCS Stand Time Needed Mount/inspect hybrids ~2 ½ hours N/A Quick Test Hybrids ~4 ½ -7 hours Thermal Cycle Hybrids ~3 hours Mount Module Cables ~ ½ hours Bonded Module Test ~5-6 hours Wien Box Test ~4 hours Pinhole Test TOTAL ~14 - 15 hours (2 1/2 techs) ~7 ½ -8 ½ hours (2 stands) Would prefer 1 additional tech and ARCS stand for stand down time, vacations, etc. So I guess 3 ½ techs and 3 ARCS stands necessary for testing

Conclusions With reduction of testing and some multi-tasking, current ARCS equipment should satisfy needs With the reduction of testing and some more automation of testing, I believe 4 techs/grad students/post-docs could perform module test At least 1 experienced physicists should be in room at all times If necessary, other tests could be removed if no additional problems found with tests Post-thermal cycling module testing