Prepared for Quincy Schools – November 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
Advertisements

Top-to-Bottom (TTB) Ranking
Top-to-Bottom Ranking & Priority/Focus/Reward Designations Understanding the.
How Can MI School Data Help With School Improvement? May 2014 Mitch Fowler
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Alexander Schwarz Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research and Evaluation Michigan Department of Education.
Facilitators of District Improvement Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer November 2013.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Accountability Scorecards An Early Orientation to the Future of Michigan School Accountability.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Accountability Programs MICHIGAN SCHOOL TESTING CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 19, 2014.
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
CTE and Workforce Inquiry in MISchoolData Portal These materials are provided as part of the Official Training Resources and Professional Development Activities.
What is a Z Score?. The State’s Waiver from NCLB All schools will achieve 85% proficiency for all students in all subjects (as measured on a statewide.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Top-to-Bottom Ranking & Priority/Focus/Reward Designations Understanding the.
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
UNDERSTANDING HOW THE RANKING IS CALCULATED Top-to-Bottom (TTB) Ranking
Top-to-Bottom Ranking & Priority/Focus/Reward Designations Understanding the.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Information on Focus Schools Released/Retained Fall 2015.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY Updates to Student Testing and School Accountability for the school year.
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
Using ACT Explore and Plan Assessment Data Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant, Calhoun ISD
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Michigan Accountability Data Tools February 1, 2013.
NEXT-GENERATION ACCOUNTABILITY Designing a Differentiated Accountability System for Michigan Presentation to the Michigan Educational Research Association.
2011 Top to Bottom and Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools List Overview Briefing: MDE August 23, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
PRHS SAT REPORTS DISTRICT AYP REPORTS. WHAT IS THE SAT TEST? The SAT is a globally recognized college admissions exam. It tests your knowledge of reading,
Mock Data Retreat Pam Lange TIE/ESA 7. 2 Agenda  Based on school’s need  May be ½ day/ full day/ two days  Work with district to determine needs –
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
MERA November 26,  Priority School Study  Scorecard Analyses  House Bill 5112 Overview.
Introduction to the MI School Data Portal These materials are provided as part of the Official Training Resources and Professional Development Activities.
College and Career Readiness (Explore, Plan, and ACT) Mitch Fowler Wes McCrea
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
SLIP January 24,  Scorecard Summary  Scorecard Change Analysis for SY  House Bill 5112 Overview  Shared Educational Entities Overview.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
Advanced Inquiry in MI School Data (How Are Our Kids Performing on State Tests?) February 2014 Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant, Calhoun ISD
Understanding Your Top from Your Bottom: A Guide to Michigan’s Accountability System September 2013 Mitch Fowler
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Accountability Scorecards Top to Bottom Ranking February 2016.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
EPAS and DataDirector Mitch Fowler Wes McCrea
MDE Accountability Update MSTC Conference, February 2016.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Update on District and School Accountability Systems 2014 AdvancED Michigan Fall Conference November 7, 2014.
Student Growth in 5 Easy Steps Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant – Calhoun ISD Web Resources -
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
Special Education Inquiry MI School Data Portal
Anderson Elementary School
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
School Data Consultant, Calhoun ISD
Prepared for DD Key Contacts – September 2013
D iscover what’s working in Michigan schools
School Data Consultant, Calhoun ISD
MI School Data and Program Evaluation
College/Career Ready for All
Focus Schools and Special Education Centers
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Michigan School Accountability Scorecards
Presentation transcript:

Prepared for Quincy Schools – November 2013 Understanding Your Top from Your Bottom: A Guide to Michigan’s Accountability System  Prepared for Quincy Schools – November 2013 Mitch Fowler fowlerm@calhounisd.org

Agenda Scorecard Overview Scorecard Components Top to Bottom Overview Understanding Z-Scores How close to Focus are we?

Outcomes Participants will: Identify Scorecard Components and Scoring Guidelines Complete an Audit to Identify Areas of Concern Understand Top to Bottom Components and Scoring Guidelines Complete a Top to Bottom Audit to Identify Areas of Concern Identify Resources from BAA (TTB Lookup Tool, BTO Look Up Tool, Focus Achievement Gap Tool)

Yellow = Met Safe Harbor Scorecard Green = Met Target Yellow = Met Safe Harbor Red = Missed Target

Scorecard Components Proficiency Participation Completion Rate Based on Annual Measurable Objectives Must be at 85% Proficient by 2022 in ALL Areas and Subgroups Participation Must Test 95% of Students Completion Rate Graduation / Attendance Rate Other Factors SIP / DIP Educator Evaluations

Scorecard Components - Proficiency Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

Scorecard Mathematics 4.88 36.18 41.06 45.94 Reading 2.53 59.73 62.26 Content Area Annual Increment 2011-12 Base Target 2012-13 Target 2013-14 Target Mathematics 4.88 36.18 41.06 45.94 Reading 2.53 59.73 62.26 64.78 Science 7.44 10.62 18.06 25.50 Writing 6.12 23.76 29.88 36.01 Green = Met Target Red = Missed Target

Top to Bottom Availability Available via the BAA Look Up Tool (On the BAA Website Here) Available on MI School Data (Public or Secure)

Top to Bottom Ranking Schools are compared to other schools in the state by utilizing z-scores (a statistical measure that describes how far you are from the middle of the pack). Z-scores that are positive, show that you are above the 50th percentile when compared to the state. Z-scores that are negative, show that you are below the 50th percentile when compared to the state.

Z-scores (Standard Deviations) Z-scores are centered around zero or the “state average” Positive is ABOVE the state avg. Negative is BELOW the state avg. Top 1/3 > +0.5 Middle 1/3 Between -0.5 & 0.5 Bottom 1/3 < -0.5 State Average Z-score = Zero -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 -0.5 0.5 2% 16% 32% 50% 68% 84% 98% Percentile State Average Slide courtesy of Doug Greer, Ottawa ISD

Top to Bottom Report (MI School Data) Overall Rank Subject Area Z-Scores

How Close to Focus Are We? Achievement Gap Z-Scores Focus Cut Off School’s Location http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/2013_Individual_School_Gap_Lookup_Tool_431296_7.xls

Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant fowlerm@calhounisd.org Thank You Questions? Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant fowlerm@calhounisd.org