A Model of Quality Assurance A Case Study: UCC Dr. Norma Ryan Director of Quality Promotion UCC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The European University Associations Institutional Evaluation Programme Nina Arnhold European University Association Birmingham, 09 December 2005.
Advertisements

The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Peter Williams President, ENQA.
Executive Director of the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA)
Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
1 Whats All This Fuss About Promotion & Tenure? Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine Sandra Burge, Ph.D. Dept. Family & Community Medicine.
Carolyn M. Byerly, Ph.D., professor Department of Journalism and Graduate Program in Mass Comm & Media Studies TENURE: BASIC INFO AND ISSUES.
Head of Learning: Job description
World’s Largest Educational Community
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
Irish Universities Quality Board Internal Quality Assurance at Universities: The Irish perspective Dr Padraig Walsh Chief Executive Irish Universities.
Prof. Iogn á id Ó Muircheartaigh Chair, Universities Ireland President, Irish Universities Association President, NUI Galway Monitoring performance including.
Internal Quality Assurance at University College Cork Dr. Norma Ryan University College Cork – National University of Ireland Cork.
Strategic Planning and the NCA Special Emphasis A Focus on Community Engagement and Experiential Learning.
Tomorrow’s Ireland...Today Quality Standards in Youth Work A work in progress.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Strategic Planning Definitions Tennessee Board of Regents.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
The evaluation of research units at HCERES
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Introduction University of Limerick Participants in The Pilot Programme and QUIP The purpose of this session… -share the benefits of our experience through.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
AHEAD Symposium A Charter for Inclusive Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Royal Hospital Kilmainham, Dublin. 28 th April 2009 Mary O Grady, Disability.
UCC Governance Video Overview Bridie Hartnett, April,
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
Annual Report 2011 Quality Promotion Committee Dr. Norma Ryan Director Quality Promotion Unit April 2012.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
CEEMAN AccreditationCape Town, CEEMAN Accreditation IQA Dr.Virginijus Kundrotas.
Self Assessment Using EFQM Excellence MODEL Down Lisburn Trust’s Experience of Continuous Improvement John Simpson Down Lisburn Trust.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
University of Niš Faculty of Electronic Engineering CUBRIK ( TEMPUS-ES-TEMPUS-SMGR) Strengthening Quality Assurance System within Western Balkans.
1 st Quality Assurance Workshop Belgrade, Nov 2007 Case Study: Quality Assurance in Ireland Strengthening Higher Education Reforms in Serbia An EU-funded.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Directorate of Academic Affairs and Registrar Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) Annual Institutional Report (AIR) Reporting Period: 1 January –
QUALITY REVIEW REVIEWED – APPRAISAL OF THE QA/QI PROTOCOLS DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED IN UL Patrick Cashell & Adrian Thomas, University of Limerick, Ireland.
Program-Review Process Ohio University Link to Program Review Web Site.
30/10/2006 University Leaders Meeting 1 Student Assessment: A Mandatory Requirement For Accreditation Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chair-Person National Quality.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
1 The Irish Experience Dr. Norma Ryan Director, Quality Promotion Unit University College Cork- National University of Ireland Cork Sarajevo 5 th December.
Principles of Good Governance
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
UCC Governance Overview January, 2017.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
What’s New at ACCJC? PRESENTERS
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

A Model of Quality Assurance A Case Study: UCC Dr. Norma Ryan Director of Quality Promotion UCC

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC2 UCC A University located in the South of Ireland, with 16,000+ students, and the highest annual research income of all the Irish Universities A University located in the South of Ireland, with 16,000+ students, and the highest annual research income of all the Irish Universities Has a particular focus on delivering 4 th level Ireland (graduate studies) and lifelong learning Has a particular focus on delivering 4 th level Ireland (graduate studies) and lifelong learning

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC3 UCC Mission University College Cork is committed to fostering a community of scholarship that values independence of thought and critical enquiry, and enables students and staff to fulfill their full potential. In an environment of excellence in teaching, learning and research, the Universitys central roles are to create, preserve and communicate knowledge, and to enhance intellectual, cultural, social and economic life locally, nationally and internationally. University College Cork is committed to fostering a community of scholarship that values independence of thought and critical enquiry, and enables students and staff to fulfill their full potential. In an environment of excellence in teaching, learning and research, the Universitys central roles are to create, preserve and communicate knowledge, and to enhance intellectual, cultural, social and economic life locally, nationally and internationally.

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC4 Strategic Framework Focus on graduate studies Focus on graduate studies Focus on quality of undergraduate and graduate programmes, and on student support services Focus on quality of undergraduate and graduate programmes, and on student support services Focus on increasing development of international research capability Focus on increasing development of international research capability Aims to increase student numbers to 20,000 by 2010 Aims to increase student numbers to 20,000 by 2010

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC5 NAIRTL Has just been awarded a grant of 6million to establish the National A Academy for the Integration of Research and Teaching and Learning - NAIRTL Has just been awarded a grant of 6million to establish the National A Academy for the Integration of Research and Teaching and Learning - NAIRTL

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC6 Universities Act 1997 Legislation that established all Irish Universities as independent autonomous institutions Legislation that established all Irish Universities as independent autonomous institutions Requires all Irish Universities to put in place quality assurance procedures Requires all Irish Universities to put in place quality assurance procedures

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC7 Section 35: QA To promote the improvement of the quality of education of students and all related activities To promote the improvement of the quality of education of students and all related activities Responsibility for process rests with the University Responsibility for process rests with the University

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC8 National Agenda In 2003 IUA published: In 2003 IUA published: A Framework for Quality in Irish Universities Sets out a framework for QI/QA and was agreed to by all Irish Universities Sets out a framework for QI/QA and was agreed to by all Irish Universities Is compatible with the European Standards and Guidelines that have been developed Is compatible with the European Standards and Guidelines that have been developed

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC9 IUQB Irish Universities Quality Board Independent body established by Irish Universities in 2003 Independent body established by Irish Universities in 2003 Purpose: to assist the Universities in the quality agenda and to conduct reviews of the effectiveness of the QI/QA reviews on behalf of the Universities. Purpose: to assist the Universities in the quality agenda and to conduct reviews of the effectiveness of the QI/QA reviews on behalf of the Universities.

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC10 UCC action The Governing Body appointed members to a Quality Promotion Committee in 1998 The Governing Body appointed members to a Quality Promotion Committee in 1998 Governing Body established the Quality Promotion Unit in 1999 Governing Body established the Quality Promotion Unit in 1999

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC11 Quality Promotion Committee Committee of Governing Body with executive authority Committee of Governing Body with executive authority Chaired by President of UCC Chaired by President of UCC Has representatives of Has representatives of –Academic Staff –Administrative and Support Staff –Governing Body external members –Students

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC12 Quality Promotion Unit Facilitates the implementation of Quality Improvement/Quality Assurance (QI/QA) procedures in UCC Facilitates the implementation of Quality Improvement/Quality Assurance (QI/QA) procedures in UCC Assists in the Follow-Up procedures following a QI/QA review of a unit Assists in the Follow-Up procedures following a QI/QA review of a unit

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC13 UCC Strategy for QA To review/evaluate all departments/academic support units/academic programmes over a 6 year period To review/evaluate all departments/academic support units/academic programmes over a 6 year period To involve students, employers, past graduates, staff To involve students, employers, past graduates, staff

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC14 Methodology Self-assessment Self-assessment –Include use of questionnaires Peer review institutional/national/international Peer review institutional/national/international On-going quality improvement On-going quality improvement

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC15 Self Assessment Report Report to provide succinct, comprehensive statement of unit activities Report to provide succinct, comprehensive statement of unit activities Core of the Report is a self-critical analysis of the unit, including how the unit sees itself contributing to the Mission and Goals and Objectives of the University Core of the Report is a self-critical analysis of the unit, including how the unit sees itself contributing to the Mission and Goals and Objectives of the University

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC16 Self Assessment Must include assessment of Must include assessment of –Staff profile –Teaching –Research –Support services, including facilities –Contribution to society

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC17 Self Reflection S - Strengths S - Strengths W - Weaknesses W - Weaknesses O - Opportunities O - Opportunities T – Threats/Challenges T – Threats/Challenges Benchmarking (aspirational) Benchmarking (aspirational) Will suggest and emphasise appropriate improvements/changes Will suggest and emphasise appropriate improvements/changes

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC18 Supporting Documentation Agreement reached with Review Group and Director of Quality as to what exactly is required in each individual case Agreement reached with Review Group and Director of Quality as to what exactly is required in each individual case Factual details are given in appendices Factual details are given in appendices

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC19 Evaluation of Teaching Evaluation by students Evaluation by students Questionnaires Questionnaires Focus groups Focus groups Views of external stakeholders Views of external stakeholders Teaching portfolios Teaching portfolios Peer review Peer review

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC20 Evaluation of Research Peer reviewed publications Peer reviewed publications Books/chapters in books Books/chapters in books Supervision of graduate students Supervision of graduate students Research grant income Research grant income Other scholarly activity Other scholarly activity

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC21 Evaluation of Self-Assessment Report Evaluation of Self-Assessment Report Site Visit to meet with staff and students and other stakeholders Site Visit to meet with staff and students and other stakeholders Report on findings Report on findings Recommendations for change/improvement Recommendations for change/improvement Review

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC22 What happens report? Report is considered by Report is considered by –Staff of Department –Quality Promotion Committee of Governing Body –Budget decision makers in UCC –Governing Body

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC23 Recommendations in report Discussed with Dean of Faculty/Vice- President and the Director of Quality Discussed with Dean of Faculty/Vice- President and the Director of Quality A Quality Improvement Plan is agreed upon and acted upon by unit in first instance A Quality Improvement Plan is agreed upon and acted upon by unit in first instance

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC24 Publication of Report Review Report is published on University web site. Review Report is published on University web site. Annual Report of Quality Promotion Committee to Governing Body also published. Annual Report of Quality Promotion Committee to Governing Body also published.

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC25 Follow-up Unit submits a report on actions taken and outcomes within 18 months of completion of the review to the Quality Promotion Committee Unit submits a report on actions taken and outcomes within 18 months of completion of the review to the Quality Promotion Committee Report on progress is considered by Governing Body and published. Report on progress is considered by Governing Body and published.

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC26 Review of QI/QA process A major review of the process in UCC and the other Irish Universities was conducted in 2005 by the EUA. The review was commissioned by the IUQB and the HEA on behalf of the Universities. The Report endorsed and commended the quality processes in place. A major review of the process in UCC and the other Irish Universities was conducted in 2005 by the EUA. The review was commissioned by the IUQB and the HEA on behalf of the Universities. The Report endorsed and commended the quality processes in place.

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC27 Major Successes Acceptance of quality review process and recognition of its benefits Acceptance of quality review process and recognition of its benefits Self-reflection process Self-reflection process Quality culture embedded in departments and units Quality culture embedded in departments and units Follow-up procedures ensuring implementation of recommendations for improvement Follow-up procedures ensuring implementation of recommendations for improvement

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC28 Challenges Acceptance of benefits of second cycle Acceptance of benefits of second cycle To reduce the workload for departments/programme boards of study in gathering data To reduce the workload for departments/programme boards of study in gathering data To ensure University acts on recommendations requiring resources To ensure University acts on recommendations requiring resources

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC29 Future Activities Development of thematic reviews, e.g. of total research activity of University Development of thematic reviews, e.g. of total research activity of University Complete second cycle of quality reviews Complete second cycle of quality reviews Development of Information Systems providing data Development of Information Systems providing data

30 October 2006Quality Promotion Unit, UCC30 Web sites