Joint Doctrine Analysis Division

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

The Robert Gordon University
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
<<Date>><<SDLC Phase>>
First, let’s talk about some of your introductions from last time: – What did you think was good about it? – What did you think was poor about it? What.
1 1 Introduction to Multimedia Chapter 9. 2 Objectives Get to know the phases of MM production. Get to know the team members in MM development.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 4c – Planning, Training, and Exercising.
Purpose of the Business Plan (as indicated in Paragraph 1) to provide a more coordinated and structured response to the issue of reproductive health commodities/supplies.
Advanced Technical Writing
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
10/10/2015 IENG 471 Facilities Planning 1 IENG Lecture END Project Report Requirements & Project Presentation Information.
1 Term Paper Mohammad Alauddin MSS (Government &Politics) MPA(Governance& Public Policy) Deputy Secretary Welcome to the Presentation Special Foundation.
Report Format and Scientific Writing. What is Scientific Writing? Clear, simple, well ordered No embellishments, not an English paper Written for appropriate.
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
PREPARING REPORTS CoB Center for Professional Communication.
1 Chapter 8++ The Final Design Report. 2 Motivation The main purpose of the design report is to provide all the information necessary to: The main purpose.
United Nations Statistics Division Registry of national Classifications.
Multinational Coordination Center
Joint Vision Why a New Document n Sustain and build on momentum of Joint Vision process ã Continue evolution of the joint force n Lessons learned.
Introduction 1. Purpose of the Chapter 2. Institutional arrangements Country Practices 3. Legal framework Country Practices 4. Preliminary conclusions.
6/3/2016 IENG 471 Facilities Planning 1 IENG 465 – Final Design Project Report & Presentation Requirements.
Literature Review. Outline of the lesson Learning objective Definition Components of literature review Elements of LR Citation in the text Learning Activity.
Evaluation Proposal Defense Observations and Suggestions Yibeltal Kiflie August 2009.
DESIGN PROPOSAL REPORT. Why write a proposal? Basic means of convincing someone to support a project. Important tool for organizing time and resources.
Writing a Critical Review
1 Train - Fight - Win Tactical Training Group Atlantic Doctrine Development & TTP Publication Review Mr. Nielsen TTGL N3A2 DD Mmm YEAR Overall Classification.
Internal Assessment IB History.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
UNCLASSIFIED Crisis Action Planning 01 January 2006 CTF Operation Order UNCLASSIFIED ing.
1 Joint Doctrine: The Authoritative Vocabulary For and Explanation of Joint Warfare and Joint Operations October 16, 2015 Representing Reality\Big Data\Big.
Final Year Project 1 (FYP 1) CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION
Unclassified Optimizing Interoperability since 1947 DAMO-SSI 24 May 2006.
. Thematic Working Group 4 Possible Elements – Chapter VI: Constraints, gaps and related financial, technical and capacity needs CGE Workshop to exchange.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Gema Bhakti 2015 Lane 4: MNCC Operations Overview 14 September September 2015.
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
2/27/2016 IENG 471 Facilities Planning 1 IENG 464 – Conceptual Design Project Report & Presentation Requirements.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
Chapter 5 Longer Reports Copyright © 2012 Pearson Canada Inc., Toronto, Ontario.
“Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency. The materials found on this website are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Evaluation Expert Committee 2nd meeting SYNTHESIS OF THE ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS FOR 2007 CONCERNING ONGOING EVALUATION Irina RAMNICEANU Helpdesk Evaluation.
Research Introduction to the concept of incorporating sources into your own work.
The Effective Reader by D. J. Henry
Chapter 11: Writing the Essay What Is an Essay?
Unit 2 Research Proposal Schedule
Advanced Technical Writing
Parts of an Academic Paper
CASE STUDY BY: JESSICA PATRON.
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Doctrine Development & TTP Publication Review Mr. Nielsen TTGL N3A2
Joint Doctrine Analysis Division
Joint Doctrine Analysis Division
Increased Efficiency and Effectiveness
Document-Based Question (DBQ) Writing
Document-Based Question (DBQ) Writing
Joint Doctrine Planning Conference Joint Doctrine Library
Transmitted by the expert
Technical Report Writing
Inducements Mike Ashley – IESBA Member and Task Force Chair
IAASB-IESBA Coordination
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Doctrine Development & TTP Publication Review Mr. Nielsen TTGL N3A2
Project Management Process Groups
Writing A critical Review
Writing reports Wrea Mohammed
Technical Writing Abstract Writing.
Writing Careful Long Reports
Document-Based Question (DBQ) Writing
Joint Vision 2020.
TECHNICAL REPORTS WRITING
Presentation transcript:

Joint Doctrine Analysis Division JP 4-08, Logistics in Support of Multinational Operations JDAD Special Study Information Brief 23APR18 Overall classification of this brief is UNCLASSIFIED LTC Chad Hayes Joint Doctrine Analysis Division DSN 668-6977 Comm: 757-203-6977 chad.b.hayes.mil@mail.mil

Purpose To inform the JDDC on the conduct and findings of the JP 4-08 special study.

Background Special Study was addressed at 60th JDPC and directed by DJ-7 in the Calendar Year 2018 Joint Doctrine Development and Assessment Schedule. “..enhance strategic and operational effectiveness by delivering joint doctrine that is adaptive to the needs of the Joint Force.” Facts and Assumptions (F) Only current JPs used for this analysis JP 4-08 has redundant content (A) JP 4-08 contains MTTP level content

Methodology Research and Analysis Determine if the same subject matter in JP 4-08 is in other JPs. Determine if subject matter could be covered in Service doctrine or MTTPs Determine if JP 4-08 should be canceled Questionnaire to JP 4-08 LA, JSDS, JDD JP 4-08 and JP 3-16 FARs analysis, Service doctrine/MTTP analysis JP 4-08 analysis with other JPs, AJPs Research and Analysis

Sources JPs Allied Joint Publications JP 3-16, Multinational Operations JP 3-34, Joint Engineering Operations JP 3-35, Deployment and Redeployment Operations JP 4-0, Joint Logistics JP 4-02, Joint Health Services JP 4-06, Mortuary Affairs JP 4-09, Distribution Operations JP 4-10, Operational Contract Support JP 4-08 was compared to JP 4-0 page by page, and to JPs 3-34, 3-35, 4-02, 4-06, 4-09, and 4-10 to identify issues related to the three topics listed in the methodology. These JPs were selected as a result of JELINT search and were specifically identified in a “JP 4-08 Transition to Cancellation Plan” developed JDD that recommended cancelling JP 4-08. JP 3-34, Joint Engineering Operations. The engineering specific information currently in JP 4-08 has some redundancies with other JPs. The analysis team has identified three paragraphs in JP 4-08 to retain as an introduction to engineering as a core logistics function/MNL capability. JP 3-35, Deployment and Redeployment Operations. JP 4-08 has some topics also included in JP 3-35, but there are unique MNL topics that provide context concerning the core capability of deployment and distribution. Paragraphs 2 (a) and (b) have more similarities with the deployment and distribution section of JP 4-0, but the information is not verbatim. JP 4-08 also includes a discussion of movement control not captured in JP 4-0, but it is in JP 4-09 (discussed in 2A.(6) below). Based on a comparison of the applicable text in both pubs, the JDAD analysis team concluded that moving any JP 4-08 information to JP 3-35 would not significantly enhance JP 3-35. JP 4-0 and JP 4-08 were compared side-by-side and page-by-page to review subject matter, content, and specific context. While there are redundant topics, a significant amount of the content is not. One such example is the principles of logistics compared to the principles of MNL. There are thirteen principles of MNL and seven principles of logistics with only two common to both, flexibility and simplicity. Additionally, in some instances where there is a redundant topic, there is also specific MNL content that is unique and only in JP 4-08. This was evident in a direct comparison of the JP 4-0 core logistics functions and the JP 4-08 MNL capabilities. For these first two instances, the text from JP 4-08 should be considered to be retained in some manner. Finally, there are topics that are redundant both in topic and content, such as the logistics imperatives, which are listed and described almost identically in JP 4-0 and JP 4-08. There is no need to retain such text from JP 4-08. JP 4-02, Joint Health Services. The health support content in JP 4-08 is an overview mentioned in the core MNL capabilities. Most of the information on the responsibilities of the joint force surgeon is already captured in JP 4-02. There is an opening paragraph of key multinational information with a subparagraph concerning medical restrictions on the provision of medical support to other nations and the use of foreign medical support by US forces. This text could be used to introduce joint health services with references for more detailed information to JP 4-02 and AJP-4.10. JP 4-06, Mortuary Affairs. Mortuary affairs information in JP 4-08 is located in a paragraph in the logistics services section of the core MNL capabilities, Appendix A, “Commander’s Checklist for Logistics Support of Multinational Operations,” and Appendix B, “Alternate Formats for Logistics Annex to Multinational Operations Plan.” The information on mortuary affairs for multinational operations in JP 4-06 is sufficient so moving content from JP 4-08 to JP 4-06 is unnecessary. JP 4-09, Distribution Operations. The majority of distribution information is in the movement control subparagraph of the deployment and distribution paragraph located in the core MNL capabilities chapter of JP 4-08. The preponderance of the information in the movement control paragraph has a MNL focus. However, JP 4-09 already has an extensive discussion on movement control that includes multinational arrangements for movement control and distribution. Transfer of additional JP 4-08 information is not necessary. JP 4-10, Operational Contract Support. The paragraph in the core MNL capabilities chapter of JP 4-08 only superficially covers the main points of operational contract support (OCS.) It is not similar to the discussion of OCS in JP 4-0 and is focused on OCS issues during multinational operations. Additionally, appendix D, “United States Contracting Considerations in Multinational Operations” is unique and informative and would provide value-added information to JP 4-10. AJP-3.12, Allied Joint Doctrine for Military Engineering. There are no significantly redundancies between JP 4-08 and AJP-3.12; however, there are inaccuracies. For example, JP 4-08, Chapter 2, paragraph 6 b states “in NATO doctrine, an engineer coordination cell provides support to the force engineer.” However, there is no mention of such a cell in AJP-3.12. Additionally, AJP-3.12 will be going through a significant revision during the next year so any specific discussion of NATO engineering doctrine should be harmonized with the next edition of AJP-3.12. AJP-4, Allied Joint Doctrine for Logistics. There are few redundancies between JP 4-08 and AJP-4. Examples of redundancies are MNL capabilities, principles, and imperatives. There are also some redundancies in planning, execution, and command and control; however, JP 4-08 focuses MNL from a US perspective. It also captures special considerations and complications in executing operations in a MNL environment. AJP-4 differs more on the NATO Logistic Support Concept and detailed methods of implementation. It also articulates roles and responsibilities for coalition nations' contributions and more detailed planning that includes reporting, financing, lead nation role, roles of specialist nations, and third party logistics. AJP-4.9, Allied Joint Doctrine for Multinational Logistics Support. There are no redundancies between JP 4-08 and AJP-4.9. JP 4-08 highlights similar information concerning several NATO specific MNL issues concerning topics such as lead nation for logistics, contractor support, and MNL organizations. AJP-4.12, Allied Joint Doctrine for Medical Support. There is one significant redundancy between JP 4-08 and AJP-4.10, which is information on the medical coordination cell (MEDCC). Paragraph 5.a.(4) and associated subparagraphs are virtually identical to AJP-4.10 paragraph 10.4.6 only in a slightly different order and organization. Most of the information in AJP-4.10 is related more to JP 4-02. Since the information is identical, the MEDCC could be briefly mentioned in a health services section with a reference to AJP-4.10 for details. The alternative would be to retain the MEDCC information and eliminate the reference because there is nothing additional about the MEDCC in AJP-4.10 in comparison with JP 4-08. Allied Joint Publications AJP-4.09, Multinational Logistics Support AJP-3.12, Military Engineering Support AJP-4.0, Logistics AJP-4.12, Medical Support

Findings Enough redundancy to justify JP 4-08 cancellation Relevant JP 4-08 multinational logistics information should move to other JPs No ALSA or Service publication identified as a reasonable location for JP 4-08 relevant info JP 4-08 should remain in the JP library until relevant information is included in other JPs

COA 1-Joint Logistics COA1 - Integrate MNL principles and functions in JP 4-0. Retain the remaining MNL relevant information with similar topics throughout JP 4-0 to include JP 4-08 appendices on Commander’s Checklist and Legal Considerations. Move appendix on MNL Contracting Support, to JP 4-10. Advantage Logistics information is in JP 4-0 Disadvantages Integration of MNL may be confusing Increases the length of JP 4-0 by 20-30 percent

COA 2-MN Ops & Jt Log Balanced COA 2 - Move JP 4-08 principles, capabilities, and Legal Authorities appendix to JP 4-0. Move Contracting Considerations appendix to JP 4-10. Move planning considerations, remaining relevant info, and Commander’s Checklist appendix to JP 3-16. Advantages Moves MNL info into the multinational ops JP Spreads the content into 3 JPs Disadvantages Minimal MNL content in the JP 4-0 Separates the MNL principles and capabilities from MNL content

COA 3-Multinational Ops COA 3 - Move Legal Authorities appendix to JP 4-0. Move Contracting Considerations appendix to JP 4-10. Move remaining JP 4-08 info to JP 3-16. Integrate the planning considerations, transitions, control and coordination. Create a JP 3-16 MNL appendix w/remaining relevant content and include the Commander’s Checklist. Advantages Directly nests multinational command and support relationships Places legal authorities in JP 4-0 Puts MNL contract considerations in JP 4-10 Disadvantage Increases the length of JP 3-16 by 25%

COA Recommendation/Coordination COA 3 - Move Legal Authorities appendix to JP 4-0. Move Contracting Considerations appendix to JP 4-10. Move remaining JP 4-08 info to JP 3-16. Integrate the planning considerations, transitions, control and coordination. Create a JP 3-16 MNL appendix w/remaining relevant content and include the Commander’s Checklist appendix. JP 4-08 JSDS (J4)/LA (USA CASCOM), JP 4-0 JSDS (J4)/LA(J4), JP 3-16 JSDS(J5)/LA(J5), JP 4-10 JSDS(J4)/LA(USA G4) concur with COA3 JP 4-08 remains in JP library till COA completion and CASCOM becomes TRA for JP 3-16 MNL appendix COA 3 Coordination with JP 3-16, 4-0, 4-10

Questions