1. Joint Doctrine Analysis Division
Joint Doctrine Notes and Competitive Area Studies Updates 61st JDPC 23 May 2018
Mr. Mark Brown
Joint Doctrine Analysis Division
DSN
Comm:

2. Joint Doctrine Notes

3. Context for Review From CJCSM 5120.01_
A JDN should address a potential doctrinal void or deficiency, or should otherwise describe constructs that can improve the joint force ability to plan, execute, and assess joint operations.
A JDN does not represent an agreed to or fully staffed doctrinal position, but provides a short term, bridging solution to a potential doctrine void identified by the JDDC.
A JDN may also simply provide information on a topic of interest to the JDDC or broader joint community, such as describing the potential impact of an emerging concept on related JPs
A JDN is canceled when its content has been put into permanent publication or the requirement no longer exists.
Approved JDNs will be reviewed annually by JS J-7 JED for applicability.

4. Joint Doctrine Notes Review
JDN#
Title
Approval Date
Last Reviewed
Status/Comments
2-13
Commander’s Communication Synchronization
18 December 2013
November 2017
(60th JDPC)
No decision this JDPC…currently retaining due to potential impact on development of the information function, JP 3-XX, Information, and related activities. Review/determine way ahead upon signature of JP 3-XX, Information.
1-16
Command Red Team
16 May 2016
61st JDPC discussion/decision…per 60th JDPC
2-16
Identity Activities
03 August 2016
No decision this JDPC…per 60th JDPC, review again at 62nd JDPC.
3-16
Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations
20 October 2016
No decision this JDPC… Review/determine way ahead upon signature of JP 3-XX JEMSO.
1-18
Strategy
25 April 2018
N/A
No decision this JDPC…

5. From 60th JDPC JDN 1-16, Command Red Team
AO Recommendation: Archive. Recommend JDDC vote to archive JDN 1-16 based upon inclusion of “red team” content in joint doctrine, particularly JP 5-0, Appendix K (Red Teams) and JP (JIPOE).
JDPC Decision: Retain. Absent proponent rationale to keep JDN 1-16, JDN 1-16 will be archived automatically after the next JDPC. The JDDC passed this proposal unanimously.

6. Command Red Team
CCMD Red Team discussions found in 14 JPs, varying degrees of depth
JP 5-0
Chapter IV, paragraph 2 e (Commander’s Role, Red Teaming) provides an overview of the red team function.
Appendix K (Red Teams)…reflects information gleaned from Chapter V of the JDN, The Red Team and Joint Planning. JP
JP 2-0
JP 2-01 JP
JP 3-11
JP 3-13 JP JP
JP 3-18
JP 3-31
JP 3-33
JP 3-50
JP 3-60
Some depth of “red team” discussion (primarily )…will be impacted by JP 2 series reset
Mentions “red team”
…no depth of discussion

7. Archive JDN 1-16, Command Red Team
Recommendation
“Red Team” is an established part of Joint Doctrine
It can be further developed as necessary
No proponent rationale has been presented to retain JDN 1-16
Archive JDN 1-16, Command Red Team

8. Questions/Discussion

9. Competitive Area Study

10. Competitive Area Study
Competitive Area Studies are a by-product of the 2018 Joint Military Net Assessment.
JS J-8 has added a Competitive Area Study into the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System process to help address gaps in requirements and capability development.
JS J-7 formed an internal cross functional team to address at least nine of the competitive areas
JDAD is JED lead for Joint Doctrine. Identifying “activities” that support closing the capability gap in a specific area.

11. Competitive Area (CA) StudiesAO
OPR
Comments
EMS
Corey
J-8
Ops Deps Tank 27 June
Land
Hayes
FCB 23 May
Maritime
Buckley
FCB 30 May
Space
Stratton
FCB 6 June
IAMD
FCB 11 June
Logistics and Sustainment
Maresh
J-4
FCB 14 June
C4/Cyber
Brown
J-6
TBD
Cyber
Air
FCB 13 June
OPR - Office of Primary Responsibility
FCB - Functional Capabilities Board

12. Questions/Discussion