Items in red require your input

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QPSC Overall KDA Based on Q38 – Intention to Leave.
Advertisements

Close Hold – Company Confidential – Not for Distribution Engagement Every Day: 2011 Engagement Survey – List of Q12 & SAIC-specific 2011 Engagement Survey.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
TalentMap 1 York Community Services: November 1-12, TalentMap Athabasca University – Spring TalentMap Employee Survey Results Presentation.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
Dear User, This presentation has been designed for you by the Hearts and Minds Support Team. It provides a template for presenting the results of the SAFE.
Department of Administration Employee Relations Committee 2012 Survey.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Mentorship in SCA We encourage you to explore the mentor/mentee relationship between you and your intern. SCA members are looking for someone to engage.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
iPPQ Team Report for Practitioners
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey
Performance Management
Welcome Michele & Nikki will be with you in a few moments.
This training references results from the 2017 TELL Kentucky Survey available online at The intent is to begin discussion among staff.
Effective Communications for ITSS Managers
2017 Winter Employee Engagement Survey
The High Cost of Low Morale
SAMPLE Drive Engagement Through Interdepartmental Collaboration
Items in red require your input
Empower Managers to Take Ownership of Employee Engagement
10 Managing Employee Retention, Engagement, and Careers
Culture Survey This document provides examples of how we analyze and report our clients’ culture survey data. It includes data from several clients in.
Leadership and Management
Administrative Faculty Evaluation Workshop 2017
Identifying Process Improvements for Better Customer Satisfaction
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Survey of Organizational Excellence
Social Services Union County
Human Resources Competency Framework
Items in red require your input
PLANNING INTO ACTION: ROLLOUT & SCORECARDS
7-2 Leadership Goals Describe the need for leadership skills and the characteristics of an effective leader. Identify the human relations skills needed.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Employee Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Just-in-Time Management Advice
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Highlights from the NYC School Survey: Results and implementation
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
Highlights from the NYC School Survey: Results and implementation
Engagement Follow-up Resources
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Sample Individual (to communicate with them about Pilot)
Departure View Glossary
Employee Engagement Defined
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Highlights from the NYC School Survey: Results and implementation
Introduction to myIMPACT-Adjuncts
Presentation transcript:

Enter Work Unit Here Work Unit Results Review Enter Date of Review Session Here Items in red require your input!! Please refer to the resource “A Guide to Understanding and Sharing Your Survey Results” for information found in this template. Specifically, refer to page 13 “Sharing Your Survey Results” for instructions on how to fill-out and complete this template for your Results Rollout Session with your work unit.

You are a valued member of our team! Thank You! For completing the survey For participating in the Work Unit Results Review Session For helping us understand our results You are a valued member of our team!

Why We Survey Provide an opportunity for confidential team member feedback Identify strengths to build upon Recognize opportunities for improvement Take action to improve the team member experience

Objectives Understand the Press Ganey survey model Review and discuss work unit results Identify key actions Communicate our follow-up plan

Ground Rules We request that you… Help us understand the meaning behind the results Provide honest and candid feedback Offer constructive suggestions for improvement Identify the highest priority items Help us focus on those areas we can control within the department and team The Ground Rules listed are a foundation for ensuring an effective and efficient Results Rollout Session. You are invited to add additional ground rules if you see a need based on your work unit.

Work Unit Feedback Process Review Engagement, Action Planning Readiness, and Tier Scores Review Strengths Review Concerns Clarify Results with Team Define Potential Actions Prioritize Next Steps

Employee Voice Model Organization Domain Engagement High Workforce Manager Employee High Performance Engagement Workforce All of the items on the survey come together in our Employee Voice Model, which is the foundation for the survey. Along the left side of the model there are three domains: Organizational, Manager, and Employee The Organization Domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to the overall organization. The Manager Domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to their supervisor/manager. The employee domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to their colleagues and jobs.

Employee Voice Model Engagement Workforce I am proud to tell people I work for this organization. I would stay with this organization if offered a similar job elsewhere. I would recommend this organization to family and friends who need healthcare. I would like to be working at this organization three years from now. I would recommend this organization as a good place to work. Overall, I am a satisfied employee. Engagement reflects the degree of commitment your employees feel towards the workplace. Commitment may be maximized as employees feel connected to the overall organization, their supervisor/manager, and their colleagues. Engagement is measured using these six items.

Engagement Score Work Unit Average Organizational Average Engagement Indicator Enter # Here 4.04 Domain Work Unit Average Organizational Average Organizational Domain Enter # Here 3.90 Manager Domain 4.02 Employee Domain 4.09 DESCRIPTION The Engagement Score indicates the degree of commitment team members feel toward the organization. Work units that are very connected to the organization will have a very strong level of commitment.

Action Planning Readiness (APR) Score Enter Work Unit Here Enter APR Score Here DESCRIPTION The APR Score represents team members’ readiness to engage in feedback and action planning. The score is assigned through calculations on a 100-point scale from survey items specific to manager performance. INDEX READINESS SCORE High readiness 90-100 Moderately high readiness 80-89 Moderate readiness 70-79 Moderately low readiness 60-69 Low readiness 0-59 Please remind the group that we share and review the results first, then come back to action plan.

Action Planning Readiness (APR) Score Action Planning Readiness Items Domain The person I report to treats me with respect. MGR The person I report to encourages teamwork. I am involved in decisions that affect my work. I respect the abilities of the person to whom I report. The person I report to is a good communicator. The person I report to cares about my job satisfaction. Manager-employee relationship Based on 6 Manager Domain Items Used consistently across all PG clients Reported on a 100 point scale; higher scores indicate a stronger manager-employee relationship Who “owns” the APR score? Answer: The manager Reason: Fosters individual accountability for leader improvement.

Tier Score Enter Work Unit Here Enter Tier Here (I, II, or III) Enter Power Item Score Here DESCRIPTION The Tier Score is a team outcome metric based on items that most powerfully impact team performance INDEX TIER PERFORMANCE POWER ITEM SCORE Tier I Above Average Performance 5.0 - 4.15 Tier II Average Performance 4.14 - 3.80 Tier III Below Average Performance 3.79 or below

Tier Score Power Item Domain Different work units work well together in this organization. ORG This organization conducts business in an ethical manner. This organization provides high-quality care and service. This organization supports me in balancing my work life and personal life. My pay is fair compared to other healthcare employers in this area. This organization treats employees with respect. This organization provides career development opportunities. The person I report to treats me with respect. MGR I am satisfied with the recognition I receive for doing a good job. I am involved in decisions that affect my work. I respect the abilities of the person to whom I report. The person I report to is a good communicator. My work unit works well together. EMP I like the work I do. My job makes good use of my skills and abilities. Based on the 15 Power Items; the items that most powerfully impact team performance Cross section of ORG, MGR and EMP items Who “owns” the Tier Score? Answer: The team Reason: Fosters work unit accountability for self-regulation; managers facilitate team improvement and report on team progress.

Strengths Item Domain Enter Item Here Enter Domain Here

Concerns Item Domain Enter Item Here Enter Domain Here

Summary Enter any summary information or observations here

Clarification of Results - Strengths What are our strengths that we want to build upon as a team? Did any of our strengths surprise you?

Clarification of Results - Concerns What help can you provide in understanding the identified areas of concern? Did any of these areas of concern surprise you?

Next Steps Summarize Feedback Hold Action Planning Session Share Action Plan with Team Regularly Review Action Plan

THANK YOU!