Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation
Intermediate-level learner
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Regression Statistics
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
Teachers Response (N= 11)
Management Philosophy
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Acrylic Type SOV SS df MS F–value p–value
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4.5. summary of anovabunder multiple regression
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
Table 2. Regression statistics for independent and dependent variables
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Test of Normality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff
MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Respondents Frequency
Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value Table 4. 2 x 2 Analysis of Variance for Genetics problem-solving Ability Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value Gender 2290.031 1 33.712 .000 Treatment 2761.884 40.658 Gender * Treatment 2.909 .043 .836 Within (Error) 145028.501 2134 67.929 Total 1516796.000 2138 Dependent Variable: GPSA whole sample Catherine M. Aurah et al. The Effects of Self-efficacy Beliefs and Metacognition on Academic Performance: A Mixed Method Study. American Journal of Educational Research, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 8, 334-343. doi:10.12691/education-1-8-11 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.