UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1/8/04Lance Simms Thermal Testing of TOB/TEC Hybrids at UCSB.
Advertisements

Slide 1L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder (for the UCSB module testing group) Current testing.
Thermal Testing of TEC/TOB Hybrids at UCSB 1/20/04 Slide 1 Thermal Testing of TOB/TEC Hybrids at UCSB.
Slide 1Module Testing Meeting March 7, 2003US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model-Anthony Affolder US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model Anthony Affolder (for.
Slide 1 Anthony Affolder US Module LT meeting June 17, 2004 UCSB Module LT Testing.
Slide 1X-Calibration Common Testing Issues-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, June 3, 2003 X-Calibration Common Testing Issues: Grounding, Environmental.
6/22/04 Slide 1 Hybrid Testing Status Lance Simms 6/22/04.
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Slide 1UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 UCSB Rod Production UCSB Rod Production, Jan , presented by Jim Lamb.
Anthony AffolderUS CMS Meeting 12/3/2002Proposal of UCSB Short-term Testing Program Assumptions Electrical and optical hybrids not burnt-in prior to arrival.
Slide 1 Anthony Affolder US Silicon Meeting, March 9, 2004 Equipment Status ARCS equipment status à Single module and 4 hybrid DAQ equipment status à Vienna.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
Slide 1Rod Production presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)April 9, 2004 Rod Production Rod Production, April , presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)
UCSB Encapsulation Studies UC Santa Barbara Based upon a 6 week study by F. Garberson in collaboration with A. Affolder, J. Incandela, S. Kyre and many.
US CMS Silicon Electronics Testing – CMS Lehman Review - May 21, Affolder1 US CMS Silicon Electronics Testing US CMS Lehman Review BNL 5/21/03 A.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
CMS Tracker Week – Module Test Meeting – April 2003 – Patrick Gartung 1 Status of US long term module testing Patrick Gartung University of California,
Slide 1 Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 18, 2005 Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids & Modules Anthony Affolder On behalf.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
J. Valls, CMS L2-L3 Meeting, Sept ROD Production at CERN  ROD Flow During Production  ROD Flow at CERN  ROD Testing Areas  Infrastructure  Equipment.
Electrical Tests of Modules and Ladders Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) 2 October 2014.
CMS Module Testing & Quality Assurance
UCSB Hybrid Bonding & Testing
FNAL Production Experience
ROD assembly and test in US
DAQ Equipment Status 2 fully equipped Vienna boxes at UCSB and FNAL
APV Lectures APV FE Basic Building Blocks How Our Testing Works
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
Update of US Testing Status
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
APV Lectures APV FE Basic Building Blocks How Our Testing Works
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
CMS Module Testing Issues
UCSB Testing 3 Stereo Modules Tested 1 SS6 Module Tested
Results from module testing
UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder
Recent TOB Developments
Hardware Needs (Near Term)
Module Failures on RODs
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
First Assembled Rod in US
Module production in Italy
US Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group)
UCSB Short-term Testing Plan
Operations/Failure Analysis
Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested
UCSB Qualification Module Grading
Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing
Sensor probing (Summary)
US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Anthony Affolder UC Santa Barbara
Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids & Modules
US Module Testing Progress Report
Operations/Failure Analysis
Operations/Failure Analysis
TOB Module Production Overview and Plan
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Module Failures on Rods
US Module Testing Progress Report
Operations/Failure Analysis
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Equipment Status ARCS equipment status DAQ equipment status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hardware needs (ARCS) Current ARCS capabilities at both sites should be able to keep up with production assuming software changes Automatic I-V curves,
Presentation transcript:

UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder (for the UCSB module testing group) Current testing infrastructure Test results Module test equipment needs Software Needs Current testing through-put L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

Testing Facilities Readiness Clean room adjacent to production area Room layout finished Currently in high bay with intentionally same layout Missing only hybrid thermal cycling test Clean room will be finished in April Storage cabinet with dry air flow in place for testing phase Long term module storage cabinets under construction at KSU L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

UCSB Recent Infrastructure Projects Hybrid holding plates Matches hybrid thermal cycling test stand Can bond and test with low noise in same holder Burn-in low voltage distribution crate LED indicators and fuse protection Crowbar HV protection circuit 12 each for FNAL/UCSB Module cold plate Attaches to current module holder Hybrid clamshell Module clamshell L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

Hybrid Visual Inspection Once FNAL indicated lift off problem, closely visually inspected our 5 hybrids Found 1 wire bond lift off Bonds have redundancy so no failure seen Removed broken bond to eliminate chance of short Will closely monitor for lift off/ wire breaks throughout production process L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder Current UCSB ARC Setup 3 ARC Controller + 5 new ARC FE + 1 old ARC FE 1 Hybrid testing (2 Hybrid clamshells) 2 Module testing (Module clamshell) 2 LED systems DEPP HV supply Missing hybrid-to-utri adapters to fully use capacity Hybrid Clamshell ARC crate DEPP ARC Controller Module Clamshell LED Controller L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Hybrid Test Results (1) 5 hybrids tested on arrival All good, but fail current requirement given in the Procedures for Module Testing Pedestal test reproducible, but noise measured very sensitive to digitization effects Measured noise varying the pedestal by changing VPSP value Digitization effects cause variations larger than ±20% Hybrid noise requirements should be changed Ni within 50% of average 0.3 < Ni < 1.5 Removes chance of chips with uniformly low/high noise from passing requirements See hep.ucsb.edu/cms/cmsUCSB.html for more complete description L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Hybrid Test Results (2) 4 hybrids have had APV bonded to pitch adapters All channels are good Hybrid clamshells enable testing without large pickup effects at chip edges Hybrid isolated with base plate and lid grounded Same requirements can be made for hybrids with or w/o PA bonded L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Gain Measurements (1) Multi-point gain added to ARCS 6.0 beta software Thanks to the Aachen group Tests are very quick and have advantages over pulse shape measurements More uniform More stable Gain linearities Gain variations Strongly suggest that test be added to all M800 production. Will be included TOB testing Make requirements on gain slope, offset and fit c2 L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Gain Measurements (2) 2 of 24 chips so far have no response with low injection values Only occurs in peak mode inverter on Caused by initialization defaults in ARCS tests VPSP set too low Thanks to T. Franke and M. Raymond for help VPSP setting will be modified in new release Removes all seen irregularities L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Module Test Results (1) 1 Prototype Module Tested 1 Production Module Tested Module testing in UCSB clamshell decreases common-mode noise to the point where location of opens become detectable by their noise levels PA-sensor Sensor-sensor Pinholes act as if saturated High current channels can have higher noise (Bad IStrip Slight noise increase on chip edges Two neighboring channels have high noise only in peak inverter on PEAK ON Unknown Problem Bad CAC Bad Istrip Sensor-sensor open PA-sensor open Pinhole L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Module Test Results (2) PEAK ON LED pinhole test Bonded one inherent pinhole on purpose Test acted as expected 120 mA needed to unsaturate pre-amp Not clear if maximum current (400 mA) supplied sufficient to find “high current” pinholes Pinhole Unknown Problem PA-sensor open Sensor-sensor open L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Module Test Results (3) PEAK ON Pinhole PA-sensor open Unknown Problem Bad CAC Bad Istrip Sensor-sensor open Gain test Pinhole clear by lack of gain Opens clear by higher gain L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

ARC Test X-calibrations Minimal X-calibration has been performed Same faulty channels found at FNAL/UCSB on prototype model CERN FHIT/UCSB ARC test compared Pedestals very similar Noise is slightly higher than CERN FHIT measurement Not understood if it is FHIT/ARC difference, a software difference, an environmental difference, or a digitization effect Once model production begins, plan to exchange modules with FNAL for X-calibration L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder ARCS Database No entries yet put into official database Waiting for ARCS interface for database upload and database definition to stablize All testing results have been made available to silicon community on local website hep.ucsb.edu/people/affolder/module_test_UCSB.html L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder DAQ status 1 full DAQ stand available at UCSB Planned only for Vienna box tests with modules Limited number of tests performed See P. Gartung’s talk Focus on bringing up hardware/software for Vienna box Xdaq, LT, and Xrod software all compiled and run Still working to understand controls/output No LED stand planned for DAQ No database work done as of yet L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder Vienna Box Status Vienna Box recently arrived at UCSB No modification necessary to use with TOB module carrier plates Full compliment of plates currently in machine shop LV distribution ready Just received HV controllers (both the A128HS and A1303) Integrating as fast as possible Demonstrated each slot works with hybrids Thermal cycled box between –25 to 30° C with chiller Need hardware to test more than one channel at a time See P. Gartung’s talk for more details L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

Current Hardware Needs ARC Needs 1 DEPP 1 LED system Will be picked up this week Torino Interlock Box In-route 3 Electrometers 2 in-route Flat cable-Lemo adapter Under construction at UCSB 13 hybrid-to-utri ver. D 1 in-route Used for both ARC module and burn-in test Limiting factor in testing through-put Hybrid thermal cycling box Lack hardware/software Tests will be performed by A. Honma’s group for M800 We are aiding in the manufacturing of test stand DAQ components 8 VUTRI 10 in-route 9 PAACB 6 in-route 1 TPO 1 in-route 1 CCU 2 PAACB to TPO interface Needed for backplane pulsing L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

Current Testing Software Needs Hybrid Characterization Database input Module Testing IV scan, backplane pulsing test, database input Module Burn-in Rods Beginning to assemble necessary infrastructure for rod assembly/ burn-in Xrod and LT software package already compiled and running L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder

Current Estimated Testing Through-put Hybrid Arrival Testing 24 hybrids per day Matches peak production (+ contingency) Requires dedicated tech Module Basic Test 2 ARC LED stands but only 1 hybrid-to-utri version D 12 modules per day Module Burn-in (Vienna Box) See P. Gartung’s talk for details Lack of hybrid-to-utri adapters limits testing through-put to 1 While burn-in test underway, no module testing possible Module characterization test will be done at beginning/end of test cycles ARC After Burn-in Test Not clear how much ARC testing necessary after burn-in Depends on grounding/pickup issues LED is minimal test Time estimates do not include database entry. After finishing test equipment acquisition/integration, database will be first priority. L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003 UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder