The Government Limits Civil Liberties

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schenck v US Facts of the case Charles Schenck, Secretary of the Socialist party, was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 Along with.
Advertisements

AMERICAN HISTORY.  Going to war was an enormous and very expensive  President Wilson and Congress had to figure out how to pay for it  Congress passed.
U.S. At War in WWI. WWI Footage 1:41:21 I. The War The U.S. played very little role in the actual fighting until 1918 – Remember we came in at the end.
Attacks on Civil Liberties.
War on the Home Front Espionage & Sedition Acts. Answer ONE of the following: What does patriotism mean to you? Do you think it’s important for people.
OGT Benchmark: Explain how individual rights are relative, not absolute, and describe the balance between individual rights, the rights of others, and.
Abrams v. United States Work taken from the United States Reports of the U.S. Supreme Court Argued October 21-22, 1919 Decided November 10, 1919.
Case Studies: Civil Liberties in World War 1
“WAR IS THE HEALTH OF THE STATE.”
Objective… Describe how the U.S. government enforced loyalty and discouraged dissent.
Progressing to War World War I as a Progressive Crusade.
DO NOW: COPY THE VOCABULARY IN YOUR NOTEBOOK 1.Civil liberties: one's freedom to exercise one's rights as guaranteed under the laws of the country 2.1.
1 ST AMENDMENT RESTRICTIONS DECEMBER 12, JUNE 1917 – ESPIONAGE ACT – POSTAL SERVICE ALLOWED TO BAN TREASONABLE OR SEDITIOUS NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES,
Case Studies: Civil Liberties in World War 1
The Most Famous Recruitment Poster Uncle Sam—He the Man!
Opportunities for African-Americans in WW1 “Great Migration.” 1916 – 1919  70,000 War industries work. Enlistment in segregated units.
APUSH Review: Schenck v. United States (1919)
The War at Home and Overseas WORLD WAR I.  Explain and analyze the expansion of federal powers.  Analyze and evaluate the ongoing tension between individual.
Intolerance in the 1920’s …unwillingness or refusal to respect contrary opinions or beliefs, persons of different races or backgrounds.
Congress will make no law….. abridging the freedom of Speech
World War I III. The HomefrontIII. The Homefront –A. Economic Mobilization 1. Financing the War1. Financing the War –Liberty Bonds –Taxes.
World War I Part IV: Repression & Reaction Prior to reviewing this Power Point... 1) Read pages ) Answer the Part I guide questions.
In times of War: National Security vs. Civil Liberties Art Lewandowski Fostoria High School.
How does the Supreme Court decide cases?. Sample Case: Virginia v. Black (2003) The Law: Virginia The Law: Virginia It shall be unlawful.
Objective: Students will continue their study of World War I by reviewing trench warfare and how the U.S. entered World War I Drill: Where were you on.
Civil Liberties during Wartime pg. 27 – Unit 5 Study Packet.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH A look at the First Amendment: Security vs. Liberty.
Warm up What were three changes the United States made to prepare for WWI?
Progressing to War The Great War as a Progressive Crusade.
World War I: US Home Front US History Spiconardi.
 Encouraged to enter industry and agriculture to replace laborers fighting in War  Over 1 mil. Women worked in the industry (munitions plants, delivered.
Did World War strengthen Democracy on the Homefront?
Dissent during WWI. Reasons for Dissent Opposition to the government’s involvement in international affairs Opposition to the Selective Service Act Political.
The Yanks Are Coming! The Yanks Are Coming!. General John J. Pershing, commanding general of the AEF. Referred to as the Doughboys and Yanks. 2 million.
March 14, 2014 Aim: Did the Sedition Act violate the First Amendment? Do Now: – Are there any factors preventing you from fully exercising your right to.
The WIB The War Industries Board was set up to oversee production of war supplies –Managed the buying and distributing of war materials –Set production.
Do Now: Are there any factors that prevent you from fully exercising your right to free speech? Are these factors fair?
: The World at War : The World at War.
Uncle Sam—He the Man! Don’t Mess with the U. S.
The congress passed the sedition act on May 16,1918. It was designed to protect America’s participation in WWI. That Eugene Debs was noted for his oratory.
1.President Wilson: The War to End All War  War outlook in Jan  Poor for Allies: Why?  U.S. troops in France---American Expeditionary Forces 
Happy Tuesday! Complete the bell ringer on the Great Migration and be ready to discuss.
21 to 30 yrs. and later extended to 40 yrs. of age.
“To win, we must endeavour to be the stronger of the two at the point of impact. Our only hope of this lies in making our own choice of operations,
Schenck vs United States(1919)
Over Here HW: GR Ch 19 [Wed 3/29] Imperialism and WW I Test [Wed 3/29]
Limiting Speech in War Time
Espionage and Sedition Acts
Who was Charles Schenck?
How did 9/11 impact our foreign policy?
America in WWI On the Home front.
Landmark Freedom of Speech Cases
Speech Clauses I (Clear and Present Danger and Bad Tendency Tests)
Influencing Public Opinion
Warm-up List and explain at least 5 things that “changed”on the “homefront” when America joined World War I.
WWI & Impact on the Homefront
SWBAT: Describe how life changed in America during WWI
Kylie Lenard & Lariena Matthias
NOTES-CHECK #s 36–40 YESTERDAY
How did the U.S. fight World War I at home and abroad?
World War I Hits the Homefront
World War I US History.
Declaration of Independence
NOTES-CHECK #s 36 – 40 YESTERDAY
Limiting Speech in War Time
Abrams v. United States Russian immigrants convicted under Sedition Act of 1918 for circulating leaflets calling for munitions strike. Charged with publishing.
Civil Liberties during Wartime
US Involvement in WWI.
The War at Home.
Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47
Presentation transcript:

The Government Limits Civil Liberties WW1 and the Air of Suspicion

Why the Paranoia? War is not usually popular. In order to ensure support, the government wants to make sure the people are backing up the war effort. “Positive” Way – convincing through propaganda “Negative” Way – punishing dissention

Espionage Act - 1917 Made giving any kind of aid to the enemy illegal Included any type of disloyalty, giving false reports, or interfering with war effort Punishment = up to $10,000 fine and 20 yrs in prison Examples: Eugene Debs made speeches opposing the draft – sentenced to 10 years in prison Edward Snowden today…NSA leaks

Schenk v. U.S. Charles Schenk, a socialist, gave flyers to newly drafted soldiers. He called being drafted involuntary servitude. He was found guilty of violating the Espionage Act. Court Case: Challenged U.S. Government and violations of free speech Supreme court said that if your words present “A clear and present danger” to the public, they were not protected (“Fire!” example) Supreme Court Limits Free Speech

Sedition Act - 1918 Made it illegal to : "willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of the Government of the United States" or to "willfully urge, incite, or advocate any curtailment of the production" of the things "necessary or essential to the prosecution of the war." 877 people convicted

Abrams v. U.S. Jacob Abrams – young anarchist – part of a group that protested the U.S. sending troops into Russia Sentenced to 15-20 yrs in prison Court Case: Law upheld, but eventually, one of the justices changes stance on things and speaks out against government enforcement of laws that go against free speech. (Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.)