November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0872r4 Submission November 2010 S.McCann (RIM), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11u report to EC on request for conditional approval.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0872r2 Submission July 2010 S. McCann (RIM), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11u report to EC on request for conditional approval.
Doc.: IEEE /0674r0 Submission June 2009 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 1 P802.11n report to EC on request for.
Doc.: IEEE /0287r0 Submission February 2015 Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)Slide 1 P802.11REVmc Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to.
Doc.: IEEE /1437r0 Submission Nov 2008 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell), Adrian Stephens (Intel), Sheung Li (SiBeam) Slide 1 Précis of P802.11n Report.
Doc.: Submission July 2009 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor.
Doc.: Submission July 2011 D. Denteneer (Philips), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to.
Doc.: Submission July 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed.
Doc.: IEEE /1468r1 Submission July 2013 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide November 2013 Motions to 802 EC Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0777r0 Report July 2016 Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)Slide 1 Date: Authors: P802.11ah Report to EC on Approval to forward draft.
P802.11aq Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
xxxx doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 March 2017
IEEE TGv March 2010 Agenda Date: Authors: March 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r1 July 2010 P802.11u report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed to RevCom Date: Authors:
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r3 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11aa Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
P802.11v Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11aq Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r4 November 2010
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0800r9 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 August 2010
June 2009 r2doc.: IEEE /0674r0 doc.: IEEE /0674r0 April 2010
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
TGn Editor Report Sept 2008 Date: Authors:
July 2009 Closing Plenary Motions
P802.11aq Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
IEEE TGv July 2010 Agenda Date: Authors: July 2010
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0800r9 November 2011
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
January 2012 doc.: IEEE /0179r1 Jan 2012
Presentation transcript:

November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 P802.11v report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed to RevCom Date: 2010-07-16 Authors: D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Introduction This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for conditional approval to send IEEE P802.11v to RevCom. This document (11-10/0800rx) was approved during the closing plenary session of the 802.11 working group on July 16, 2010. Passed in the Working Group 54-0-2 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11v November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11v Draft Opened Closed Days Ballot Type Pool Approve Disapprove Abstain Return D7.0 2009-10-8 2009-11-7 30 Initial 161 105 [81%] 25 [19%]* 6 [4%] 137 [85%] D9.0 2010-1-29 2010-2-17 19 1st Recirc 112 [84%] 22 [16%]* 141 [88%] D10.0 2010-3-29 2010-4-13 15 2nd Recirc 122 [87%] 18 [13%] 146 [91%] D11.0 2010-5-26 2010-6-10 3rd Recirc 130 [92%] 11 [8%] 147 [91%] D12.0 2010-6-22 2010-7-7 4th Recirc 133 [94%] 8 [6%]** 7 [5%] 148 [92%] D12.0a 136 [96.5%] 5 [3.5%]** * Includes one commenter with no comments ** D12.0a indicates post ballot vote changes D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Mandatory Coordination November 2008 June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Mandatory Coordination Coordination Entity Draft Date Status IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC) D7.0 Oct 09 “Meets all editorial requirements. “ Quantities, Units and Letter Symbols (SCC14) Not required Terms and Definitions (SCC10) Registration Authority Committee (RAC) Slide 4 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Page 4 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

Comments by Ballot – P802.11v July 2010 November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Comments by Ballot – P802.11v Draft Ballot Not Required Satisfied Known Unsatisfied Assumed Unsatisfied Total D7.0 Initial 88 226 9 4 327 D9.0 Recirc 1 40 63 942 1045 D10.0 Recirc 2 18 33 1048 1181 D11.0 Recirc 3 30 1053 1087 D12.0 Recirc 4 2 3 1069 1074 152 355 4121 4714 Comment totals reflect current voter status D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter Commenter D7.0 D9.0 D10.0 D11.0 D12.0 Total R. Roy (SRA) 4* 4 R. Miller (AT&T) 1 12 14 J. Kwak (Interdigital) 7 5 H. Worstell (AT&T) 9 935 1042 1050 1053 4089 Clint Chaplin (Samsung) 2 6** 13 942 1048 1069 4125 *Assumed unsatisfied, no response to repeated e-mails to commenter ** Commenter has indicated that the proposed resolutions satisfy his comments D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Unsatisfied Comments July 2010 Commenter D7.0 D9.0 D10.0 D11.0 D12.0 November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Unsatisfied Comments Commenter D7.0 D9.0 D10.0 D11.0 D12.0 Total H. Worstell (AT&T) 2 7 933 1040 13 1037 14 1038 33 4055 9 935 1042 1050 1052 4088 7 comments are expanded to 933 comments on the same subjects, and are re-iterated in subsequent ballots D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Comments by Ballot – All other commenters November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Comments by Ballot – All other commenters D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Unsatisfied Comments – Topics November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Unsatisfied Comments – Topics Topic #Comments Various 16 MIB 33 Location 12 AP Collaboration 9 Scope 4055 Total 4125 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Vote changes since last ballot November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Vote changes since last ballot M. Fischer From: Matthew Fischer Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 10:23 PM Subject: RE: TGv remaining "no" votes I wish to change my vote to YES. C. Hansen From: Christopher Hansen Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 10:30 PM Subject: Re: TGv remaining "no" votes I’ll change my vote to "yes" D. Hunter I herewith withdraw my one negative Sponsor Ballot comment and change my 802.11v Sponsor Ballot vote from "Disapprove" to "Approve"…I approve of the technologies specified in the 802.11v draft (including the one technology about which I made the comment) and would now like to vote to Approve the Draft for submission to the IEEE 802 LMSC and to IEEE-SA as an IEEE standard. Thanks, David Hunter D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Unsatisfied comments The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the ballot resolution committee during sponsor ballot is attached. Double click on the icon to the right to open this. A copy of the unsatisfied comments presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGv Timeline Recirculation (TGv Draft 13.0) Open 2010-7-20 Close November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 TGv Timeline Recirculation (TGv Draft 13.0) Open 2010-7-20 Close 2010-7-30 Recirculation (Unchanged 13.0) 2010-8-6 2010-8-16 Revcom Submission 2010-8-20 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

802.11 EC Motion – Conditional Approval to send P802.11v to RevCom November 2008 June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 802.11 EC Motion – Conditional Approval to send P802.11v to RevCom Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee for conditional approval to forward P802.11v D13.0 to RevCom. Moved: Bruce Kraemer 2nd: <tbd> Yes No Abstain WG vote on the Motion Passed: xx y, x n, x a Slide 13 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Page 13 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Project Scope This amendment provides Wireless Network Management enhancements to the 802.11 MAC, and PHY, to extend prior work in radio measurement to effect a complete and coherent upper layer interface for managing 802.11 devices in wireless networks. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Project Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide amendments to the IEEE 802.11 PHY/MAC layers that enables management of attached stations in a centralized or in a distributed fashion (e.g. monitoring, configuring, and updating) through a layer 2 mechanism. While the 802.11k Task Group is defining messages to retrieve information from the station, the ability to configure the station is not in its scope. The proposed Task Group will also create an Access Port Management Information Base (AP MIB). D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Technical Issue -1 Essence of the issue in the 7 (4055) comments is a difference of opinion on interpretation of the PAR scope Comment #7405300023:” ….Multiple BSSID Support is outside that scope, and is not an authorized change to the 802.11 Standard.” The Ballot Resolution Committee provided the following response: Disagree….The TGv PAR includes the indicated feature, as the scope indicates "Wireless Network Management, "to extend prior work" "to effect a COMPLETE upper layer interface". The PAR does not indicate that it is limited to extending prior work in radio measurement. The PAR requires the group to both extend prior work and to provide a complete interface. Multiple BSSID - Enables the AP to manage/reduce the RF resources consumed by beacon frames. Note that the base multiple BSSID capability is added by TGk, and is extended by TGv. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Technical Issue -2 Essence of the issue in the 7 (4055) comments is a difference of opinion on interpretation of the PAR scope Comment #7405800023:” …. SSID List extension is outside that scope, and is not an authorized change to the 802.11 Standard..” The Ballot Resolution Committee provided the following response: Disagree….The TGv PAR includes the indicated feature, as the scope indicates "Wireless Network Management, "to extend prior work" "to effect a COMPLETE upper layer interface". The PAR does not indicate that it is limited to extending prior work in radio measurement. The PAR requires the group to both extend prior work and to provide a complete interface. SSID LIST - Enables the station to send fewer Probe Request frames, reducing the RF resources used, enabling improved radio management. D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Comment Expansion July 2010 Each of 7 Draft 7.0 comments, for example November 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1437r1 July 2010 Comment Expansion Each of 7 Draft 7.0 comments, for example #7405300023:” The PAR for TGv authorized the Task Group to make certain changes to the 802.11 Standard, "to extend prior work in radio measurement to effect a complete and coherent upper layer interface for managing 802.11 devices in wireless networks." Multiple BSSID Support is outside that scope, and is not an authorized change to the 802.11 Standard.” Has a proposed resolution of “Delete this phrase, and all refs to Multiple BSSID Support in the document” and Becomes multiple Draft 9.0 Comments, each of which restate and expand the comment, and indicate specific text changes (#7405300023 becomes 106 comments), for example: Delete the figure at page 300 line 1 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support Delete the figure at page 299 line 33 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support Delete the paragraph at page 299 line 18 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support Delete the figure at page 299 line 1 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support Delete the paragraph at page 298 line 56 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support Delete the figure at page 298 line 40 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support Delete the paragraph at page 298 line 29 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support etc D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell