Minnesota Port and Waterway Security Working Group Meeting April 12, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOA for EGovernment 1 Emergency Services Enterprise Framework: A Service-Oriented Approach Sukumar Dwarkanath COMCARE Michael Daconta Oberon Associates.
Advertisements

Homeland Security Information Network-Emergency Management (HSIN-EM) Fire Service Community Overview Technologies for Critical Incident Preparedness Conference.
Department of Homeland Security Site Assistance Visit (SAV)
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
INTEGRATING RISK MANAGEMENT INTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY ENTERPRISE Brief to OEMA Spring Directors Seminar 12 April 2012SPRING DIRECTORS' SEMINAR
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
IS-700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES (DSCA)
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. Cybersecurity.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
©2010 National Center for Food Protection and Defense. All rights reserved. Do not copy or distribute without permission of NCFPD. Food and Agriculture.
THIRA FEPA Mid Year Work Session THIRA – EMPG/HSGP Grant Requirement Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) “THIRA processes.
Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Guide Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 201.
Houston UASI and RCPI A local-regional approach to THIRA
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
Arizona: One Approach to doing a THIRA Presented by: Lisa Hansen, Assistant Director, Planning and Preparedness, Arizona Department of Homeland Security.
Preservation and Disaster Management. Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that.
For Discussion Purposes Only
Fiscal Year 2008 Urban Areas Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program State Process and SHSS.
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Federal Advisory Board DHS Challenges & Opportunities Captain Curtis Dubay, P.E. Department.
Planning Fundamentals  Include participation from all stakeholders in the community.  Use problem-solving process to help address the complexity and.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
N EW Y ORK S TATE O FFICE OF E MERGENCY M ANAGEMENT Director Bill Davis.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Disasters and Emergencies The Role of The Chaplain in the world of Emergency Management.
Division of Emergency Management & Homeland Security Department of Emergency Services & Public Protection June 25, 2013 Connecticut All-Hazards Response.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Strategies and Implications for Integrating GeoSpatial Technologies in Emergency Management Education Programs National Emergency Management Institute.
1 The DNA of Emergency Management. 2 Approaches to Disaster Planning Two types of planning u Emergency 0perations Plan u Emergency Support Function.
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop February 26, 2013 Franklin County Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
National Incident Management System NIMS Revision Al Fluman, Acting Director Incident Management Systems Division (IMSD), National Integration Center.
1 State Homeland Security: Priorities and Funding R. Chris McIlroy Homeland Security and Technology Division National Governors Association.
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
State Emergency Management
Fiscal Year 2007 Urban Area Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate Preparedness Section Planning Branch 1.
Maximizing the Facility Hazard Vulnerability Assessment
Homeland Security, First Edition © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Overview of National Infrastructure Protection CHAPTER 3.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
Aoife Longmore and Donny Cummings City of Austin Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) Austin RESILIENCE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Austin.
2016 THIRA & State Homeland Security Grant. Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) National Preparedness Goal driven Annual Assessment.
Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council (FSSCC) 2011 KEY FSSCC INITIATIVES 2011 Key FSSCC Initiatives Project Name: Project Description: All-Hazards.
National Emergency Communications Plan Update National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meeting February 16, 2015 Ron Hewitt.
1 Iowa Emergency Management Association Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Department Emergency Management Program Development Course EMERGENCY.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
Nate Kaufman Nate Kaufman Safeguarding California Implementation Action Plans Executive Order and Legislation.
Keys to THIRA/SPR Results driven by participants
Overview Briefing Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness May 2012.
Risks and Hazards to Consider Unit 3. Visual 3.1 Unit 3 Overview This unit describes:  The importance of identifying and analyzing possible hazards that.
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
April 21, 2017 Workshop Overview
HIRA This is the lesson objective.
California Cybersecurity Integration Center (Cal-CSIC)
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cybersecurity ATD technical
HIRA This is the lesson objective.
Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235
Presentation transcript:

Minnesota Port and Waterway Security Working Group Meeting April 12, 2012

Welcome Director Kris Eide, MN Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Purpose: Identify, catalog, assess and prioritize statewide critical infrastructure/key resources located in and along our ports and on and along our waterways Enhance our awareness of statewide waterway security

Risk Management Framework The NIPP describes the processes to: Set Security Goals Identify Assets, Systems, Networks, and Functions Assess Risk (Consequences, Vulnerabilities, and Threats) Prioritize Implement Protective Programs Measure Effectiveness

THIRA Concept Development DHS - HSEM THIRA Concept Development 5

Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment What it is What it does Who is involved? When is it due? What are the components? Now what? Comprehensive Preparedness Guide 201

Released Apr 2012 Consisted of the CPG 201 and the CPG 201 toolkit Give jurisdiction of any size the template needed to develop a THIRA of their own Scalable Whole Community Approach Once heavy lift complete, document is easy to update / revise

The THIRA process consists of five basic steps: 1. Identify the Threats and Hazards of Concern. Using experience and available resources, identify a list of the threats and hazards of concern to the community. 2. Give Threats and Hazards Context. Using the list of threats and hazards, develop context that shows how those threats and hazards may affect the community. 3. Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards. Using the threat and hazard context, identify impacts to the community through the lens of the Core Capabilities described in the National Preparedness Goal (Goal). 4. Set Capability Targets. Looking across the estimated impacts to the community, in the context of each core capability and coupled with a jurisdictions desired outcomes, set capability targets. 5. Apply the Results. Plan for the ability to deliver the targeted level of capability with either community assets or through mutual aid, identify mitigation opportunities, and drive preparedness activities. These five steps are adaptable to the needs and resources of any jurisdiction 8

Toolkit – Your Roadmap CPG 201 Toolkit – Click hereClick here Step-by-step how to guide to writing your own THIRA Also contains 11 pages of resource tabs to help research efforts Templates for the Context and Examine Core Capabilities sections of the final document

The THIRA process consists of five basic steps: 1. Identify the Threats and Hazards of Concern. Using experience and available resources, identify a list of the threats and hazards of concern to the community. 2. Give Threats and Hazards Context. Using the list of threats and hazards, develop context that shows how those threats and hazards may affect the community. 3. Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards. Using the threat and hazard context, identify impacts to the community through the lens of the Core Capabilities described in the National Preparedness Goal (Goal). 4. Set Capability Targets. Looking across the estimated impacts to the community, in the context of each core capability and coupled with a jurisdictions desired outcomes, set capability targets. 5. Apply the Results. Plan for the ability to deliver the targeted level of capability with either community assets or through mutual aid, identify mitigation opportunities, and drive preparedness activities. These five steps are adaptable to the needs and resources of any jurisdiction 10

Threat Who knows what Likelihood Presence Indicators Warnings Intelligence Community State Law Enforcement Local Law Enforcement Private Sector Public Sector What are they International Terrorism Domestic Terrorism Cyber Terrorism Homegrown Violent Extremism Lone Wolf Analysis (MN-JAC) Jurisdictional Specific Prioritized Threat Assessment HSEM Example 11

Hazard Who knows what Likelihood History Federal Agencies State Agencies Local Agencies Tribal Partners Public Sector What are they Floods Tornados Winter Events Severe Weather Fire Analysis (HSEM) Jurisdictional Specific Prioritized Hazard Assessment DHS - HSEM THIRA Concept Development HSEM Example 12

Risk Vulnerability CIKR Prioritized Hazards Prioritized Threats Analysis (HSEM) Jurisdictional Specific Prioritized Risk Assessment Consequences HSEM Example 13

14

DHS - HSEM THIRA Concept Development The THIRA process consists of five basic steps: 1. Identify the Threats and Hazards of Concern. Using experience and available resources, identify a list of the threats and hazards of concern to the community. 2. Give Threats and Hazards Context. Using the list of threats and hazards, develop context that shows how those threats and hazards may affect the community. 3. Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards. Using the threat and hazard context, identify impacts to the community through the lens of the Core Capabilities described in the National Preparedness Goal (Goal). 4. Set Capability Targets. Looking across the estimated impacts to the community, in the context of each core capability and coupled with a jurisdictions desired outcomes, set capability targets. 5. Apply the Results. Plan for the ability to deliver the targeted level of capability with either community assets or through mutual aid, identify mitigation opportunities, and drive preparedness activities. These five steps are adaptable to the needs and resources of any jurisdiction 15

Step Two – Give Them Context When might a threat or hazard occur? What time of day? What season? Where might the threat or hazard occur? Populated areas? Industrial or residential areas? Description statements (Table 1, CPG 201) Ex. An EF3 tornado strikes the business district on a Saturday afternoon in the Spring

DHS - HSEM THIRA Concept Development The THIRA process consists of five basic steps: 1. Identify the Threats and Hazards of Concern. Using experience and available resources, identify a list of the threats and hazards of concern to the community. 2. Give Threats and Hazards Context. Using the list of threats and hazards, develop context that shows how those threats and hazards may affect the community. 3. Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards. Using the threat and hazard context, identify impacts to the community through the lens of the Core Capabilities described in the National Preparedness Goal (Goal). 4. Set Capability Targets. Looking across the estimated impacts to the community, in the context of each core capability and coupled with a jurisdictions desired outcomes, set capability targets. 5. Apply the Results. Plan for the ability to deliver the targeted level of capability with either community assets or through mutual aid, identify mitigation opportunities, and drive preparedness activities. These five steps are adaptable to the needs and resources of any jurisdiction 17

NPG contains the 31 Core Capabilities

31 Core Capabilities ( CPG 201 – Pg 8)

The THIRA process consists of five basic steps: 1. Identify the Threats and Hazards of Concern. Using experience and available resources, identify a list of the threats and hazards of concern to the community. 2. Give Threats and Hazards Context. Using the list of threats and hazards, develop context that shows how those threats and hazards may affect the community. 3. Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards. Using the threat and hazard context, identify impacts to the community through the lens of the Core Capabilities described in the National Preparedness Goal (Goal). 4. Set Capability Targets. Looking across the estimated impacts to the community, in the context of each core capability and coupled with a jurisdictions desired outcomes, set capability targets. 5. Apply the Results. Plan for the ability to deliver the targeted level of capability with either community assets or through mutual aid, identify mitigation opportunities, and drive preparedness activities. These five steps are adaptable to the needs and resources of any jurisdiction 20

The THIRA process consists of five basic steps: 1. Identify the Threats and Hazards of Concern. Using experience and available resources, identify a list of the threats and hazards of concern to the community. 2. Give Threats and Hazards Context. Using the list of threats and hazards, develop context that shows how those threats and hazards may affect the community. 3. Examine the Core Capabilities Using the Threats and Hazards. Using the threat and hazard context, identify impacts to the community through the lens of the Core Capabilities described in the National Preparedness Goal (Goal). 4. Set Capability Targets. Looking across the estimated impacts to the community, in the context of each core capability and coupled with a jurisdictions desired outcomes, set capability targets. 5. Apply the Results. Plan for the ability to deliver the targeted level of capability with either community assets or through mutual aid, identify mitigation opportunities, and drive preparedness activities. These five steps are adaptable to the needs and resources of any jurisdiction 21

THIRA Validation THIRAs should be developed to align w/ CPG 201 To ensure Regional THIRAS are consistent, each THIRA will be evaluated by these 5 questions Did the jurisdictions provide… 1. … description statements of the threats & hazards of concern? 2. … outcome statements for all 31 NPG Core Capabilities? 3. … estimated impacts for all threats and hazards of concern in relation to the 31 Core Capabilities? 4. … capability targets for all 31 Core Capabilities? 5. … an affirmation that their submittal is in compliance w/ CPG 201? 22

Lifeline Sectors Energy Water Communications Transportation Emergency Services

Lifeline Sector Awareness – Where do we fit?

Time to take the next step! The NIPP describes the processes to: Set Security Goals Identify Assets, Systems, Networks, and Functions Assess Risk (Consequences, Vulnerabilities, and Threats) Prioritize Implement Protective Programs Measure Effectiveness

Assessment Process One or two day workshops available Tailored to your needs Lifeline Sector Awareness (4 hours) Risk Assessment Methodology (4 hours Risk Assessment Team Building (4 hours) THIRA Concept Development (4 hours) Risk Assessment Field Work – (8 hours) DHS / HSEM Combined Effort

CIKR Asset Protection Technical Assistance Program (CAPTAP) When: May 1-4, 2012 Where: Kandiyohi County Rescue Squad Building Contact Grant Hosmer or Gary Lokken if you have any questions about this class.

Assignments: Cassie Determine CI in your area waterways What CI areas need assessment? Enter CI into ACAMs

Questions Comments Concerns Next Meeting: July 12 th, 2012